@Gabriel Snyder: You've decided to outsource the job to a team in India. They can work all shifts. Trouble is, they would end every post by writing "Is there anything else I can help you with?" #announcements
Hm. This partypants character seems like your typical blog-person who wants to work for Gawker or some similar entity, but can't, for any variety of reasons. This frustrates/saddens them, so they decide to hate Gawker (and similar entities) instead. I've seen it dozens of times before partypants, and her personal blog tells this same story in sad, exacting detail.
What I really don't get is being obsessed with internet strangers to the point of spending your time "reblogging" them and just, you know, attacking them at every opportunity. At least the folks at Gawker are a) Good writers b) Funny c) Getting paid to do it. If you're doing this kind of muck pro bono, well... sigh for you. A big ol' sigh for you.
@TallulahSkankhead: There were a couple of good turns of phrase here or there in the posts of hers that I read, but they were overshadowed by the obsessive coverage of the same few subjects and a lotta cheap slams at people's looks.
I dunno. I just don't get some parts of the internet, I guess.
@Richard Lawson: Still, you're sort of shooting the messenger here, and it's disappointing coming from a good writer who I thought was fair. Pro bono? Money makes the snark OK? Lines in the sand.
@TallulahSkankhead: I'm not saying money makes the snark OK (I quit, remember?), I'm just saying I really don't understand engaging in the snark (and low-quality snark at that) for fucking free. It seems crazy.
@o-line: yeah, that link was not classy. They didn't even mention that the article was satiric, leaving readers with the distinct impression that Blakeley is a date rapist.
Someone at HP doesn't like Richard, and are willing to be vicious and underhanded. HP is like a shitty high school newsletter.
@Annoying: He was soliciting ideas for a story. Without seeing the story that resulted, I have no idea whether he was being a dickface, or just pursuing an idea for some really dark humor.
It's news in the blog world, and Gawker should have reported it the minute they heard about it and confirmed it--because Gawker would have been outraged if, say, a Times reporter had been similarly charged and the Times didn't report it. But all of this fact-free back and forth in the comments does no service to journalism or justice, is patently unfair to the people involved in some very personal turmoil, and is damned tiresome at this length. See you on another thread, folks.
11/03/09
11/03/09
11/03/09
11/03/09
11/03/09
11/03/09
11/03/09
11/03/09
11/03/09
11/03/09
11/03/09
11/03/09
11/03/09
11/03/09
09/14/09
09/15/09
09/15/09
@LeeroySpitzer:
No, no... *this* is Gavrilo Princip. The conflict he started was nothing compared to what we just witnessed on this thread.
09/14/09
09/14/09
Still think this could be a brilliant gambit for the book tour.
09/14/09
09/14/09
09/14/09
Still wondering if this whole incident was staged to add some media juice to your book tour. Metalicious.
09/14/09
09/14/09
09/14/09
09/14/09
09/14/09
What I really don't get is being obsessed with internet strangers to the point of spending your time "reblogging" them and just, you know, attacking them at every opportunity. At least the folks at Gawker are a) Good writers b) Funny c) Getting paid to do it. If you're doing this kind of muck pro bono, well... sigh for you. A big ol' sigh for you.
09/14/09
09/14/09
I dunno. I just don't get some parts of the internet, I guess.
09/14/09
EXACTLY. Everyone just needs to calm the fuck down.
09/14/09
That is all.
09/14/09
09/14/09
09/15/09
09/15/09
09/14/09
[www.huffingtonpost.com]
The link to the e-mail about date rape is a delightful touch.
09/14/09
Someone at HP doesn't like Richard, and are willing to be vicious and underhanded. HP is like a shitty high school newsletter.
09/14/09
09/15/09
09/15/09
09/15/09
09/15/09
09/15/09
09/14/09