• Profile logout login

#rumormonger#dinerfranchisecorporationcompanyhistoryhtml

Gawker

Share Cancel
   
Upload an image | Add an image URL
×

logging in
  • FAQ. Include # before tag:
  • #tips,
  • #stalker,
  • #opencaption,
  • #internalmemos,
  • etc.

New York, 6:35 PM
Tue Dec 1
55 posts in the last 24 hours

Team

Tip Your Editors:

Tipline: 646-214-8138

Editor-in-Chief:
Gabriel Snyder |

West Coast Editor:
Richard Rushfield |

Contributing Editors:

Valleywag:
Ryan Tate |

Media:
Hamilton Nolan |

Politics:
Alex Pareene |

Investigations:
John Cook |

Entertainment:
Brian Moylan |

Nights:
Adrian Chen |
Azaria Jagger |
Ravi Somaiya |

Weekends:
Foster Kamer |

Video Editor:
Richard Blakeley |

SUBSCRIBE TO Gawker RSS

New: Breaking news and daily top stories via email
4260 Subscribers
Gawker
  • Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.
    Dsmvwl  Admin  Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×
    Image of Spirit Fingers Spirit Fingers
    05:44 PM

    In reply to Rumor: Us Weekly Pays Big For Tiger Woods Girl #2
    "Tiger, you do know the Gosselins, Jon and Kate, don't you? No? Here, let me introduce you."

    Welcome, Tiger and wife, to the non-abating news cycle for the next month at least... expect revelations, tearful denials, fervent protestations, and someone wailing, "And what about the children?!"

    Yes, a mighty thing you've done for publishing this Holiday season. Jingle-Bell Balls in Your Face!
     Reply
    Spirit Fingers was starred Spirit Fingers was unstarred
    Image of mimigoliath mimigoliath
    05:26 PM

    In reply to Rumor: Us Weekly Pays Big For Tiger Woods Girl #2
    Isn't 24 too young to have a facelift? Her eyebrows are in the freaking ionosphere.
     Reply
    mimigoliath was starred mimigoliath was unstarred
    Image of lobstr lobstr
    05:11 PM

    In reply to Rumor: Us Weekly Pays Big For Tiger Woods Girl #2
    Incomprehensible to think he'd go for that unattractive piece of trash over the rather hot Swedish wife. Golfers..
     Reply
    lobstr was starred lobstr was unstarred
    Image of heywhat heywhat
    06:16 PM

    @lobstr: Agreed. Would it kill Tiger to have a hot mistress? How hard can it be to find an attractive piece of ass?
     Reply
    Edited by heywhat at 12/01/09 6:17 PM heywhat was starred heywhat was unstarred
    Image of Brad Brown Brad Brown
    04:52 PM

    In reply to Rumor: Us Weekly Pays Big For Tiger Woods Girl #2
    As Kwanzaa Charlie Brown would say, that girl has more clap than an auditorium.
     Reply
    Brad Brown was starred Brad Brown was unstarred
    Image of A Message To Rudy A Message To Rudy
    04:51 PM

    In reply to Rumor: Us Weekly Pays Big For Tiger Woods Girl #2
    Very rarely do you see the words "24 year-old cocktail waitress" in a news story without the word "affair" nearby.
     Reply
    A Message To Rudy was starred A Message To Rudy was unstarred
    Image of BookishLookish BookishLookish
    04:53 PM

    @A Message To Rudy: Those daring young bitches should just be fitted with chastity belts from the get-go.
     Reply
    BookishLookish was starred BookishLookish was unstarred
    Image of A Message To Rudy A Message To Rudy
    05:03 PM

    @BookishLookish: Actually, I was trying to suggest that it's the guys who get themselves in trouble by always courting the aforementioned 24 year-old cocktail waitresses.
     Reply
    A Message To Rudy was starred A Message To Rudy was unstarred
    Image of noonecaresowen noonecaresowen
    05:08 PM

    @A Message To Rudy: And of course she spells her name "Jaimee".
     Reply
    A Message To Rudy promoted this comment noonecaresowen was starred noonecaresowen was unstarred
    Image of A Message To Rudy A Message To Rudy
    05:13 PM

    @noonecaresowen: And yet "Grubs" only has one "B". Go figure.
     Reply
    A Message To Rudy was starred A Message To Rudy was unstarred
    Image of pollyannacowgirl pollyannacowgirl
    04:49 PM

    In reply to Rumor: Us Weekly Pays Big For Tiger Woods Girl #2
    I have a feeling that we're going to be hearing from Rachel U, and this time, she's going to admit to being Tiger's hooer. These bimbos can't STAND being upstaged.

    *rubs hands gleefully*
     Reply
    Little Green Frog (Wise Latina) promoted this comment pollyannacowgirl was starred pollyannacowgirl was unstarred
    Image of ArtfulSlinger ArtfulSlinger
    04:49 PM

    In reply to Rumor: Us Weekly Pays Big For Tiger Woods Girl #2
    This chick was from the first season of Tool Academy, who was there with her fake boyfriend, so I can only assume she was trolling for money the whole time!!!!
     Reply
    ArtfulSlinger was starred ArtfulSlinger was unstarred
    Image of Matt Cherette Matt Cherette
    04:48 PM

    In reply to Rumor: Us Weekly Pays Big For Tiger Woods Girl #2
    Seeing that TMZ comment makes me crave the return of the "The Unapproved" feature even more. Can we please bring it back? Hell, I'll even do it.
     Reply
    Matt Cherette was starred Matt Cherette was unstarred
    Image of m4ximusprim3 m4ximusprim3
    04:39 PM

    In reply to Rumor: Us Weekly Pays Big For Tiger Woods Girl #2
    The most amazing thing is that Tiger is allowing this to occur. He's on track to be the first athlete to bank one billion dollars - and people are getting these contracts for $150,000?

    If I were him, every woman who has ever touched the 1-wood would immediately get a million dollars and a legally binding non-disclosure agreement, or they'd end up at the bottom of a very deep lake.

    I've said it before and I'll say it again: He's handling this all wrong.
     Reply
    m4ximusprim3 was starred m4ximusprim3 was unstarred
    Image of momof3wildkids momof3wildkids
    04:52 PM

    @m4ximusprim3: You're right. He should have allowed the interview with the FHP to go forward. The less disclosure the more shit will fly in to fill the void. (e.g. picture of rather whorish woman above)
     Reply
    Edited by momof3wildkids at 12/01/09 4:53 PM momof3wildkids was starred momof3wildkids was unstarred
    Image of resipsaloquacious resipsaloquacious
    05:04 PM

    @momof3wildkids:

    He's handling it as perfect as one could. There appears to be no chance for arrest, for he or his wife. Continue with the no comment, no comment, no comment. This is the only chance the story will die.

    Media loves to argue that if he just tells the truth, this will all die down. Bullshit. If he says nothing he has a much better chance that it will all die down. If the mistresses come out of the wood work, they are coming out of the work -- there is nothing he can do to stop it. Attempting to get ahead of the story by admitting to the affairs is a sucker's bet, one that will not work and one that the media hopes he takes.

    If there are mistresses out there and they want airtime they will get airtime, regardless of whether Tiger admits to his affairs or not.
     Reply
    resipsaloquacious was starred resipsaloquacious was unstarred
    Image of GregorMendel GregorMendel
    05:21 PM

    @resipsaloquacious: He is trying to keep his wife out of the pokey salad weeds. If she hit him, he cannot hide behind the 5th to protect her.
     Reply
    resipsaloquacious promoted this comment GregorMendel was starred GregorMendel was unstarred
    Image of resipsaloquacious resipsaloquacious
    05:27 PM

    @GregorMendel:

    From the reports, it seems he achieved his goal. I call that a win. Who mentioned the 5th Amendment? It concerns self-incrimination. The more relevant issue would be Florida's law on whether the state can force a spouse to testify against his/her will against his/her spouse, which I do not know.
     Reply
    resipsaloquacious was starred resipsaloquacious was unstarred
    Image of m4ximusprim3 m4ximusprim3
    05:36 PM

    @resipsaloquacious: I'm with you on the "no comment" thing - his business is his business, and admitting to an affair is not going to appease the vultures.

    I just can't believe someone with his money and influence can't corrall some fugly bitches, especially when his public image is worth something like $80-$90 million a year. 5 million to silence some road meat seems like a pittance.
     Reply
    Edited by m4ximusprim3 at 12/01/09 5:37 PM m4ximusprim3 was starred m4ximusprim3 was unstarred
    Image of GregorMendel GregorMendel
    05:41 PM

    @resipsaloquacious: When this all started, my legal brethren were all a-flutter about the fact that Tiger did not have to talk to the police as we are all protected by the 5th amendment. The difference, however, is that if he is in no danger of self-incrimination he can be compelled to talk to them. And spousal privilege does not apply in domestic violence cases in the vast majority of states.
     Reply
    GregorMendel was starred GregorMendel was unstarred
    Image of GregorMendel GregorMendel
    05:42 PM

    @m4ximusprim3: Win.
     Reply
    m4ximusprim3 promoted this comment GregorMendel was starred GregorMendel was unstarred
    Image of m4ximusprim3 m4ximusprim3
    05:46 PM

    @GregorMendel: Thanks! I don't know anything about the legal aspects of it, but as a practical matter, it seems like someone with nearly unlimited financial resources could do a better job at damage control.
     Reply
    m4ximusprim3 was starred m4ximusprim3 was unstarred
    Image of resipsaloquacious resipsaloquacious
    05:54 PM

    @GregorMendel:

    The police/DA cannot establish probable cause to file a domestic violence charge (as the hospital reports cannot support such a claim). Tiger will not file a report against his wife for abuse. Therefore, Tiger will not have to testify in Court. The legal aspect of this story appears over.
     Reply
    resipsaloquacious was starred resipsaloquacious was unstarred
    Image of resipsaloquacious resipsaloquacious
    05:58 PM

    @m4ximusprim3:

    We are on the same page.

    But there is a risk in drafting a "road meat" non-disclosure agreement. If such an agreement became public, then, he would have serious sponsor issues.

    The lesson for the young, insanely wealthy and uber-famous: don't get married. See Jeter, Derek.
     Reply
    resipsaloquacious was starred resipsaloquacious was unstarred
    Image of RollsRoyceRevenge RollsRoyceRevenge
    03:40 PM

    In reply to Rush Sets Wedding Date!
    I, for one, wish nothing but the best for Rush's fourth marriage.

    And his fifth, sixth, seventh and--who knows?--eighth marriages.
     Reply
    RollsRoyceRevenge was starred RollsRoyceRevenge was unstarred
    Image of mimigoliath mimigoliath
    09:20 AM

    In reply to Rush Sets Wedding Date!
    Gross.
     Reply
    mimigoliath was starred mimigoliath was unstarred
    Image of Lysergic Asset Lysergic Asset
    11/30/09

    In reply to Rush Sets Wedding Date!
    Wait, Limbaugh reads this site? My God, think of how much more thoroughly believable* bullshit we could get him to believe. Come on, people!

    *(to gullible blowhards with no fact-check department)
     Reply
    Lysergic Asset was starred Lysergic Asset was unstarred
    Image of benjwah004 benjwah004
    12:21 AM

    @Lysergic Asset: Do you reckon Rush knows about Glenn Becks terrible secret from 1990?
     Reply
    Lysergic Asset promoted this comment benjwah004 was starred benjwah004 was unstarred
    Image of Lysergic Asset Lysergic Asset
    12:29 AM

    @benjwah004: The back electrolysis or the naked housecleaning?
     Reply
    Lysergic Asset was starred Lysergic Asset was unstarred
    Image of benjwah004 benjwah004
    12:55 AM

    @Lysergic Asset: Ewww.... Back electrolysis? That's heavy.
    I was referring to the gay porno he starred in with Zombie Transvestite Carrie Prejean (w/ special guest Zombie Nixon).
     Reply
    benjwah004 was starred benjwah004 was unstarred
    Image of Lysergic Asset Lysergic Asset
    12:57 AM

    @benjwah004: Ha - there really is no limit to the possible scenarios we could envisiom.
     Reply
    Lysergic Asset was starred Lysergic Asset was unstarred
    Image of BettyCrocker BettyCrocker
    11/30/09

    In reply to Rush Sets Wedding Date!
    The only thing worse than imagining sexin' with Rush is imagining his bedfarts, of which there are surely aplenty.

    He and Andrea Peyser would make a great couple, though.
     Reply
    BettyCrocker was starred BettyCrocker was unstarred
    Image of Lysergic Asset Lysergic Asset
    11/30/09

    @BettyCrocker: She likes the ladies, remember? [gawker.com]
     Reply
    Lysergic Asset was starred Lysergic Asset was unstarred
    Image of onebadclam onebadclam
    11/30/09

    In reply to Rush Sets Wedding Date!
    And he has the gall to call gay marriage an abomination.
     Reply
    onebadclam was starred onebadclam was unstarred
    Image of unclevanya unclevanya
    11/30/09

    In reply to Rush Sets Wedding Date!
    She won the ring by bidding the lowest pre-nup settlement figure in the silent auction.

    To paraphrase the great Judy Tenuta: "Didja ever get married to someone because you were too lazy to commit suicide?"
     Reply
    unclevanya was starred unclevanya was unstarred
    Image of JudyPaceFace JudyPaceFace
    02:05 AM

    @unclevanya:
    God help me, I'm inappropriately laughing at work
     Reply
    unclevanya promoted this comment JudyPaceFace was starred JudyPaceFace was unstarred
    Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion

Login

Enter your username and password.

Please enter a username.
Please enter your password.
logging in
Login via Facebook | Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Reset Password

Please enter your email address to have your password reset.

Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
requesting password reset

Register

Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.

Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.

Please enter a username.
Please enter a password.
Please confirm your password.
Passwords are not identical.
Please enter a valid email address.
registration sent, waiting for reply

Submit Your Comment

You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.

See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.

Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
logging in

Login with your Facebook or Gawker account.

Sign up here.



  • Archives
  • About
  • Advertising
  • Legal
  • Help
  • Report a Bug
  • FAQ
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.