<![CDATA[Gawker: race is a social construct, discuss]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: race is a social construct, discuss]]> http://gawker.com/tag/race is a social construct, discuss http://gawker.com/tag/race is a social construct, discuss <![CDATA[ New Yorker music critic Sasha Frere-Jones ... ]]> New Yorker music critic Sasha Frere-Jones is concerned that all the indie kids don't try to sound like black people anymore. He went to an Arcade Fire show and was totally bored! Do they even have a rhythm section? It's all shouting and French horns, isn't it? "But, in the past few years," says Sasha, "I've spent too many evenings at indie concerts waiting in vain for vigor, for rhythm, for a musical effect that could justify all the preciousness." Ok so he didn't he get there in time for LCD Soundsystem then? [New Yorker]

]]>
Tue, 16 Oct 2007 15:15:00 EDT Pareene http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=311487&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Cornel West takes time away from his busy ... ]]> cornelCornel West takes time away from his busy teaching schedule to discuss his new record, Never Forget: "50 Cent, Snoop, Game, Nelly. On one level, I love those brothers, because their artistic and aesthetic work is a part of who I am... On the other hand, I challenge those brothers because I'm just against misogyny. I'm against homophobia. So somebody can be in my house and in my community and I still have to present a moral critique, because I'm just against those things. I just think they're wrong. So the question is, how do I deal with the love and embrace of them as artists and at the same time respectfully challenge them? So in that sense, I'm not really with the crowd that trashes hip-hop. I can't stand that. That's ridiculous. And I'm not with the crowd that somehow tries to give some justification for misogyny or homophobia. I just think the critique of homophobia has to be more explicit on hip-hop records—that's why I've addressed it on my album. Including the domestic violence and the misogyny and the sexism and so forth—it goes hand in hand with that. That's true with anything—anti-Semitism, it could be racism, any form of bigotry. I just have to take a stand against that. It's just who I am. Now that's a little different from this post-Imus trashing of Snoop. Because I'm not part of that crowd. At all." Okay then! [VV]

]]>
Wed, 22 Aug 2007 10:40:04 EDT abalk http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=292131&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ When 'Time Out' Seemed Like A Lifeline ]]> fire islandRod Townsend records the gays in and around their natural environment of Fire Island and reports back. This is the time, and this is the record of the time. Put your hands over your eyes.

EXT. BAY BAR
The Sunday noon crowd at Bay Bar consists of those running in and out to get iced coffee products and those sitting at tables enjoying iced coffee products. VISORGAY, wearing olive drab cargo shorts and a navy mesh Nike visor, sits with TANKGAY, in olive drab cargo shorts and a robin's egg blue tank. They are at a prime table overlooking the harbor and the boardwalk that runs along it. Across the water, unidentifiable shrieks can be heard.

VISORGAY What is that noise?

TANKGAY
It's a kid.

VISORGAY
No, it's a dog.

TANKGAY
What kind of dog?

VISORGAY
An unhappy dog.

TANKGAY
I'll take an unhappy dog over an unhappy kid.

VISORGAY
What is with all the kids this year?

TANKGAY
I don't know, but they're everywhere.

VISORGAY
(In a radio announcer voice.) It's Kid's Day every Sunday in Fire Island Pines. That's right. Kids drink free.

TANKGAY
(Laughs.) Bring your kid and get a free bottle of WET!


NASTYPLASTY hops up the stairs and into Bay Bar. He wears over-sized sunglasses and thermal shorts with the words "Nasty Plasty" on the elastic band. They are cut off at the calf. The thermals are covered by leopard-print running shorts.
TANKGAY
Look at her!

VISORGAY
(In an affected Kimora Lee Simmons-esque accent.) She has got it going on!

TANKGAY
Obviously has a need to be the center of attention.


NASTYPLASTY darts in, comes out with an iced coffee product, and then runs down the stairs. At the same time a group of MIDDLEAGED GAYS in assorted polos and reading glasses gets up from a back table. They leave a stack of newspaper and magazines behind. TANKGAY goes to the abandoned table and takes the reading material to his table. TANKGAY takes the Economist; VISORGAY takes Time Out New York.

TANKGAY I never actually read this. I just listen to the podcasts while I'm on the treadmill. Sometimes I have to really pay attention because of the accent.

VISORGAY
The podcast is in British?

TANKGAY
Yeah. The other day. What was it? Oh. (Affects a British accent.) The American performing ah-tist, Fifty-Cent. Fiv. Tay. Cint. I'm like, "It's Fiddy. Fiddy!" (He looks at VISORGAY's Time Out.) Before I moved to New York, I used to think that was the best magazine.

VISORGAY
Which one?

TANKGAY
The one you're reading. When I lived outside New York, it seemed like a lifeline, but now I think it's just awful.

VISORGAY
Maybe it's because you live here now. Hmm. No. I think it's gone through a little downfall. Now it's just useful. It's a tool.


TANKGAY takes a Blackberry Pearl out of his pocket, and pushes several buttons.

TANKGAY My sister's kid. Modern. Can text message with the best of them. Told me about something his dog did.

VISORGAY
That's too much info. I read the first sentence of any text message and then I almost always just delete it.

TANKGAY
No wonder my phone isn't working right. All that downloading.

VISORGAY
Exactly. Delete, delete.


BOTH thumb through sections of Sunday's New York Times.

TANKGAY (He looks at The Week in Review section.) Do you know anyone in Minneapolis?

VISORGAY
No. Well. (Closes one eye and knits brows.) I don't know. I don't think so.

TANKGAY
Me either. It's cold there.

VISORGAY
It's cold here. Right? It's cold today.

TANKGAY
You probably got a little sun on your run. Did you bring your shirt?

VISORGAY
No. (He rubs his chest and very slightly tweaks his nipples.) I like the attention.


Previously: The Pines Party

]]>
Tue, 07 Aug 2007 12:40:38 EDT Rod Townsend http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=286821&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ "Local" Kids Versus "Local" Parents In Carroll Gardens ]]> The gentrification of Carroll Gardens, the land of pregnancy, is hitting a sticky patch. A bunch of Brooklyn parents are upset at the behavior of some of the teenagers in Carroll Park, at Smith and Carroll Streets. On Wednesday, Gowanus Lounge posted some of the parent's complaints and summed them up thusly:
This all has to do with teenagers snapping wet t-shirts near some moms and kids. The teens didn't enjoy being told to stop. Many recriminations ensued. Threats were uttered by the kids to the adults. The police were called—and to us this is the most interesting part—didn't respond to what could have become a lousy incident in anything resembling a timely fashion. The kids kept up the harassment. They threw things at the adults. And, when the cops finally showed they are said to have been disinterested if not dismissive.
There's more, involving rock-throwing and threats to break people's noses, but the gist of it is that parents with their small kids were scared of the teenagers.

(The Post has a follow-up story today.) And we're still torn about the whole thing.

It would be pretty damn easy to simply dismiss the (white) parents' complaints about the (black) kids as just another example of clueless upper-middle-class, overprotective parents with expensive strollers getting all unnecessarily agitated about a little horseplay by kids who have probably lived in the neighborhood longer than they have, who are probably subconsciously bitter and acting out over suddenly having to cater to the whims of over-privileged yuppies who have invaded their neighborhood, bringing their perhaps latently racist attitudes with them. (A friend reports once being at a community meeting with a parents' association in the neighborhood, and one mother asked whether it would be possible to "move the projects." Er, eek!) And, you know, the fact that these "scary" kids are being raised by (probably single) parents who don't have the money to send them to a fancy day camp, and that there aren't many options for poor kids in the summer, and that they have just as much right to be in the park as anyone else, is another thing! And maybe the police didn't respond quickly because, frankly, water balloons are annoying but last time we checked, not illegal! It's very Fortress of Solitude, don't you think?

But on the other hand! That doesn't mean you can go around throwing rocks at people and threatening to break their noses. And they may be being raised by single parents, but who said that gives them the right to be rude, violent little twerps? Little girls shouldn't be walking around with knives. (Unless it's on the Upper East Side.) And the police probably don't want to get involved because the whole thing is a bloody nuisance.

Park Punks Amok [NYP]
Mom Confronts Hooligans in Carroll Park [Gowanus Lounge]

]]>
Fri, 13 Jul 2007 16:35:18 EDT Doree Shafrir http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=278226&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Tiger Woods' Daughter Off-White, Maybe Even Taupe ]]> woods and kidThe New York Post today fronts a photo of golfer Tiger Woods with his smoking-hot wife and new daughter Sam. While commending Woods for releasing the pictures without seeking remuneration, the paper is totally confused about his offspring's ethnicity.

Sam already outdoes her dad in terms of multicultural makeup. Her Swedish mommy adds an extra layer to her papa's already far-flung heritage.

He's one-quarter Chinese, one-quarter Thai, one-quarter African-American, one-eighth American Indian and one-eighth Dutch, and has always referred to himself as "Cablinasian."

What that makes Sam is anybody's guess.

Oooh, we'll take a shot! How about "a baby?"

A BABE IN THE WOODS FAMILY [NYP]

]]>
Tue, 26 Jun 2007 11:00:19 EDT abalk http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=272218&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ New York Gay Pride Parade In The Red ]]> coinzDonations to Heritage of Pride, the horribly-named non-profit that produces New York's annual gay pride parade, have dropped off so significantly that the organization is now in the red after years of flushness. Why? Because rich and white people just don't care about their stupid parade. According to the Observer: "'Some people,' said Dennis Spafford, a spokesman for Heritage of Pride, 'don't care anymore.'" OMG no!

Observer-gay John Koblin beat the mean gay streets and the homo hangouts and found that, guess what? Chelsea-living middle-class honky-homos think that every day is their rainbow flag-waving, leather buttfloss-wearing excuse to be as gay as a day in May.

"I live in New York, and it's sort of like every day is Gay Pride Parade," said Matt Davie, 37, an associate publisher at Simon & Schuster, standing in the main room of G Lounge in Chelsea on June 14. "It's not this special day that I can suddenly throw on my rainbow flag, or whatever. That's every day. I don't need this special day where I'm out of the closet."
Clearly! But who else isn't going?
"White people say they experience the parade as being tired and corny," said [journalist Richard] Goldstein. "They'll say it's unattractive to them. The reason it's unattractive to them is because there are all these faces of people of color from all over the world.

"What happens is the parade gets blacker and blacker," he said. "Fewer white people feel drawn to it. The result is, to be seen at the parade is a little déclassé."

There's an upside to this, you know! Soon Gay Pride will be like the Puerto Rican parade—only worse, because it'll have all manner of brown people, and there'll be fences and boomboxes and the stench of frightened white people! Maybe some wilding! And that's how the gays will get their edgy back.

Goodbye, Mr. Chaps [NYO]
[Image via LOLGay]

]]>
Wed, 20 Jun 2007 10:20:58 EDT Choire http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=270550&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ They Call Me MISTER Uncle Ben ]]> uncle benGreat news on the race front: An African-American man, long known for his servile demeanor and non-threatening appearance, has attained a position of responsibility and respect in corporate America.
Uncle Ben, who first appeared in ads in 1946, is being reborn as Ben, an accomplished businessman with an opulent office, a busy schedule, an extensive travel itinerary and a penchant for sharing what the company calls his "grains of wisdom" about rice and life.
Dude's a rice-shilling Dick Parsons! We have finally made Dr. King's dream a reality. Gladys Knight, all is forgiven.

Uncle Ben, Board Chairman [NYT]

]]>
Fri, 30 Mar 2007 11:45:14 EDT abalk2 http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=248395&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Matt Drudge Shocked That Multiracial Candidate May Have Diverse Genetic Background ]]> obamaYou know, in addition to being BLACK.

Drudge Report
Earlier: Matt Drudge Cannot Hide His Deep Knowledge Of African-American Culture

]]>
Fri, 23 Mar 2007 13:42:11 EDT abalk2 http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=246586&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Gawker Helps Bring Blacks And Asians Together ]]> teensLike the rest of you, we've been deeply disturbed by the recent controversy concerning Kenneth Eng's infamous "I Hate Blacks" column. (Eng was dismissed from his position at Asian Week yesterday.) But then it occurred to us that we have two members of the Gawker family who might be able to help us heal the breach, or at least begin a dialogue, between blacks and Asians. We asked The Assimilated Negro and Spinachdip to get to the bottom of the enmity between the two communities. The results will make everyone feel a little better. Except maybe the gays.

Spinach: Okay, well, having read the article, my thoughts are sort of, "I'm not saying it's right, but I understand."
TAN: Ha! I totally liked the guy who wanted to defend it, saying, "ACTUALLY, some people do think this way..."
Spinach: Well, yeah ...people are kinda racist. My grandmother, for instance. She doesn't even try to hide it.
TAN: I hate you, chink. Go make me some General Tso's. Your grandma too. So, anyway, what do you think you agree with? I loved his citing of Rush Hour.
Spinach: Because, you know, that's the only point where my culture and your culture intersect. Jackie Chan is our representative and Chris Tucker yours.
TAN: Fuck that. Oprah and Obama are our representatives. Jackie Chan is yours.
Spinach: My grandmother, though, bless her heart, she told my sister, "You can marry an American, just don't bring back a black man."
TAN: Ha. I have a problem with the weak-willed comment. Aren't Asians notoriously pussy-willed? We definitely make shit happen .
Spinach: Fuck naw. If we don't get shit done, we commit ceremonial suicide. That's the ultimate price.
TAN: That's the ultimate pansy-ass passive-aggressive move. If we don't get shit done we loudly vocalize it and blame it on white people. And, uh, when did you guys fight the Russians?
Spinach: Couple of times, actually. At least Japan did.
TAN: Oh, aren't you Mister Smarty-Pants. "Look at me, with my knowledge of history."
TAN: Speaking of Asian wars, Vietnamese is easily my most favorite asian cuisine.
Spinach: Pho is cure for whateverthefuck ails you.
TAN: I do think you guys win on the religion tip. I'm totally not down with Christianity.
Spinach: Christianity is too dogmatic for me. People use it too much as a get-in-heaven-free card. Whereas Eastern beliefs tend to be more about philosophy. It's about how to think, rather than what to think.
TAN: Word. Plus, fortune cookies!!!
Spinach: You know, there's definitely a love-hate relationship between our cultures.
TAN: Yeah... you know the origins at all?
Spinach: Should I?
TAN: I think it started in the ghetto Chinese spots. Once you guys started serving up chicken that we liked, it tipped the balance of power and we got defensive.
TAN: Did you ever have a black guy cheat off your paper/test or anything like that in school?
Spinach: I actually went to an almost-all-white school. There were maybe two or three black kids in each class.
TAN: Did they cheat off you?
Spinach: I think everyone cheated off me, black or white.
TAN: Ha...you're such a smart Asian. Er, REDUNDANT! So what could we do to make things better? If we agree there is some truth to Eng's sentiment...
Spinach: I think, what happens is that the black American experience is almost the opposite of the Asian American experience, and that's where the tension comes in.
TAN: How so? You're talking about the small penis thing?
Spinach: THAT IS A MYTH! We'd be driving bigger cars if that was true.
TAN: How's the homosexuality jumpoff in the Asian community? Are you guys as homophobic as black people?
Spinach: Not really.
TAN: It seems like there might be more gay Asians around than standard homosexual percentages. [Oh, God, here we go. —Ed.]
Spinach: I can't speak for other Asian cultures, but homosexuality is, if not completely accepted, acknowledged.
TAN: Chop Sticks ... not just for food anymore!
Spinach: That's because the gay community loves the Gaysians.
TAN: Ahhh.
Spinach: We generally don't have a lot of chest hair. Saves money on waxing.
TAN: Back to the rift: Between Chinese food, Wu Tang, and Lucy Liu, I cannot understand why we don't love each other. I actually think it's one-sided. Maybe Eng has a point: We eat your food, watch your movies, fuck your women ... and what do we give back? Ol' Dirty Bastard, the Inspector Deck, etc. Do you take anything from black culture? I mean, apart from our money? We support Asians over black people. Sigh.
Spinach: Yeah, well... Actually, if you go to any Asian community in California, you'll see these rice rockets with ridiculous bass speakers pumping out. Is E-40 still popular out there?
TAN: Maybe?
Spinach: That hyphy shit.
TAN: I don't know if that balances things out ... E-40 and hyphy vs. Chinese food and Lucy Liu?
Spinach: ...and you see those kids on St. Mark's with dreads and afros.
TAN: True. So have we concluded anything here?
Spinach: What are we doing here again?
TAN: i think we're either bridging the Negro-Asian gap, or making the rift wider.
Spinach: I blame my parents.
TAN: Ha, ME TOO!!!
Spinach: Here's what I think happens with my parents' generation: First-generation Asians come to America and see the poverty in black neighborhoods and think, "Why are they poor when we can make a living? It must be because they're lazy." Which isn't fair, of course - first generation immigrants are, by nature, entrepreneurial.
TAN: It's true, that is a difference. Eng doesn't even cite that. Asians work hard. Negroes party hard
Spinach: We're trying to change though
TAN: Us too... if only we could meet in the middle, we'd make the perfect human. Our big penises, your work ethic ...
Spinach: Too bad we can't mate.
TAN: We can... this is where Lucy Liu is so critical. We should convert Lucy Liu and Beyonce into breeders for a new generation of Negrasians
Spinach: Beyonce for Lucy Liu? I think that's a fair trade. We can throw in a couple more to make it work under the salary cap.
TAN: Alright, we probably have enough to give to our mutual enemy The White Man, don't you think?
Spinach: Yeah, I mean, it's not like we built a railroad here or anything. This should do. I'd hate to be the white man who edits this. [No fucking shit. —Ed.]
TAN: Ha... they can do something for a change.
Spinach: I should ask though, why do you hate us?
TAN: I envy your small penises and tapered jeans. Off to give this to Whitey. Wish me luck.

We wish both of you luck! And your communities. We're proud to have played a part, however small, in affecting rapprochement.

Black History Month Ends On Bad Week For Brown People
'Hate Blacks' writer dismissed by AsianWeek [SFC]
[Image via]

]]>
Thu, 01 Mar 2007 16:05:18 EST abalk2 http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=240836&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Black History Month Ends On Bad Week For Brown People ]]> http://gawker.com/assets/resources/2007/02/mn_hate27_ph-thumb.jpgThe last week of Black History Month started so well! Two black people won Oscars! But it was all downhill from there: A city council hearing aimed at discouraging the use of a racist and offensive (contextually speaking) term—what the papers call "the 'n' word"—resulted in that term being used nearly fifty times. Back on the West Coast, a San Francisco newspaper was forced to pull a column entitled "Why I Hate Blacks." One sample reason: "Contrary to media depictions, I would argue that blacks are weak-willed. They are the only race that has been enslaved for 300 years." (Full column at right, click to enlarge.) In South Africa, white folks have begun to rally around a song that extols the virtues of an Afrikaner general. In trying times like these, where can a troubled soul turn to get away, however briefly, from the tangled thicket of race and its presentations? Maybe to the culture section!

arts.jpg
Eh, we give up.

COUNCIL GOES SLUR CRAZY OVER N-WORD [NYP]
Asian paper's 'I Hate Blacks' column assailed [SFC]
Song Wakens Injured Pride of Afrikaners [NYT]

]]>
Wed, 28 Feb 2007 15:49:01 EST abalk2 http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=240470&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Malcolm Gladwell: You Might Be A Racist If... ]]> Over on his blog, deep thinker/afro-joke-goes here New Yorker scribe Malcolm Gladwell ponders the recent Michael Richards imbroglio and comes up with a few simple ways to determine the racism level of public outbursts. Gladwell boils it down to three factors:

  • Content: "What is said clearly makes a difference. I think, for example, that hate speech is more hateful the more specific it is. To call someone a nigger is not as a bad as arguing that black people have lower intelligence than whites."
  • Intention: "Was the remark intended to wound, or intended to perpetuate some social wrong? Was it malicious?"
  • Conviction: "Does the statement represent the individual's considered opinion?"

    All solid metrics, but we can't help finding the list a bit incomplete. After the jump we provide a few suggestions of our own. Click through and see how many you qualify for!


  • Creativity: Anyone can call someone a "cheap Jew." It takes a hard-boiled racist with an advanced level of vitriol to refer to a tribesman as a "hook-nosed, Challah-eating Heeb."
  • Universality: While everyone has one ethnic group they particularly can't stand (well, one plus the Jews), the real racist can hate the blacks, the English, and the Chinese at the same time.
  • Irrationality: It's okay to hate Italians because they're greasy and they're all somehow connected to the mob. A true connoisseur of bigotry will despise them for something completely nonsensical, like the fact that they eat dead chickens.
  • Obscurity: If your racism takes the form of loathing not just the Irish, but specifically the Irish from Innishannon, Co. Cork, you are a true racist.
  • Mel Gibson: If you are Mel Gibson, you are a racist.

    Defining A Racist [Gladwell]

    [Image via]

]]>
Mon, 04 Dec 2006 13:00:01 EST abalk2 http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=219074&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Paula Zahn Asks, Who Wants To Be A Bigot On National TV? ]]> diversity.gifWe were forwarded the following e-mail about an upcoming Paula Zahn special that was too good not to share:

As part of a Paula Zahn Now special on intolerance we are doing a story that looks at hidden prejudices within us all. Three professors have come up with a test (taken by computer) that tells you if you have hidden biases. We would like to shoot a group of people taking this test and see what the results are. (We need a mixed group - black, white, asian, etc... young, old, male female...etc.)

Here's where I need some help. We are looking for 12 people who would be willing to come in to CNN office at Time Warner building and take the test this Friday (12/1); exact time TBD. It is such a sensitive subject matter and for the purposes of our program we will focus only on the biases of Americans. Therefore, we are looking for American students, or foreigners who have spent a considerable amount of time living in the United States.

We are looking to put together a diverse group!

Yeah, a diverse group of racists! This is like accepting a casting call for "To Catch a Predator." Good luck!

]]>
Tue, 28 Nov 2006 16:55:09 EST abalk2 http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=217722&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Inscrutable John Ridley Racialist Thing Continues on HuffPo ]]> ridley.jpgToday, screenwriter John Ridley responds to the four pages of hyperventilating comments that his Esquire excerpt provoked by . . . uh, we're still not sure. The title of his new essay is 'Nigger v. Queer: How Gays Got it Right," which seems to imply that he equates the way gay people have "reclaimed" the word queer with how he wishes black people would nullify the stigma associated with "nigger." Wait, is that what he's saying? "There is not one individual on this planet who can make a black into a nigger. We can only do that to ourselves."

Hmm, it doesn't sound like he's suggesting that "nigger" should become a relatively offensiveness-free term like "queer." In fact, we're not really getting the point of the comparison at all. And we're definitely not getting the comparison of "the left"'s refusal to use the word to a "sick game of Twister." Or what Ridley is trying to mean by "I am unsure of how anyone can take a contrary stance with the tenant of self-reliance" (though we're 90% sure he meants 'tenet.')
Actually, the only thing we're really sure of is that the HuffPo might want to hire some kind of proofreader or something, so people would at least have a better idea of what, exactly, they should be getting offended by.

John Ridley: Nigger v. Queer: How Gays Got it Right
[HuffPo]
Earlier: Esquire: Race-Baiting Hot New Trend For Spring

]]>
Mon, 13 Nov 2006 15:55:00 EST Emily Gould http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=214416&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ 'Esquire:' Race-Baiting Hot New Trend For Spring ]]> ridley.jpgIn December's Esquire, and in a HuffPo excerpt, screenwriter John Ridley (pictured) eschews pussyfooting around the 'n-word.' He also eschews, um, making any kind of sense.

So I say this: It's time for ascended blacks to wish niggers good luck. Just as whites may be concerned with the good of all citizens but don't travel their days worrying specifically about the well-being of hillbillies from Appalachia, we need to send niggers on their way. We need to start extolling the most virtuous of ourselves. It is time to celebrate the New Black Americans—those who have sealed the Deal, who aren't beholden to liberal indulgence any more than they are to the disdain of the hard Right.
Not really our place to get upset about/analyze any of the above (we learned at least that much from all of our 'Dialectics of ____ and Its Discontents' classes in college), but we did want to point out that Esquire might have wanted to vet this article a little bit more closely for, you know, being sort of legendarily offensive. Also, copyeditor? "Travel their days?"

The Manifesto of Ascendancy for the Modern American Nigger [Esquire]

]]>
Fri, 10 Nov 2006 14:50:00 EST Emily Gould http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=213961&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Stanley Crouch, Ethnologist ]]> simg_t_mc68689j6nryjpg175.jpgLiterary pugilist Stanley Crouch turns his eye to Barack Obama, the junior senator from Illinois, whom many believe will be this nation's first black president. Except, according to Crouch, he won't: "Obama's mother is of white U.S. stock. His father is a black Kenyan. Other than color, Obama did not - does not - share a heritage with the majority of black Americans, who are descendants of plantation slaves... when black Americans refer to Obama as 'one of us,' I do not know what they are talking about."

Wow. We thought we'd dispensed with this kind of thing a ways back, but apparently not: One drop of ivory blood and you're out of the race. Senator Obama had better start embracing his inner Caucasian (our suggestion: start with some Dave Matthews CDs) or Crouch is gonna bop him on the head.

What Obama isn't: black like me [NYDN]

]]>
Thu, 02 Nov 2006 13:20:46 EST abalk2 http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=211951&view=rss&microfeed=true