@beefer:
And We don't want him back either. His record of political prognosticayshuns was just as eye rolling awful in Canada City as it is in US America.
Gotta disagree with the people who say working for a non-profit means you 'should' be poor.
In fact, fuck you. I mean, what kind of morality do you think you're propagating with that line of thought?
That the only people who deserve to get paid are the ones doing evil? Sounds like exactly the kind of incentive system that's going to produce lots of evil. (Ahem).
Also, there is precisely zero economic difference between soliciting donations and charging fees (like, say, HBO). Both produce the same result - diversification of revenue streams beyond advertising, which is a win for just about everyone involved, from people who don't like an excess of ads polluting their media to program managers whose (professional) lives aren't completely dominated by Nielsen ratings.
Alternately, you can go back to Hot 97, if that's what you prefer.
I'm going to venture one more opinion on this, and that is that it seems like at some point, for her salary to be that much greater than the next highest paid employer, she must have given the station an ultimatum to pay her more in line with other media bigs in town or she'd walk. Good for her that it worked, but, and this is an honest opinion from a person that used to write speeches for the CEO of a major, well, the biggest, media company in town: there isn't a media executive worth much more than a quarter million a year.
But then I'm a huge cynic when it comes to executive "talent." Also, WNYC is decidedly not a business.
Just one more thing: for all the outrage this post inspires in you all, I am curious about how many pledge. If you don't give, you have no standing to bitch about this. SO GO PLEDGE!!! SPRING FUNDRAISER ENDS TODAY! Think of all the street cred you will have when you hurl turds Laura Walker! Also the tote bag is fantastic for starting up conversations with elderly people on the bus.
@Preopsician: No, continue to donate if you're a listener, but voice your concern about the appearance of impropriety (because, c'mon, that's all it really is, isn't it?) to them in a sane, rational manner.
This isn't freaking Enron. They actually do need the money, and they are providing a service you can't find in the commercial market.
I am, as always, extremely ambivalent about the quality of WNYC's local programming. I also think we're entering a time when certain formulas should apply to figuring out the ratio of executive pay to that of an entities lowest paid employee, both in private enterprise and in the non-profit realm.
Perhaps she's taking an unpaid month off to save her station money. That would go a long way toward paying an employee's salary.
But if we're going to get our economy back in line for whatever is next, one of the things we should look at is either getting executive pay back in line with the rest of the grunts, or ridding the workplace of heirarchicical structures that encourage competition in which top slots are seen as automatic lottery wins.
@Helman: I like that show; I've called in. I like lots of WNYC shows (having an infant/toddler makes TV impossible, which makes radio more important), but there's a lot that's unlistenable. The station to me has always seemed oddly provincial compared to other markets.
Or maybe I was just spoiled by "The Famous Coachman with Blues and Music After Hours," Sunday mornings, midnight to six, on the WDET of my teen years.
The way NPR's structured, really big stations (like WNYC and L.A.'s KCRW) in big cities pay very large amounts to run All Things Considered, Morning Edition, what have you. It's tiered, so they're coughing up a lot more than, oh, WVTF in Roanoke, VA, and, indeed, keeping the whole shebang afloat.
In fact, you'll hear (say on a Pacifica forum), that NPR's lost its community roots because it only caters to the main cities' news, views and opinions in its coverage (not to mention, you're better off as a WNYC reporter trying to get on ATC or ME than if you're working for WVTF.)
So if she's bringing in the bucks, via donations, corporate underwriting, what have you, for both her station and the network, you won't hear a peep about it from the gang at 635 Mass. Avenue, NW.
@squidbait:So one person makes more money than you think they should and all of a sudden f*ck cancer and AIDS research. What? That is the dumbest thing I have ever heard, other than the ranter on that Rush post.
@rockandhardPL: Why donate to cancer and aids research in the first place? People are going to die. Your $10 isn't going to do shit except pay for your mail/phone spam for the rest of your life by that charity for more donations.
No, I was specifically referring to the ear-raping beg-fests that these stations put their listeners (and DJs) through.
If she is really such a great CEO, she'd fire herself and hire a reasonably-salaried replacement.
Sorry, but this whole story is just nasty. Good for her, earning 500k for running an amazing station. I'm sorry folks at WNYC are getting laid off, but it is not on account of Ms. Walker's salary.
Also, for the sake of completeness, her professional background is this:
"Ms. Walker began her professional career as a journalist and producer at National Public Radio, where she received a prestigious Peabody Award for Broadcast Excellence. In 1983 she joined the staff of Carnegie Hall where she launched the award-winning series, AT&T Presents Carnegie Hall Tonight. She joined the Sesame Workshop (formerly Children's Television Workshop) in 1987, where for eight years helped launch the acclaimed children's television series, Ghost Writer, lead the organization's efforts to establish a cable television channel (now Noggin), and headed the development efforts to fund these initiatives as well as other priorities of the organization."
It's not like she came over from AIG, for god's sake. Lay off her, why don't you.
@Helman: Agreed. It seems to me that Gawker is making the mistake of thinking that one's skill set should be devalued if one takes a job at a non-profit. It is foolish to think that a woman with her background, who could be earning as much or more were she to continue working in television or at a for-profit radio station, should take a pay cut just for the hell of it. And you know, why wouldn't NPR want to attract someone with her experience and knowledge by offering an attractive salary? This is the reality of living in a capitalist society. You cannot expect people to put the interests of an organization they work for over their own interests. And its bullshit to presume that people should not be paid what their skill set is worth. As a corollary, did Denton take a paycut when he started shuttering sites, firing bloggers and asking existing bloggers to take on extra roles for fairness sakes? I highly doubt it.
@Housebroken(mostly): She worked for Sesame Street, for fuck's sake. Why target Sesame Street/NPR lady? Sheesh. Surely there are more deserving subjects.
@John Cook: This woman has worked at NPR, it seems, forever. I mean, it's not like she is paid the salary she is to lure her away from a for-profit job (a matching pledge, as they say).
She now runs the largest public radio station in the country, and WNYC is terrific. Of course this is not all her doing, but still. This lady seems to have devoted her entire career to NPR, and the folks who determine her compensation (she obviously didn't decide herself what salary she would earn) decided she was worth it.
@John Cook: You are mainly looking at numbers and not at accomplishment, which she has many. As someone in the public radio world, I think her salary is deserved.
@ae38: I'm sure that would make great copy for their fundraising drives, when the tell us that they depend on their listeners and are barely scraping by and all of this stuff costs money, etc. Good for her that she's making so much money. But there's a reason that the salaries of the managers of nonprofit institutions are a matter of public record: So they can be scrutinized. And the fact that she makes more than the CEO of NPR--or the former CEO of NPR; records aren't yet available for current management--and $200K more than the next highest paid WNYCer is indisputably out of whack.
@Housebroken(mostly) : "Under 50," maybe... See if you can find me even three people under 30 who have worked at four nationally-known media organizations in positions of comparable responsibility, with comparable track records. Most people under 30 are lucky to have a job as the "Associate" to someone at that level. Idiot.
@Housebroken(mostly): Dude/Lady: Add up the years: what you are saying is not possible. No one under 30 can have spent 20 years working for public radio. Don't be an ass.
@Helman: OK, dispute it. I don't think you actually mean to argue that a salary of $220,000 more than the next highest-paid employee isn't out of whack. I think you're arguing that it's justifiably out of whack. Or do you really think that no one should ever be surprised or chagrined to learn that their immediate superior makes $200,000 a year more than they do?
@John Cook: I am fine with her earning 220k more than the next highest-paid employee, absent any contrary information about why she doesn't deserve it. WNYC is a business. If her fundraising skills or her programming vision contribute substantially to the station -- which, I think they must! Because although you act like she is paying herself, obviously her salary is determined by the Board -- go Laura. You do not have enough evidence to tar her as you have.
On the plus side, it appears that you have convinced people not to contribute to WNYC! Well played.
I mean, why develop stories on the likes of -- oh, I don't know -- Cheney, Bruno, Republicans in general, Spitzer, Murdoch, etc. -- when you can take down the head of a non-profit that provides a huge service for this town? Now THAT's a story to be proud of.
@Helman: Noblesse oblige! Sorry, honey, doesn't fly. She's a parasyte, pure and simple. A MONTH in Greece! A MONTH! And you defend that? Get out of here!
Wow. The station is all NPR except for 4 hours during the day and virtually expense-free music shows at night. She's done an excellent job of keeping good NPR shows out of the market--Harry Shearer and others we couldn't possibly know about unless we lived in a college town. So just what does she do?
Who is worth more? This big media rainmaker or the four staffers and some of the eleven additional staffers that could have been paid out of the difference between her salary and the $200,000 (tops) she actually deserves.
As someone axed from a big media company (along with three others) to make room for a Chief Revenue Officers (another half-mil rain maker) who then proceeded to preside over a $10 million+ revenue drop.
I know that executive compensation is out of whack with reality, especially the reality that most executives just aren't the good.
@Mediahohoho: Okay, that's just a horrible comment. Probably too bitter to post on this. I think she should give some listener money back to the station; it's not why people pledge.
09/01/09
09/01/09
And We don't want him back either. His record of political prognosticayshuns was just as eye rolling awful in Canada City as it is in US America.
06/06/09
In fact, fuck you. I mean, what kind of morality do you think you're propagating with that line of thought?
That the only people who deserve to get paid are the ones doing evil? Sounds like exactly the kind of incentive system that's going to produce lots of evil. (Ahem).
Also, there is precisely zero economic difference between soliciting donations and charging fees (like, say, HBO). Both produce the same result - diversification of revenue streams beyond advertising, which is a win for just about everyone involved, from people who don't like an excess of ads polluting their media to program managers whose (professional) lives aren't completely dominated by Nielsen ratings.
Alternately, you can go back to Hot 97, if that's what you prefer.
06/05/09
But then I'm a huge cynic when it comes to executive "talent." Also, WNYC is decidedly not a business.
06/05/09
06/05/09
06/05/09
This isn't freaking Enron. They actually do need the money, and they are providing a service you can't find in the commercial market.
06/05/09
06/05/09
06/05/09
And the doubting thing...yeah, that.
06/05/09
06/05/09
06/05/09
06/05/09
Perhaps she's taking an unpaid month off to save her station money. That would go a long way toward paying an employee's salary.
But if we're going to get our economy back in line for whatever is next, one of the things we should look at is either getting executive pay back in line with the rest of the grunts, or ridding the workplace of heirarchicical structures that encourage competition in which top slots are seen as automatic lottery wins.
06/05/09
06/05/09
06/05/09
Or maybe I was just spoiled by "The Famous Coachman with Blues and Music After Hours," Sunday mornings, midnight to six, on the WDET of my teen years.
06/05/09
06/05/09
see also: [www.pbs.org]
06/05/09
06/05/09
06/05/09
In fact, you'll hear (say on a Pacifica forum), that NPR's lost its community roots because it only caters to the main cities' news, views and opinions in its coverage (not to mention, you're better off as a WNYC reporter trying to get on ATC or ME than if you're working for WVTF.)
So if she's bringing in the bucks, via donations, corporate underwriting, what have you, for both her station and the network, you won't hear a peep about it from the gang at 635 Mass. Avenue, NW.
06/05/09
06/05/09
06/05/09
06/05/09
06/05/09
No, I was specifically referring to the ear-raping beg-fests that these stations put their listeners (and DJs) through.
If she is really such a great CEO, she'd fire herself and hire a reasonably-salaried replacement.
06/05/09
06/05/09
Also, for the sake of completeness, her professional background is this:
"Ms. Walker began her professional career as a journalist and producer at National Public Radio, where she received a prestigious Peabody Award for Broadcast Excellence. In 1983 she joined the staff of Carnegie Hall where she launched the award-winning series, AT&T Presents Carnegie Hall Tonight. She joined the Sesame Workshop (formerly Children's Television Workshop) in 1987, where for eight years helped launch the acclaimed children's television series, Ghost Writer, lead the organization's efforts to establish a cable television channel (now Noggin), and headed the development efforts to fund these initiatives as well as other priorities of the organization."
It's not like she came over from AIG, for god's sake. Lay off her, why don't you.
06/05/09
06/05/09
06/05/09
06/05/09
06/05/09
She now runs the largest public radio station in the country, and WNYC is terrific. Of course this is not all her doing, but still. This lady seems to have devoted her entire career to NPR, and the folks who determine her compensation (she obviously didn't decide herself what salary she would earn) decided she was worth it.
Why target her?
06/05/09
06/05/09
06/05/09
06/05/09
: "Under 50," maybe...
See if you can find me even three people under 30 who have worked at four nationally-known media organizations in positions of comparable responsibility, with comparable track records. Most people under 30 are lucky to have a job as the "Associate" to someone at that level.
Idiot.
06/05/09
06/05/09
06/05/09
06/05/09
why are you targeting John Cook? He gets paid for pages views and clicks, which increase with conflict.
For the sake a completeness- [www.observer.com]
In any case the only "nasty" thing about the story are the comments (from which I am not excluded).
06/05/09
I loved that show, and I award Ms. Walker a pass on this nonsense as a result.
06/05/09
06/05/09
06/05/09
On the plus side, it appears that you have convinced people not to contribute to WNYC! Well played.
I mean, why develop stories on the likes of -- oh, I don't know -- Cheney, Bruno, Republicans in general, Spitzer, Murdoch, etc. -- when you can take down the head of a non-profit that provides a huge service for this town? Now THAT's a story to be proud of.
06/06/09
Noblesse oblige! Sorry, honey, doesn't fly. She's a parasyte, pure and simple. A MONTH in Greece! A MONTH! And you defend that? Get out of here!
06/06/09
06/05/09
06/05/09
She must have been trained as a lawyer.
06/05/09
06/04/09
06/04/09
06/04/09
As someone axed from a big media company (along with three others) to make room for a Chief Revenue Officers (another half-mil rain maker) who then proceeded to preside over a $10 million+ revenue drop.
I know that executive compensation is out of whack with reality, especially the reality that most executives just aren't the good.
06/04/09