More often than not ugly guys like Letterman have to use their status in the workplace to score with the women; or they would never be given a second look. Some exceptions do exist - but not usually. . . .
He took advantage (imo).
Darling, we women of (ahem) a certain age have some perspective on the situation that apparently escapes you.
Screwing the boss to get ahead seems like a great strategy in your 20s and 30s. Believe me, I've seen both men and women do it.
But it has a depressingly bad effect on the rest of the workforce, who must constantly deal with the side effects of the bo-mance. Resentment builds, as hard-working people begin to suspect that their own careers are lagooned while sweetie-of-the-month gets the good assignments, promotions and undivided boss attention.
Look, it's difficult enough to traverse the emotional terrain when two colleagues are romancin'. When it's the boss-man (and it usually IS a man), that terrain is littered with landmines, son.
i do not condone this behavior at all but that's the way a lot of men and women work in the entertainment business- casting couch realities have been around for decades and we read about them here all the time - unfortunately, there are predators, victims and future stars-
@budy920: Ugh, if I hear one more person suggest/assume these women are "victims," I'm going to scream.
I know this is hard for some people to understsand, but women are perfectly capable of schtupping their superios without being victimized by the experience. Yes, sexual harrassment and predation exists. But there is zilch evidence that it existed between Letterman and these interns. It is not an inherent aspect of such a relationship, and to suggest that it is just makes women sound like idiots who aren't in control of their own sexuality.
Women sometimes WANT to fuck the boss. It does not make them victims.
@budy920: This isn't the casting couch. Screwing around with a subordinate, however willing, isn't a crime. It's a tich tacky, and one wonder why there weren't any Sr. female producers and writers on Letterman's payroll, but it's not a casting situation.
@if_i_only_had_a_heart: Same thing that should happen if the underling tires of the boss--Everybody needs to acts like grown ups and continues to do their job.
And yes, of course, SOMETIMES that is not what happens and someone is fired or demoted as part of the fall-out from the relationship. But my point is--there is NO evidence that happened between Dave and any of his employees so the assumptions these women were victimized is bogus.
@Atilla the Bun: No, to suggest a power imbalance exists -- that sexual harrassment inheres to the relationship -- does not make "women sound like idiots who aren't in control of their own sexuality"; but it sure makes men sound like that. Of course, it's part of any relationship between a boss (for our purposes male) and subordinate (for our purposes female), always, always. That doesn't mean the relationship can't turn into something more meaningful, and it doesn't mean that that power imbalance has to be exploited -- BUT IT IS ALWAYS, ALWAYS THERE. And to deny so is idiotic. And regardless of what women want or think they want, their desires should not always be met. Plenty of college students think they're in love with their professors, but that doesn't mean those professors should take advantage of that delusion or crush. Grow up.
@GotlandMilk: There is a big, BIG difference between saying a "power imbalance exists" and ASSUMING that a woman who is sleeping with her boss is a "victim." One does not necessarily begat another, and the post I was responding to was assuming that it does. And where did I say a woman should get sex on demand from her boss? Of course they shouldn't. Any person that wants to engage in a sexual relationship with their boss or employee is taking a risk that it could end up messy. That's true for even co-workers of equal stature. There is that saying "don't fish off the company pier" for a reason. Certainly in this specific instance, things did get messy. But not because these women were in any way victims. To assume they are is bullshit.
@Atilla the Bun: I agree. Victim-politics don't always need to be injected into these things.
And, (because this isn't Jezebel I'll just say this), if you look at the situation, in the end isn't Letterman the "victim?" Has he not lost and been hurt in the end? And to suggest that he isn't, because he's a man, is to just further play into the damaging conception our society has of masculinity which doesn't like vulnerable/victim men.
@Lulupasternak: Just a minor correction, but Barbara Gaines has been an executive producer of the Late Show since 2000, she occasionally appears on-camera and while I don't know, it's probably pretty safe to say that she's never slept with Dave.
@if_i_only_had_a_heart: In this particular case, the "underling" started living with someone from 48 Hours and continued being Dave's assistant.
@Atilla the Bun: You say "potatoE" and I say "potaAto," because I don't think there is a "big, big difference" between an existing "power imbalance" and "sexual harassment," that is victimization. Sex is a complicated matter, intimate, messy, chockfull of all sorts of emotions and vulnerabilities. So when a man, a boss, and in this case thirty years older, is sleeping with a subordinate, chances are it's not healthy, not based on mutuality and consiousness, that is, a meeting of minds. Just because the woman agrees to it, or even initiates it, doesn't mean she isn't THE ONE being manipulated. Plenty of things are done tacitly. But there is a big, big difference between a mess ignited by two sexually involved co-workers, and a mess ignited when one person has power over another. That all said, sometimes good relationships can start in the darndest ways. But not in this case, not where a man essentially built a harem -- had one affair after the next -- for what I'm sure were narcissistic, selfish purposes. Who cares how nice Letterman seems -- what is he really?
I think the issue is less that he slept with someone at work than that he cheated repeatedly on his wife, whom he just married in March after some 20-odd years together.
If she's cool with Dave banging the interns, it's one thing; if she's not, it's a pretty asshole-ish thing to do.
@Spiers: For all we know they had some bizarre on/off again relationship. I mean, if you're "dating" for 20 years, there's a pretty big red flag there to begin with.
Otherwise, these people are adults and I don't see the issue.Not the best idea of course but it happens all the time.
@bboston88: Exactly, there are probably many reasons for Dave and his wife to get married after 20 years on and off, most related to their son's well being. Sexual fidelity probably wasn't one of them.
@Spiers: Agree. Hate that people say "maybe they had an arrangement", "it was consensual", etc. He cheated with a bunch of young interns. As a woman, hearing the "you go, Dave!" is depressing. But then again, Choire called me a "knee-jerk Victorian" and it bothered me all weekend. *sigh*
@La Mareada: Maybe. But if you (Dave) are a public figure, and you have a young child - at what point do you ask yourself "If what I am doing comes out, how could it affect my son?" I don't know when these affairs ended (if they have), but it seems an open secret that they were frequent and ongoing.
@FormerEnglishMajor: If I stopped watching any form of entertainment because the entertainers involved cheated on their spouse or significant others, I'd basically have to move into a sensory deprivation tank.
The cheating issue is between Letterman and his now-wife. It's a little sleazy, but it's been blown out of proportion. Bring out the smelling salts because a rich, famous guy possibly cheated on his significant other? I don't get it.
@Atilla the Bun: oh, I agree. and I know the "artists tend to be dirtballs" argument. I guess I had always sorta admired Dave as a guy who needled the peccadilloes of others because I assumed he wasn't the kind to live in such a glass house (so, more of a hold- the - mirror- up guy than a hypocrite).
It has just made me sad that he was, in fact, no better (or worse) than the other guys, and I had really believed he was. I guess I thought he was just better and smarter and more circumspect than what we now know. Y'know?
@FormerEnglishMajor: Oh, I hear you. But I would be more surprised to hear that Leno or O'Brien had done this.
Letterman spent most of his adult life as a bachelor and has always seemed so cynical and bitter to me that I'm not really shocked to hear he had dalliances.
And really, it's not like he was pulling one-night stands with blonde bimbos. Seemed more like he was dating/sleeping with these women over an extended period of time, and they were not exactly the types I see target for superficial reasons. As for his girlfriend--as others have said, the fact that it took him 20 years to marry her is telling that perhaps committment was not his strong suit.
@FormerEnglishMajor: It's just that why would he think some dickhead would try to extort him? He wasn't doing anything illegal. He was banging people at work the way millions of people do every day.
He isn't an elected offiicial. He's never been a moralizer. I even take issue with calling him a hypocrite -- if you look back at his jokes, they weren't moralistic, they were silly.
I am honestly puzzled as to why this is considered a scandal at all. Consensual sex with at least one woman at the office whose career has never suffered as a result. None of the show's employees apparently had a problem with any of it. So what the hell is the problem?
@Trixie from Toronto: It's kinda sucky, when you work at a place where the boss has affairs with the employees, that they're the ones who get air time, the best assignments, etc. It's a problem for the other 99 people out of 100. I mean, last week we heard he had paid for her tuition, which means at least one person was kinda unhappy with it.
And I'd say poking fun at people for having affairs does sort-of set you up as the opposite. He always did those jokes with an air of how ridiculous these guys were, implying that he (Dave) wasn't ridiculous. Or again, so it seemed to me.
On a personal level, it has settled into just my own vague disillusionment. It just seems too "common" for Dave to be a 55-year-old banging the 25-year-old; I guess I always thought of him as being exceptional, and more self-aware.
@FormerEnglishMajor: But that's making the assumption that the Letterman staff were pissed about it. Given that there's never been a whisper about this in the media before, I am thinking no one cared. Surely something would have shown up after almost four decades in television if Letterman were constantly banging his employees and bestowing them with privileges no one else got. People would have been leaking it to the media.
Letterman has also made a practice of giving employees air time for years, many of them men he was certainly not sleeping with. A lot of people who write for comedy shows have no interest in being in front of the camera, by the way, so again, this might not have been something that anyone cared about.
And if you look back at his jokes re: Clinton and Spitzer et al, yes, he needled them for some of their dumb moves -- Spitzer putting the hookers on his gold card, for example, and Sanford lying about being on the Appalachian trail -- but he really did not moralize.
The revelation that he likes women and often sleeps with them is about as surprising to me as finding out Rosie was a lesbian. The guy was a shameless flirt.
I honestly cannot understand the surprise or the outrage, I guess. It seemed so obvious to me, and no one seems to have been hurt by it, so who cares?
@Atilla the Bun: He was a bachelor, yes, but was in long-term committed relationships, first with Merill Markoe, then with his present wife, so he wasn't single. Go back and read Markoe's interview on Jezebel from a couple weeks ago. Their relationship was definitely not open, and she all but outs Dave sleeping with someone(s) at work. She clearly was and is pissed about this. How are long-term affairs better than one-night stands?
Point of Information! It was reported in an old newspaper column called "Grab Bag" which was a compendium of unsourced data (the Way it Was in the old news business) that "percentage of office workers who have sex at the work site: 40." Favorite precise location: the boss's desk.
I thought, what in the world does the other 60% do all day?
It is presumed some of this frivolity involved bosses and staffers.
@depardoo: At a place I used to work that will remain nameless, the cleaning lady walked in on two employees (both married and not me) going at it on the conference room table. She called building security, building security called their supervisor, but everybody kept their jobs. But I don't know if either the cleaning lady or the conference table have ever been the same again. In any event, workplace sex does not surprise me in the least, so I don't know why everyone is getting the vapors over this thing with Letterman. I'd probably be more surprised to find out he hadn't had sex with someone he works with.
@Atilla the Bun: is that worth calling security over? i mean maybe if they didn't work for the company whose conference table it was...otherwise can you just close the door and come back later?
@pattycakes: I been thinking over an incident reported in our neighborhood. See, this guy who was a deputy sheriff in real life was experiencing fellatio in a back row at the movie theatre, same as any movie, when an usher came upon the scene, stopped a patrol wagon out front, and ratted out the frolickers. The motivation of the usher is not reported.
There once was a talk host named Dave
Whose young interns he could not stave
Blackmailed for 2 mil,
But he knew the drill,
He'll still bang broads in the "Cave"..
I always thought Dave Letterman was weird because he held out on marriage for so long. I know he has tons of cash he doesn't want to lose but it seems cruel to have a child at such a late age.
10/05/09
He took advantage (imo).
10/05/09
Dave -- call me.
10/05/09
It's the ones who don't and then watch the ones who do get the promotions, plum assignments, air time, etc.
10/05/09
10/06/09
10/05/09
Screwing the boss to get ahead seems like a great strategy in your 20s and 30s. Believe me, I've seen both men and women do it.
But it has a depressingly bad effect on the rest of the workforce, who must constantly deal with the side effects of the bo-mance. Resentment builds, as hard-working people begin to suspect that their own careers are lagooned while sweetie-of-the-month gets the good assignments, promotions and undivided boss attention.
Look, it's difficult enough to traverse the emotional terrain when two colleagues are romancin'. When it's the boss-man (and it usually IS a man), that terrain is littered with landmines, son.
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
I know this is hard for some people to understsand, but women are perfectly capable of schtupping their superios without being victimized by the experience. Yes, sexual harrassment and predation exists. But there is zilch evidence that it existed between Letterman and these interns. It is not an inherent aspect of such a relationship, and to suggest that it is just makes women sound like idiots who aren't in control of their own sexuality.
Women sometimes WANT to fuck the boss. It does not make them victims.
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
And yes, of course, SOMETIMES that is not what happens and someone is fired or demoted as part of the fall-out from the relationship. But my point is--there is NO evidence that happened between Dave and any of his employees so the assumptions these women were victimized is bogus.
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
And, (because this isn't Jezebel I'll just say this), if you look at the situation, in the end isn't Letterman the "victim?" Has he not lost and been hurt in the end? And to suggest that he isn't, because he's a man, is to just further play into the damaging conception our society has of masculinity which doesn't like vulnerable/victim men.
10/05/09
10/05/09
@if_i_only_had_a_heart: In this particular case, the "underling" started living with someone from 48 Hours and continued being Dave's assistant.
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
If she's cool with Dave banging the interns, it's one thing; if she's not, it's a pretty asshole-ish thing to do.
10/05/09
Otherwise, these people are adults and I don't see the issue.Not the best idea of course but it happens all the time.
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
The cheating issue is between Letterman and his now-wife. It's a little sleazy, but it's been blown out of proportion. Bring out the smelling salts because a rich, famous guy possibly cheated on his significant other? I don't get it.
10/05/09
It has just made me sad that he was, in fact, no better (or worse) than the other guys, and I had really believed he was. I guess I thought he was just better and smarter and more circumspect than what we now know. Y'know?
10/05/09
Letterman spent most of his adult life as a bachelor and has always seemed so cynical and bitter to me that I'm not really shocked to hear he had dalliances.
And really, it's not like he was pulling one-night stands with blonde bimbos. Seemed more like he was dating/sleeping with these women over an extended period of time, and they were not exactly the types I see target for superficial reasons. As for his girlfriend--as others have said, the fact that it took him 20 years to marry her is telling that perhaps committment was not his strong suit.
10/05/09
He isn't an elected offiicial. He's never been a moralizer. I even take issue with calling him a hypocrite -- if you look back at his jokes, they weren't moralistic, they were silly.
I am honestly puzzled as to why this is considered a scandal at all. Consensual sex with at least one woman at the office whose career has never suffered as a result. None of the show's employees apparently had a problem with any of it. So what the hell is the problem?
10/05/09
And I'd say poking fun at people for having affairs does sort-of set you up as the opposite. He always did those jokes with an air of how ridiculous these guys were, implying that he (Dave) wasn't ridiculous. Or again, so it seemed to me.
On a personal level, it has settled into just my own vague disillusionment. It just seems too "common" for Dave to be a 55-year-old banging the 25-year-old; I guess I always thought of him as being exceptional, and more self-aware.
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
Letterman has also made a practice of giving employees air time for years, many of them men he was certainly not sleeping with. A lot of people who write for comedy shows have no interest in being in front of the camera, by the way, so again, this might not have been something that anyone cared about.
And if you look back at his jokes re: Clinton and Spitzer et al, yes, he needled them for some of their dumb moves -- Spitzer putting the hookers on his gold card, for example, and Sanford lying about being on the Appalachian trail -- but he really did not moralize.
The revelation that he likes women and often sleeps with them is about as surprising to me as finding out Rosie was a lesbian. The guy was a shameless flirt.
I honestly cannot understand the surprise or the outrage, I guess. It seemed so obvious to me, and no one seems to have been hurt by it, so who cares?
10/05/09
10/05/09
I thought, what in the world does the other 60% do all day?
It is presumed some of this frivolity involved bosses and staffers.
10/05/09
Imagine being the cleaning person who has to take care of that desk.
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
And then smirk and walk away.
10/05/09
10/05/09
Whose young interns he could not stave
Blackmailed for 2 mil,
But he knew the drill,
He'll still bang broads in the "Cave"..
10/05/09
As old winter falls. An
intern is driven as snow.
Media blossums bloom.
(A lo-ku as I don't have the patience to count syllables)
10/05/09
Speaking of spirits,
What would Ed Sullivan say?
"Atta boy, there, Dave!"
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
I assume that you are referring to the following:
"Girl, I'm really mad at you
For giving head to Steve McQueen.
And those tricks with fruit are kind of cute.
I'll bet you keep your pussy clean."
10/05/09
10/05/09
Is that right?! That makes a lot more sense. I've been trying to decipher that tune for years.
10/05/09
10/06/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
I mean, the first 4500 +/- posts were a bit interesting, but seriously. We are over it.
10/05/09