I was going to host a Chanel-a-thon Fourth of July party, but now my dreams of a Chanel get-together have been deChanelled. What in the Chanel am I going to do with two hundred logo'd frankfurters? I was feeling really Chanel, dressed to the Chanels, lighting the grill that burns with the intensity of a thousand Chanels but now I am bereft, lost, like unemployed St. Laurent, wandering around Paris picking up crap from Moujik number eight. Chanel.
Nice try, Foster. This post is merely bait for commenting lawyers to disagree with you and thus give you a pretext to ban or destar (oh, the horror!).
Most lawyers (excluding, this one) reading this post would be compelled to point out the importance in preventing and/or stopping the misappropriation of such a valuable trademark like Chanels. Some lawyers(again, excluding this one), might even ask you the question of what Gawker Media's lawyers would do if a website called Gawkster, Fawker or Deadsplat started a gossip/media or sports blog.
@Foster Kamer: Foster, I thought you were going to teach me about evil, not make me feel seriously displeased. Resipsa is one of the smartest cookies on this site and I don't think he was being an asshole, he was pointing something out to you.
@BookishLookish: I think Mr. Kamer was being declarative re his "asshole" sentence and not accusatory.
With that said I will cautiously point out in a similarly declarative tone that "gasoline" "cellophane" and "aspirin" are all words that used to be trademarked until the masses sullied them with their filthy tongues. I'm sure an easy trope in law school is pointing out the commonality of "Kleenex" and "Xerox" and the hazard they run of losing their lucrative capitalization. Chanel isn't a product used by a huge percentage of the population so the hazard would seem to be much smaller but I guess they have a lawyer who wanted to assert themselves, perhaps for career reasons or sexual unhappiness.
And speaking of sex, Bookish, our Citrus Babylon awaits a mere hour north of where I sit at this very moment. If that's too expository for a Monday morning I apologize. I took klonopin last night. I mean Klonopin. Don't yell at me, F. Hoffmann–La Roche, Ltd.
@Mohamed Ndiaye-Kingué: He never had any to start with, at least of the human variety. He needs a new flesh suit, lest his true reptilian appearance burst through his leathery, craquelured mask.
Our family has owned about five different bearded collies over the last forty years, so I speak from experience when I say Karl looks like he could use a good de-shedding comb.
@Foster Kamer: If the inference that it will be hard to keep one's star next week was meant to read that we have to catch all your typos, then it will be a slippery trinket to acquire indeed.
07/04/09
07/03/09
07/05/09
07/05/09
07/03/09
07/03/09
07/03/09
07/03/09
07/03/09
07/03/09
07/03/09
Most lawyers (excluding, this one) reading this post would be compelled to point out the importance in preventing and/or stopping the misappropriation of such a valuable trademark like Chanels. Some lawyers(again, excluding this one), might even ask you the question of what Gawker Media's lawyers would do if a website called Gawkster, Fawker or Deadsplat started a gossip/media or sports blog.
Like I said, ban bait.
07/03/09
07/03/09
07/03/09
This is ungood.
07/20/09
With that said I will cautiously point out in a similarly declarative tone that "gasoline" "cellophane" and "aspirin" are all words that used to be trademarked until the masses sullied them with their filthy tongues. I'm sure an easy trope in law school is pointing out the commonality of "Kleenex" and "Xerox" and the hazard they run of losing their lucrative capitalization. Chanel isn't a product used by a huge percentage of the population so the hazard would seem to be much smaller but I guess they have a lawyer who wanted to assert themselves, perhaps for career reasons or sexual unhappiness.
And speaking of sex, Bookish, our Citrus Babylon awaits a mere hour north of where I sit at this very moment. If that's too expository for a Monday morning I apologize. I took klonopin last night. I mean Klonopin. Don't yell at me, F. Hoffmann–La Roche, Ltd.
07/03/09
07/03/09
07/03/09
07/03/09
07/03/09
07/03/09
07/03/09
07/03/09
07/03/09
Incidentally, Foster, the commoners are taking the name of Chanel in vain, not in vein.
07/03/09
07/03/09
07/04/09