• Profile logout login

#robertthomson

Gawker

Share Cancel
   
Upload an image | Add an image URL
×

logging in
  • FAQ. Include # before tag:
  • #tips,
  • #stalker,
  • #opencaption,
  • #internalmemos,
  • etc.

New York, 1:02 AM
Tue Dec 8
50 posts in the last 24 hours

Team

Tip Your Editors:

Tipline: 646-214-8138

Editor-in-Chief:
Gabriel Snyder |

West Coast Editor:
Richard Rushfield |

Contributing Editors:

Valleywag:
Ryan Tate |

Media:
Hamilton Nolan |

Politics:
Alex Pareene |

Investigations:
John Cook |

Entertainment:
Brian Moylan |

Nights:
Adrian Chen |
Azaria Jagger |
Ravi Somaiya |

Weekends:
Foster Kamer |

Video Editor:
Richard Blakeley |

SUBSCRIBE TO Gawker RSS

New: Breaking news and daily top stories via email
4260 Subscribers
Gawker
  • posts about #robertthomson more →

    Wall Street Journal Editor: We 'Must Think the Unthinkable'

    Marissa Mayer, Temptress of Google

    Party Time at the WSJ (Please Send Pics)

    Wall Street Journal Editor's Newsroom Dig At Fox News

    News Corp. Would Like to Renew Its MySpace Deal with 'Parasite' Google

    WSJ Scolds 'Confused' Simpletons at Times

    NYT Slams WSJ Editor's 'Strange Analysis'

    WSJ Editor Slams 'Brain Dead' Times Readers

    Outrage: WSJ In Blog Duplicity Scandal

    Debunking the AP's Aggregation Aggravation

  • Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.

    Dsmvwl  Admin  Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×
    Image of Mediahohoho Mediahohoho
    10/29/09

    In reply to Wall Street Journal Editor: We 'Must Think the Unthinkable'
    I'm pretty sure the herd in marketing could be thinned considerably. #wallstreetjournal
     Reply
    Mediahohoho was starred Mediahohoho was unstarred
    Image of TheBusinessGuy TheBusinessGuy
    10/29/09

    In reply to Wall Street Journal Editor: We 'Must Think the Unthinkable'
    For newspapers, what has always been unthinkable is changing with the times. From a stubborn refusal to standardize ad sizes to accommodate national advertisers to their initial dismissal of and subsequent deer-in-the-headlights reaction to the Internet, they have brought about their own death. And what is their imaginative solution? To cut back on the things that make them valuable and unique and that could help them trounce their web rivals: deep reportorial resources and expert editorial judgement. Honestly, if an individual were this self-destructive, someone would do an intervention. #wallstreetjournal
     Reply
    TheBusinessGuy was starred TheBusinessGuy was unstarred
    Image of naugahydeinplainsight naugahydeinplainsight
    10/29/09

    In reply to Wall Street Journal Editor: We 'Must Think the Unthinkable'
    Meanwhile over on Slate, Daniel Gross argues reports of the newspaper industry's death are greatly exaggerated. A focus on plummeting circulation and weak ad figures "might be a case of making too much of a few numbers and ignoring some important ones." [www.slate.com]

    #tips
     Reply
    Edited by naugahydeinplainsight at 10/29/09 12:42 PM naugahydeinplainsight was starred naugahydeinplainsight was unstarred
    Image of RollsRoyceRevenge RollsRoyceRevenge
    10/29/09

    In reply to Wall Street Journal Editor: We 'Must Think the Unthinkable'
    "We may be bought by an obnoxious Australian, for example." #wallstreetjournal
     Reply
    RollsRoyceRevenge was starred RollsRoyceRevenge was unstarred
    Image of random_play random_play
    10/23/09

    In reply to Marissa Mayer, Temptress of Google
    The Laugh is back! #marissamayer
     Reply
    random_play was starred random_play was unstarred
    Image of jackbarber jackbarber
    10/22/09

    In reply to Marissa Mayer, Temptress of Google
    This is the first time I've ever been on Marissa Mayer's side about anything. And I share her flabbergastery.

    I'd read about this earlier today and thought nothing of it.

    But watching the vid Thomson is clearly making a conscious sexual / sexist entendre and the overall effect is downright creepy.

    What a terrible lackey loser he is. Go back to Britain and edit your shitty right-wing rag. He probably has rupert's balls in his mouth right now.

    p.s. All these MSM f'ers from Niesenholtz to Spanfellow to this dbag are so ridiculously disingenuous, as anyone with half a brain knows. All of their arguments are specious. If you don't like what Google's doing turn it off and lose 20-50% of your traffic.

    Ok I'm done now. #marissamayer
     Reply
    jackbarber was starred jackbarber was unstarred
    Image of joeynhes joeynhes
    10/23/09

    @jackbarber: I think his point has merit and just because she happens to be female (I am too) you're alleging his criticism is sexist. Also, know the Thomson family and FYI he is lovely, brilliant and a happy family man.
     Reply
    jackbarber promoted this comment joeynhes was starred joeynhes was unstarred
    Image of therealmusashi therealmusashi
    10/24/09

    @jackbarber: I like how you accuse him of making a sexual / sexist entendre, and in the same breath say he's got someone's balls in his mouth.

    Well done. #marissamayer
     Reply
    jackbarber promoted this comment therealmusashi was starred therealmusashi was unstarred
    Image of jackbarber jackbarber
    10/27/09

    @joeynhes: Ok I'm sorry I said Thomson has Rupe's balls in his mouth. That was unfair!

    His point however has zero merit, so I can't follow you there..

    This is all empirical:

    If he doesn't like what Google is doing, he can easily block Goog's crawler (or whatever you call it) from any and all News Corp content.

    Problem is, Google drives News Corp a shitload (excuse my language!) of traffic, therefore driving very material page views and revenue.

    Hence my problem with Thomson's, Spanfeeler's and all those other old media execs disingenuous carping about Google.

    They're basically -- and IMO pathetically -- trying to make enough nuisance so Google pays them something they shouldn't by rights have to pay them to make them shut up and fade back into the woodwork.

    Google is correctly ignoring them and doing nothing. #marissamayer
     Reply
    jackbarber was starred jackbarber was unstarred
    Image of jackbarber jackbarber
    10/27/09

    @therealmusashi: I can't tell if you're offended but if so I also apologize to you for saying Thomson has Rupie's balls in his mouth. #marissamayer
     Reply
    jackbarber was starred jackbarber was unstarred
    Image of Claire Buoyant Claire Buoyant
    10/22/09

    In reply to Marissa Mayer, Temptress of Google
    Looks like the source and quote use the same text size to me. Did Google change that already? #marissamayer
     Reply
    Claire Buoyant was starred Claire Buoyant was unstarred
    Image of Meiyou Wenti Meiyou Wenti
    10/22/09

    In reply to Marissa Mayer, Temptress of Google
    Like so much success today, Google is profiting off others' work. And most people see this as OK. So much for the work ethic. #marissamayer
     Reply
    Claire Buoyant promoted this comment Meiyou Wenti was starred Meiyou Wenti was unstarred
    Image of Claire Buoyant Claire Buoyant
    10/22/09

    @Meiyou Wenti: Down with capitalist running dogs! #marissamayer
     Reply
    Claire Buoyant was starred Claire Buoyant was unstarred
    Image of Meiyou Wenti Meiyou Wenti
    10/22/09

    @Claire Buoyant: Never trust the capitalist roaders. #marissamayer
     Reply
    Meiyou Wenti was starred Meiyou Wenti was unstarred
    Image of belltolls belltolls
    10/22/09

    In reply to Marissa Mayer, Temptress of Google
    I once got a really bad blowjob from The Journal. Forgive me for shopping around. #marissamayer
     Reply
    belltolls was starred belltolls was unstarred
    Image of Trai_Dep Trai_Dep
    10/22/09

    In reply to Marissa Mayer, Temptress of Google
    I'm quite impressed that a WSJ editor even knows what Teh Google is.
    His full-time assistant who prints out his daily emails deserves a raise for filling him in before the conference began. #marissamayer
     Reply
    Trai_Dep was starred Trai_Dep was unstarred
    Image of Nick Denton Nick Denton
    07/10/09

    In reply to Wall Street Journal Editor's Newsroom Dig At Fox News
    I know we're not supposed to say anything nice about News Corporation. But what's the real story of the Wall Street Journal's move to Midtown? The lack of complaint. These titans of business journalism may be forced to share the same skyscraper as the alcoholics of the New York Post and the angry men of Fox News. But so much richer are the lunch options of Midtown -- compared with the wasteland of the World Financial Center -- that the constantly whining WSJ reporters are uncharacteristically reconciled to this particular change.
     Reply
    Nick Denton was starred Nick Denton was unstarred
    Image of Pinekatz Pinekatz
    07/10/09

    In reply to Wall Street Journal Editor's Newsroom Dig At Fox News
    "the newspaper's new "Hub," an area on the sixth floor with loads of flat-screen displays blaring TV news around the clock — the beating heart of the new, multiplatform Journal"

    Oink.

    Newsgathering skills? Its all very incestuous and obscene. Everyone licks the other's face and if profit or its illusion can be created, these guys do it. They go home satisfied, together, back to their exclusive world and they don't know how much Pinekatz wants to cut them.

    Its why I turned off business news to use as white noise in my office. Its value was less than that.
     Reply
    Edited by Pinekatz at 07/10/09 3:34 AM Pinekatz was starred Pinekatz was unstarred
    Image of ChillbearLatrigue ChillbearLatrigue
    07/10/09

    In reply to Wall Street Journal Editor's Newsroom Dig At Fox News
    I understand that Thomson is also bringing back the tradition of "droit de cuissage" - the right of editors to take the new brides of employees' to their beds on their wedding nights.
     Reply
    ChillbearLatrigue was starred ChillbearLatrigue was unstarred
    Image of Tremonius Tremonius
    05/28/09

    In reply to News Corp. Would Like to Renew Its MySpace Deal with 'Parasite' Google
    I'm trying to think how I would intone with a straight face "I'm not worried. After all, I'm only going to lose maybe half my revenue."


    News Corpse needs to negotiate a "lucrative ad deal" with Facebook.

     Reply
    Tremonius was starred Tremonius was unstarred
    Image of Krashstar Krashstar
    05/28/09

    @Tremonius: Perhaps their margins are north of 50%?


    It's not impossible, given what an awesome product they've got, and how famously devoted their customers are.


    Oh wait...

     Reply
    Krashstar was starred Krashstar was unstarred
    Image of Pope John Peeps II Pope John Peeps II
    05/28/09

    In reply to News Corp. Would Like to Renew Its MySpace Deal with 'Parasite' Google
    Look at that. Even his HANDS are jowly. Ewwww.ww.
     Reply
    Pope John Peeps II was starred Pope John Peeps II was unstarred
    Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion

Login

Enter your username and password.

Please enter a username.
Please enter your password.
logging in
Login via Facebook | Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Reset Password

Please enter your email address to have your password reset.

Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
requesting password reset

Register

Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.

Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.

Please enter a username.
Please enter a password.
Please confirm your password.
Passwords are not identical.
Please enter a valid email address.
registration sent, waiting for reply

Submit Your Comment

You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.

See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.

Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
logging in

Login with your Facebook or Gawker account.

Sign up here.



  • Archives
  • About
  • Advertising
  • Legal
  • Help
  • Report a Bug
  • FAQ
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.