• Profile logout login

#stephenwolfram

Gawker

Share Cancel
   
Upload an image | Add an image URL
×

logging in
  • FAQ. Include # before tag:
  • #tips,
  • #stalker,
  • #opencaption,
  • #internalmemos,
  • etc.

New York, 6:35 PM
Sun Nov 29
12 posts in the last 24 hours

Team

Tip Your Editors:
tips@gawker.com
Tipline: 646-214-8138

Editor-in-Chief:
Gabriel Snyder | Email

West Coast Editor:
Richard Rushfield | Email

Contributing Editors:

Valleywag:
Ryan Tate | Email

Media:
Hamilton Nolan | Email

Politics:
Alex Pareene | Email

Investigations:
John Cook | Email

Entertainment:
Brian Moylan | Email

Nights:
Adrian Chen | Email
Azaria Jagger | Email
Ravi Somaiya | Email

Weekends:
Foster Kamer | Email

Video Editor:
Richard Blakeley | Email

SUBSCRIBE TO Gawker RSS

New: Breaking news and daily top stories via email
4260 Subscribers
Gawker
  • posts about #stephenwolfram more →

    Wake Us When Wolfram Alpha Can Solve an Actual Problem

    The Humans Who Will Kill the Google Machine
  • Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.
    Dsmvwl  Admin  Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×
    Image of i'm a bottle i'm a bottle
    05/19/09

    In reply to Wake Us When Wolfram Alpha Can Solve an Actual Problem
    My preferred method of retrieving data using natural language queries is by using virginal priestesses that live in mountain temples. Their services do indeed cost me a goat, require me to participate in ritual cleansing, fasting, abstention from all sexual activity and avoiding touching unclean women for up to two weeks, but there is the added advantage of my being able to receive my data in dactylic hexameter with complex rhyme schemes.
     Reply
    i'm a bottle was starred i'm a bottle was unstarred
    Image of Figaro Figaro
    05/18/09

    In reply to Wake Us When Wolfram Alpha Can Solve an Actual Problem
    WOlframAlpha is near complete crap. I've tried around 40 queries so far and none of them have been great. Maybe 10 were OK, rest just plain awful.


    So far, this service is a giant fail.

     Reply
    Figaro was starred Figaro was unstarred
    Image of i'm a bottle i'm a bottle
    05/18/09

    In reply to Wake Us When Wolfram Alpha Can Solve an Actual Problem
    I love it. It's like a really smart calculator. Unfortunately, it's not robust enough to answer the questions that I need answered with any great frequency. Give it some time and some input from the humanities community and it will get there.
     Reply
    i'm a bottle was starred i'm a bottle was unstarred
    Image of i'm a bottle i'm a bottle
    05/18/09

    @i'm a bottle: The weather data is golden as is the demographics stuff. I love how they spit out the charts automatically for you.
     Reply
    i'm a bottle was starred i'm a bottle was unstarred
    Image of celery celery
    05/18/09

    In reply to Wake Us When Wolfram Alpha Can Solve an Actual Problem
    To be honest, the only hype I read about this was a gushing piece by one Owen Thomas. Not surprised it ended this way.
     Reply
    celery was starred celery was unstarred
    Image of Shadowlayer Shadowlayer
    03/10/09

    In reply to The Humans Who Will Kill the Google Machine
    They better have a kickass logo to go with that name
     Reply
    Shadowlayer was starred Shadowlayer was unstarred
    Image of i'm a bottle i'm a bottle
    03/09/09

    In reply to The Humans Who Will Kill the Google Machine
    Ask Wolfram.
     Reply
    i'm a bottle was starred i'm a bottle was unstarred
    Image of skippywasserman skippywasserman
    03/09/09

    In reply to The Humans Who Will Kill the Google Machine
    Back when I was a kid we had two places in town to go get answers. There was the library, with its books and facts and encyclopedias, and metal detectors. And there was Rupert K. McCormack. Ol' Rupe could answer just about anything, and in half the time. He was right just about as often, and was often so much more helpful than those tired old books. Often, he was also much more forthcoming about certain subjects, such as drugs, videotape, and certain legal matters, than those dusty old women and the books they kept pretty down there at the main branch's special collections room.


    Yep. Back when I was a kid...

     Reply
    skippywasserman was starred skippywasserman was unstarred
    Image of 1Melanie 1Melanie
    03/09/09

    @skippywasserman:


    Awww...it's ok honey. You must have just had a birthday. The library was a special place back in those days wasn't it...


    before quaint town libraries turned to big community centers with neglected children hogging the computers.


    Yes, remember the oak card holders of the Dewey Decimal System.

     Reply
    1Melanie was starred 1Melanie was unstarred
    Image of Juancho Juancho
    03/09/09

    @1Melanie: so, so true (says the librarian at the town library turned community center with neglgected children and adults hogging the pcs).
     Reply
    Juancho was starred Juancho was unstarred
    Image of skahammer skahammer
    03/09/09

    In reply to The Humans Who Will Kill the Google Machine
    I thought Wolfram was working on revising the scientific method by deconstructing the process of induction or something. I don't know, even this seems like a comedown.
     Reply
    skahammer was starred skahammer was unstarred
    Image of britneyspearstears britneyspearstears
    03/09/09

    In reply to The Humans Who Will Kill the Google Machine
    Nothing is true?


    Yes.

     Reply
    britneyspearstears was starred britneyspearstears was unstarred
    Image of belltolls belltolls
    03/09/09

    In reply to The Humans Who Will Kill the Google Machine
    If I only had a brain.
     Reply
    belltolls was starred belltolls was unstarred
    Image of RocktheDebit RocktheDebit
    03/09/09

    In reply to The Humans Who Will Kill the Google Machine
    But are monads involved?
     Reply
    RocktheDebit was starred RocktheDebit was unstarred
    Image of i'm a bottle i'm a bottle
    03/09/09

    @RocktheDebit: It depends on which possible world we happen to be in.
     Reply
    i'm a bottle was starred i'm a bottle was unstarred
    Image of phlox✔ phlox✔
    03/09/09

    In reply to The Humans Who Will Kill the Google Machine
    While the potential ramifications of this 'next great leap' are exciting,
    I'm still going for the anagrams.


    Wolfram Alpha:
    Flap, Wham, Oral!
    Harm, A Flop Law.
    A Prof All...Wham!

     Reply
    phlox✔ was starred phlox✔ was unstarred
    Image of Uncle_Billy_Slumming Uncle_Billy_Slumming
    03/09/09

    In reply to The Humans Who Will Kill the Google Machine
    This is the mechanical turk. See if Jeff Bezos or D.E. Shaw is involved.
     Reply
    Uncle_Billy_Slumming was starred Uncle_Billy_Slumming was unstarred
    Image of Claire Buoyant Claire Buoyant
    03/09/09

    In reply to The Humans Who Will Kill the Google Machine
    "Compute" answers to questions? Like...42?
     Reply
    Claire Buoyant was starred Claire Buoyant was unstarred
    Image of phlox✔ phlox✔
    03/09/09

    @Claire Buoyant: The answer to 42 is always milk with pi. You're welcome.
     Reply
    phlox✔ was starred phlox✔ was unstarred
    Image of phlox✔ phlox✔
    03/09/09

    @Claire Buoyant: Thanks to you and LardBeuys I am up to (nerd) speed on all things 42.
    Here I was thinking you were just being really random & capricious.
     Reply
    phlox✔ was starred phlox✔ was unstarred
    Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion

Login

Enter your username and password.

Please enter a username.
Please enter your password.
logging in
Login via Facebook | Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Reset Password

Please enter your email address to have your password reset.

Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
requesting password reset

Register

Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.

Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.

Please enter a username.
Please enter a password.
Please confirm your password.
Passwords are not identical.
Please enter a valid email address.
registration sent, waiting for reply

Submit Your Comment

You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.

See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.

Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
logging in

Login with your Facebook or Gawker account.

Sign up here.



  • Archives
  • About
  • Advertising
  • Legal
  • Help
  • Report a Bug
  • FAQ
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.