<![CDATA[Gawker: spoiler alert]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: spoiler alert]]> http://gawker.com/tag/spoileralert http://gawker.com/tag/spoileralert <![CDATA[Oh Yes, There Will Be Weed]]> When it comes to plot details, producers of Mad Men are as tight lipped as an Olsen twin at an all-you-can-eat buffet. So, what happens in episode two three? One phrase: "I'm Peggy Olson and I want to smoke marijuana."

Last night, due to a glitch with iTunes, the second third episode of the show was briefly available for download for everyone who signed up for a season pass. One of our loyal readers snagged it and passed this along. Peggy actually utters that line. Awesome.

Our tipster sent over a brief (if not vague) recap: "The episode features some modernist poetry, fabulous lindy hop, Roger in blackface, a new substance of choice in the offices of Sterling Cooper, and Joan rocking out in French while on the accordion. There is also a strange subplot between Sally and her grandpa."

We get so excited when two of our favorite things come together. We're getting the gravity bong out of storage for this one.

Update: AMC issued a statement:

"The third episode of Mad Men's new season was made available prematurely to some iTunes Season Pass holders for a short time late last night. We urge those who received this episode in error to please refrain from spoiling plot lines out of respect to other ‘Mad Men' fans who are looking forward to watching the story unfold."

Sorry. Too late! Looks like the cat's out of the (dime) bag.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5340788&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Did the Mad Men Season 3 Premiere Live Up to the Hype?]]> Well the first episode of the new season of Mad Men just ended. Let's scan the internet to get the immediate reactions of a few folks, shall we?

Needless to say, if you haven't watched the episode yet and don't want to have anything spoiled for you, you might want to skip scrolling down on this post.

Tracie Egan at Jezebel live-blogged the episode and came away less than impressed:

10:24 Am I the only one who is disappointed by this episode so far? It's really oddly paced and not getting to any of the shit that interests me (Peggy, Joan, Betty, etc.).

10:55 That was it!?

Vulture's Logan Hill loved it:

If you had never seen Mad Men before, this premiere would have utterly baffled you. But we don't care about you! We loved it: Take these two moments that wouldn't mean anything to a newbie:

The brand London Fog? Pryce explains that there never was any fog there - just the coal dust from the industrial era. This is the most direct metaphor we've seen yet for this unsentimental show. Believe in the romantic mist, or Mad Men's cool, smoky style, if you want: Underneath, it's all carcinogenic. Those cigarettes aren't toasted, they're lethal. The Sterling Cooper men (and this show) willfully perpetuate the lie: "I don't care what they say," says Cooper. "London Fog is a great name."

Another moment: "You look like Ty Power," says the stewardess to Don. "Remember him?" Like Don, Power was a former Marine typecast as the romantic lead. But Power died in 1958, years after his prime. Don, who needs reading glasses, is a relic of an older era in 1963, which is why his advice to the London Fog guys is so last-decade. That season-three poster of Don calmly holding a cocktail as the water rises in his office? Don's too cocky to notice the water rising. He's the oblivious frog who doesn't know the sixties are about to boil him up.

Alan Sepinwall, the TV critic at The Star-Ledger, loved the show and the new London Fog client storyline.

Yes, "Mad Men" is back, and "Out of Town" was an incredibly satisfying way for the show to return from the long hiatus. Heck, even if the rest of the episode had been a drag, it would have been worth it for the running gag about London Fog itself, which served as a metaphor for the whole show.

On Twitter, Jake Tapper felt inspired to light up and booze:





Defamer founding editor Mark Lisanti was enthused over the continuation of Don Draper adulterous ways:





Our new Defamer guy Richard Rushfield had issues with a certain Sterling Cooper in-house promotion:





Mediaite's Anthony De Rosa know's it's still all about the booze:





Yahoo Sports blogger Eamonn Brennan fondly recalled a time when few people cared so much about an episode of the show.





Pop culture enthusiast Max Valliquette was obviously impressed and then immediately saddened by the mindless tripe he watched afterwards:




I'll add more reactions as we find them as they begin rolling in from the West Coast later tonight. And tomorrow our Brian Moylan will have a more extended recap along with some video highlights from tonight's show. But judging by the reactions of the masses found via "#madmen" and "Mad Men" Twitter searches, the reaction seems to be generally positive.

What did you think about it?

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5338713&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Let's Get Ready for Lost]]> I don't know about you, but I am pooping kittens in anticipation of Wednesday's Lost season premiere. The great big mystery machine is my favorite thing on the air. Let's look at a little preview.

Mastermind exec producers Cartlon Cuse and Damon Lindelof recently spoke to a group of TV critics and divulged some interesting tidbits! Warning, there are some (slight) spoilers.

From The Hollywood Reporter:

On that four-toed statue...

The idea [was] to say the history of the island was a long one, and that people had been on the island for a long time... and this season, as we’re skipping through time, hopefully they’ll see that.

On Sawyer's shirtlessness...

Sawyer has a lot to do this year. For those who are not fans of time travel, we have his shirt off in the season premiere.

From Entertainment Weekly:

"Episode 3 spoiler: A male character makes this shocking declaration: 'Because I am in love with the woman sitting next to me.'"

"Episode 3 spoiler: Someone says, 'You're in my life now — you and Charlie.'"

"Episode 3 spoiler: A male character poses this question to another male character: 'I assume you've come back for the bomb.'"

Said Cuse: "As we get deeper into the season, you're going to learn a lot more about the island's history."

So that's exciting.

On Sunday, I'm watching a few key episodes with some friends, as recommended by EW's always-reliable Jeff "Doc" Jensen:

Season 3
"Flashes Before your Eyes" (Disc 2)
"Through the Looking Glass" Parts 1 & 2 (Disc 6)

Season 4
"The Constant" (Disc 2)
"Cabin Fever" (Disc 3)
"There's No Place Like Home Parts" 1 & 2 (Disc 4)

Happy obsessing til Wednesday, Chahhhhlie.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5133506&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Ralph Nader, Asshole]]> Guess who's here: Ralph Nader! The irritating old fool went completely around the bend this year, and now he's on Fox News calling Barack Obama an Uncle Tom. That's right! The formerly respectable lefty consumer advocate—seriously, we didn't even hate on him after 2000—now just says outrageous nonsense for attention, like when he did the thing with the parrot. He's pissed away his relevance and thus his hope of accomplishing any of his admirable goals and we're sick of him.

In 2000, Nader got nearly 3 million votes, for 2.74 percent of the popular vote. In 2004, he didn't even get 500k. This year it looks like he managed to get half a percent of the vote, though, with 587,758 and counting, so good work, Ralph! He beat the Libertarian! And got just enough votes, it looks like, to put Missouri in the McCain camp! SPOILER!!!

There was a time, 20 years ago, when Nader could've been in a Democratic president's cabinet. And, you know, then he could've actually helped working people and stuff! Now he just talks to parrots and says incredibly insulting things about Barack Obama, who everyone likes, unlike poor dumb Ralph Nader, who invented seat belts and then spent his last years annoying liberals.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5077489&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Jim and Pam Sittin’ In A Tree…]]> Our country is self-destructing before our very eyes. Banks are collapsing, wars are raging, politicians are canceling their appearances on Letterman, but at least we can still rely on true love. That’s right, on last night’s hour-long season premiere of The Office, we finally got the satisfaction of seeing ... um, well, something that can only be described as an epic spoiler. Fans of The Office who dutifully tuned into NBC last night, please follow along after the jump to continue the conversation. Those of you who DVR'd it, well, you might want to continue along to another post.

Where were we? Ah yes, we finally got to see ... Jim pop the question to Pam! And don’t let the fact that it happened on a dingy highway rest stop in the middle of a rainstorm fool you, it was totes romantic. Not quite as romantic as that Tim and Dawn kiss from the original British Office Christmas Special, but still, pretty good. Get your Kleenex ready and check it out.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5055371&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[What Will Our President of Tomorrow Look Like in the Future?]]> The presidency ages a man. (And hypothetically it would a woman, but we'll never know!) Remember when there was color in Bill Clinton's and George W. Bush's hair? Barely? After two terms in the Oval Office, both men looked twenty years older. This despite the fact that Bush gets 12 hours of sleep a night and Clinton received regular tail! But what will happen to Barack Obama or John McCain? Obama does too many drugs to sleep and old people like McCain just doze off in front of the tv each night for a couple unsatisfying hours. So we had intern Anna Peele work a little photoshop wizardry to age Obama and McCain and help us figure out exactly which terrifying visage we'll be forced to look upon in 2012. Scary results below!

See? Then they'll dissolve the Senate and create the Galactic Empire.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5027380&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Next Four Eliminations Leaked to the Web]]> The tumult surrounding Project Runway continues, now with illicit spoilers. The fashion design competition show has been involved in all sorts of hullabaloo ever since the news dropped that the series would be moving from Bravo to Lifetime after the 5th season, which premiered last week. NBC Universal was pissed and threatened to sue. Then came more bad news about Nina Garcia-related woes and a much groaned-about move to Los Angeles. As this new season approached, Bravo seemed to barely acknowledge it—almost as if they were bitterly trying to sabotage the show. And now these spoilers. Some sneaky someone went onto the show's Wikipedia page and added results for the next four challenges, including who gets eliminated. Is it real, is it a hoax? Take a look after the jump at a screenshot of the "Designer Elimination Chart" and judge (heh) for yourself. Update: Most of the chart has been removed from the Wiki page, but we still have the screenshot!

Goodbye, Jerrell! See ya later, Suede! You were too annoying and queeny for this world. As we tend to play the wild speculation game around here once in a while, we like to think that this was all part of the same great Bravo super plot that squelched any buzz for the current season. Wouldn't that be wicked and hilarious? Truly as bitchy a move as a bitchy network like Bravo could muster. Of course it could mean lawsuits and firings and all that, so we're just sayin' is all. Just sayin'. Can't wait to watch what happens.

Hey, wait a second.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5027308&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[In Which We Start To Say Goodbye (Yet Again) to Lost]]> Tonight begins the two-part, three hour long finale of this most wonderful of seasons of Lost. The ABC mind-bender show has been in top form this year, with its tantalizing ballet of bobs and weaves, feints and hints. We now know who the Oceanic Six are, but still not why they are (we will learn something about that tonight). We know a little about time travel, some new tidbits about the island's history, and a little more about who's gonna dieeee (Chahhlee.) As we slowly start to bundle up for the long, cold nuclear winter of having no Lost until next January, let's enjoy these final moments. Here is EW.com's Doc Jensen with a typically thorough and engaging episode preview and, after the jump if you're so inclined, are some sneak peeks from tonight's installment. (With a familiar face, for Battlestar Galactica fans.) The real kicker, though? We don't even get a new episode next week! Bah.



[Via Videogum]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=390924&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[OMFG: Serena's Big Secret]]> It's amazing to watch a show wildly redeem and practically reinvent itself in one night. The episode, written brilliantly by Paul Sciarrotta (seems to be his first episode!), was funny and suspenseful and, um, downright shocking at the end. (Well, as shocking as a network television show about dopey teenagers can get). The jokes! The Waverly Inn! Page Six! Tinsley Mortimer! Sciarrotta, a Georgetown alum, seems to know his pop-ish topical New York stuff, something the show was sorely missing. And what else? Gays! Bitchiness! And, um, murder?

The Eric-is-gay plot line was just as silly and expected and satisfying as one could hope. And the Asher tie-in was surprising and funny and full of teeth. ("Get this faggot out of my house!") The Lily and Serena comfort the 'mo stuff was a bit maudlin, but understandably necessary. It's sort of a bummer that the Eric/Asher relationship is kinda over before it started, but I'm sure there will be other twinky idiots on the horizon for our diminutive little friend.

Leighton Meester was in fine form (she's the best actress of the kids, I think) as Blair maneuvered all the gay rumors via Gossip Girl (great to see her heavily featured again!) and crushed little squawking Jenny Humphrey. The nice little button of sadness put at the end of their battle was warm and smart, and leads me to think they may not actually be "done' as Jenny so wearily declared.

This is all, of course, just preamble to the wham bang holy holy shit final scene, in which a devastated, weepy Serena, having had yet another scary "I'm gonna tellll" run in with Georgina, broke down at Blair's house. What was the secret, Blair and everyone else wanted to know. It involved video, so I assumed it was porn. But...um... no. "I killed someone," Serena moaned. And then that music! That thumping, scary scary music. I must admit I got up and did a little "WTF???" dance and then made my roommate rewind and replay the last scene. It was shocking and brilliant and just what this show needed to really get the soapy fantastic stuff going. I can't wait to see where they take this. Hopefully it won't fizzle and die too soon... LIKE THE MAN SERENA KILLED. Shocking clip is below.

Crazy! And, I should mention. This Friday, at 8pm at the People's Improv Theatre, Sara Benincasa, comedienne (and Gawker commenter!) is hosting a panel discussion on this here show. I will be one of the panel members, joining some fantastic funny folk, so if you're around you should definitely come. It's going to be silly (and boozy) and there is free GG-themed food. Info is here.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=387530&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Iron Man 2: It's Inevitable]]> Did you go see Iron Man this weekend? The whizbang blow 'em up made made more money than God, so we're assuming you were one of the gurgling many who showed up to watch Charlie Chaplin dance for his career. (I know, he's great in it and it's frickin' awesome and blah blah). Did you stay through the end? If not, you should have! After the credits was as bold and silly a sequel tease as it gets. Samuel L. Jackson! Wearing an eye patch! Something about Avengers! Whee! We shan't say any more, lest we spoil a movie we ourselves have not yet seen, so we'll keep a bootleg of the secret ending safely after the jump. [From WNJO]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=387186&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Newsweek Critic Celebrates Retirement By Spoiling Cinema's Greatest Endings]]> Since put-upon, soon-to-retire film critic David Ansen officially has nothing to lose by prattling on at length over at Newsweek, expect a lot more pieces like the one in the magazine's current issue. To wit: Hollywood movies have lousy endings! And: Here, let me give them all away!

Now that the summer season is (almost) here, along with the usual collection of sequels, comedies, converted TV shows and special-effects derbies, we can expect a deluge of happy endings—you don't build franchises on bleak conclusions. The very notion of a franchise film, however, almost guarantees that its ending be less than fully satisfying. If it were, why would we want to come back for more? ...
Will any of these upbeat finales, like the much-anticipated return of Indiana Jones, fill us with real joy—the way that rousing rock-and-roll finale of the original "Shrek" left us with a big childlike grin on our faces? Constructing these tentpole extravaganzas, the studios often think that throwing millions of dollars of special effects in our faces is a reasonable substitute for a dramatically coherent ending, as if the sheer noise and spectacle will convince us we're having a thumping good time.

Naturally, Ansen can't even wank himself to a decent climax; first come the spoilers, from About Schmidt to Witness For The Prosecution to Carrie to Before Sunset and more — none especially guarded mass-culture secrets, but all yielding some pop for anyone who hasn't seen them. Then come the loose ends: Two of last year's most celebrated films, No Country For Old Men (Best Picture!) and There Will Be Blood (Best Picture runner-up!), were debated, dissected and embraced precisely because of the ambiguity of their endings. Neither receive any mention here.

Ansen also omits Star Wars, which kicked off the most profitable franchise in cinema history with a perfectly self-contained two-hour film — then followed it with a grim sequel featuring a cliffhanger still waiting to be outdone. Our own theory is that Ansen planned his own two-part series, which will conclude in next week's issue with a grand finale announcing... Oh, why spoil it? We've been waiting forever to see how Ansen will explain his last 30 years.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=383163&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA['Post' Rats Out 'Sopranos' Secrets]]> For a variety of reasons we were unable to catch last night's penultimate "Sopranos." We've already informed most of our friends (that is, everyone on IM) not to tell us what happened, and we've avoided every website we know that might reveal any spoilers. This leaves us with very little to read. Oh, well, we thought: At least there's always the newspapers. They'll be safe, right? So if you did happen to see last night's episode, do keep quiet about it; gosh, we'd hate to learn about any surprises!

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=265580&view=rss&microfeed=true