susan wojcicki

posts about #susanwojcicki more →
How Google Will Invade Your Privacy While 'Protecting' It
Google Cuts Off Its Big-Media Dreams
Google's austerity campaign
Googler mom Esther Wojcicki's sideline job as Google publicist
Google founder's journalist mother-in-law writes blimp infomercial
Susan Wojcicki's children set for life
Solving Google's childcare crisis, the Microsoft way
Kinderplex crisis reveals Google founder's fumbling and fibbing
Google daycare now a luxury for Larry and Sergey's inner circle
The women of Google, minus the catfight

Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.

Dsmvwl Admin Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×

SeaBassTian
03/11/09

In reply to How Google Will Invade Your Privacy While 'Protecting' It
"But is it relevant to our online lives today? In an age of oversharing, when we update Facebook with every emotion and Twitter every Web page we come across, when we blog, blog, blog it all, is Google really the biggest threat - or is it us?" We have traced the calls and they are coming from inside your damn house. Updating your privacy settings won't help you when you insist on living your life like an open blog. But I'm guilty just like you!
Reply

SeaBassTian was starred SeaBassTian was unstarred

Uncle_Billy_Slumming
03/11/09

In reply to How Google Will Invade Your Privacy While 'Protecting' It
You just revealed more than you probably wanted to in that post.

I wish i had a friend named Shuman Ghosemajumder. That's a great name. Schubert Ghosemajumder would work too.
Reply

Uncle_Billy_Slumming
03/11/09

@Uncle_Billy_Slumming:

Here's some fun reading on the topic of privacy:

[www.alternet.org]'s_spying_efforts_on_the_united.../

And we shouldn't forget the reason Homeland Security Cyberdude just quit:

"Rod Beckström's resignation as director of the Homeland Security Department's National Cybersecurity Center (NCSC). In his resignation letter, Beckström said the National Security Agency effectively controls DHS' cyber initiatives and dominates most national efforts"

[fcw.com]
Reply

i'm a bottle
03/11/09

In reply to How Google Will Invade Your Privacy While 'Protecting' It
I find it rather transparent system. I wish all the sites I visit would tell me what they think about me. At least I can opt out.
Reply

i'm a bottle was starred i'm a bottle was unstarred

i'm a bottle
03/11/09

@i'm a bottle: ...a rather transparent system, I meant.
Reply

i'm a bottle was starred i'm a bottle was unstarred

Shadowlayer
02/14/09

In reply to Google Cuts Off Its Big-Media Dreams
Google is not even near collapse, the problem with this is that now they're net-bound only, there's no other media universe outside to conquer, which means that now on their ad business will only grow as much as the net does.

Plus there's the short term fact that tv ads still surpass online ads worldwide, so Google is not only losing a future market, but a big source of revenue that would come in handy right now.
Reply

Shadowlayer was starred Shadowlayer was unstarred

Maulleigh
02/12/09

In reply to Google Cuts Off Its Big-Media Dreams
I don't understand how companies like these have layoffs. Why not sell some of their expensive stock? Like, duh?
Reply

Maulleigh was starred Maulleigh was unstarred

TedEx
02/12/09

@Maulleigh: Or get rid of some perks like free breakfast and dinner. Cut 40 employees who were probably passionate in helping Google win in the radio ad space or make people actually pay for breakfast and dinner? Hmmm... tough choice.
Reply

TedEx was starred TedEx was unstarred

FracturedAcetabulum
02/12/09

In reply to Google Cuts Off Its Big-Media Dreams
"A Google army marches on its stomach." And it's fiscal sense.
Reply

BadUncle
02/12/09

In reply to Google Cuts Off Its Big-Media Dreams
Perhaps they can just be exiled?
Reply

BadUncle was starred BadUncle was unstarred

CheapCynicism
02/12/09

In reply to Google Cuts Off Its Big-Media Dreams
Is that analogy right, Owen? If I remember AP Euro History, the march to Moscow and its occupation cost Napoleon 3/4 of his men, and most of the remaining quarter died on the way back.

No, I don't have better things to do with my time. Why?
Reply

CheapCynicism was starred CheapCynicism was unstarred

Uncle_Billy_Slumming
02/12/09

@CheapCynicism:

Yes, ehem, quite right. As you can see in the chart I just threw together...

[en.wikipedia.org]
Reply

Uncle_Billy_Slumming
02/12/09

@Uncle_Billy_Slumming:

Here's another question: Will John K. Lattimer be purchasing their penises (penis-eye?) for thousands of dollars, eventually?

[www.straightdope.com]
Reply

Tremonius
02/12/09

@CheapCynicism: Right, he crossed the Elbe on his visit to Moscow with 450,000 troops, the way I heard it. I ain't wikiing here. By the time he left his army at the Elbe on his quick return, they numbered 10,000. Two river crossings, the sublime to the ridiculous.

Hey, this analogy means radio is burning!
Reply

Tremonius was starred Tremonius was unstarred

Owen Thomas
02/13/09

@CheapCynicism: Have you looked at Google's stock price lately?
Reply

Owen Thomas was starred Owen Thomas was unstarred

Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion

SUBSCRIBE TO Gawker

Login

Reset Password

Register

Submit Your Comment