I'm not very easily sold on change, but this is nothing short of excellent in ten different ways. My favorite, irreverent two: (1) this places a greater emphasis (and importance) on the fine art of tagging. Which is awesome. And (2) this is going (ideally) to move a lot of the insidery, old-school, overindulgent stuff off of posts and into tag forums. Where readers may put the "hack" in "hacking away" at us, and we can provoke them. On that note, you can find me here:
@bowel_and_the_obstructors: it's more a symbol of excess. Kate couldn't stop with twin girls and she can't have one hairdo--she must have many hair agendas, you see. And now it looks like one husband isn't going to cut it either.
I can see Denton, metaphorically over your shoulder, saying "Hmm, making a mess out of people's lives, nah, still tame. Marty Singer about to f up some children. Hmm, OK, that will get his name on the lawsuit but he's not famous enough on his own, no-one gives an s. Get Kate Gosselin too. "Sleazy", "awful"? Foster, what are you, a pussy? "child-exploiting Kate Gosselin". OK, now we're cooking. Go with that."
@BaldwinPeriphetes: Unfortunately, this is the kind of shit Nick hates (anything even mildly self-referential and I actually feel him cringe from SoHo).
@Jsmoke: Oh, no props needed. It's fairly stupid. I'm always waiting for the hammer to come down whenever I'm doing it the way I think I'm supposed to be doing it, so there's that, too. I'm lucky enough to have a boss who can occasionally roll with this kind of thing without canning me. See this tag for further reference:
@Gabriel Snyder and Julia Allison: Dammit Gabriel. By that metric, I should be starred too. ;)
P.S. Julia notice the winky thing I tagged on to my comment.
@onebadclam: That is exactly why I miss my short lived stint w/a star. Some of those red comments were hilarious, even if they made me fear for the future of America.
I suppose I should have added a winky face emoticon at the end of the "you're overexposing her," because people don't seem to inherently understand the whole "Sarcasm" thing.
@Julia Allison: Oh, BS. I'm nice to you, but that's just too ridiculous to ignore. It's patently obvious that you were serious, and to suggest otherwise -- especially by insinuating that it's the fault of the commenters in this post -- is both cowardly and arrogant.
@mattchew03: Why can she never own up to it when she's caught being a fool? I don't understand that personality trait. She did it here a while ago on some other topic, didn't she -- Seaworld shilling or something?
"I was just kidding!! You don't get my sense of humour!!"
@Julia Allison: I suppose I should have added a winky face emoticon at the end of the "you're overexposing her," because people don't seem to inherently understand the whole "Sarcasm" thing.
Ah, well. Next time.
I suppose I should have added a winky-faced emoticon at the end of the "You're overexposing her," because people don't seem to inherently understand the whole "sarcasm" thing.
Ah, well. Next time.
I charge $10 a word for copy editing and, no, I won't take it in cupcakes.
JA's concern over Anna Wintour being overexposed is touching in its spectacular lack of self-awareness. Shame they don't make mirrors for the soulless.
10/15/09
#sorrygabe
#tooinsidery
#oldschool
#tagrelatedhumor
#mycock
#nickdenton
#selfreferential
#juvenile
#immature
#foster
#jambalaya
#rappers
#fuckinjews
#fuckyousoupsoup
#thisisgoingtobesomuchfun
#EEEEE!!!!
10/15/09
10/15/09
10/15/09
What "stuff" would that be? Care to elaborate? #comments
10/15/09
10/15/09
10/04/09
10/04/09
10/04/09
10/04/09
10/04/09
10/04/09
10/04/09
10/04/09
10/05/09
10/04/09
I can see Denton, metaphorically over your shoulder, saying "Hmm, making a mess out of people's lives, nah, still tame. Marty Singer about to f up some children. Hmm, OK, that will get his name on the lawsuit but he's not famous enough on his own, no-one gives an s. Get Kate Gosselin too. "Sleazy", "awful"? Foster, what are you, a pussy? "child-exploiting Kate Gosselin". OK, now we're cooking. Go with that."
10/04/09
10/04/09
10/04/09
[gawker.com]
10/05/09
09/10/09
This is the funniest thing I've seen in AGES!
09/10/09
09/10/09
09/10/09
09/10/09
P.S. Julia notice the winky thing I tagged on to my comment.
09/10/09
09/11/09
09/11/09
Thanks for the heart Clammy.
09/11/09
09/10/09
09/10/09
09/10/09
Ah, well. Next time.
09/10/09
09/10/09
09/10/09
"I was just kidding!! You don't get my sense of humour!!"
09/10/09
Ah, well. Next time.
I suppose I should have added a winky-faced emoticon at the end of the "You're overexposing her," because people don't seem to inherently understand the whole "sarcasm" thing.
Ah, well. Next time.
I charge $10 a word for copy editing and, no, I won't take it in cupcakes.
09/10/09
09/10/09
09/10/09
09/10/09
It goes double for upTweeting.
09/10/09
Holdonjustasecondtherebuster. Is this actually true? Or is this just a way to up her value in the eyes of the people who pay people to write?
09/10/09
09/10/09
09/10/09
So what's going rate for someone of Julia's kalopodion?
09/10/09
09/10/09
I'm going to jot that down. That could be a winning business model on the internet.
09/10/09
1. comment
2. reply
3. ???
4. profits!
09/11/09
denouement? :P
09/10/09
09/10/09
(Every time I see her, I think of The Most Photographed Barn in America, from White Noise.)
09/10/09
Rofl... rofl... roflmaobagaflob
09/10/09