You make no sense. You said that if Palin didn't write the post, that "leads one to pretty much dismiss all of the points it attempts to make." It does? Why? You admit it is thoroughly researched, logical and well written. Is the argument less valid if someone else wrote it? I call an ad hominem.
@SuhinaCalydon: Well, it sounds like she is a person whose ability to communicate sophisticated ideas is highly questionable is passing someone else's ideas and writing off as her own. In most formal settings such as school or a journal that would get the argument dismissed. On the other hand, the fact that she did not write it may make it more worthy of attention rather than less since she is kind of stupid.
@zissoublue: No president does. It is a matter of time limitation as much as anything else. That is why nobody jumps on presidents for not writing their own speeches. Plus Obama is rather famously smart enough to communicate sophisticated ideas, writers or not.
@SuhinaCalydon: A good point. I think Palin, I mean her Facebook writer, is trying to dazzle everyone with research capabilities and crossed t's and such...and embedded quotes! It's like she's trying to be a smart, hand-gesturing lawyer at the end of an LMC movie.
Too bad the point she's making is crap. So old people have consultations about what sort of care they want to keep receiving, or not receive. What's the big deal? It's not a "death panel." People hear "death panel," and they think a government committee will decide if someone can live or die, and that's not true here.
i just went over to her facebook page to read the note (i cant believe i never visited that before! comedy gold!) and started clicking through some of the profiles of the people urging her to run for president and, surprise! a lot of them don't seem like real people. examples:
[www.facebook.com]
[www.facebook.com]
they're just liking everything and constantly writing insane shit on her wall.
Fortunately, even if someone gave her this in the form of a prepared speech, she couldn't possibly deliver it. In fact, I'd like to see that happen: "Read this aloud, Sarah. Can you tell us what it means?" Where's Katie Couric when you need her?
What sick country am I living in where a Maverick Governor gives up her seat so she can just toll away the hours on Facebook? This is the hope for the poor white people in America?
The insurance companies have found uneducated and ill-informed numnuts to further their agenda and SP decided she wanted a first-class seat on the wrong-way train so she hired someone to put her "thoughts' out there for the sheep-like masses.
When I am appointed to the death panels, they will be the first to go.
Alternate theory: she got lucky. Kind of how those million monkeys banging on a million typewriters producing a Shakespearesque play in a million years.
@johnny_carsick: ugh, that's gonna get filed under "nightmare fodder" in my brain- hundreds of thousands of sarah palins writing hundreds of thousands of sarah palin soundbytes.
@HurtsSoGood:
Thanks to the Internet, we now know that not even a billion monkeys banging on a billion typewriters can produce anything like a single good line from a Shakeaspeare play.
Let me introduce you to the TM patented-pending Devil's Avocado method for filtering uncharacteristically eloquent documents purportedly written by brain-addled, illiterate imbeciles.
Step 1: remove all text enclosed within quotation marks. Result: in this instance, 351 words are reduced to 152 words.
Step 2: Google key passages or phrases from the remaining 'original' text; in this instance: "medicare advance care planning consultation coercive effect". Result: Google result number five, being the first after four expressly referencing the Palin Facebook quote: "Rush Limbaugh has falsely claimed that seniors would be subject to "[m]andatory counseling" at "a minimum of every five years, more often if the seasoned citizen is sick or in a nursing home." He added, "That's an invasion of the right to privacy." Washington Examiner chief political correspondent Byron York falsely claimed on Fox News' Fox & Friends that the bill "says that there will be consultation between a caregiver and a patient to discuss things like hospice care and other issues -- other end-of-life issues," which he claimed raised the question of "whether there's any coercive element to this."
A poor example of cobbling. The lazy plagiarist's best friend.
@DevilsAvocado: After reading your comment, I am now sorta, kinda looking forward to her book being published. We should throw a "Ghostwriter Filtering" party! I make a mean party dip.
But whoever it is, their being enlisted to perform these services is obviously part of a diabolical plan to rehabilitate Palin's image as a staggering dipshit.
Just wait until she gets a Twitter account again, then everyone can see what an idiot she is regardless of all the carefully ghostwritten wordcraft.
"With all due respect" was the tipoff for me. She's not big on giving due respect to anything that doesn't fit into her narrow, uninformed little worldview. Remember what she said about community organizing?
08/13/09
08/13/09
08/13/09
08/13/09
08/13/09
08/13/09
08/13/09
Too bad the point she's making is crap. So old people have consultations about what sort of care they want to keep receiving, or not receive. What's the big deal? It's not a "death panel." People hear "death panel," and they think a government committee will decide if someone can live or die, and that's not true here.
Fucking Sarah Palin.
08/13/09
[www.facebook.com]
[www.facebook.com]
they're just liking everything and constantly writing insane shit on her wall.
08/13/09
08/13/09
08/13/09
08/13/09
When I am appointed to the death panels, they will be the first to go.
08/13/09
08/13/09
08/13/09
08/13/09
08/13/09
Thanks to the Internet, we now know that not even a billion monkeys banging on a billion typewriters can produce anything like a single good line from a Shakeaspeare play.
08/13/09
Step 1: remove all text enclosed within quotation marks. Result: in this instance, 351 words are reduced to 152 words.
Step 2: Google key passages or phrases from the remaining 'original' text; in this instance: "medicare advance care planning consultation coercive effect". Result: Google result number five, being the first after four expressly referencing the Palin Facebook quote: "Rush Limbaugh has falsely claimed that seniors would be subject to "[m]andatory counseling" at "a minimum of every five years, more often if the seasoned citizen is sick or in a nursing home." He added, "That's an invasion of the right to privacy." Washington Examiner chief political correspondent Byron York falsely claimed on Fox News' Fox & Friends that the bill "says that there will be consultation between a caregiver and a patient to discuss things like hospice care and other issues -- other end-of-life issues," which he claimed raised the question of "whether there's any coercive element to this."
A poor example of cobbling. The lazy plagiarist's best friend.
08/13/09
08/13/09
08/13/09
Just wait until she gets a Twitter account again, then everyone can see what an idiot she is regardless of all the carefully ghostwritten wordcraft.
08/13/09
08/13/09
08/13/09
Yes.
[signed - indentured acolyte]
pp. Devil's Avocado
08/13/09
08/13/09
08/13/09