That work-a-month-for-free thing is illegal. Workers could sue for payment. Which they would probably do, if they don't make the cut. Dumb, dumb, dumb. Not to mention, obnoxious.
@daveyjonesisdead: I think they can do that if it is considered training. There are some jobs where you actually have to pay to go through training run by the employer before you can get hired.
The consensus hiring reminds me of a story a professor told of an employer sued for discrimination when the entire staff was asked if they prefer to fire the staff member with AIDS or have their health premiums increase because a staff member has AIDS and they voted to fire. How many years until their stupid consensus violates some discrimination law?
@Lymed: More than likely the candidate has already been vetted and approved by two or three heavy hitters in the organization before being allowed to audition for the job, so they're as good as hired. In the rare event consensus is "no", either the top pig (ref. Animal Farm) breaks morale and image by telling everyone their vote is merely advisory, or HR comes up with something legally passable. It's been done for decades.
@dantsea: It's not that different from tenure, honestly. Those who have it vote on those who don't. A month is probably not long enough to determine whether or not someone's an asshole or incompetent, though. Anyone but the most dangerously psychotic can hold it together for a month.
07/29/09
07/29/09
07/29/09
07/29/09
Shine on, crazy diamonds.
07/29/09
07/29/09
07/29/09
07/29/09
07/29/09
07/29/09
07/29/09
07/29/09
07/29/09
07/29/09
You know, for the afterlife!