See, here's the thing about mistakes: People don't make them intentionally. That's why they're called "mistakes."
So threatening to fire people is not an effective mistake-prevention strategy. People will avoid engaging in intentional behavior that would cause them to be fired, of course (assuming they want to keep their jobs).
But people won't go, "Hey, I was planning to fuck up royally today, but now that I know that I may get fired for that, I've decided to take a different, not-fucking-up approach instead." It doesn't work that way.
What the "make mistakes and you're fired" threat WILL do is totally stress people the fuck out, and stressed-out people are probably likely to make more mistakes. So expect more mistakes on FNC in the near future.
@wadeanderson: I'm not going to reply to your entire, long comment, because I don't feel like getting in a boring argument.
I'm only going to excerpt this part: "You can make fun of me, and I will be reassured that all of you are cynics and hopeless." and laugh, and laugh, because... well, for obvious reasons.
But the actual quality control memo doesn't say it will fire people who screw up. It says there will be a "zero-tolerance" policy but then says the discipline for the errant worker can be whatever FNC wants it to be, including just a letter to a personnel file. Big whoop.
The whole memo is ultimately all bark and no bite.
@MisterHippity: It's a typical lawyer move of sounding threatening without ultimately being obligated to do anything. Trust--if they really intended to implement a policy of firing people that made the mistakes, they would have said that. And they didn't. "Up to and including termination" means "we can do anything and are required to do nothing." If I as a lawyer was put to task with drafting a "quality control" policy that gave the boss lee-way to do anything they wanted in response to an error--including nothing--this is exactly how I would word it.
And even dumber, they can already fire anybody they want to without cause except in the rare cases of employees that have for-cause employment contracts (and I guarantee you the people in the editing rooms don't have such contracts). So the memo does nothing but re-state the status quo in language that sounds intimidating but means nothing. Kind of like Fox News itself.
@minge: Conservatives have never been wrong about anything ever in the history of everything...in their own minds. Which is exactly what makes them so dangerous.
But what about the on-purpose "mistakes" like "Foley, D" above? Oh, I know, They'll just stop covering that stuff alltogether to fair and balance it out.
Ah, the old bait-and-switch; who goes to work at Faux Noise expecting "accuracy" to play any part? It's like accepting a job as a secretary and finding out you're also responsible for the bathroom plumbing.
A "mistake chain" is to Fox News what a polymer chain is to PVC — an inextricable component in its material constitution. To eliminate the chain is to eliminate the product.
They showed Going Rouge not once but twice in the same segment (before finally correcting the error on screen)! Is no one watching their daytime shows?
Those "recent months" are in the past two weeks, right? What else have we missed? Are there racial slurs slipped into the crawl that no one reads? America must know!
11/23/09
Which is why Rupert wants to hide his newspaper content, he's preparing to take his errors to print!
11/23/09
So threatening to fire people is not an effective mistake-prevention strategy. People will avoid engaging in intentional behavior that would cause them to be fired, of course (assuming they want to keep their jobs).
But people won't go, "Hey, I was planning to fuck up royally today, but now that I know that I may get fired for that, I've decided to take a different, not-fucking-up approach instead." It doesn't work that way.
What the "make mistakes and you're fired" threat WILL do is totally stress people the fuck out, and stressed-out people are probably likely to make more mistakes. So expect more mistakes on FNC in the near future.
11/23/09
I'm only going to excerpt this part: "You can make fun of me, and I will be reassured that all of you are cynics and hopeless." and laugh, and laugh, because... well, for obvious reasons.
11/23/09
The whole memo is ultimately all bark and no bite.
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
" Please know that jobs are on the line here."
The messages seems clear enough to me.
11/24/09
And even dumber, they can already fire anybody they want to without cause except in the rare cases of employees that have for-cause employment contracts (and I guarantee you the people in the editing rooms don't have such contracts). So the memo does nothing but re-state the status quo in language that sounds intimidating but means nothing. Kind of like Fox News itself.
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
If I remember the Falafel Chronicles correctly, that's not what Bill O'Reilly thinks.
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
It's short for (Dickin'-Fo' Life).
11/23/09
11/23/09
". . . and we never having to explain, retract, qualify or apologize again. " Or proofread, apparently