Gawker 
Enter your username and password.
-
more about #deadtrees more comments → El Matardillo: Send me $4.99 and I'll tell you how it will all unfold. more » Ricki-Oh: Charge for all content. All of it. Where people got the idea that they have a right to consume the work of others without paying for it is beyond me. ... more » Aaron Altman: Go ahead, old media. I DARE ya to charge for online access to your product. I DOUBLE DARE YA. more » PandoraSpocks: Plans for unringing the bell = the swan song of the truly desperate. more » miss_msry: If "Times Select" couldn't survive, how will NYT Daily survive online? more » belltolls: I like David Carr's idea that newspapers should engage in collusion in order to make this happen. Then only people with money will get the "news". Unu... more » oopsidoo: The minute Nisenholtz was forced by the powers that be to say that, he quietly went to the men's room, threw up a little and started cutting himself. ... more » MrInBetween: Let me see if I follow: So the few newspapers left with a pulse are requiring paid staffers to write blogs that few people read, the very same thing t... more » Weegee's bored: I had the flu this weekend and blogged all over the Sunday Times. more » Aaron Altman: How long before Sly Stallone pens a guest column? And, good on them. On the surface, there's an elegiac tone to the whole venture, but here's hoping s... more » GuyBitchy: Maybe Twitter should accept that it's basically worthless. more » marcsiry: I'm going to flip what @NewYorkez said a different way: When you go to Google, you're thinking about the future: I am going to buy a snowblower and wa... more » Nick Douglas: Whoa, this is almost as huge as that time Flickr added search and totally destroyed Google! And that time Facebook added search and utterly obliterate... more » oopsidoo: hey, considering that the web is their only hope of ever saving themselves, and unlike the print people, the web people actually still have job prospe... more » garbanzo314: Union and the internet? That's a winning combination. more » -
#deadtrees
Online Subscriptions Weighed At Times, Time Inc.
Well, this was probably inevitable: Now that everyone in the world is telling newspaper and magazine publishers they need to charge for website access, the big players are reconsidering the idea. More » -
#newspapers
Seattle Paper Migrates Self, Pay To Internet
Hearst is preparing to take the Seattle Post-Intelligencer online-only, the largest newspaper to make such a move. Pay and benefits are coming along for the ride. More » -
#deadtrees
From Failed Paper To Blog
Denver's Rocky Mountain News closed Friday. And this week? The writers are blogging, naturally, at IWantMyRocky.com. Here's to hoping someone invited the advertising staff onto the site. -
#deadtrees
Twitter May Find News Profits That Eluded Publishers
Newspaper publishers have long imagined their journalism filled Google's results and fueled its profits. But Twitter is building a popular, potentially profitable news search engine from mostly amateur content. More » -
#wtf
Big Raises for New York Times Web Staff
Not all newspaper journalists are getting hammered by the simultaneous implosion of their industry and the economy: The embattled Times just raised Web staff salaries by an average 12 percent. Yay unions? More » -
#magazines
Entertainment Weekly Lives
Entertainment Weekly lost a quarter of its staff to layoffs last year, but Time Inc. will continue publishing the magazine, even though it maybe considered axing its print edition. Risky. More » -
#deadtrees
Times Finally Runs Display Advertising on Front Page
It once might have raised hackles for the Times to carry a display ad on the front page. Now the only scandal is that the paper waited so long. More » -
#deadtrees
Arianna Huffington Says She Believes In Newspapers. Buy It?
Seeing Arianna Huffington in the LA Times Sunday, someone who has worked for the internet publisher tipped us to a purported lookalike: Ursula from the Little Mermaid. Mean and juvenile! But maybe appropriate! More » -
-
#newsweek
Newsweek Nukes Itself Into Printed Blog
The rumors appear to be true: Newsweek will amputate up to one million copies from its 2.6 million circulation, according to Wall Street Journal sources, and no fewer than 500,000. There will be an unknown number of layoffs, announced Thursday, to be achieved through voluntary buyouts like the 111 from last spring. But the biggest change at the 73-year-old magazine: It's going to become a whole lot more like Washington Post Co. sibling Slate, with contrarian, gimmicky or otherwise grabby headlines that wouldn't be out of place on Digg. More »
