"if people want to enjoy a fundamental baseline of serious news media in this country, they will have to pay for it, somehow."
I agree with this, but feel like it misses a larger point. This isn't exactly the full picture of how it worked during the heyday of print journalism, is it? Subscriptions made up a small percentage of revenue, but the rest was comprised mainly of advertising and classifieds. There really is no successful subscription-only media model that has ever worked, as far as I know.
You still have to figure out some sort of successful advertising model to complete the picture.
But.... unless I'm missing something, while the original links won't turn up on Google, any story of any real interest will be linked to by a host of of blogs and other sites and the stories will therefore end up on google anyway.
It just means that if I'm searching for a Wall Street Journal story I'll just have to first click on some business blog that's linked to it.
When I was a child, movie theater marquees were emblazoned with the slogan 'STOP PAY TV!" That didn't work, and pay TV seems to be doing just fine. #newscorporation
The death of print is not a good thing, nor is it progress. The internet itself is not free. You don't have to pay to browse titles at a newsstand. We don't yet have the answer to the question: what replaces print news?
People are NOT meant to sit and stare at electronic screens all day. They just aren't. #newscorporation
@unclevanya: Honestly with the advent of E-paper like Kindle, I don't think the difference between reading news on paper versus screens will be very big. #newscorporation
@ostartero: NASA spent millions developing a pen that would write in space. The Russians took pencils.
The story may be apocryphal, but the lesson isn't. People who still can't access (or afford) the internet or own digital cable still have no idea what a Kindle is, or why it is allegedly better than picking up a newspaper or book.
Whether or not people say they're going to pay is irrelevant. The will pay, and it'll just be some tough shit if they don't want to. Because they won't have anything to look at otherwise.
That's the great thing about being a media mogul. You can make people do stuff "just 'cuz".
Also, it needs to be reiterated every time this story appears on this site (which is maybe two or three times a week), Gawker has a vested interest in content not going behind a paywall. Articles like these are opinion pieces more than anything resembling journalism (I know, it's Gawker, journalism doesn't come into it). #newscorporation
11/24/09
I agree with this, but feel like it misses a larger point. This isn't exactly the full picture of how it worked during the heyday of print journalism, is it? Subscriptions made up a small percentage of revenue, but the rest was comprised mainly of advertising and classifieds. There really is no successful subscription-only media model that has ever worked, as far as I know.
You still have to figure out some sort of successful advertising model to complete the picture.
11/24/09
It just means that if I'm searching for a Wall Street Journal story I'll just have to first click on some business blog that's linked to it.
11/24/09
11/19/09
11/19/09
11/19/09
11/19/09
11/19/09
11/19/09
11/19/09
11/19/09
11/19/09
11/19/09
I am sorry last night I said you fuck wombats.
I retract the statement.
Harmless petting is as far as it ever went, I'm sure.
RRR
11/19/09
11/18/09
11/17/09
People are NOT meant to sit and stare at electronic screens all day. They just aren't. #newscorporation
11/17/09
11/17/09
The story may be apocryphal, but the lesson isn't. People who still can't access (or afford) the internet or own digital cable still have no idea what a Kindle is, or why it is allegedly better than picking up a newspaper or book.
11/17/09
That's the great thing about being a media mogul. You can make people do stuff "just 'cuz".
Also, it needs to be reiterated every time this story appears on this site (which is maybe two or three times a week), Gawker has a vested interest in content not going behind a paywall. Articles like these are opinion pieces more than anything resembling journalism (I know, it's Gawker, journalism doesn't come into it). #newscorporation
11/18/09