• Profile logout login

#television#the

Gawker

Share Cancel
   
Upload an image | Add an image URL
×

logging in
  • FAQ. Include # before tag:
  • #tips,
  • #stalker,
  • #opencaption,
  • #internalmemos,
  • etc.

New York, 11:56 AM
Tue Dec 1
57 posts in the last 24 hours

Team

Tip Your Editors:

Tipline: 646-214-8138

Editor-in-Chief:
Gabriel Snyder |

West Coast Editor:
Richard Rushfield |

Contributing Editors:

Valleywag:
Ryan Tate |

Media:
Hamilton Nolan |

Politics:
Alex Pareene |

Investigations:
John Cook |

Entertainment:
Brian Moylan |

Nights:
Adrian Chen |
Azaria Jagger |
Ravi Somaiya |

Weekends:
Foster Kamer |

Video Editor:
Richard Blakeley |

SUBSCRIBE TO Gawker RSS

New: Breaking news and daily top stories via email
4260 Subscribers
Gawker
  • posts about #television more →

    NBC's New Amy Poehler Show Doesn't Suck Any Worse Than Other NBC Shows

  • Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.

    Dsmvwl  Admin  Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×
    Image of BowlingForDollars BowlingForDollars
    11:43 AM

    In reply to A Bravo Contract Delivered White House Gatecrashers to the Today Show
    I've got a THIRD UPDATE for you: The first two are lies. ALL LIES!
     Reply
    BowlingForDollars was starred BowlingForDollars was unstarred
    Image of BowlingForDollars BowlingForDollars
    11:32 AM

    In reply to A Bravo Contract Delivered White House Gatecrashers to the Today Show
    Matt Lauer, as part of the NBC "News" (and I use the term loosely) team, never bothered to ask if Michaele Salahi was going to be part of "Real Housewives".

    Is that because he already knew the answer and he forgot to ask? I mean, that's the whole reason they were at the White House, right? With cameras in tow?

    Seems as though NBCUniComcast is waiting to see how this plays out. If people continue to hate on these two, perhaps they won't be part, but if it blows over, then a million dollars says they are part of the cast.
     Reply
    BowlingForDollars was starred BowlingForDollars was unstarred
    Image of Matt Cherette Matt Cherette
    11:20 AM

    In reply to A Bravo Contract Delivered White House Gatecrashers to the Today Show
    Am I too late for the influx of unapproved Drudge commenters? It's always so fun.
     Reply
    Matt Cherette was starred Matt Cherette was unstarred
    Image of wrongneighborhood wrongneighborhood
    11:28 AM

    @Matt Cherette: oh, they're coming. It's still early in parts of Midwest and West - give them time.
     Reply
    wrongneighborhood was starred wrongneighborhood was unstarred
    Image of mimigoliath mimigoliath
    11:05 AM

    In reply to A Bravo Contract Delivered White House Gatecrashers to the Today Show
    So now you don't have to be a shitty reality show star, you can still become temporarily famous by being an aspiring shitty reality show star.

    Aspiring shitty reality show star - we have really let ourselves go, America.
     Reply
    mimigoliath was starred mimigoliath was unstarred
    Image of wrongneighborhood wrongneighborhood
    10:51 AM

    In reply to A Bravo Contract Delivered White House Gatecrashers to the Today Show
    Drudge is linking to Gawker, I never thought I would see the day. Unapproved commenter deluge in 3... 2... 1...
     Reply
    wrongneighborhood was starred wrongneighborhood was unstarred
    Image of Tremonius Tremonius
    10:48 AM

    In reply to A Bravo Contract Delivered White House Gatecrashers to the Today Show
    Next you'll tell us all those actors who appear on talk shows are merely plugging other network product.

    And which newscasts are "unscripted, reality-based programs"?

    I'll take my answer on the air.
     Reply
    Tremonius was starred Tremonius was unstarred
    Image of Richard Petty Bourgeoisie Richard Petty Bourgeoisie
    10:42 AM

    In reply to A Bravo Contract Delivered White House Gatecrashers to the Today Show
    That contract has as a defined term "Reality Hold Period." I feel like that includes the last ten years.
     Reply
    Richard Petty Bourgeoisie was starred Richard Petty Bourgeoisie was unstarred
    Image of lobstr lobstr
    10:41 AM

    In reply to A Bravo Contract Delivered White House Gatecrashers to the Today Show
    the key phrase is "If I appear in the series.." .. but the series hasn't begun yet, so can they be held to that clause?
     Reply
    lobstr was starred lobstr was unstarred
    Image of OrneryBabe OrneryBabe
    10:52 AM

    @lobstr: That's what I was wondering, too.
     Reply
    John Cook promoted this comment OrneryBabe was starred OrneryBabe was unstarred
    Image of John Cook John Cook
    11:32 AM

    @lobstr: The language is also "from the date of this agreement," which in the New Jersey case was obviously executed before decisions were made about who would be appearing in the show. So it looks like the contract says, "if a decision is made in a future about your appearance on the show, then you're obligated from this date to appear exclusively on Bravo unless we say otherwise." If Bravo said to the Salahis, "you're on the show," then the clause would be in force. There's also the clause about being "reasonably available" to market the show, which isn't dependent on appearing on the show. Not to mention the general pressure that Bravo could exert on them by holding the decision about whether they will join the cast over their heads.
     Reply
    John Cook was starred John Cook was unstarred
    Image of intime intime
    10:38 AM

    In reply to A Bravo Contract Delivered White House Gatecrashers to the Today Show
    So, people will now risk arrest and imprisonment to get on a reality TV show?

    I guess I shouldn't be surprised by this.
     Reply
    intime was starred intime was unstarred
    Image of Lymed Lymed
    10:37 AM

    In reply to A Bravo Contract Delivered White House Gatecrashers to the Today Show
    Now we will be forced to live through countless stunts because we keep rewarding them.
     Reply
    Lymed was starred Lymed was unstarred
    Image of Helio Helio
    10:30 AM

    In reply to A Bravo Contract Delivered White House Gatecrashers to the Today Show
    I caught the tailend of Larry King's show last night and witnessed the travesty of Ariana Huffington, Ben Stein, and Jesse Venture "debate" the troop escalation in Afghanistan. It was one of the dumbest things i have ever seen and almost wish the Salahis had made it. Perhaps they were scambling to find guests, and this was the best they could do but Larry King really has no business moderating a discussion on anything and but pop cultural (living or dead) icons and suspenders.
     Reply
    Helio was starred Helio was unstarred
    Image of Jackie Yoshi Jackie Yoshi
    11/29/09

    In reply to Biggest Loser: Basically Killing Fat People for Your Amusement
    Finally someone who gets it! I think Jillian is a major bitch, and she's blaming the fat people for taking it too far. When you have psychotic raging whore screaming at you to keep going, you're not going to stop even if it means you could die.

    I don't know what her problem is, every time I see her on TV she has one of the contestants with her, acting like she's their best friend. I don't know if this is like Stockholm Syndrome, or she yells at them that they better act like she's gold or she'll get angry.

    Seriously, this show is nothing but giving fat haters a chance to watch fat people suffer. As far as Jillian goes, I think someone really needs to give her a psychological work-up. She claims she was fat, and got thin, so everyone else could do it. I suppose thin and acting almost like a Nazi officer, is better than being fat in this society?

    Also, they've started involving children. That's right, more child abuse for entertainment. I don't know what to make of this, it's really beyond me. Someone would expose their child to a sadist like Jillian. I think those parents need to be investigated by child services.
     Reply
    MissNormaDesmond promoted this comment Jackie Yoshi was starred Jackie Yoshi was unstarred
    Image of unfuckwithable unfuckwithable
    11/29/09

    In reply to Christmas-Saving Dogs Fight Raging Battle Royale For Prime-Time Network Domination
    What, no Watch, TiVo, Kill breakdown?
     Reply
    unfuckwithable was starred unfuckwithable was unstarred
    Image of lostarchitect lostarchitect
    11/28/09

    In reply to Christmas-Saving Dogs Fight Raging Battle Royale For Prime-Time Network Domination
    Oh, I don't know. "Doctor Frumpykins, Esquire" sounds like a pretty good name for an English bulldog, if you ask me.
     Reply
    lostarchitect was starred lostarchitect was unstarred
    Image of skt.smth skt.smth
    11/28/09

    In reply to Christmas-Saving Dogs Fight Raging Battle Royale For Prime-Time Network Domination
    Please, please let the developmentally challenged kid's father be played by Chris Burke (Corky from "Life Goes On") so we can have an unexpected and completely inane national dialogue about whether developmentally challenged people who procreate should be able to put their developmentally challenged offspring on the public option.
     Reply
    skt.smth was starred skt.smth was unstarred
    Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion

Login

Enter your username and password.

Please enter a username.
Please enter your password.
logging in
Login via Facebook | Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Reset Password

Please enter your email address to have your password reset.

Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
requesting password reset

Register

Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.

Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.

Please enter a username.
Please enter a password.
Please confirm your password.
Passwords are not identical.
Please enter a valid email address.
registration sent, waiting for reply

Submit Your Comment

You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.

See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.

Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
logging in

Login with your Facebook or Gawker account.

Sign up here.



  • Archives
  • About
  • Advertising
  • Legal
  • Help
  • Report a Bug
  • FAQ
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.