• Profile logout login

#swearing

Gawker

Share Cancel
   
Upload an image | Add an image URL
×

logging in
  • FAQ. Include # before tag:
  • #tips,
  • #stalker,
  • #opencaption,
  • #internalmemos,
  • etc.

New York, 7:37 AM
Wed Nov 25
49 posts in the last 24 hours

Team

Tip Your Editors:
tips@gawker.com
Tipline: 646-214-8138

Editor-in-Chief:
Gabriel Snyder | Email

West Coast Editor:
Richard Rushfield | Email

Contributing Editors:

Valleywag:
Ryan Tate | Email

Media:
Hamilton Nolan | Email

Politics:
Alex Pareene | Email

Investigations:
John Cook | Email

Entertainment:
Brian Moylan | Email

Nights:
Adrian Chen | Email
Azaria Jagger | Email
Ravi Somaiya | Email

Weekends:
Foster Kamer | Email

Video Editor:
Richard Blakeley | Email

SUBSCRIBE TO Gawker RSS

New: Breaking news and daily top stories via email
4260 Subscribers
Gawker
  • posts about #swearing more →

    Humorless Supreme Court Keeps Foul-Mouthed Tapes To Themselves

    'Shit,' 'Fuck' to Enliven Supreme Court Oral Arguments

    WNBC Anchor's Swearing Was All Co-Anchor's Fault

    Let's abuse Google's new source code search

  • Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.

    Dsmvwl  Admin  Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×
    Image of overunderover overunderover
    11/03/08

    In reply to Humorless Supreme Court Keeps Foul-Mouthed Tapes To Themselves
    "Clarence, just once, can you look at the mother fucking camera? Just once?!"
     Reply
    overunderover was starred overunderover was unstarred
    Image of JinxyMcDeath JinxyMcDeath
    11/03/08

    In reply to Humorless Supreme Court Keeps Foul-Mouthed Tapes To Themselves
    I recently read a horrible thing about the Supreme Court and I need to share it:


    The abortion case that followed Roe v. Wade was Planned Parenthood of PA v. Casey. In sum, Pennsylvania passed a law with all these provisions for woman who want abortions including a 24-hour wait time, but most horrribly, a spousal notification. All women seeking abortions in PA would be REQUIRED to notify their husbands first. Seriously.


    The 3-judge panel on the 3rd circuit heard the case and upheld the statute but struck down the spousal notification provision...except for one judge who dissented and wanted to uphold spousal notification. He argued that although 90% of women would tell their husbands they were getting an abortion, the other 10% were negligible since the law shouldn't protect a small minority. The other judges argued that the 10% of women who wouldn't tell their husband did so because they were fearful for their safety. The judge who just didn't give a fuck about the 10% of women who could be beaten for getting pregnant? NEW Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito.


    I'll be on a ledge...


    P.S. The SC struck it down. O'Connor wrote (paraphrased) "since when do women lose rights when they get married?" Ha!

     Reply
    JinxyMcDeath was starred JinxyMcDeath was unstarred
    Image of BookishLookish BookishLookish
    11/03/08

    @JinxyMcDeath: We need her back now more than ever...
     Reply
    BookishLookish was starred BookishLookish was unstarred
    Image of Unfun Unfun
    11/03/08

    In reply to Humorless Supreme Court Keeps Foul-Mouthed Tapes To Themselves
    "Who put the pubic hair on my coke?" That'll always be my favorite Supreme Court dirty talk.
     Reply
    Unfun was starred Unfun was unstarred
    Image of Iceland Spar Iceland Spar
    11/03/08

    In reply to Humorless Supreme Court Keeps Foul-Mouthed Tapes To Themselves
    This is actually their typical practice, they've only made exceptions a few times (I believe the campaign finance hearing and one of the Gitmo Detainee cases were two of them) when they released the audio immediately after the hearing. I think that if they could delay the audio from this particular case from being released for 100 years, they would do so.


    BTW - what's up with that picture? It looks like Christmas with my family when nobody knows which camera to look at for the picture.

     Reply
    Iceland Spar was starred Iceland Spar was unstarred
    Image of BookishLookish BookishLookish
    11/03/08

    @Iceland_Spar: And why they gotta make the tiny Jewish lady stand in the back like that? No manners, these justices!
     Reply
    BookishLookish was starred BookishLookish was unstarred
    Image of scroll_lock scroll_lock
    11/03/08

    @BookishLookish: Talk about manners! Where are the tiny Jewish lady's hands, HMMM?!
     Reply
    scroll_lock was starred scroll_lock was unstarred
    Image of Iceland Spar Iceland Spar
    11/03/08

    @BookishLookish: @scroll_lock: I think she's goosing Scalia. And what is up with her frilly neckerchief?
     Reply
    Iceland Spar was starred Iceland Spar was unstarred
    Image of Aaron Altman Aaron Altman
    11/03/08

    In reply to Humorless Supreme Court Keeps Foul-Mouthed Tapes To Themselves
    BADER GINSBURG: Antonin... I love you...

    SCALIA: I'm sorry... I can't.

    BADER GINSBURG: Why, what's the matt -

    (Squirting sound interrupts)

    SCALIA: Oops! (Amorously.) I guess I can. Heh. Sorry about that.

    BADER GINSBURG (caressing his cheek): Oh, my love. (Beat.)

    Ten-second delays can happen to anyone.

    SCALIA: Oh, Ruth. Let's (BLEEP!) again.
     Reply
    Aaron Altman was starred Aaron Altman was unstarred
    Image of scroll_lock scroll_lock
    11/03/08

    @Aaron Altman: My favorite's the one where they had to make a quick call to Robert Bork for help getting the Astroglide bottle open.
     Reply
    scroll_lock was starred scroll_lock was unstarred
    Image of BookishLookish BookishLookish
    11/03/08

    @scroll_lock: Was that the willing third partner ruling I've been hearing about?
     Reply
    BookishLookish was starred BookishLookish was unstarred
    Image of scroll_lock scroll_lock
    11/03/08

    @BookishLookish: Yes, and it makes quid pro quo a bit hard to keep up with in the absence of notes.
     Reply
    scroll_lock was starred scroll_lock was unstarred
    Image of DontMakeMe DontMakeMe
    11/03/08

    @Aaron Altman: Or the time Justice Stewart kept bursting in on them with a camcorder yelling "I know pornography when I see it!"
     Reply
    DontMakeMe was starred DontMakeMe was unstarred
    Image of Aaron Altman Aaron Altman
    11/03/08

    @BookishLookish: @scroll_lock: @DontMakeMe: Robes were changed to protect the identity of the... AAAAGH MY EYES ARE BURNING.
     Reply
    Aaron Altman was starred Aaron Altman was unstarred
    Image of Aaron Altman Aaron Altman
    11/03/08

    @DontMakeMe: Heh. Was gonna work that in but I wanted to keep the scene intimate. And believable! I know, it didn't work.
     Reply
    Aaron Altman was starred Aaron Altman was unstarred
    Image of scroll_lock scroll_lock
    11/03/08

    @DontMakeMe: Those videos were grainy and badly lit but if you paused it (I've heard) you could make out Thomas's throbbing burden of proof.
     Reply
    scroll_lock was starred scroll_lock was unstarred
    Image of Aaron Altman Aaron Altman
    11/03/08

    @scroll_lock: BTW, they only do it at SCOTUS in the wee hours, because otherwise, you know, squeaking carries.
     Reply
    Aaron Altman was starred Aaron Altman was unstarred
    Image of DontMakeMe DontMakeMe
    11/03/08

    @Aaron Altman: @scroll_lock: Ha! I count always count on you to bring laughter to an otherwise crappy day!
     Reply
    DontMakeMe was starred DontMakeMe was unstarred
    Image of Aaron Altman Aaron Altman
    11/03/08

    @DontMakeMe: We make each other laugh, even while, um, driving.
     Reply
    Aaron Altman was starred Aaron Altman was unstarred
    Image of City_Dater City_Dater
    11/03/08

    @Aaron Altman:


    Ruth would sooooo not go there. Ick.

     Reply
    City_Dater was starred City_Dater was unstarred
    Image of Aaron Altman Aaron Altman
    11/03/08

    @City_Dater: Hah! It's Antonin's dulcet tones, thassall.
     Reply
    Aaron Altman was starred Aaron Altman was unstarred
    Image of scroll_lock scroll_lock
    11/03/08

    In reply to Humorless Supreme Court Keeps Foul-Mouthed Tapes To Themselves
    The most unseemly tape we'll never hear is the discussion Clarence Thomas led wherein he debated the merits of Bader Ginsburg's hippie bush vs. Sandra Day O'Connor's landing strip.
     Reply
    scroll_lock was starred scroll_lock was unstarred
    Image of Aaron Altman Aaron Altman
    11/03/08

    @scroll_lock: I think you might mean their windswept buttes.
     Reply
    Aaron Altman was starred Aaron Altman was unstarred
    Image of scroll_lock scroll_lock
    11/03/08

    @Aaron Altman: The wind will blow the cobwebs off, at least.
     Reply
    scroll_lock was starred scroll_lock was unstarred
    Image of souplines souplines
    11/03/08

    In reply to Humorless Supreme Court Keeps Foul-Mouthed Tapes To Themselves
    Supreme court to CSPAN "bite me fuckers"
     Reply
    souplines was starred souplines was unstarred
    Image of Aaron Altman Aaron Altman
    11/03/08

    In reply to Humorless Supreme Court Keeps Foul-Mouthed Tapes To Themselves


    For anyone who might be interested in hearing the Supreme Court in action, look up "May It Please The Court" on Amazon, Half.com, etc. It's a book and cassette tape set (not sure if it's ever been released on CD) that includes audio recordings of SCOTUS justices and famous-name lawyers from some of the biggest cases of our time. I'm going all Sarah Palin right now so please don't ask me for case names etc. Pretty sure Roe v. Wade is on there, the Miranda case, Brown v. Board of Ed., etc. Just get the damned thing while you still can, and tell the publishers to release the darn thing on CD or MP3 already!!!


    [www.amazon.com]

     Reply
    Aaron Altman was starred Aaron Altman was unstarred
    Image of BankerHardcore BankerHardcore
    11/03/08

    @Aaron Altman: I'm only in if it's narrated by Morgan Freeman or Samuel Jackson.
     Reply
    BankerHardcore was starred BankerHardcore was unstarred
    Image of Aaron Altman Aaron Altman
    11/03/08

    @BankerHardcore: Hah! How about Peter Irons of the Earl Warren Bill of Rights Project at the Univ. of California? Just as sexy.
     Reply
    Aaron Altman was starred Aaron Altman was unstarred
    Image of dinahshore dinahshore
    11/03/08

    In reply to Humorless Supreme Court Keeps Foul-Mouthed Tapes To Themselves
    The Supreme Court won't allow cameras in the court room, and since they have the final say, we won't be seeing clips of Scalia saying 'fuck' on YouTube any time soon.
     Reply
    dinahshore was starred dinahshore was unstarred
    Image of freedc freedc
    11/03/08

    @dinahshore: It's not about video though, the Supreme Court has done audio recordings of every argument for decades now. Sometimes it's released quickly, other times not.


    Well fuck, I guess we can hear that shit next summer then.

     Reply
    freedc was starred freedc was unstarred
    Image of dinahshore dinahshore
    11/03/08

    @freedc: shit, my fuck-up.

    (This is way too much fun)
     Reply
    dinahshore was starred dinahshore was unstarred
    Image of BookishLookish BookishLookish
    11/03/08

    @dinahshore: Cussing--it's as American as apple pie.
     Reply
    BookishLookish was starred BookishLookish was unstarred
    Image of BookishLookish BookishLookish
    11/03/08

    In reply to Humorless Supreme Court Keeps Foul-Mouthed Tapes To Themselves
    All that education and not one of them knows pig Latin? Yeesh.
     Reply
    BookishLookish was starred BookishLookish was unstarred
    Image of lobstr lobstr
    11/03/08

    In reply to Humorless Supreme Court Keeps Foul-Mouthed Tapes To Themselves
    What about the Open Motherfuckin Records Act, Shitwhores?
     Reply
    lobstr was starred lobstr was unstarred
    Image of Takes One to Know One Takes One to Know One
    11/03/08

    In reply to Humorless Supreme Court Keeps Foul-Mouthed Tapes To Themselves
    They didn't want to tempt Roberts with a public "That's what she said."
     Reply
    Takes One to Know One was starred Takes One to Know One was unstarred
    Image of BookishLookish BookishLookish
    11/03/08

    @frobisher: They didn't want us to see Thomas get all giggly and Scalia go all red in the face.
     Reply
    BookishLookish was starred BookishLookish was unstarred
    Image of Colonel Mustard Colonel Mustard
    11/03/08

    In reply to Humorless Supreme Court Keeps Foul-Mouthed Tapes To Themselves
    They're going to keep all that fucking shit to themselves.
     Reply
    Colonel Mustard was starred Colonel Mustard was unstarred
    Image of rosaluxembourgeoise rosaluxembourgeoise
    11/03/08

    In reply to Humorless Supreme Court Keeps Foul-Mouthed Tapes To Themselves
    Dura lex, sed lex, and fuck it.
     Reply
    rosaluxembourgeoise was starred rosaluxembourgeoise was unstarred
    Image of zapfdingbatme zapfdingbatme
    10/30/08

    In reply to 'Shit,' 'Fuck' to Enliven Supreme Court Oral Arguments
    Fuck 'shit' and 'fuck' I wanna hear 'sweet screaming Jesus!' on t.v. more often. What gives?
     Reply
    zapfdingbatme was starred zapfdingbatme was unstarred
    Image of unclevanya unclevanya
    10/31/08

    @lastcigaretteme: I was always partial to "sweet buttery Jesus" myself.
     Reply
    unclevanya was starred unclevanya was unstarred
    Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion

Login

Enter your username and password.

Please enter a username.
Please enter your password.
logging in
Login via Facebook | Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Reset Password

Please enter your email address to have your password reset.

Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
requesting password reset

Register

Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.

Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.

Please enter a username.
Please enter a password.
Please confirm your password.
Passwords are not identical.
Please enter a valid email address.
registration sent, waiting for reply

Submit Your Comment

You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.

See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.

Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
logging in

Login with your Facebook or Gawker account.

Sign up here.



  • Archives
  • About
  • Advertising
  • Legal
  • Help
  • Report a Bug
  • FAQ
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.