Enter your username and password.
New York, 3:12 AM
Sat Dec 5
54 posts in the last 24 hours

Tip Your Editors:
Tipline: 646-214-8138
Editor-in-Chief:
Gabriel Snyder |
West Coast Editor:
Richard Rushfield |
Contributing Editors:
Valleywag:
Ryan Tate |
Media:
Hamilton Nolan |
Politics:
Alex Pareene |
Investigations:
John Cook |
Entertainment:
Brian Moylan |
Nights:
Adrian Chen |
Azaria Jagger |
Ravi Somaiya |
Weekends:
Foster Kamer |
Video Editor:
Richard Blakeley |
Please enter your email address to have your password reset.
Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.
Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.
You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.
See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.
10/31/09
WeepyVP Joe10/30/09
WeepyVP Joe10/30/09
WeepyVP JoeAnd he doesn't drink. I don't trust people who don't drink, unless they've already been alcoholics. #joebiden
10/30/09
WeepyVP JoeEither this new crop of staff writers is utterly fucked, or the editorial direction has taken a nosedive, or both.
Is there some negative correlation between the quality of stories and the quality of AJAX/CSS? #joebiden
10/30/09
10/30/09
10/30/09
10/30/09
WeepyVP Joe10/30/09
WeepyVP Joe10/31/09
10/30/09
WeepyVP JoeThat being said, why are we posting crap from Fox News anyway - I thought we weren't supposed to take this stuff seriously?
#joebiden
08/03/09
08/02/09
08/02/09
08/03/09
08/02/09
08/02/09
08/02/09
Needless to say, it was never corrected. He was French, after all.
08/02/09
Also he misspelled École Normale Supérieure as École Normal Supérieure (TWICE in the same paragraph—nice!) and alleged that the 2002 doc Derrida was solely made by Amy Ziering Kofman, when in fact filmmaker Kirby Dick co-directed and co-everything the doc and he usually gets the 1st credit for the project.
Nothing on the Alessandra Stanley Richter scale of wrongness, IMHO. What did I miss?
08/04/09
Well, their description of his work came entirely from The Big Reactionary Book of Filosophy, and did not address a single issue Derrida has ever actually written about.
"deconstruction, the method of inquiry that asserted that all writing was full of confusion and contradiction..."
uh, whut? Are you kidding me?
"and that the author's intent could not overcome the inherent contradictions of language itself..."
??? Where, what... Are they talking about his argument with Searle? Where do they get this crap?
"...robbing texts - whether literature, history or philosophy - of truthfulness, absolute meaning and permanence."
Can somebody please tell me what the fucking subject of "robbing" is here? Does it even matter in this random word-spew?
Could somebody please cite one article or book in which D argues anything about a book's capacity for "truthfulness"?
I mean, the Derrida I've read addresses the history of the concept of writing (in relation to speech), Freud's theories of memory, the concept of "spirit" in Heidegger, the ramifications of gift-giving in certain anthropological theories, questions of testimony versus confession, etc, etc, etc.
But apparently I'm wrong. The NYT sets me straight. What Derrida actually wrote about was the fact that "reality isn't real! Back to you, Steve Doocy!"
08/02/09
in ye olde days, reporters got double plus secret probation for a misspelled middle initial
08/02/09
"Though the correct date of the moon landing was fresh in his mind, Manly said, he read right over that mistake. Catching it might have flagged the need for more careful vetting."
Here's something else that might have flagged the need for more careful vetting: the words "By Alessandra Stanley" under the headline.