as a person with one of those glittery, worthless Bacherlor's Degrees (from a "good" school no less) I'm from the lower middle class and I was told ad nauseum that this if I did this thing this other, even better, thing would happen.
And it just so happens that the whole thing bottoms out the year that I graduate and every employer wants experience over a piece of fine grained paper with words no one can read (seriously, every time i look at that diploma, i think it's laughing at me). Blame me for not being savvy enough. Blame me for not being like all the first genertation kids and do pre-med or engineering. Shit bores me to tears. The skills I do have are rather narrow (theater tech, what what!) but pay my cell phone bill and my blissfully low loans BUT I'd like to move out soon. No, I don't feel entitled but I'm more than a little annoyed. #thepoors
Ugh. I'm about to have to make the decision to leave my pretty good job to go to grad school. Lately it's seeming like a worse and worse idea to do so. #thepoors
The problem is that college degrees do not afford any sort of skill set upon graduation. The folks I see surviving the recession best are those who had a job skill (working on cars, refinishing furniture, web design, any sort of construction journeyman, etc.). Being able to produce something tangible is a valuable commodity if you can find your marketplace. #thepoors
I don't disagree, but for at least the past 50 years, the elite of American students were steered away from learning trades. Those jobs were considered infra dig. They paid relatively poorly and were considered not appropriate for the upwardly mobile.
It worked well when the number of college grads was small enough that they could be absorbed into junior management positions and learn skills on the job. The problem of the U.S. evolving into a service economy was discussed with regularity, but most people with choices still wanted to push pencils, not pushcarts.
Sex and race discrimination, which also shrunk the pool, didn't hurt either. #thepoors
@Seeräuber Jenny: I can agree with all of your astute observations. The last 50 years have been a boon for higher education and our (former) economy was supportive of exactly what you describe. Now, not so much. What happens next? Can we re-grow the economy in a fashion that will support a workforce with a high proportion of low-level and middle managers again soon? Will people with advanced degrees lower their career thresholds and still be able to pay their student loans off and pay the light bill? The pending dilemma looms large and I have metric ton of empathy for recent and soon-to-be grads. #thepoors
@PaisleyPajamas: just as big an issue going forward is dealing with the social and psychological impact of having to do more with less. I find many people I know are having a much more difficult time coping with that, than anything else...........which is another reason the pharmaceutical companies are doing so well. There is an entire generation that is judged... and judges......based on what we possess rather than who we are, as people. #thepoors
@Seeräuber Jenny: LOL!!! I just like to bitch and moan about how no matter what you do, you're gonna be farked somewhere and sometime along the way. #thepoors
Geez, why not just reconfigure the public school structure, and perhaps extend formal education a year? Making Senior year of HS and Freshman year of college the equivalent of attaining an associates degree. You spend the majority of your Senior year of high school prepping for college, and the majority of your Freshman year of college with your head in a toilet...I say make both those years more productive. #thepoors
@Spirit Fingers: We had this in some Canadian provinces up until very recently - an extra year of university-oriented classes for students who were aiming for accenptance into degree programs(as opposed to career college or vocational school). I was in one of the last years to go through this system, and although it didn't affect the amount of time I spent face down in a toilet in my freshman year, it meant that the time I spent there wasn't so costly to my GPA, since I had a better foundation in basic concepts and had seen some material before. It would be interesting to see the result if this were applied across the board... #thepoors
@Spirit Fingers: It is odd that we haven't yet reached any sort of structural parity with Britain's A-Levels and Germany's Abitur. I mean, granted, IB and AP, but those seem to be less standardized and more "frantic high schooler packing in classes so he or she can get into Georgetown like Daddy and Mommy wants"... Though I guess A-levels and the Abitur are similarly only for the British and German college-bound.
Huh. I had a point somewhere. I think it was "destroy the bottom-up approach of regional schoolboards, and make all schools directly controlled by the federal government". That point is in there somewhere. Promise. You might have to squint. #thepoors
American students need more of their education structured around a standardized test? The federal government should take a larger role in shaping education?
This is a parody post, right? You do realize this is exactly what's happened over the past decade and the results have been dismal?
@john.zirinsky: I drew a comparison to the A-Levels and the Abitur, and did so only for the group of students being discussed. That is to say, the university-bound, not everyone, which the current state merit tests aim and assess (and yes, to which the federal government stupidly and inefficiently links funding.)
Wouldn't it be smarter to adequately prepare (and yes, assess, as is done with the SAT/ACT/AP/IB now) the college-bound because they are college-bound, than to instead apply the same pre-university standard to _everyone_ in high school? That, by the way, being the approach that only now lends itself to producing plummeting standards. My old school district in Michigan now requires every student to take four years of a language, of science, and of math, all for the purpose of university preparation. I applaud the ideal, but I very much doubt the implementation. Indeed, the kids who will go to (and succeed in) college will have done this anyway. Kids who are uninitiated or unable will fail out. Which I guess is a method of bringing meaning back to the diploma... even if the other 16,000+ school districts make it a lot easier to get.
Though, I guess a lot of my thoughts above are predicated on a notion that anyone knows what the hell they want to do in life starting at age 14, and that they already know how to accomplish that. Which is silly. There's something stomach-churning about the German convention of testing students at the age of 12 and then sorting them off to their future careers. But I think there's something to be said for the fact that Germans subsequently seem to attach far less cultural shame to vocational careers than we Americans seem to do.
No Child Left Behind is fucked, yes. But is that only because it is a federal policy? Or is just that it's a _bad_ federal policy? Or is it maybe just that all current federal policy on education is weakened by only being able to lead with a carrot on a stick (strings attached to funding promises) and are able to interfere in no other way?
The above questions aren't rhetorical, by the way. If you're learned on the issue, please fill me in. I just can't imagine simply celebrating the inefficiency of having 16,210 some separate school boards and districts in this country. Or imagine that that's NOT a flawed approach to educating our youth. What reason beyond small-f federalism is there for allowing (and saluting) the ability of a Kansas school board to decide it can no longer teach evolution? Or to accept that property tax funding models mean that rich neighborhoods get good schools and poor neighborhoods get shit schools (something that seems even more anti-egalitarian than sorting kids by ability at age 12)?
(I actually welcome informed information to the contrary of any of my above thoughts or understandings-- the above is all pretty naive and simplistic, and I would always like my thoughts on topical issues to better conform to reality. Please, educate me.)
Sorry if this is frazzled and disjoint. I pretty much just stream of consciously dumped all connected, half-formed thoughts on public education. Long week, lots of math. #thepoors
It's good that we can all have a sense of humor about this topic but the sad reality remains that there are a lot of people struggling mightily to simply survive and see college as their best chance of a more stable future.....even if the reality may not bear that out at the moment. This little tidbit was inspired by two such women who sat next to me on the train this morning and relayed their stories of despair. #thepoors
@Buttafooco: Whether or not I was going to college was never a question, and I thought it would get me somewhere. Now I'm a junior and freaking the fuck out because it doesn't seem like my degree is going to impress anybody. It's terrifying. #thepoors
@Lucky: It will........but sometimes human nature is such that it wants to know the destination, and fear is the defacto answer when the comforting ones are out of sight. What's that old saying........fear is the darkroom where negatives develop...........thankfully, we now live in a world where you can just hit a delete button...........so do just that..........hit delete. You are in a position that's the envy of many 35-50 year olds because you still have choices in terms of career paths..........theirs are much less so. #thepoors
I'd argue that we've probably had too many people taking on enormous loan debt and going to college in recent years. How many adrift kids did you meet that were only there because they were "supposed to" go to college? I'm not sure that was healthy for society to begin with, especially because it explains the demand factor for the enormous college cost increases over recent decades. #thepoors
@Unsolicited Advice: Not to mention the whiny folks who did this, or did this for grad school and law school, and now think they're entitled to handouts to pay for those choices. #thepoors
@Unsolicited Advice: 30 years ago I was one of those adrift kids, luckily I didn't take out any loans. Journalism majors never make enough money to pay them back. #thepoors
This argument is going to get me absolutely killed, I know it, but my thought is that the solution to this education crisis is to revoke all of the inflationary Federal subsidy. Go ahead and call me a slavish devotee of the "Invisible Rand" or whatever. #thepoors
@Unsolicited Advice: Well the government shouldn't be subsidizing individual tuition. That's true. It just incentivizes universities to spend money on "education bling" and drives up tuition rates.
The problem is that cutting tuition aid would mean we'd have to directly fund the universities, which would basically put the entire higher ed system under the control of the federal government.
@Unsolicited Advice: I agree. I read an article recently suggesting something similar for health care (get rid of insurance and just fucking pay for it). The only way to get out-of-control prices for education and health care under control is to actually expose them to consumers. With the Federal subsidies for education and insurance for health care, no one asks "How much?" What other goods or services do people buy without asking the price? None, methinks. #thepoors
Well, with health and education in particular, the philosophy seems to be that these are entitlements. Anyone that seeks an education or to be healed should have it! And while I agree to an extent, these incentives tend to pervert behavior.
(That's kind of where the whole thing veers off into the bloodstained wilderness of central planning vs. market economics.) #thepoors
@Richard Petty Bourgeoisie: While I was an undergrad at a public ivy tuition costs for both in-state and out-of-state students went UP four.different.times. The board of regents always gave these innocuous reasons why as they cut programs, lowered the standards for out-of-state incoming freshman...oh, AND created an $8M addition to the stadium for the football team to change their uniforms. If you enter an institution thinking you are going to pay $X per semester for full-time tuition, that's what you should pay for your years spent there--not $XX because someone decided (at your expense) that a tri-colored scoreboard is a good idea and at all meaningful to the quality of higher education.
@Richard Petty Bourgeoisie: But isn't the whole point of insurance a division of risk? Let's assume that people are more than atomized "consumers" and we're allowed to think about a "public." #thepoors
Exactly. To criticize someone for taking out loans for the best possible higher education when the unrelenting message for the last 40 years has been: "Education is the key, poor people!" is, quite frankly, pretty shitty. #thepoors
@Seeräuber Jenny: I don't believe the message has ever been, "Education, at all costs, with no foreseeable way to repay, is the key, poor people!" People have been working their way through school for a long time, delaying schooling until they have money saved, working their asses off for grants and scholarships, and otherwise coming up with ways to finance education that aren't the same as, "well, I couldn't find a job/I'm entitled to a job/doesn't everyone get a great job?, so I'm going to say to hell with common sense and take on six figures of debt even though I don't even pay off my credit card every month!" And I'm more thinking of middle-class kids, not the poors. #thepoors
Given the rising cost of education, it has long been impossible to work one's way through college and/or graduate school unless you plan to take 20 years to graduate.
I think your statement about the mindset of student borrowers contains an awful lot of faulty assumptions. You also seem to be unaware of the way the educational institutions, aided and abetted by the media sold the message of "Get a great education and you will be able to get a great job."
Reasonable expectations fostered by supposedly reliable sources are not the same thing as entitlement. #thepoors
I've known some people who've taken off a year or two to save for their community college tuition, but that's a tiny fraction of what a top four-year private school costs. #thepoors
@Seeräuber Jenny: Look, we're all responsible for a minimum of common sense, critical thinking and some basic financial planning (hmmm, will that copy editor job or liberal arts teaching job really support repayments on $150k of loans? What's the market for these fields? What's the future prognosis? It wasn't that hard to figure out, even when I was 15, that the market for tenure-track English professors, particularly traditional types, was a bad idea. Similarly, not that hard to find out what starting-out editors made, even if you made it to a great publication. Also not hard to figure out the best status-value options for which school to choose.). You roll those dice, it's on you. No one promised you a rose garden.
Sorry, "long been" = how long? I know kids doing it now, and I knew several people, with children, working in the day and going to night law school, in the last decade.
I could choose to go to a great exec mba program now, and it might - maybe - mean some greater market skills and cred to a pretty marketable resume already. But for $100k and an uncertain return? NFW. And I have a job. Knock wood. #thepoors
@Unsolicited Advice: There was a story on the local news in Chicago where they showed Vets coming home to 60k and 70k in student loan debt. Their wives said they were bombarded by calls the whole time they were in Iraq. #thepoors
But aren't these concepts related? Think in terms of supply reactions to the demand-side stimulus that a subsidy provides.
All of this Federal loan money is resulting in runaway cost inflation as students leverage up and pile into institutions. The "demand" for higher education has consequently exploded.
In response to the demand, schools are racing to increase facilities and staff. The effect is a cost spiral as the ability to assume debt overwhelms the college system's capacity. The pain is particularly powerful in city schools, which have to pay a hell of a lot more for real estate and basic services to accomodate burgeoning student bodies.
The market is inevitably doing what Federal policymakers won't - setting a bar. Costs are rapidly rising to a point where the bar to admission will fall back in place in the form of 300K 4-year bills for a bachelor's. And then we're back at square one again, with a raft of unemployable kids burdened with debt and a new generation unable to afford education. #thepoors
@Miss Pontificating: That's weird, because if you are in the reserves (not sure about active duty) they have a program that makes your student loan payments for you--unless this has been revoked recently? A good friend of mine from college stayed in the reserves for that benefit specifically because it meant several hundred dollars MORE per month she didn't have to come up with. #thepoors
I agree, it is complicated. But I just hate it when it looks like poor and middle class people are being singled out for seizing one of the few ropes that could lead to upward mobility (and let's face it, if you're poor and obscure, going to community college won't do it; you have to go to a really good school and get lucky). Do you think Obama would be president today if he'd gone to Maui Community College?
Taking a risk on an education still seems more defensible than speculating that a bigger house that you really didn't need in the first place will appreciate in value. #thepoors
The perfect peg for my upcoming story about how the NBC sitcom Community has increased interest in attending community colleges. Golden! [gawker.com]#thepoors
Harumph. I call shenanigans on these stats until I see the college GRADUATION rates. 50% of the students who enroll in college in my state don't finish. Just because all these kids enroll for 1-3 years of drinking and irresponsibility doesn't mean they become drunk adults with college degrees. #shutupcollege
But are they graduating any smarter? I'm going to go with "no" and cite as an example the young woman I interviewed last week, who asked me "What is Public Policy, anyway?" She was interviewing for the position of "Policy Analyst." Her major? Public Policy and Administration.
Wait till they find out that after having been told all their lives that education is the key to a better life that in fact it's only one key. You need at least four more to unlock the vault. #shutupcollege
@Conchie Birdie: I completely agree. It’s good that more people are becoming educated, but a college education is being watered down into a high school one. Professional degrees are quickly becoming the new Bachelor’s. #shutupcollege
@Conchie Birdie: Community colleges have no barrier to entry, making them somewhat derided for their perceived low quality. This perception is a shame, though, since community colleges often act as a bridge to "regular" college for those young people who are the first in their families to pursue higher education. If that's not quality, I'm not sure what is. #shutupcollege
@h_bee: No no no no... I meant the entire education system - I wasn't trying to deride anyone who attends community college. Rather, what is the quality of knowledge these days? #shutupcollege
@Conchie Birdie: Fair point - my misunderstanding. I think as a rule our high schools are increasingly failing our kids, which actually makes the role of the community college that much more relevant.
I work in the system. You can't imagine the lack of academic skills and basic knowledge we see from recent h.s. grads. Astounding. #shutupcollege
11/12/09
And it just so happens that the whole thing bottoms out the year that I graduate and every employer wants experience over a piece of fine grained paper with words no one can read (seriously, every time i look at that diploma, i think it's laughing at me). Blame me for not being savvy enough. Blame me for not being like all the first genertation kids and do pre-med or engineering. Shit bores me to tears. The skills I do have are rather narrow (theater tech, what what!) but pay my cell phone bill and my blissfully low loans BUT I'd like to move out soon. No, I don't feel entitled but I'm more than a little annoyed. #thepoors
11/12/09
11/12/09
11/12/09
I don't disagree, but for at least the past 50 years, the elite of American students were steered away from learning trades. Those jobs were considered infra dig. They paid relatively poorly and were considered not appropriate for the upwardly mobile.
It worked well when the number of college grads was small enough that they could be absorbed into junior management positions and learn skills on the job. The problem of the U.S. evolving into a service economy was discussed with regularity, but most people with choices still wanted to push pencils, not pushcarts.
Sex and race discrimination, which also shrunk the pool, didn't hurt either. #thepoors
11/12/09
11/12/09
11/13/09
Sorry to take so long to reply, but I was going over carpentry and plumbing school catalogues.
I'm so glad that few people ask for my advice, because I don't have an effing clue what anyone should do. #thepoors
11/13/09
11/13/09
I don't remember it ever being quite this bad. #thepoors
11/12/09
11/12/09
11/12/09
Huh. I had a point somewhere. I think it was "destroy the bottom-up approach of regional schoolboards, and make all schools directly controlled by the federal government". That point is in there somewhere. Promise. You might have to squint. #thepoors
11/12/09
11/12/09
American students need more of their education structured around a standardized test? The federal government should take a larger role in shaping education?
This is a parody post, right? You do realize this is exactly what's happened over the past decade and the results have been dismal?
11/12/09
Wouldn't it be smarter to adequately prepare (and yes, assess, as is done with the SAT/ACT/AP/IB now) the college-bound because they are college-bound, than to instead apply the same pre-university standard to _everyone_ in high school? That, by the way, being the approach that only now lends itself to producing plummeting standards. My old school district in Michigan now requires every student to take four years of a language, of science, and of math, all for the purpose of university preparation. I applaud the ideal, but I very much doubt the implementation. Indeed, the kids who will go to (and succeed in) college will have done this anyway. Kids who are uninitiated or unable will fail out. Which I guess is a method of bringing meaning back to the diploma... even if the other 16,000+ school districts make it a lot easier to get.
Though, I guess a lot of my thoughts above are predicated on a notion that anyone knows what the hell they want to do in life starting at age 14, and that they already know how to accomplish that. Which is silly. There's something stomach-churning about the German convention of testing students at the age of 12 and then sorting them off to their future careers. But I think there's something to be said for the fact that Germans subsequently seem to attach far less cultural shame to vocational careers than we Americans seem to do.
No Child Left Behind is fucked, yes. But is that only because it is a federal policy? Or is just that it's a _bad_ federal policy? Or is it maybe just that all current federal policy on education is weakened by only being able to lead with a carrot on a stick (strings attached to funding promises) and are able to interfere in no other way?
The above questions aren't rhetorical, by the way. If you're learned on the issue, please fill me in. I just can't imagine simply celebrating the inefficiency of having 16,210 some separate school boards and districts in this country. Or imagine that that's NOT a flawed approach to educating our youth. What reason beyond small-f federalism is there for allowing (and saluting) the ability of a Kansas school board to decide it can no longer teach evolution? Or to accept that property tax funding models mean that rich neighborhoods get good schools and poor neighborhoods get shit schools (something that seems even more anti-egalitarian than sorting kids by ability at age 12)?
(I actually welcome informed information to the contrary of any of my above thoughts or understandings-- the above is all pretty naive and simplistic, and I would always like my thoughts on topical issues to better conform to reality. Please, educate me.)
Sorry if this is frazzled and disjoint. I pretty much just stream of consciously dumped all connected, half-formed thoughts on public education. Long week, lots of math. #thepoors
11/12/09
11/12/09
It's gallows humor. #thepoors
11/12/09
11/12/09
11/12/09
11/12/09
11/12/09
11/12/09
This argument is going to get me absolutely killed, I know it, but my thought is that the solution to this education crisis is to revoke all of the inflationary Federal subsidy. Go ahead and call me a slavish devotee of the "Invisible Rand" or whatever. #thepoors
11/12/09
Did this comment get tagged with #thepoors because of the word "loan" or the word "journalism."
11/12/09
The problem is that cutting tuition aid would mean we'd have to directly fund the universities, which would basically put the entire higher ed system under the control of the federal government.
Be careful what you wish for...
11/12/09
11/12/09
Well, with health and education in particular, the philosophy seems to be that these are entitlements. Anyone that seeks an education or to be healed should have it! And while I agree to an extent, these incentives tend to pervert behavior.
(That's kind of where the whole thing veers off into the bloodstained wilderness of central planning vs. market economics.) #thepoors
11/12/09
11/12/09
11/12/09
11/12/09
Exactly. To criticize someone for taking out loans for the best possible higher education when the unrelenting message for the last 40 years has been: "Education is the key, poor people!" is, quite frankly, pretty shitty. #thepoors
11/12/09
11/12/09
Given the rising cost of education, it has long been impossible to work one's way through college and/or graduate school unless you plan to take 20 years to graduate.
I think your statement about the mindset of student borrowers contains an awful lot of faulty assumptions. You also seem to be unaware of the way the educational institutions, aided and abetted by the media sold the message of "Get a great education and you will be able to get a great job."
Reasonable expectations fostered by supposedly reliable sources are not the same thing as entitlement. #thepoors
11/12/09
I've known some people who've taken off a year or two to save for their community college tuition, but that's a tiny fraction of what a top four-year private school costs. #thepoors
11/12/09
Sorry, "long been" = how long? I know kids doing it now, and I knew several people, with children, working in the day and going to night law school, in the last decade.
I could choose to go to a great exec mba program now, and it might - maybe - mean some greater market skills and cred to a pretty marketable resume already. But for $100k and an uncertain return? NFW. And I have a job. Knock wood. #thepoors
11/12/09
11/12/09
But aren't these concepts related? Think in terms of supply reactions to the demand-side stimulus that a subsidy provides.
All of this Federal loan money is resulting in runaway cost inflation as students leverage up and pile into institutions. The "demand" for higher education has consequently exploded.
In response to the demand, schools are racing to increase facilities and staff. The effect is a cost spiral as the ability to assume debt overwhelms the college system's capacity. The pain is particularly powerful in city schools, which have to pay a hell of a lot more for real estate and basic services to accomodate burgeoning student bodies.
The market is inevitably doing what Federal policymakers won't - setting a bar. Costs are rapidly rising to a point where the bar to admission will fall back in place in the form of 300K 4-year bills for a bachelor's. And then we're back at square one again, with a raft of unemployable kids burdened with debt and a new generation unable to afford education. #thepoors
11/12/09
11/13/09
I agree, it is complicated. But I just hate it when it looks like poor and middle class people are being singled out for seizing one of the few ropes that could lead to upward mobility (and let's face it, if you're poor and obscure, going to community college won't do it; you have to go to a really good school and get lucky). Do you think Obama would be president today if he'd gone to Maui Community College?
Taking a risk on an education still seems more defensible than speculating that a bigger house that you really didn't need in the first place will appreciate in value. #thepoors
11/22/09
What can I say, you can not believe everything you see in the news.
11/12/09
11/12/09
11/12/09
11/12/09
11/12/09
11/12/09
11/12/09
11/12/09
11/12/09
10/30/09
10/31/09
But at least I'm employed! #shutupcollege
10/30/09
What. The. Fuck. #shutupcollege
10/30/09
I might have broken down and said "JUST LEAVE NOW" and then sobbed quietly in the empty conference room. #shutupcollege
10/30/09
10/30/09
10/30/09
10/30/09
10/30/09
10/30/09
10/30/09
10/30/09
I work in the system. You can't imagine the lack of academic skills and basic knowledge we see from recent h.s. grads. Astounding. #shutupcollege