Gawker 
Enter your username and password.
New York, 6:06 AM
Tue Nov 24
46 posts in the last 24 hours
Tip Your Editors:
tips@gawker.com
Tipline: 646-214-8138
Editor-in-Chief:
Gabriel Snyder | Email
West Coast Editor:
Richard Rushfield | Email
Contributing Editors:
Valleywag:
Ryan Tate | Email
Media:
Hamilton Nolan | Email
Politics:
Alex Pareene | Email
Investigations:
John Cook | Email
Entertainment:
Brian Moylan | Email
Nights:
Adrian Chen | Email
Azaria Jagger | Email
Ravi Somaiya | Email
Weekends:
Foster Kamer | Email
Video Editor:
Richard Blakeley | Email
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.
10/18/09
10/18/09
We do not watch tightrope walkers to see them be successful. It's the potential spectacle of failure that draws us in. #djam
10/18/09
If you start with the basic assumption that many of these people have encountered and dealt with addicts before (e.g. his manager who also manages Eminem, a man who has admitted drug problems), his show and death become a clusterfuck of malfeasance.
The thing that I find most egregious about the way the people around DJ AM present this is that they act as if there were no signs even though his therapist, his manager, and all these other people are talking about how he started sweating while holding a crackpipe.
How do you witness that and not apply the brakes? #djam
10/18/09
10/18/09
Having him pick up a crack pipe? Over the line, clearly. He was a crack addict and not fairing too well. Just looking
10/18/09
10/18/09
I don't know...I feel like people could have seen this coming if they gave any thought whatsoever to Goldstein's mental health. Didn't anyone at MTV ever think about how the plane crash could have affected him emotionally? Not to mention the high probability that pain meds could have a destabilizing effect on a former addict? #djam
10/18/09
10/18/09
10/18/09
I never felt for the guy before this particulary story, but it hits home in a lot of ways and reminds me of people I've lost. You shouldn't treat the overcoming of addiction like a vacation from the drugs or the alcohol, something that you can eventually return to if you feel better and "can control" yourself; you should treat it like a death, something that is removed and gone and buried. Watching people return once they're "better" only to fall apart again is an accepted part of (eventual) recovery, but on the flipside it can also lead to horrific death, and I just think considering where we're at as a society, and how damning addiction has become, we should be trying, even as television networks, to help one another out. Having viewers is useless if a chunk of them end up dead because of misinformation via clever editing about the recurrence of addiction. #djam
10/18/09
Does that make any sense? I'm trying to write comments during commercials for Desperate Housewives *cough gay cough*, so I'm not sure if I'm explaining things adequately.
10/19/09
10/19/09
10/18/09
Well said, Foster. Overall, I thought the NYT article captured that feeling.
This analogy, however, felt off to me:
"'If you want to stay monogamous with your wife, don’t get into a hotel room alone with a woman — even if you’re only in there to fix her Wi-Fi. It’s not a good idea,'" [a family medicine doctor with a specialty in addiction] said. #djam
10/18/09
10/18/09
10/18/09
-"I'm here to fix your Wi-Fi."
-"Come on in. I was just in the shower." #djam
10/18/09
10/18/09
10/18/09
09/28/09
I realize that you work the night shift, but I hope you remember that this means you sleep during the day.
Also, whether you intended this or not, the comment about Ms. Lee is worthy of Tucker Max at his most cringe-inducing. Would her death be more tragic if she appeared in "Eyes Wide Shut" and "Gosford Park?"
09/28/09
I do a lot of tedious work at nights and have for quite a while now, work that oftentimes has me waiting for things to finish, time that I use to peruse this side of the internet until my attention has to revert back to these tedious manual processes. I used to love Gawker's night blogging because it was totally different from the day side of stuff, but carried the same sort of irreverence and genial "aw fuck" attitude that I've come to know over the last several years as a reader, and since I finally emerged from reclusiveness at the start of summer to become a more (I dare say) serious commenter. But this flippant way of coming across while retelling absolutely terrible news, of exploiting the exploited and then afterward critiquing the exploitation, is tiring and trite. You're terrible at this Andrew, and you've just caused me to finally give up and reread shit on Slate while at work and give my ad-bound eyes to them rather than continue to hope for a rebound. The Titanic finally sank, damnit.
For the record, I take full responsibility for having continued to read your posts after having had my intelligence insulted weeks ago. If I had half a brain, I would've left at "you go girl," but you know, I just really thought something else would happen with the night posts. I really am disappointed.
09/28/09
Andrew: you focus on the novelty aspect, and attempt, ham-handedly, to sensationalize the alleged murderer. Your complete dismissal of the victim is reprehensible. You devote one and one-half sentences to her, reducing her life to "appeared in such classics as ..." This is the worst possible kind of exploitation; the trivializing of a horrible act and what must have been a terrible death.
There is no possible excuse for the final paragraph. It shows incredible insensitivity---summarizing a story in which the victim is tortured and killed with a flippant "run because they will kill you" is not journalism. It is, at best, a juvenile display and a misguided and inept attempt to replicate the tone of other Gawker posts. You failed and should be ashamed.
I too will no longer visit this site during the night.
09/28/09
Most writers worth their salt try to disguise how much they deeply despise women, Andrew. Try harder, sweetheart. For your sake, for ours.
09/28/09
Shit. Sorry. Got it.
09/28/09
09/28/09
09/28/09
09/28/09
08/27/09
..Because nothing should entice you to cast LiLo in your project more than being part of a staged "reality" process of doing so...
08/27/09
08/27/09
08/27/09
08/27/09
08/27/09
08/27/09
08/27/09
08/27/09