• Profile logout login

#scarysadshaws#popular

Gawker

Share Cancel
   
Upload an image | Add an image URL
×

logging in
  • FAQ. Include # before tag:
  • #tips,
  • #stalker,
  • #opencaption,
  • #internalmemos,
  • etc.

New York, 7:50 AM
Mon Dec 7
15 posts in the last 24 hours

Team

Tip Your Editors:

Tipline: 646-214-8138

Editor-in-Chief:
Gabriel Snyder |

West Coast Editor:
Richard Rushfield |

Contributing Editors:

Valleywag:
Ryan Tate |

Media:
Hamilton Nolan |

Politics:
Alex Pareene |

Investigations:
John Cook |

Entertainment:
Brian Moylan |

Nights:
Adrian Chen |
Azaria Jagger |
Ravi Somaiya |

Weekends:
Foster Kamer |

Video Editor:
Richard Blakeley |

SUBSCRIBE TO Gawker RSS

New: Breaking news and daily top stories via email
4260 Subscribers
Gawker
  • Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.

    Dsmvwl  Admin  Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×
    Image of Novaload Novaload
    10/31/09

    In reply to Nobody Loves Weepy VP Joe
    Biden was the most inscrutable choice, ever, for VP. Instead of "change" Obama brought out an old hack, who had trouble with both truth telling, even during the campaign, and with inserting his foot into his mouth. Oh, to know what kind of negotiation that was, to get him on the ticket---except, perhaps to allay terrified old white guys who feared a woman and a (half)black man on the ticket would bring on the apocalypse. #joebiden
     Reply
    Novaload was starred Novaload was unstarred
    Image of Thistledew Thistledew
    10/30/09

    In reply to Nobody Loves Weepy VP Joe
    apparently I am in the minority, but I love Joe Biden! I think he's like the lovable Steve Urkel of the White House. He comes in, says stupid stuff, knocks shit over, and is like "Did I do that?" Oh Joe. #joebiden
     Reply
    applejuice promoted this comment Thistledew was starred Thistledew was unstarred
    Image of ModestProposal ModestProposal
    10/30/09

    In reply to Nobody Loves Weepy VP Joe
    Joe Biden is everything thats wrong and fucked up with congress. This dope won his seat in the Senate when he was 29 and has never had another job until being VP. He has learned about as much about how the country works from his perch in DC as Palin learned about Russia from staring at it. He is walking proof we need term limits.

    And he doesn't drink. I don't trust people who don't drink, unless they've already been alcoholics. #joebiden
     Reply
    ModestProposal was starred ModestProposal was unstarred
    Image of Motoko Kusanagi Motoko Kusanagi
    10/30/09

    In reply to Nobody Loves Weepy VP Joe
    Why is it that I feel compelled to defend Gawker's subject matter against the editors/writers at least once a day lately?

    Either this new crop of staff writers is utterly fucked, or the editorial direction has taken a nosedive, or both.

    Is there some negative correlation between the quality of stories and the quality of AJAX/CSS? #joebiden
     Reply
    Motoko Kusanagi was starred Motoko Kusanagi was unstarred
    Image of romulus romulus
    10/30/09

    @Motoko Kusanagi: From where I'm standing, it would appear to be a positive correlation. It's a good day when I get tripped up by fewer than five unresponsive scripts, infinite waits for comments to load or what have you. #joebiden
     Reply
    Motoko Kusanagi promoted this comment romulus was starred romulus was unstarred
    Image of Motoko Kusanagi Motoko Kusanagi
    10/30/09

    @romulus: The site gets prettier, and the content gets lamer. Just callin it as I see it. #joebiden
     Reply
    Motoko Kusanagi was starred Motoko Kusanagi was unstarred
    Image of romulus romulus
    10/30/09

    @Motoko Kusanagi: Oh yeah, I didn't mean to quibble. I agree that the site gets fancier all the time, but features seem to break often. I should have added before that it could well be my OS and browser causing headaches most readers don't experience. And in all fairness, I haven't been reading long enough to judge contemporary content against the past. #joebiden
     Reply
    romulus was starred romulus was unstarred
    Image of meerkat meerkat
    10/30/09

    In reply to Nobody Loves Weepy VP Joe
    Not sure what point you're trying to make, Amrita... that you think Cheney's worldview makes some sense? That Cheney was initially popular, before everything he did brought his popularity rating to a low of 28%? I love it that Biden is willing to call a moron a moron. This is a ridiculous post. #joebiden
     Reply
    meerkat was starred meerkat was unstarred
    Image of Conchie Birdie Conchie Birdie
    10/30/09

    In reply to Nobody Loves Weepy VP Joe
    Oh, and if you're trying to poke fun at Vice Prez Biden for weeping during the debate when he spoke about his first wife and baby daughter who died, well then, that's just messed up. #joebiden
     Reply
    Conchie Birdie was starred Conchie Birdie was unstarred
    Image of Novaload Novaload
    10/31/09

    @Conchie Birdie: One might argue that it was the worst kind of political hackdom for him to bring them up expressly to show his "empathy" side and try to squeeze a tear out of his plastic-surgeryized eye slots. #joebiden
     Reply
    Novaload was starred Novaload was unstarred
    Image of Conchie Birdie Conchie Birdie
    10/30/09

    In reply to Nobody Loves Weepy VP Joe
    I'm absolutely NOT a supporter of ANYTHING Dick says... but, Good Lawwd, Biden, Bin Laden will always BE a part of the issue. I'm sorry, I guess if you had the prez saying this I could understand... but, uh, Joe? Nope.

    That being said, why are we posting crap from Fox News anyway - I thought we weren't supposed to take this stuff seriously?
    #joebiden
     Reply
    Conchie Birdie was starred Conchie Birdie was unstarred
    Image of VoxPopuli VoxPopuli
    02/06/09

    In reply to Even More Depressing 'Sex and the City' Sequel Coming
    I have a new-found respect for Menudo. At least they knew when to add fresh blood.
     Reply
    VoxPopuli was starred VoxPopuli was unstarred
    Image of VoxPopuli VoxPopuli
    02/06/09

    @VoxPopuli: Oh, wait, never mind.


     Reply
    VoxPopuli was starred VoxPopuli was unstarred
    Image of Steverino Begins Steverino Begins
    02/05/09

    In reply to Even More Depressing 'Sex and the City' Sequel Coming
    The most preposterous thing about the first movie was the way they tortured Carrie so needlessly. He stands her up at the altar, she takes like 2 years to move on with her life, and then suddenly everything's okay again? (Sorry, spoiler.) It felt like the entire series "condensed" into 2.5 hours and revealed the weird masochistic undertones of the whole show. Now they've backed themselves into a corner; if there's more "Big trouble" it'll feel like a retread. If the conflict is just having and dealing with a kid or something, it'll be boring. Get yourself out of that one, Michael Patrick King.


    I know, I've thought about this way too much. I watched the first one while home sick on Dayquil.

     Reply
    Steverino Begins was starred Steverino Begins was unstarred
    Image of badasscat badasscat
    02/05/09

    In reply to Even More Depressing 'Sex and the City' Sequel Coming
    My wife forced me to sit and watch the first one with her. Guess what? Not even she could make it through the first ten minutes.
     Reply
    badasscat was starred badasscat was unstarred
    Image of PikaDar Brisetout PikaDar Brisetout
    02/05/09

    In reply to Even More Depressing 'Sex and the City' Sequel Coming
    I have never seen one episode of the show or even the movie. What does this mean, I ask you?!
     Reply
    PikaDar Brisetout was starred PikaDar Brisetout was unstarred
    Image of Wrapitup Wrapitup
    02/06/09

    @PikaDar❂Queen of the Tamagotchi: It means you'll never get to find out if you're a Carrie, a Melinda, a whats-her-name brunette, or some PR blonde lady named Sam. Because of this, you'll have no way to introduce yourself when you meet SATC fans and they say "OMG! I"m so totally a ___".
     Reply
    Wrapitup was starred Wrapitup was unstarred
    Image of Wrapitup Wrapitup
    02/05/09

    In reply to Even More Depressing 'Sex and the City' Sequel Coming
    Now we finally have something to look forward to when the Depression hits.
     Reply
    Wrapitup was starred Wrapitup was unstarred
    Image of unclevanya unclevanya
    02/06/09

    @Wrapitup: Indeed. Michael Patrick King will be the new Edna Ferber, penning frothy comedies about people with lives all of us Poors can only dream of having.


    Who else will be at the Algonquin Roundtable II?

     Reply
    unclevanya was starred unclevanya was unstarred
    Image of shostakobitch shostakobitch
    02/05/09

    In reply to Even More Depressing 'Sex and the City' Sequel Coming
    This installment is going to reboot the franchise. Gotham is much darker and more brooding, main characters die, there is no "Robin" and when Samantha takes it in the shitter the resulting mess ruins a $12,000 couch - and there are closeups of the whole thing from the jokes about the meatpacking district all the way to the grunting, sad denouement.
     Reply
    shostakobitch was starred shostakobitch was unstarred
    Image of Seeräuber Jenny Seeräuber Jenny
    02/05/09

    @shostakobitch:


    Looking for Mr. Grossbar.

     Reply
    Seeräuber Jenny was starred Seeräuber Jenny was unstarred
    Image of shostakobitch shostakobitch
    02/05/09

    @Seeräuber Jenny: Maybe Tuesday Weld can play a high-end furniture store owner when they go to replace the couch.
     Reply
    shostakobitch was starred shostakobitch was unstarred
    Image of misslinda misslinda
    02/05/09

    In reply to Even More Depressing 'Sex and the City' Sequel Coming
    Oh god no, this is a really bad idea! Every year in real life is like 5 years on a lady-over-40's skin! That movie won't get made for at least 3 years, and by that time, those ladies are gonna look a hot mess on the big screen, especially that horsie one. *shudder*
     Reply
    misslinda was starred misslinda was unstarred
    Image of Private Hangnail Private Hangnail
    02/05/09

    In reply to Even More Depressing 'Sex and the City' Sequel Coming
    This will be a relief for those people who cannot understand plot unless it's explained in voiceover. I can imagine they feel somewhat cheated and confused when searching for entertainments.
     Reply
    Private Hangnail was starred Private Hangnail was unstarred
    Image of sample032 sample032
    02/05/09

    @Private Hangnail: Oh, I understood. What bugged me was how one-dimensional the sugar daddy boyfriend was. They could have cast a broken ATM to play his role.
     Reply
    sample032 was starred sample032 was unstarred
    Image of saythatscool saythatscool
    02/05/09

    @sample032: @Private Hangnail: Now see folks? This is how it's done. Take some fuckin' notes from the masters and get to work.
     Reply
    saythatscool was starred saythatscool was unstarred
    Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion

Login

Enter your username and password.

Please enter a username.
Please enter your password.
logging in
Login via Facebook | Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Reset Password

Please enter your email address to have your password reset.

Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
requesting password reset

Register

Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.

Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.

Please enter a username.
Please enter a password.
Please confirm your password.
Passwords are not identical.
Please enter a valid email address.
registration sent, waiting for reply

Submit Your Comment

You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.

See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.

Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
logging in

Login with your Facebook or Gawker account.

Sign up here.



  • Archives
  • About
  • Advertising
  • Legal
  • Help
  • Report a Bug
  • FAQ
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.