• Profile logout login

#scarysadshaws#discussed

Gawker

Share Cancel
   
Upload an image | Add an image URL
×

logging in
  • FAQ. Include # before tag:
  • #tips,
  • #stalker,
  • #opencaption,
  • #internalmemos,
  • etc.

New York, 8:32 AM
Fri Dec 11
59 posts in the last 24 hours

Team

Tip Your Editors:

Tipline: 646-214-8138

Editor-in-Chief:
Gabriel Snyder |

West Coast Editor:
Richard Rushfield |

Contributing Editors:

Valleywag:
Ryan Tate |

Media:
Hamilton Nolan |

Politics:
Alex Pareene |

Investigations:
John Cook |

Entertainment:
Brian Moylan |

Nights:
Adrian Chen |
Azaria Jagger |
Ravi Somaiya |

Weekends:
Foster Kamer |

Video Editor:
Richard Blakeley |

SUBSCRIBE TO Gawker RSS

New: Breaking news and daily top stories via email
4260 Subscribers
Gawker
  • Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.
    Dsmvwl  Admin  Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×
    Image of VoxPopuli VoxPopuli
    02/06/09

    In reply to Even More Depressing 'Sex and the City' Sequel Coming
    I have a new-found respect for Menudo. At least they knew when to add fresh blood.
     Reply
    VoxPopuli was starred VoxPopuli was unstarred
    Image of VoxPopuli VoxPopuli
    02/06/09

    @VoxPopuli: Oh, wait, never mind.


     Reply
    VoxPopuli was starred VoxPopuli was unstarred
    Image of Steverino Begins Steverino Begins
    02/05/09

    In reply to Even More Depressing 'Sex and the City' Sequel Coming
    The most preposterous thing about the first movie was the way they tortured Carrie so needlessly. He stands her up at the altar, she takes like 2 years to move on with her life, and then suddenly everything's okay again? (Sorry, spoiler.) It felt like the entire series "condensed" into 2.5 hours and revealed the weird masochistic undertones of the whole show. Now they've backed themselves into a corner; if there's more "Big trouble" it'll feel like a retread. If the conflict is just having and dealing with a kid or something, it'll be boring. Get yourself out of that one, Michael Patrick King.


    I know, I've thought about this way too much. I watched the first one while home sick on Dayquil.

     Reply
    Steverino Begins was starred Steverino Begins was unstarred
    Image of badasscat badasscat
    02/05/09

    In reply to Even More Depressing 'Sex and the City' Sequel Coming
    My wife forced me to sit and watch the first one with her. Guess what? Not even she could make it through the first ten minutes.
     Reply
    badasscat was starred badasscat was unstarred
    Image of PikaDar Brisetout PikaDar Brisetout
    02/05/09

    In reply to Even More Depressing 'Sex and the City' Sequel Coming
    I have never seen one episode of the show or even the movie. What does this mean, I ask you?!
     Reply
    PikaDar Brisetout was starred PikaDar Brisetout was unstarred
    Image of Wrapitup Wrapitup
    02/06/09

    @PikaDar❂Queen of the Tamagotchi: It means you'll never get to find out if you're a Carrie, a Melinda, a whats-her-name brunette, or some PR blonde lady named Sam. Because of this, you'll have no way to introduce yourself when you meet SATC fans and they say "OMG! I"m so totally a ___".
     Reply
    Wrapitup was starred Wrapitup was unstarred
    Image of Wrapitup Wrapitup
    02/05/09

    In reply to Even More Depressing 'Sex and the City' Sequel Coming
    Now we finally have something to look forward to when the Depression hits.
     Reply
    Wrapitup was starred Wrapitup was unstarred
    Image of unclevanya unclevanya
    02/06/09

    @Wrapitup: Indeed. Michael Patrick King will be the new Edna Ferber, penning frothy comedies about people with lives all of us Poors can only dream of having.


    Who else will be at the Algonquin Roundtable II?

     Reply
    unclevanya was starred unclevanya was unstarred
    Image of shostakobitch shostakobitch
    02/05/09

    In reply to Even More Depressing 'Sex and the City' Sequel Coming
    This installment is going to reboot the franchise. Gotham is much darker and more brooding, main characters die, there is no "Robin" and when Samantha takes it in the shitter the resulting mess ruins a $12,000 couch - and there are closeups of the whole thing from the jokes about the meatpacking district all the way to the grunting, sad denouement.
     Reply
    shostakobitch was starred shostakobitch was unstarred
    Image of Seeräuber Jenny Seeräuber Jenny
    02/05/09

    @shostakobitch:


    Looking for Mr. Grossbar.

     Reply
    Seeräuber Jenny was starred Seeräuber Jenny was unstarred
    Image of shostakobitch shostakobitch
    02/05/09

    @Seeräuber Jenny: Maybe Tuesday Weld can play a high-end furniture store owner when they go to replace the couch.
     Reply
    shostakobitch was starred shostakobitch was unstarred
    Image of misslinda misslinda
    02/05/09

    In reply to Even More Depressing 'Sex and the City' Sequel Coming
    Oh god no, this is a really bad idea! Every year in real life is like 5 years on a lady-over-40's skin! That movie won't get made for at least 3 years, and by that time, those ladies are gonna look a hot mess on the big screen, especially that horsie one. *shudder*
     Reply
    misslinda was starred misslinda was unstarred
    Image of Private Hangnail Private Hangnail
    02/05/09

    In reply to Even More Depressing 'Sex and the City' Sequel Coming
    This will be a relief for those people who cannot understand plot unless it's explained in voiceover. I can imagine they feel somewhat cheated and confused when searching for entertainments.
     Reply
    Private Hangnail was starred Private Hangnail was unstarred
    Image of sample032 sample032
    02/05/09

    @Private Hangnail: Oh, I understood. What bugged me was how one-dimensional the sugar daddy boyfriend was. They could have cast a broken ATM to play his role.
     Reply
    sample032 was starred sample032 was unstarred
    Image of saythatscool saythatscool
    02/05/09

    @sample032: @Private Hangnail: Now see folks? This is how it's done. Take some fuckin' notes from the masters and get to work.
     Reply
    saythatscool was starred saythatscool was unstarred
    Image of MrInBetween MrInBetween
    02/05/09

    In reply to Even More Depressing 'Sex and the City' Sequel Coming
    I'd love it if Joan Rivers co-starred in the sequel and acted as if she was a 40-something puma, and the four aging ladies all acted as if Joan was their age (and it would be even better if all the young guys thought Joan was the hottest, making Samantha, in particular, rage with jealousy). The filmmakers won't do it, of course, but such a film would do boffo box office because the haters, every last one of them, would pay to see it at least three times.
     Reply
    MrInBetween was starred MrInBetween was unstarred
    Image of Beausoleil Beausoleil
    02/05/09

    In reply to Even More Depressing 'Sex and the City' Sequel Coming
    Dude, can anyone get a hardon for these hags anymore?
     Reply
    Beausoleil was starred Beausoleil was unstarred
    Image of sample032 sample032
    02/05/09

    @Beausoleil: The brunette's still OK.
     Reply
    sample032 was starred sample032 was unstarred
    Image of Beausoleil Beausoleil
    02/05/09

    @sample032: Yeah, you're right. But the plastic surgical nose is a little rough on the eyes. Byt, yeah, point taken.
     Reply
    Beausoleil was starred Beausoleil was unstarred
    Image of Jenmcb Jenmcb
    02/06/09

    @Beausoleil: they don't have nosejobs....


    find a more pertinent subject to joke about

     Reply
    Jenmcb was starred Jenmcb was unstarred
    Image of unclevanya unclevanya
    02/06/09

    @Jenmcb: Lighten up, Facebook.
     Reply
    unclevanya was starred unclevanya was unstarred
    Image of BullfightsOnAcid BullfightsOnAcid
    02/05/09

    In reply to Even More Depressing 'Sex and the City' Sequel Coming
     Reply
    BullfightsOnAcid was starred BullfightsOnAcid was unstarred
    Image of Dickdogfood Dickdogfood
    02/05/09

    In reply to Even More Depressing 'Sex and the City' Sequel Coming
    I won't be satisfied until the sequel comes out where they're all crazy cat ladies.
     Reply
    Dickdogfood was starred Dickdogfood was unstarred
    Image of MAGGIEBETH MAGGIEBETH
    02/05/09

    @Dickdogfood: Yes! Because older single women deserve barren, barren feline loneliness. Get a man, losers!
     Reply
    MAGGIEBETH was starred MAGGIEBETH was unstarred
    Image of Dickdogfood Dickdogfood
    02/05/09

    @MAGGIEBETH: I can't see how my loathing for these four fictional characters is exactly equivalent to a loathing for older single women in general, especially since they're hardly representative (as if any four fictional characters could be, of course).
     Reply
    Dickdogfood was starred Dickdogfood was unstarred
    Image of everfade everfade
    02/05/09

    In reply to Even More Depressing 'Sex and the City' Sequel Coming
    They are the new Golden Girls.
     Reply
    everfade was starred everfade was unstarred
    Image of leonleonleon leonleonleon
    02/05/09

    @everfade:Yea more like the new Golden Shower Girls HA! piss jokes
     Reply
    leonleonleon was starred leonleonleon was unstarred
    Image of The One The One
    02/05/09

    @everfade: Well, pretty soon the SATC sequel can double as a Golden Girls reunion.
     Reply
    The One was starred The One was unstarred
    Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion

Login

Enter your username and password.

Please enter a username.
Please enter your password.
logging in
Login via Facebook | Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Reset Password

Please enter your email address to have your password reset.

Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
requesting password reset

Register

Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.

Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.

Please enter a username.
Please enter a password.
Please confirm your password.
Passwords are not identical.
Please enter a valid email address.
registration sent, waiting for reply

Submit Your Comment

You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.

See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.

Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
logging in

Login with your Facebook or Gawker account.

Sign up here.



  • Archives
  • About
  • Advertising
  • Legal
  • Help
  • Report a Bug
  • FAQ
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.