Enter your username and password.
New York, 6:33 AM
Fri Nov 27
11 posts in the last 24 hours

Tip Your Editors:
tips@gawker.com
Tipline: 646-214-8138
Editor-in-Chief:
Gabriel Snyder | Email
West Coast Editor:
Richard Rushfield | Email
Contributing Editors:
Valleywag:
Ryan Tate | Email
Media:
Hamilton Nolan | Email
Politics:
Alex Pareene | Email
Investigations:
John Cook | Email
Entertainment:
Brian Moylan | Email
Nights:
Adrian Chen | Email
Azaria Jagger | Email
Ravi Somaiya | Email
Weekends:
Foster Kamer | Email
Video Editor:
Richard Blakeley | Email
Please enter your email address to have your password reset.
Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.
Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.
You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.
See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.
10/20/09
10/20/09
10/20/09
10/20/09
10/20/09
10/20/09
10/20/09
10/20/09
My count is this:
The former Presidents and First Ladies add up to ten; the Obamas would be five, including mother-in-law; the Bidens are at least two (Joe & Jill) with another three to six possibles (Beau and wife, Hunter and wife, and Ashley and ???).
The Cheneys would have lost their detail over the summer, unless Napolitano has extended their protection. (Insert hunting joke here.)
Pelosi's protective detail comes from the Capitol Police, unless I'm mistaken.
So my numbers don't add up, but they're a good start.
10/20/09
10/20/09
10/20/09
In the meanwhile, my mad Google Fu skillz dredged up an item in USN&WR from July stating that Cheney's protection has been extended, although there's no indication for how long, or whether the extension applies to his wife and daughters.
So, let's say that we have the 10 formers, five Obamas, at least five Bidens, Deadeye Dick, and Madame Speaker, for a total of 22. Add the wives of Biden's sons, and we get to the publicized total of 24 people with full-time details.
Now, who wants to speculate on the lucky eight who get part-time Secret Service protection? #barackobama
10/20/09
10/20/09
10/20/09
You're welcome.
10/20/09
09/29/09
09/29/09
09/29/09
09/29/09
09/29/09
09/29/09
09/29/09
I can't vouch for the accuracy, but supposedly this is the break down:
* Yes: > 5%
* Maybe: 2.6%
* Health care: 1.9%
* No: 90%
[www.huliq.com]
09/29/09
Hell to the NO.
09/28/09
does anyone think they're going to somehow be denied healthcare because the president wants to provide it to everyone else?
"gee, sorry Steve, we only have enough health care for 47,363,234 people, and you're number 47,363,235."
09/29/09
09/29/09
09/29/09
09/29/09
09/28/09
09/04/09
Am I the only one who noticed that this does not create the acronym "CREW"?
Copy editors: Can't live with 'em, can't read without 'em.
09/04/09