<![CDATA[Gawker: the advocate]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: the advocate]]> http://gawker.com/tag/theadvocate http://gawker.com/tag/theadvocate <![CDATA[Badvocate]]> More than a dozen layoffs at The Advocate this week, according to Queerty.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5393876&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[A Gay Media Empire to Shove in the Closet]]> A new kingpin of gay content has just come out to Wall Street: Here Media, which rules queer pay-TV, film, magazines, books, and websites. But has anyone stopped to ask if we need it?

The media itself is gayer than ever: From the pink mafia at the New York Times to the ambisexual likes of Neal Boulton, it's hard to think of the LGBT community as underrepresented in the mainstream. At the same time, as gays move out to the suburbs and raise kids, it gets harder for them to relate to the urban obsessions of the gay press.

And yet wannabe pink-collar kingpins like Here Media CEO Paul Colichman keep trying. His company is the product of a fire sale thinly disguised as a merger announced late last week. The company is made up of the post-layoff remnants of PlanetOut, the operator of a gay content portal and an online-personals site, along with Here Networks, a subscription cable channel, and Regent Entertainment Media, an indie film studio focused on the gay market.

Colichman (above), the Obama-hating Regent boss whom Queerty dubbed "the whiny queer version of Rupert Murdoch," is reprising the old dream that led a few queer media and tech veterans to start PlanetOut in the first place: Media for the gays, by the gays.

Under former CEO Lowell Selvin, PlanetOut expanded into everything from book publishing to all-gay cruises. An all-gay transatlantic crossing on the Queen Mary 2 proved such a financial disaster that it helped sink the company. But Selvin & Co. were too busy with playing with cruise ships to notice what was happening to the gay market: Having come out of the closet en masse in the '90s, most gays and lesbians found their interests weren't that different from mainstream America. The notion of a gay Web portal, which might have made sense in the mid-'90s, no longer worked in an age of blogs and search engines. And pay classifieds of any persuasion found it hard to compete with Craigslist ads.

Yet the dream of gay-media world domination continues to draw the likes of Selvin and Colichman. It's the promise of being a big pink fish in a small pond. Gay men seeking attention — who'd imagine? But that same dynamic is what dooms gay media moguls to being small fry.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5129853&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Bisexual Editor's Gay Marriage Slam]]> Nealb3-1Sure, it makes sense that gay media mogul Paul Colichman, owner of Out and the Advocate, is taking some flack because he doesn't support Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama. To gay rights advocates, after all, Obama is far preferable to his opponent. But Colichman's critics would do well to distance themselves from comrade-in-arms Neal Boulton, the Genre editor who slammed Colichman in Page Six today and declared his own support for Obama "whether he says he's for gay marriage or not." Pansexual playboy Boulton should realize that's easy for him to say, but for Colichman and his gay partner it's an entirely different story. Boulton is already married to a woman. The marriage is one of some devotion, and a natural outgrowth of Boulton's attraction to women. And it's hard to imagine the editor settling down with a man.

Boulton is with his wife mainly because she is mother to his children. And as he himself recently pointed out, "I am a horrible catch, as I am more married to my work and my guitar than I would ever be to any man woman or child."

Perhaps Boulton will be ready to settle down eventually. But, in the meantime, he should conjure some more sympathy today — now — for gays who would like the option to get married sooner. Gays like Paul Colichman.

(Photo via Queerty)

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5041811&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[PlanetOut sells print business to gay TV service]]> planetout_logo_corp.gifBill Gates's money hasn't been enough to staunch the bleeding at PlanetOut. The San Francisco-based gay-media company is finalizing a deal to sell its magazine and book publishing business to the Here Network, a gay and lesbian video-on-demand service. The company publishes leading gay-interest mags The Advocate and Out. Subscribers were up but ad pages down in 2007. A decline in advertising from pharmaceutical companies hurt The Advocate. PlanetOut will keep its online properties such as Gay.com, and promises to promote Here movies as part of the deal.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=378803&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Were Gay Mags Just Given Away?]]> Re. the "sale" of Out and The Advocate: PlanetOut.com sold the mags, along with some other properties, to Regent Releasing for $6 million cash, payable in $1 million increments over the next year. But according to Regent and PlanetOut: "The funds shall be treated as prepaid advertising, to be applied as the marketing occurs." So. Regent bought a year's worth of advertising on PlanetOut's gay.com and got an entire book and magazine publishing business for free, then? Jesus. That's colossal mismanagement of your brands! Or a fantastic sponsor giveaway.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=378521&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA['Out,' 'Advocate' Sold]]> PlanetOut Inc. used to have a monopoly on Serious Gay Media—they published Out and The Advocate. But they went into tremendous debt and sold their entire magazine and book publishing business to Regent Releasing (owner of Here!) for $6 million. Our favorite theory (because we know nothing of the workings of the gay media): "PlanetOut's financial problem are due to its expansion into the gay cruise business - where it has lost millions." Why on Earth can't that happen to The National Review? [Towleroad]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=378437&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[The Advocate is now offering you the option...]]> The Advocate is now offering you the option to receive the magazine without a concealing cover. Worried that your mail carrier might know that you're gay? That Vanity Fair subscription probably tipped him off months ago anyway. [NYT]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=276152&view=rss&microfeed=true