• Profile logout login

#thechart

Gawker

Share Cancel
   
Upload an image | Add an image URL
×

logging in
  • FAQ. Include # before tag:
  • #tips,
  • #stalker,
  • #opencaption,
  • #internalmemos,
  • etc.

New York, 4:13 AM
Sat Dec 19
47 posts in the last 24 hours

Team

Tip Your Editors:

Tipline: 646-214-8138

Editor-in-Chief:
Gabriel Snyder |

West Coast Editor:
Richard Rushfield |

Contributing Editors:

Valleywag:
Ryan Tate |

Media:
Hamilton Nolan |

Politics:
Alex Pareene |

Investigations:
John Cook |

Entertainment:
Brian Moylan |

Nights:
Adrian Chen |
Azaria Jagger |
Ravi Somaiya |

Weekends:
Foster Kamer |

Video Editor:
Richard Blakeley |

SUBSCRIBE TO Gawker RSS

New: Breaking news and daily top stories via email
4260 Subscribers
Gawker
  • posts about #thechart more →

    Debunking the AP's Aggregation Aggravation

    Shit on the Rise

    You Call This a Downturn?

    Facebook's new value: $1.3 billion?

    Trivia Quiz Proves Liberals Smug, Anti-American

    Why bad news isn't good news for finance sites

    Deep Breath

    Widgets are dead

    Big in Japan! How Twitter jumped the Pacific

    Worldwide visitors to Facebook up 153 percent in a year
  • Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.
    Dsmvwl  Admin  Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×
    Image of blogissuchanuglyword blogissuchanuglyword
    04/09/09

    In reply to Debunking the AP's Aggregation Aggravation
    This has a ton of flaws in it. First, it doesnt account at all for overlap. I read the Times everyday, because I like. Do I sometimes click a link on a blog or google something that directs me to the Times website, yes, but those page views would have happened without assistance. Also, you've got websites where you can esentially read a Times story without ever actually going to their website. Have you heard of Gawker.com? You can go, read the gist of the article, and never bother to click through to the Times, never affecting their page views and having their writers work for free. I guess the Times could reference Gossip Girl in more of their news stories, but, it might be a good idea to have a few people out there still actually reporting.
     Reply
    blogissuchanuglyword was starred blogissuchanuglyword was unstarred
    Image of GilroyBrizo GilroyBrizo
    04/09/09

    In reply to Debunking the AP's Aggregation Aggravation
    dont WSJ, CNN, and NYT all pay the AP for its content? I don't think they're the ones the AP is complaining about. In fact, I bet any offsite links those 3 do have, they actually have business agreements with whoever they link to.

    Why even bother trying to lump them in with Google News which just links whatever it feels like?
     Reply
    GilroyBrizo was starred GilroyBrizo was unstarred
    Image of Owen Thomas Owen Thomas
    04/09/09

    @GilroyBrizo: Actually, Dow Jones, the publisher of the WSJ, already runs a rival newswire, and CNN is planning one of its own that it's pitching directly to the AP's newspaper customers. In any event, can you explain to me what a licensing agreement to run complete articles has to do with the right anyone has under the fair-use doctrine to quote from news stories?
     Reply
    Owen Thomas was starred Owen Thomas was unstarred
    Image of MisterHippity MisterHippity
    04/08/09

    In reply to Debunking the AP's Aggregation Aggravation
    Simply quoting Google and Techmeme execs saying that this is bullshit does not "debunk" the AP's stance, as the title of this piece claims. Google and Techmeme aggregate news, so they are directly threatened by this.


    Looking to representatives of those two companies for the final word on this subject is like looking to Halliburton for the final word on whether the Iraq war is justified.

     Reply
    MisterHippity was starred MisterHippity was unstarred
    Image of 92BuickLeSabre 92BuickLeSabre
    04/08/09

    @MisterHippity: Well, who else would you expect KBR to tell you to listen to?
     Reply
    92BuickLeSabre was starred 92BuickLeSabre was unstarred
    Image of UmaGaleo UmaGaleo
    04/08/09

    In reply to Debunking the AP's Aggregation Aggravation
    But the chart supports the newspapers' central complaint: Papers' sites would still get traffic without search engines. But those search engines' news sites wouldn't get any traffic without the papers. Yet that dependency is not reflected in revenues.
     Reply
    UmaGaleo was starred UmaGaleo was unstarred
    Image of Owen Thomas Owen Thomas
    04/09/09

    @UmaGaleo: You live in a fascinating world where newspapers are the only media and newspaper-employed journalists are the only people capable of reporting. Is it pretty there?
     Reply
    Owen Thomas was starred Owen Thomas was unstarred
    Image of kimsama kimsama
    04/02/09

    In reply to Shit on the Rise
    But what do these statistics mean when paired with the fact that shit just got real?
     Reply
    kimsama was starred kimsama was unstarred
    Image of pufflehuff pufflehuff
    04/02/09

    In reply to Shit on the Rise
    I desperately want someone to do this graph for the Telegraph, only for b******, f***, c***, etc. Foreals, they do that!
     Reply
    pufflehuff was starred pufflehuff was unstarred
    Image of westie1984 westie1984
    04/02/09

    In reply to Shit on the Rise
    Alas, no Paki
     Reply
    westie1984 was starred westie1984 was unstarred
    Image of pufflehuff pufflehuff
    04/02/09

    @westie1984: Fuck's sake, wanker.
     Reply
    pufflehuff was starred pufflehuff was unstarred
    Image of Smitros Smitros
    04/02/09

    In reply to Shit on the Rise
    This thread reads like a collective case of Tourette's.
     Reply
    Smitros was starred Smitros was unstarred
    Image of Awesome X Awesome X
    04/02/09

    In reply to Shit on the Rise
    Unsurprisingly, the Guardian's cock has failed to go up.
     Reply
    Awesome X was starred Awesome X was unstarred
    Image of MisterHippity MisterHippity
    04/02/09

    In reply to Shit on the Rise
    The ration of cocks to cunts in that chart reminds me of parties at my old fraternity.
     Reply
    MisterHippity was starred MisterHippity was unstarred
    Image of MisterHippity MisterHippity
    04/02/09

    @MisterHippity: RATIO
     Reply
    MisterHippity was starred MisterHippity was unstarred
    Image of leonleonleon leonleonleon
    04/02/09

    @MisterHippity: I liked ration better
     Reply
    leonleonleon was starred leonleonleon was unstarred
    Image of Aaron Altman Aaron Altman
    04/02/09

    @MisterHippity: @resipsaloquacious: ...and ration-al.
     Reply
    Aaron Altman was starred Aaron Altman was unstarred
    Image of MincnglyWhrdL'mer MincnglyWhrdL'mer
    04/02/09

    @MisterHippity: I need a better ration of cock (HEY-O)
     Reply
    MincnglyWhrdL'mer was starred MincnglyWhrdL'mer was unstarred
    Image of pufflehuff pufflehuff
    04/02/09

    @MisterHippity: Were the queues long?
     Reply
    pufflehuff was starred pufflehuff was unstarred
    Image of uninspired uninspired
    04/02/09

    In reply to Shit on the Rise
    2000 was an up-year for cock
     Reply
    uninspired was starred uninspired was unstarred
    Image of onebadclam onebadclam
    04/02/09

    In reply to Shit on the Rise
    As usual, cock is not performing to expectations.
     Reply
    onebadclam was starred onebadclam was unstarred
    Image of mfnher mfnher
    04/02/09

    In reply to Shit on the Rise
    The bastard's flatlined.
     Reply
    mfnher was starred mfnher was unstarred
    Image of bytememehard bytememehard
    04/02/09

    In reply to Shit on the Rise
    Proves the Brits aren't as bigga jerk-offs as we think.
     Reply
    bytememehard was starred bytememehard was unstarred
    Image of Sarcastro Sarcastro
    04/02/09

    In reply to Shit on the Rise
    I'll fuck you, bastard, until the shit comes out of your arse and your cunt quivers and then I'll remove my cock and wank.


    There, all in one sentence. You can thank me later, Guardian.

     Reply
    Sarcastro was starred Sarcastro was unstarred
    Image of Aaron Altman Aaron Altman
    04/02/09

    @Sarcastro: You say the sweetest things, you fuck-wank, cock-arse, shit-cunt of a bastard.
     Reply
    Aaron Altman was starred Aaron Altman was unstarred
    Image of Sarcastro Sarcastro
    04/02/09

    @Aaron Altman: That means so much, arse-bastard. You're really the cock-of-the-walk, no shit. Wanks a lot, cock.
     Reply
    Sarcastro was starred Sarcastro was unstarred
    Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion

Login

Enter your username and password.

Please enter a username.
Please enter your password.
logging in
Login via Facebook | Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Reset Password

Please enter your email address to have your password reset.

Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
requesting password reset

Register

Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.

Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.

Please enter a username.
Please enter a password.
Please confirm your password.
Passwords are not identical.
Please enter a valid email address.
registration sent, waiting for reply

Submit Your Comment

You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.

See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.

Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
logging in

Login with your Facebook or Gawker account.

Sign up here.



  • Archives
  • About
  • Advertising
  • Legal
  • Help
  • Report a Bug
  • FAQ
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.