I won't read this for the same reason I won't read The Last Tycoon, even though Fitzgerald and Wallace are among my all-time favorite authors. Both men obsessively rewrote and re-edited everything they did; so I think they'd each be horrified if they knew people were reading stuff that wasn't quite finished. As hungry as I am for new DFW content, out of respect for his memory I'll stay away from this one.
I've got mixed feelings about this. Having it out there would be great for the world of literature. But, given the circumstances, putting it out so soon seems mercenary.
I understand the timeline of its publication may be considered inconsiderate to those of us taking more time to mourn, but I would not label this move by the publisher materialistic; if only, because, well, really, what isn't?
Given the incompleteness of the work, the absence of the worker, I would appreciate if Little, Brown kept the manuscript in tact, with little intervention, editing. I think this would give an unfinished novel by a dead author an appropriate context. Whatever.
You'll buy the book--the hardcover--for your collection. But you won't actually read it until they publish the novel in paperback, which will be sometime around 2012.
03/02/09
03/02/09
03/02/09
03/02/09
03/02/09
03/02/09
03/02/09
03/02/09
I understand the timeline of its publication may be considered inconsiderate to those of us taking more time to mourn, but I would not label this move by the publisher materialistic; if only, because, well, really, what isn't?
Given the incompleteness of the work, the absence of the worker, I would appreciate if Little, Brown kept the manuscript in tact, with little intervention, editing. I think this would give an unfinished novel by a dead author an appropriate context. Whatever.
You'll buy the book--the hardcover--for your collection. But you won't actually read it until they publish the novel in paperback, which will be sometime around 2012.