@depardoo: No, it means "we're not gonna book a space until we're sure this class is gonna pay for itself.
I'm in the social media teaching racket, or was until recently. I've been teaching this stuff for longer than it's had a proper name, but in the last year it seems that every douchenozzle with a Twitter account is charging three figures for an afternoon of "Social Media 101." It's mortifying to those of us who actually have something to teach and consider teaching an honorable profession, rather than a quick buck source to tack on to your day job in case you get fired.
I mean, there are people with ads in the paper, $150 for a two-hour class. And these people were sitting in MY class six months ago. I'm good, but no way can I turn out a guru that fast. #scams
Dawn turned out to be pretty good for washing the oil off birds whose feathers got caught in oil spills. Sometimes things in the humaniac movement are inconveniently complicated.
I've had this problem today over the ConAgra fan group going around on Facebook: "Join the ConAgra Foods Foundation, Help me fight child hunger. When you become a fan of ConAgra Foods Foundation, they'll donate $10 to Feeding America - up to $100,000 through Oct. 10th!" They have just over half the maximum members; only about $54,000 will (supposedly) be donated to Feeding America.
Yet this is a terrible company. Environmental issues, labor issues, health issues, ethical issues. Becoming a "fan" comes with an implicit approval of the company, but refusing to do so means withholding a sum of money from a children's hunger charity based on a moral stance. Even if I donate $10 to the charity on my own, I'm still aware of the $10 I could be donating but am not. What's a girl to do?
I am tired of people pretending that product marketing is anything but the work of the fucking devil. Why can't consumer products be judged on their merits, not how "edgy" their nonsensical short films are or how deep the manure pool of their disingenous emotional pleas are. Proctor & Gamble using animal rights as marketing tool? Cognitive dissonance, anyone?
10/27/09
10/27/09
10/27/09
10/27/09
10/27/09
"we'll send you the location after you sign up" = we're expecting stalkers #scams
10/28/09
I'm in the social media teaching racket, or was until recently. I've been teaching this stuff for longer than it's had a proper name, but in the last year it seems that every douchenozzle with a Twitter account is charging three figures for an afternoon of "Social Media 101." It's mortifying to those of us who actually have something to teach and consider teaching an honorable profession, rather than a quick buck source to tack on to your day job in case you get fired.
I mean, there are people with ads in the paper, $150 for a two-hour class. And these people were sitting in MY class six months ago. I'm good, but no way can I turn out a guru that fast. #scams
10/27/09
10/27/09
Or is that the gin? #scams
10/13/09
10/12/09
LaterNever.10/12/09
LaterNever.10/12/09
LaterNever.10/12/09
10/10/09
10/09/09
10/09/09
Yet this is a terrible company. Environmental issues, labor issues, health issues, ethical issues. Becoming a "fan" comes with an implicit approval of the company, but refusing to do so means withholding a sum of money from a children's hunger charity based on a moral stance. Even if I donate $10 to the charity on my own, I'm still aware of the $10 I could be donating but am not. What's a girl to do?
(PS: Become a part of the quandry! [bit.ly])
10/09/09
10/09/09