Enter your username and password.
New York, 6:00 AM
Tue Dec 8
49 posts in the last 24 hours

Tip Your Editors:
Tipline: 646-214-8138
Editor-in-Chief:
Gabriel Snyder |
West Coast Editor:
Richard Rushfield |
Contributing Editors:
Valleywag:
Ryan Tate |
Media:
Hamilton Nolan |
Politics:
Alex Pareene |
Investigations:
John Cook |
Entertainment:
Brian Moylan |
Nights:
Adrian Chen |
Azaria Jagger |
Ravi Somaiya |
Weekends:
Foster Kamer |
Video Editor:
Richard Blakeley |
Please enter your email address to have your password reset.
Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.
Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.
You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.
See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.
12/04/08
12/04/08
And who cares what Bill's doing (or whom)?
12/03/08
12/03/08
This only once again proves that those people are, indeed, smarter than the rest of us stayte kollege egukated idiuts. They take big gains when times are good, and big handouts when times aren't so good (and still circumvent the constitution during their free time. Yeah!)
Oh, if daddy had only earned enough caddy scholarship money to go to Harvard, instead of BC.
12/04/08
12/03/08
12/03/08
12/03/08
12/03/08
12/03/08
12/03/08
I got yer emoluments right here, pal.
12/03/08
12/03/08
basically makes more than the Secretary of State? For reviewing
documents at a warehouse and writing a paragraph of an appellate brief
every so often? What economic collapse?
12/04/08
12/03/08
12/03/08
12/03/08
12/03/08
@aurorabora: The Real Housewives of Atlanta taught me how to hate myself. Does that count? :-)
12/03/08
12/03/08
@Heneage: There is no getting away from powdered wigs for the foppishly dressed, is there? :-)
12/03/08
12/03/08
12/03/08
12/03/08
12/03/08
12/03/08
12/03/08
12/03/08
12/03/08
That's a walk or an enema or something.
And you can only do it in a cardigan.
12/04/08
12/03/08
12/03/08
12/03/08
12/03/08
Dear well-funded lunatics,
I am available to file frivolous Constitutional violation claims on your behalf, despite your complete and total lack of standing, until Hilary Clinton is stripped of office or my bar license is revoked for filing such ridiculous claims. If you are also in need of a PR person to handle your media image, I'm sure another Gawker commenter will be willing to join up. We will be extremely costly and will need to be paid, up-front, in cash.
Yours in right-wing conspiring,
Spar & Associates.
12/03/08
12/03/08
12/03/08
12/03/08
12/03/08
12/03/08
12/03/08
12/03/08
I think she will be great in the job when no one actually gives a damn and lets her in without a single raised eyebrow... but how exactly is this any sort of change from the years of growing executive power at the cost of the constitutional integrity? I bet most Obama supporters thought to themselves "You know how I hope Obama interprets the constitution? The same way that Nixon did!" (See: Saxbe, Ed)
12/03/08
Just so I have ammo when arguing with my dad later, do you know any specific examples of this? I love burning my dad with facts he didn't anticipate.
12/03/08
12/03/08
12/03/08
12/03/08
Oh, this is a grammar question, right? Is "shall have been" past perfect, or past imperfect tense?
12/03/08
12/03/08
Also, I'm not satisfied that the syntactical analysis doesn't support this theory. Does "shall have been" mean "during the course of the future, it will have been increased at least once," or does it mean, "during the course of the future, it will be increased (i.e.: larger) from the congressional salary"?
12/03/08
12/03/08
12/03/08
12/03/08
@SinisterRouge: Hi! At first I thought it was going to be a serious issue, but I guess not.
12/03/08
12/03/08
12/03/08
12/03/08
12/03/08
12/03/08
12/03/08