• Profile logout login

#projectrunway#tech#article

Gawker

Share Cancel
   
Upload an image | Add an image URL
×

logging in
  • FAQ. Include # before tag:
  • #tips,
  • #stalker,
  • #opencaption,
  • #internalmemos,
  • etc.

New York, 7:57 AM
Fri Dec 11
59 posts in the last 24 hours

Team

Tip Your Editors:

Tipline: 646-214-8138

Editor-in-Chief:
Gabriel Snyder |

West Coast Editor:
Richard Rushfield |

Contributing Editors:

Valleywag:
Ryan Tate |

Media:
Hamilton Nolan |

Politics:
Alex Pareene |

Investigations:
John Cook |

Entertainment:
Brian Moylan |

Nights:
Adrian Chen |
Azaria Jagger |
Ravi Somaiya |

Weekends:
Foster Kamer |

Video Editor:
Richard Blakeley |

SUBSCRIBE TO Gawker RSS

New: Breaking news and daily top stories via email
4260 Subscribers
Gawker
  • Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.
    Dsmvwl  Admin  Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×
    Image of Lymed Lymed
    12/09/09

    In reply to There Is No Such Thing as a 'Two-Part Finale'
    At least something actually happened on the first half of the 2-part Top Chef Finale. (I'm looking at you Project Runway...)
     Reply
    Lymed was starred Lymed was unstarred
    Image of ms_priestypants ms_priestypants
    12/09/09

    In reply to There Is No Such Thing as a 'Two-Part Finale'
    Somebody needs to tell Padma her Spanx are riding down.
     Reply
    ms_priestypants was starred ms_priestypants was unstarred
    Image of snugbug snugbug
    12/09/09

    In reply to There Is No Such Thing as a 'Two-Part Finale'
    A two-part finale is oxymoronic, but perhaps not so much so as the concept of the Final Destination franchise:

    Final Destination (2000)
    Final Destination 2 (2003)
    Final Destination 3 (2006)
    The Final Destination (2009)

    TK:
    The Final Destination: OK, One More For the Road (2011)
    The Final Destination: For Real This Time (2013)
    The Final Destination: Ha, Ha, Just Kidding! (2015)

    etc.
     Reply
    Edited by snugbug at 12/09/09 4:21 PM snugbug was starred snugbug was unstarred
    Image of FitnessMadeSimple FitnessMadeSimple
    12/09/09

    In reply to There Is No Such Thing as a 'Two-Part Finale'
    House's two-part season 4 finale was the best two hours of television I've ever seen.
     Reply
    FitnessMadeSimple was starred FitnessMadeSimple was unstarred
    Image of lionel-mandrake lionel-mandrake
    12/09/09

    In reply to There Is No Such Thing as a 'Two-Part Finale'
    Next you're going to tell me that "Venti" isn't Italian for Extra Large. Or that a "Child Size" soda at the movies is actually a "Small".
     Reply
    lionel-mandrake was starred lionel-mandrake was unstarred
    Image of Heneage Heneage
    12/09/09

    In reply to There Is No Such Thing as a 'Two-Part Finale'
    Brian, where is my recap of 12 Men of Christmas? How do I get my Kristen Chenoweth + Hot Men + sappy Lifetime movie fix now?

    Don't make me go over to Jezebel
     Reply
    Heneage was starred Heneage was unstarred
    Image of Brian Moylan Brian Moylan
    12/09/09

    @Heneage: They did it on Fleshbot, and they posted all the clips of the shirtless guys, which is pretty much all you needed to see. Yes, I watched it.
     Reply
    Brian Moylan was starred Brian Moylan was unstarred
    Image of Brian Moylan Brian Moylan
    12/09/09

    @Heneage: I would post a link, but it's NSFW. But it's easy to find.
     Reply
    Brian Moylan was starred Brian Moylan was unstarred
    Image of Heneage Heneage
    12/09/09

    @Brian Moylan: looks like I'll have to turn on "Private Browsing" and take a gander. Who knows what other treats I'll run into over in that wasteland of depravity.
     Reply
    Heneage was starred Heneage was unstarred
    Image of misslinda misslinda
    12/09/09

    In reply to There Is No Such Thing as a 'Two-Part Finale'
    I read "stunt" as something entirely different.
     Reply
    misslinda was starred misslinda was unstarred
    Image of TedSez TedSez
    12/09/09

    In reply to There Is No Such Thing as a 'Two-Part Finale'
    This is still better than what "Survivor" always does, which is wait to announce the winner till the after-show "reunion" show. So if you only TiVo'd the finale itself, you're out of luck.
     Reply
    TedSez was starred TedSez was unstarred
    Image of Brian Moylan Brian Moylan
    12/09/09

    @TedSez: They stopped doing that, so the last thing your TiVo will show is the winner. They're nice.
     Reply
    Brian Moylan was starred Brian Moylan was unstarred
    Image of misslinda misslinda
    12/09/09

    @TedSez: Why no love for the reunion show? It's always fun to see their glammed up hair and makeup. I, for one, am rather excited to see what wonders Shambo's mullet holds.
     Reply
    misslinda was starred misslinda was unstarred
    Image of Brian Moylan Brian Moylan
    12/09/09

    @misslinda: If Shambo wins, she better spend $25 and update her mullet to the wedge. It is the stereotypically lesbian haircut of today.
     Reply
    Brian Moylan was starred Brian Moylan was unstarred
    Image of misslinda misslinda
    12/09/09

    @Brian Moylan: Shambo's not winning the million bucks, and it's going to take a lot more than a Supercut to spruce her up for the reunion show.
     Reply
    misslinda was starred misslinda was unstarred
    Image of TedSez TedSez
    12/09/09

    @Brian Moylan: That's good to know. Now if they'd just keep everyone from Tweeting the winner before it's broadcast on the West Coast three hours later....
     Reply
    TedSez was starred TedSez was unstarred
    Image of skahammer skahammer
    12/09/09

    @TedSez: Thanks for coming, Ted. Yes, we're all here to discuss your Twitter habit....
     Reply
    skahammer was starred skahammer was unstarred
    Image of skahammer skahammer
    12/09/09

    In reply to There Is No Such Thing as a 'Two-Part Finale'
    Two-parters, pshaw. I consider myself lucky when my finale has even one good part.
     Reply
    skahammer was starred skahammer was unstarred
    Image of snugbug snugbug
    12/09/09

    @skahammer: [in Toby Young's accent]:

    "I can certainly imagine at least one circumstance in which a two-part finale is the most desirable outcome."
     Reply
    snugbug was starred snugbug was unstarred
    Image of skahammer skahammer
    12/09/09

    @snugbug: Well played, snuggie, well played.

    Although in my opinion one of those would clearly be the grand finale, while the other would just be a coda.
     Reply
    Edited by skahammer at 12/09/09 3:54 PM skahammer was starred skahammer was unstarred
    Image of GlasgowRose GlasgowRose
    11/22/09

    In reply to Project Runway: Fashion Weak
    Check out the video for Irina's Spring 2010 collection - still stealing from Madonna (Love Profusion video) with rolling blond model & butterflies. Ugh.

    [irinashabayeva.com]
     Reply
    GlasgowRose was starred GlasgowRose was unstarred
    Image of joutfit joutfit
    11/20/09

    In reply to Project Runway: Fashion Weak
    am i taking crazy pills, or were irina's "warrior woman" hat-helmets a BLATANT rip-off of jillian lewis's from season 4?

    and i realized how much i hated this season when it felt like a chore to watch the judges' deliberations...and even the collections themselves.
     Reply
    MisterHippity promoted this comment joutfit was starred joutfit was unstarred
    Image of heywhat heywhat
    11/20/09

    In reply to Project Runway: Fashion Weak
    So is New York Magazine going to let Irina's thieving ass slide by this time? Or will they be taking legal action?
     Reply
    Edited by heywhat at 11/20/09 6:30 PM heywhat was starred heywhat was unstarred
    Image of VioletViolet VioletViolet
    11/20/09

    In reply to Project Runway: Fashion Weak
    I really liked Irena's collection. Maybe she's a bitch, but her collection was just as good as any of the previous winners' and I'm glad she won.
     Reply
    VioletViolet was starred VioletViolet was unstarred
    Image of TriedandTrue TriedandTrue
    11/20/09

    In reply to Project Runway: Fashion Weak
    I absolutely hate it that every finale, M. Kors wears those damn sunglasses. A. It's dark in there - sunglasses are so silly. B. Why the Diva attitude? It really, really irks me!
     Reply
    TriedandTrue was starred TriedandTrue was unstarred
    Image of MisterHippity MisterHippity
    11/20/09

    In reply to Project Runway: Fashion Weak
    Ok, so here's the scoop on how they came up with "designer introductions" during the runway show, when in reality the designers were hidden backstage during fashion week.

    Missy Schartz at Entertainment Weekly (who was at the Bryant Park show last February) says they filmed the segments where you see designers on the runway separately, on the same day they had the real show in front of the public. (See her recap where she mentions this here: [www.ew.com]) They had to stick a bunch of extras in some seats to fill up the front rows for those shots. Schwartz surmises that they are probably all employees of Lifetime. (I'm guessing also Bunim-Murray.)

    So they basically held two shows: One for the public, in which the designers' identities were hidden, and then a second one in front of just the judges and a few extra seat-fillers, where they had the designers come out and introduce themselves - and then appear later to walk with the models at the end of their shows.

    Then they spliced the two together to create the illusion that the public got to see who the designers were. (Which, as Brian points out, is totally stupid, because the whole world knows that didn't really happen.)
     Reply
    Edited by MisterHippity at 11/20/09 4:37 PM MisterHippity was starred MisterHippity was unstarred
    Image of Zira Zira
    11/20/09

    @MisterHippity:

    Do you know if they did something similar when Project Runway was on Bravo or was this one of Lifetime's brilliant innovations?
     Reply
    MisterHippity promoted this comment Zira was starred Zira was unstarred
    Image of scouts honor scouts honor
    11/20/09

    @Zira: I don't think so. In those seasons, they just had decoy collections from designers who didn't make the finals but whose auf'ing had not yet aired.
     Reply
    MisterHippity promoted this comment scouts honor was starred scouts honor was unstarred
    Image of MisterHippity MisterHippity
    11/20/09

    @Zira: They never had to do that before, because usually everybody knew who the final four, five or six designers were by the time the final runway show happened. So they'd have every designer left (as of the last show aired before fashion week) do a runway show. One to three of these were "decoy" shows and the others were real.

    They couldn't do that for this season, because none of the episodes had aired when Fashion Week happened. So they had to keep every designer's identity a secret.

    They'll probably go back to the old model next season. That season starts Jan. 14, and fashion week will likely be in late February. So they'll probably do the "decoy" thing and show six or seven collections at Fashion Week again.
     Reply
    Edited by MisterHippity at 11/20/09 5:32 PM MisterHippity was starred MisterHippity was unstarred
    Image of MisterHippity MisterHippity
    11/20/09

    @scouts honor: Or ... what scouts honor said (much more succinctly).

    #tips
     Reply
    MisterHippity was starred MisterHippity was unstarred
    Image of Zira Zira
    11/20/09

    @MisterHippity:

    There was a fascinating article in one of the rags about how the Bryant Park fashion shows for each season are too far in advance of the actual season.....what is actually shown in the fashion shows doesn't reflect what will actually be in stores because its too far in advance. Its a throwback to an earlier time when it took much longer to produce and ship clothes.

    There's been a lot of talk about changing the dates for the Bryant Park shows.
     Reply
    Zira was starred Zira was unstarred
    Image of Brian Moylan Brian Moylan
    11/20/09

    @MisterHippity: That's going to be interesting, because Fashion Week is February 11th-18th. If the season starts January 14, only four designers will have gotten the boot before the finale is filmed. If they use 12 designers, that means 8 will have to show. If they do 16 designers (as they did for season six), that means 12 will have to show. That would be pretty crazy, either way.
     Reply
    Brian Moylan was starred Brian Moylan was unstarred
    Image of MisterHippity MisterHippity
    11/20/09

    @Brian Moylan: Well, I see your point ... there would have to be more decoys than usual. But not quite as many as your counts, I don't think.

    The P.R. show is always the last day of Fashion Week, which is a Friday. So that means they'll hold the final on Friday, Feb. 19.

    Now the show starts on Thursday, Jan. 14th, so that means they'll actually have time to air six episodes before the final runway show (1/14/ 1/21, 1/28, 2/4, 2/11 and 2/18). So that means, if they have 16 designers again, they'll be left with 10 still standing by the time the runway show happens.

    But I think they'll do a double-elimination just before the runway show (as they did in the last season in 2008). So there will be 9 left. And then maybe they'll show nine collections (where five or six will be decoys).

    But that's still alot of decoy shows. The most they did before, I think, was six shows (three decoys) in 2008.

    Obviously, if they have fewer than 16 contestants, the number of decoys needed would fall accordingly.

    This is why I'm really surprised they waited in until 1/14 to air the premiere. I thought they' do it on 1/7, to squeeze in that extra week before the final show.
     Reply
    Edited by MisterHippity at 11/20/09 10:22 PM MisterHippity was starred MisterHippity was unstarred
    Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion

Login

Enter your username and password.

Please enter a username.
Please enter your password.
logging in
Login via Facebook | Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Reset Password

Please enter your email address to have your password reset.

Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
requesting password reset

Register

Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.

Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.

Please enter a username.
Please enter a password.
Please confirm your password.
Passwords are not identical.
Please enter a valid email address.
registration sent, waiting for reply

Submit Your Comment

You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.

See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.

Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
logging in

Login with your Facebook or Gawker account.

Sign up here.



  • Archives
  • About
  • Advertising
  • Legal
  • Help
  • Report a Bug
  • FAQ
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.