Wow, this one really brought out the Beck crazies. Is it McCarthy or King that brought them out? Oh well, approved comments only for this thread. I get enough crazy on the streets of NYC.
When you show that much hate towards gays I believe deep inside that person would suck a dick in a second or already has and hate's the fact he enjoyed it or fantasizes about it.
@Sharksbreath: Look, until he solicits a cop in a men's restroom or is outed because his meth dealing gay hooker has an ethical conflict with his hypocrisy (the way normal gay Republicans do) he's on your team, k?
Let's play a game. We all know that Republican officials always turn out to be liars, adulterers, closet cases, theives, and other assorted evil. What will this cretin's eventual scandal be? Sleeping with underage girls? boys? animals? Dressing like a nazi and being spanked? I think the level of hater matches the level of scandal so I can't wait to hear what bizarre fuckery this dude has been up to.
You may recall that Iowa-based Representative King, along with Ron Paul, voted against a plaque honoring the slaves who were forced to build the Capitol building.
I know it's early but no you may not recall that because the post you link to expressly states that Ron Paul did not vote against the plaque.
You know when you're dealing with a difficult client and, in order to make them see and agree with what you're proposing, you craft it in such a way that they think it was their idea? I think someone, somewhere, has gotten through to O'Reilly. Just think: could this, perchance, be the end of the culture war?
I'm sure he'll clarify his position this evening, but the way he establishes that the public option is dead before proceeding with a moderate sounding position, you have to wonder if he's contemplating a run for office.
After all, he's bound to be getting bored with television in general and his shtick in particular, plus political leaders are much more likely to get into the history books and they're often pretty adept at talking out of both sides of their mouth.
@l'américaine française: I, too, have seen moments in which he exhibits a reasonable, listening-to-both-sides position. I'm thinking that's when producers tap into his earpiece and demand he fulfill his nightly anger quota. Bam, back to blowhard.
Well, HE doesn't care if Obama doesn't get elected next time. It's ratings gold for him. So it would be an awesome time for him to kneecap the Republicans on this one and identify, again, as a independent.
I think he's right on the money, for once. The trouble is and remains on the supply-side, though, and the troublesome implications are and were over costs. Cost, cost, cost. He and they and we have to be honest about taxes, and approach this like a thoughtful compromise instead of a wild ideal.
@Unsolicited Advice: Here's a modest proposal: end one of the largest entitlements in the federal budget, the tax exemption for money paid on home mortgages, worth, last I read, over $100 billion a year. It's patently discriminatory against renters and the kind of social engineering one would think fiscal conservatives hate (one would think).
I know, that figure only gets us a tenth of the way there, but it's a start.
Landed, middle-class individuals have the demographics to keep that mortgage exemption in perpetuity. There simply isn't a politically viable way to remove that in the midst of a foreclosure crisis. Especially because the hit to home valuations (the tax benefit is a component of price) is unwelcome after 20-40% home price declines in 2 years and would probably put most homes underwater. If we're cutting fat, I'd suggest starting elsewhere, not least because I - like more than half of Americans - am a homeowner!
(That's why the Baucus plan is structured as it is: the "tax" is structured to look like a premium. And it removes another large entitlement, the fact that most employed recipients of health care pay for it out of pre-tax income.)
@Mediahohoho: FYI only the interest paid on a mortgage is tax deductible. Not the whole mortgage payment. I think that is a pretty important distinction.
@Mediahohoho: Not only is it patentedly discriminatory against renters, but it really only benefits fairly well-off homeowners because you can only take it if you itemize. More than half of the benefit is taken by just 12 percent of taxpayers- those who make more than $100,000. It's downright regressive. Plus it inflates home values and artificially steers investment capital into property at the expense of other investment opportunities, like stocks, and thus may stifle innovation.
Sadly, howevermuch economists and renters may hate the mortgage income deduction, the political will to get rid of it will never materialize.
@Unsolicited Advice: I'm realistic enough to realize that what you say is true, that there are too many recipients of this particular entitlement for it to ever be considered. That doesn't mean it isn't a good idea--just that it can't be done in our me-first political culture. Same thing with cutting defense spending, or ending our adventurous clusterfuck wars.
But unless we do start to address some of these sacred cows, people will always be able to say we can't pay for health care reform. And it will always be untrue.
09/24/09
09/24/09
09/24/09
09/24/09
When you show that much hate towards gays I believe deep inside that person would suck a dick in a second or already has and hate's the fact he enjoyed it or fantasizes about it.
No Homo.
09/24/09
09/24/09
09/24/09
09/24/09
I know it's early but no you may not recall that because the post you link to expressly states that Ron Paul did not vote against the plaque.
09/24/09
09/24/09
Also, I vote that the Real Steve King likes to dress up like Karl Marx and be sexed over by underage dancing Muslim boys dressed like slaves.
09/18/09
09/18/09
*cue Twilight Zone music*
09/18/09
I don't know what to say.
April 1 is months away, right?
09/18/09
09/18/09
After all, he's bound to be getting bored with television in general and his shtick in particular, plus political leaders are much more likely to get into the history books and they're often pretty adept at talking out of both sides of their mouth.
09/18/09
He was on The View in October 2008 and he said, I quote, "Well, sometimes socialism is good."
Of course, I can't find the damn video-segment on YouTube now where I first heard it, but this article quotes his phrase:
[www.associatedcontent.com]
One measly example, I know, but just sayin', he's not all evil.
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
I know, that figure only gets us a tenth of the way there, but it's a start.
09/18/09
Landed, middle-class individuals have the demographics to keep that mortgage exemption in perpetuity. There simply isn't a politically viable way to remove that in the midst of a foreclosure crisis. Especially because the hit to home valuations (the tax benefit is a component of price) is unwelcome after 20-40% home price declines in 2 years and would probably put most homes underwater. If we're cutting fat, I'd suggest starting elsewhere, not least because I - like more than half of Americans - am a homeowner!
(That's why the Baucus plan is structured as it is: the "tax" is structured to look like a premium. And it removes another large entitlement, the fact that most employed recipients of health care pay for it out of pre-tax income.)
09/18/09
09/18/09
Sadly, howevermuch economists and renters may hate the mortgage income deduction, the political will to get rid of it will never materialize.
09/19/09
But unless we do start to address some of these sacred cows, people will always be able to say we can't pay for health care reform. And it will always be untrue.
09/19/09