takashi murakami

posts about #takashimurakami more →
Luxury, LV, and Leftovers: Art Eats the Rich
Would-Be Movie Mogul Takashi Murakami Storms L.A. With New Studio
Jack-Off Sculpture Sells For $15 Million
Murakami's $4M Jack-off Cartoon
Takashi Murakami's Louis Vuitton bag

Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.

Dsmvwl Admin Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×

SultanaEleusis
04/23/09

In reply to Luxury, LV, and Leftovers: Art Eats the Rich
Cash fans blur the line between art and commerce, and should be considered the hot new art form of 2009.
Reply

SultanaEleusis was starred SultanaEleusis was unstarred

Smitros
04/23/09

@SultanaEleusis:

This reminds me (since disco is being discussed on the Idol thread) to ask whether anyone could come up with lyrics about cash fans to the tune of Donna Summer's "Last Dance."
Reply

Smitros was starred Smitros was unstarred

James Tiberius Quirk
04/23/09

In reply to Luxury, LV, and Leftovers: Art Eats the Rich
Never knew about Koons and tiered pricing but it all makes perfect sense now, from Warhol to Koons to Hirst is a straight line of hucksterism.
Reply

aurora*raby
04/23/09

@James Tiberius Quirk: All great art is nothing more than sleight of hand articulated with a little technique. The three people you mentioned have done their job well: They've held up a mirror and shown us what fools we are.
Reply

aurora*raby was starred aurora*raby was unstarred

The Real JR
04/23/09

In reply to Luxury, LV, and Leftovers: Art Eats the Rich
I really didn't *get* Murakami and during the Brooklyn Museum exhibit I basically had a bitchfit about his work while my friends shook their heads at me.

I felt his work was juvenile and slightly mysogynistic. Mechanical planes that transform into naked women with shaved vadges? Really?

Then again what do I know about art?

And the whole fact that he was able to get such a visceral reaction from someone which then spurred discourse pretty much *is* the definition of "art".

I still hate his shit though.
Reply

The Real JR was starred The Real JR was unstarred

aurora*raby
04/23/09

@The Real JR: Ornamental art in general may no longer be as relevant as some people would like it to be.
Reply

aurora*raby was starred aurora*raby was unstarred

Hydroceph
04/23/09

In reply to Luxury, LV, and Leftovers: Art Eats the Rich
Question for Gawkers and fashionistas: do straight me wear YSL belts, the really colorful ones with the white background and multicolored logos? Because i've been trying to suss out this one checker at the supermarket who makes my gaydar ping and he wears a belt like that.
Reply

Hydroceph was starred Hydroceph was unstarred

Hydroceph
04/23/09

@Hydroceph: Or maybe it's Louis Vuitton. Whatevs.
Reply

Hydroceph was starred Hydroceph was unstarred

aurora*raby
04/23/09

@Hydroceph: Who the fuck knows what straight men wear these days. But best of luck in your pursuit of this fashion-forward young man. How could he not find you absolutely irresistible?
Reply

aurora*raby was starred aurora*raby was unstarred

Hydroceph
04/23/09

@aurora*raby: Alas, i'm just trying to figure him out. At 38, i'm too old and married to pick up 20 year olds. But thanks, darling. kiss kiss.
Reply

Hydroceph was starred Hydroceph was unstarred

Smitros
04/23/09

In reply to Luxury, LV, and Leftovers: Art Eats the Rich
In a more perfect world, one of these would have been sold to Kari Ferrell.
Reply

Smitros was starred Smitros was unstarred

Smitros
04/23/09

In reply to Luxury, LV, and Leftovers: Art Eats the Rich
Thorstein Veblen FTW.
Reply

Smitros was starred Smitros was unstarred

Hydroceph
04/23/09

@Smitros: He's either crying his eyes out, or giggling madly. I can't decide which.

And other than the Mrs. Smitros vs. Mr. Hydroceph thing, i'm really starting to worry that you're me, and i just don't know it.
Reply

Hydroceph was starred Hydroceph was unstarred

Smitros
04/23/09

@Hydroceph:

That's why we're on opposite coasts, so as to prevent confusion, I think.
Reply

Smitros was starred Smitros was unstarred

Hydroceph
04/23/09

@Smitros: Or the implosion of the universe, like in Ghostbusters...you know, how they weren't supposed to cross the streams of the proton beams.
Reply

Hydroceph was starred Hydroceph was unstarred

BxgrlJeri
04/23/09

In reply to Luxury, LV, and Leftovers: Art Eats the Rich
I think LV bags are the ugliest things ever and just prove that complete assholes will buy crap no matter how hideous if it makes a statement about how foolishly they spend their money. Or something.
Reply

BxgrlJeri was starred BxgrlJeri was unstarred

flossy
04/23/09

In reply to Luxury, LV, and Leftovers: Art Eats the Rich
They're more expensive because of the size of the edition (assuming there are far more than 500 handbgs available for purchase), and it's "art" because the artist designated it as such. Sure, that doesn't make any sense, but expecting the art market to base prices on anything even remotely resembling a realistic definiteion of art is hopelessly naive. For example, this work by Piero Manzoni is considered a priceless masterpiece of conceptual art:
Reply

flossy was starred flossy was unstarred

flossy
04/23/09

@flossy: Alright, let's try that again:

Reply

flossy was starred flossy was unstarred

Nic Fit
04/23/09

In reply to Luxury, LV, and Leftovers: Art Eats the Rich
Wait till all those people who paid millions for Warhols discover that they're just the equivalent of t-shirts on canvas.

Class action!
Reply

Nic Fit was starred Nic Fit was unstarred

misslinda
04/23/09

@Nic Fit: Years ago I had a silkscreen instructor in college who had made prints for Warhol. She told a story of her first job for him. He gave her a collage that was a bunch of cut up pieces of contruction paper taped together and told her to make a silksreen out of it. When she got back to her studio, some of the pieces had come undone and she didn't know where they were meant to go. She gathered the courage to call up Warhol and tell him that some pieces fell off of his collage and she didn't know how to put them back in the right place. He told her it didn't matter, put them whereever she likes, and hung up. And that's art folks.
Reply

misslinda was starred misslinda was unstarred

aurora*raby
04/23/09

In reply to Luxury, LV, and Leftovers: Art Eats the Rich
"I'm only interested in collecting fine art." Ha, and I doubt the gourmet butter guy made a disposable fortune by selling dairy products.
Reply

aurora*raby was starred aurora*raby was unstarred

iheartapocalypse
04/23/09

In reply to Luxury, LV, and Leftovers: Art Eats the Rich
The only lasting contribution made to art since the 1950s was Jeff Koons developing a tiered membership program for Metropolitan Museum of Art.
Reply

iheartapocalypse was starred iheartapocalypse was unstarred

Mary Mouse
04/23/09

@iheartapocalypse: Wait, what? I know he worked in membership at the MoMA for a while, but I've never heard that one before.
Reply

Mary Mouse was starred Mary Mouse was unstarred

iheartapocalypse
04/23/09

@Mary Mouse: Jeff Koons invented the tiered membership program that museums and charities use to lure donations. He figured people would like to be grouped and terraced into a hiarchy with increasingly cool names based on how much you donate. Its a fucking genius grift. If he hadn't done that, he wouldn't be able to employ people to make plaster castes of him fucking porn stars and then put his name on it. The only creativity left in the world is in the field of con artistry.
Reply

iheartapocalypse was starred iheartapocalypse was unstarred

Mary Mouse
04/23/09

@iheartapocalypse: Sure. That makes perfect sense. It's like the presidential campaign thing in your tax return. When midwestern tourists come to the Met, they ask them if they'd also like to contribute to the "Jeff Koons Fucks His Porn Star Wife (While Michael Jackson, a Monkey and a Puppy Watch) Plaster Caste(sic) Fund." That's totally how art works.
Reply

Mary Mouse was starred Mary Mouse was unstarred

Smitros
04/23/09

@Mary Mouse:

Back in the day, Cynthia Plaster Caster did this for love (of something or other) and not for commerce.
Reply

Smitros was starred Smitros was unstarred

Hydroceph
04/23/09

@iheartapocalypse: For reals? That's where the "Gold Circle," "Platinum Circle," and "Diamond-Encrusted Bidet" nonsense came from?
Reply

Hydroceph was starred Hydroceph was unstarred

iheartapocalypse
04/23/09

@Mary Mouse: I see my attempt at a pun did not go over so well.
Reply

iheartapocalypse was starred iheartapocalypse was unstarred

Mary Mouse
04/23/09

@iheartapocalypse: Ha, sorry. I am incredibly cranky today. I was just about to email my friend who works in development at the Met and get some facts from her to refute your Jeff Koons story :)
Reply

Mary Mouse was starred Mary Mouse was unstarred

DevilsAvocado
04/23/09

In reply to Luxury, LV, and Leftovers: Art Eats the Rich
Given that aforementioned handbags sell for three and a half brazillion dollars, I'd say the print was a downright bargain. My suggestion - take it down to a capable tailor, get him or her to fashion it into a clutch... et voila! A collector's piece.

Moral of the story - don't ever expect the art market to function rationally. That went out the window sometime in the late 1800s.
Reply

DevilsAvocado was starred DevilsAvocado was unstarred

Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion