I respect her a tad more now just for recognizing that what she is doing will be a challenge for her rather than assuming that since she is so great everyone will love her for it.
This opened already. I saw it last week, and the production was great. Seeing a production outside is rare, so it's a nice twist. Although, it was freezing cold, and started to rain at the end. (which ended up being quite funny, as the final song in the play has a lot of rain imagery)
Fear is good! Show awe in the presence of Twelfth Night!
If only because it was my favorite one as a kid (ok, having a favorite Shakespeare from your childhood is kinda silly - but it was the abridged versions for kids, back then).I even thought it would be cool to name my potential kids Sebastian and Viola, but later I thought, naming a daughter after a musical instrument is not such a great idea..
anyway, go, Hathaway! as both Viola and Garland. let's drink to that...
This is the literary equivalent of a lesbian buddy of mine in the '80s arguing passionately that Whitney Houston was gay... as if knowledge of her true sexual orientation was all that was keeping them apart.
In those days, wearing a square doily around your neck meant you were bi. (A a triangular collar-doily meant you were gay. A round one signaled straightness.)
So the evidence is pretty compelling, you have to admit ...
The man that some suspect really wrote most of Shakespeare's works, Christopher Marlowe was almost certainly gay.
There is a lot of evidence that Marlowe was the man with the real gift.
He was a page to a noble as a youngster, a spy in her Majesty's Secret Service, privy to Royal Courts, well-traveled, educated in Latin, Greek and the classics at Cambridge and proved his talent with early works like Faustus and Edward the II.
Shakespeare had little formal education, had likely never traveled further than London and its environs, did not leave behind a SINGLE BOOK in his will, etc. etc.
Of course we have to believe that Marlowe faked his death and wrote from exile.
The bottom line for me is that there is no substantial proof that Shakespeare wrote all of the works attributed to him. There is also no conclusive proof that it was Marlowe, Bacon, de Vere or Stanley either.
@Dickens_Ghost: Yeah, that's always a fun game to play. Just reading Faustus was enough to indicate that this wasn't Shakespeare. There is a qualitative difference.
@Dickens_Ghost: Where is the documentary evidence of the great Shakespeare conspiracy?
There’s a ton of evidence that there was a man named Shakespeare who wrote plays, acted, and ran a theatre company. There is no evidence that anyone was involved in a conspiracy to author works anonymously and attribute them to a "Shakespeare."
Where is the letter revealing the secret? Just one letter is all it would take, one diary page, out of the reams of paper kept and traded among all of those who would have been involved. But there is nothing. Nothing.
It’s a fun game to play—how do we know what we know?—but at the end of the day, you have to go where the evidence is.
06/22/09
06/22/09
06/22/09
Hard to see her passing for a boy, though.
06/22/09
06/22/09
06/22/09
06/22/09
If only because it was my favorite one as a kid (ok, having a favorite Shakespeare from your childhood is kinda silly - but it was the abridged versions for kids, back then).I even thought it would be cool to name my potential kids Sebastian and Viola, but later I thought, naming a daughter after a musical instrument is not such a great idea..
anyway, go, Hathaway! as both Viola and Garland. let's drink to that...
06/22/09
06/22/09
03/10/09
03/10/09
03/10/09
03/10/09
It is also highly unusual for Brits to be gay.
It is practically heard of for Brit playwrights to be gay.
The Times is mistaken, methinks.
03/10/09
03/10/09
03/10/09
So the evidence is pretty compelling, you have to admit ...
03/10/09
03/10/09
There is a lot of evidence that Marlowe was the man with the real gift.
He was a page to a noble as a youngster, a spy in her Majesty's Secret Service, privy to Royal Courts, well-traveled, educated in Latin, Greek and the classics at Cambridge and proved his talent with early works like Faustus and Edward the II.
Shakespeare had little formal education, had likely never traveled further than London and its environs, did not leave behind a SINGLE BOOK in his will, etc. etc.
Of course we have to believe that Marlowe faked his death and wrote from exile.
The bottom line for me is that there is no substantial proof that Shakespeare wrote all of the works attributed to him. There is also no conclusive proof that it was Marlowe, Bacon, de Vere or Stanley either.
03/10/09
03/10/09
03/10/09
There’s a ton of evidence that there was a man named Shakespeare who wrote plays, acted, and ran a theatre company. There is no evidence that anyone was involved in a conspiracy to author works anonymously and attribute them to a "Shakespeare."
Where is the letter revealing the secret? Just one letter is all it would take, one diary page, out of the reams of paper kept and traded among all of those who would have been involved. But there is nothing. Nothing.
It’s a fun game to play—how do we know what we know?—but at the end of the day, you have to go where the evidence is.
03/10/09
03/10/09
Twelfth Nut
Henry IV's Parts
Merkin of Venice
03/10/09
03/10/09
Romeo and Julio
As You Lick It
03/10/09
O, Fellow.
King Leer
Ass You Like It.
03/10/09