<![CDATA[Gawker: the dark knight]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: the dark knight]]> http://gawker.com/tag/thedarkknight http://gawker.com/tag/thedarkknight <![CDATA[New Harry Potter Officially a Juggernaut]]> Harry Potter and The Half-Blood Prince opened on 3,003 screens nationwide at midnight and hauled in $22.2 million, shattering the previous midnight screening record of $18.5 million set by The Dark Knight. [LA Times]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5315916&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Academy Awards Widening Best Picture Race to 10 Films]]> The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.Sick of trying to decide which of the five Best Picture nominees will win in your Oscar pool? Well, now you'll get to decide between ten! Yes, in a move to attract more ratings, the Academy is widening the race.

The Oscar best picture race has been dominated by tiny, often indie, films that not very many people see, i.e. The Reader. Widening the field could mean that they won't necessarily be the only ones competing for the top prize, and the studios and their big-budget "prestige" titles can finally play in the pool again. Ten nominees means more competition, which could net some eyeballs curious to see how the crazy It's a Mad Mad Mad Mad World-style race ends up.

For example, had their been ten Best Picture nominees last year, The Dark Knight would surely have been among them, which would likely have brought in some curious fanboys. And if the studios have doubled chances of doing a blitz awards-tie-in marketing, then that's even better. More money for everyone means nicer, bigger parties and then everyone wins!

We think it's a fine idea, as more competition is more fun. Though we'll have to suffer through twice as many set-up clips, it ought to make the long, long, long evening slog to the final dance all the more put-up-withable. Because now TEN enter and only one leaves. Lots more carnage.

[Oscars.org]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5302138&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Oscar Tug-Of-War Pits Ledger Versus Ledger]]> Kim Ledger had plenty to do yesterday on his long flight to the Oscars, starting with an acceptance speech no one quite expected him to deliver on behalf of his son Heath.

Which isn't to say that anyone has yet confirmed his or her role as the Sunday night's official Best Supporting Actor proxy. Maybe the mystery is just one component of the Condon/Mark Surprise Parade™, or, as seems increasingly likely, it reflects uncertainty among the Ledgers, Michelle Williams and Warner Bros. over just who should stand for the late actor upon his imminent Oscar victory Sunday night.

At the very least, we thought it was agreed that the Academy would hold the statuette for 3-year-old Matilda Ledger until she reached 18. But her grandfather was ambiguous on Thursday, noting to TMZ's tape-wielding hellhounds that he'll hold it for her "forever." As shrieked at the top of Tom O'Neil's lungs, that's not really how it works, but we've long sought an unprecedented Oscar custody battle, so may the best Ledger win. Or, should the Academy lose its nerve, may it simplify everything and just give the award to Robert Downey Jr.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5157333&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Petitioner Halfway To Assuring You Never See The Joker Onscreen Again]]> The fanboy crusade to earn The Dark Knight a Best Picture Oscar nomination may have failed, but one fan hasn't lost faith in the potential of Batman people-power.

The Ultimate Joker founder Fer Barbella never wants to see the Joker in the movies again. TV, fine. Animation, fine. But Heath Ledger was so good, he says, that the character deserves permanent retirement. And the only way to achieve that, apparently, is to gather 50,000 signatures in an impassioned plea for geek solidarity. More than 30,000 readers have contributed in two weeks; by the end of the month Barbella may fulfill his pledge to organize a march on Warner Bros.

But please — no hate mail. The organizers acknowledge their deficiencies:

Regarding some aggressive and radical comments here… to all of them… WHY SO SERIOUS? Just share your POV, but as well as we have the right to ask for this cause without being rude with you, you have the right to show some respect and class writing like a normal person. Please, do not overuse the f… word, for God's sake. And yes, we're morons, idiots and all that stuff… so what?

Oh, which reminds us: The Stop Uwe Boll petition is stalled well short of its million-signer goal. Don't let democracy pass you by.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5155319&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Batman's Next Flight Now Years Away]]> As much as Warner Bros. would love for Christopher Nolan to begin working on a follow-up to The Dark Knight, like, yesterday, new reports reveal that his plans for a Bat-sequel are being put off.

According to Variety, Nolan is determined to make a non-Bat film his next project, though at least WB has kept him in the family:

Warner Bros. is tying up a big deal with its "Dark Knight" director Christopher Nolan for a big-scale spec script titled "Inception" that Nolan wrote and will direct as his likely next film.

WB is aiming for a summer 2010 release; production begins this summer.

Given the reported size of Inception, it's likely that post-production and a worldwide press tour could tie Nolan up until the fall of 2010; even if his brother Jonathan has a script for the Dark Knight sequel ready to go at that point, a winter 2011 feels like the earliest release possible (though summer 2012 seems like a far better bet). It's possible that WB could move ahead quickly with a different helmer, but Nolan would have to sign off on the decision since WB seems intent on retaining its cozy relationship with him. Will Batmania ebb over the next several years? Perhaps, but at least it'll give Christian Bale time to work out his lifetime supply of expletives on someone else's set.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5151868&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[How To Best Campaign For a Dead Oscar Nominee? Don't]]> Just because Heath Ledger was a favorite to claim this year's Best Supporting Actor Oscar since before The Dark Knight even opened, that doesn't mean he can't use a gentle, posthumous awards-season studio nudge.

But how gentle is "gentle"? David Carr asks and mostly answers that question in today's NYT, best characterizing Warner Bros.' strategy as some balance of print ads and ignoring press requests for comment. Which is no doubt working, as is the self-perpetuating momentum of critical and Globes plaudits. Yet oddly downplayed in the equation is the viability of a dead nominee — especially one of Ledger's stature, talent and now legend. Beyond the obvious boost for a film just theatrically re-released, why would Warner's spend any money pushing Ledger for an award his untimely death and ensuing mythology has bought and paid for already?

That's not to say Ledger's performance isn't excellent, awards-worthy, iconic, whatever, and Academy voters will reward it in accordance with its "competition" — a dude in blackface, the guy who killed Harvey Milk, Revolutionary Road's token nod and Philip Seymour Hoffman, who stole the 2005 acting Oscar that Ledger deserved in the first place for Brokeback Mountain. As Carr points out (and we recall from first-hand experience), Ledger was a lousy campaigner then.

His ghost, however, is not, which makes Warner's job much less complicated than today's survey implies. The studio's marketers are really the only ones who can get in his way, and it's mildly surprising they'd hazard the exploitation factor naturally accompanying Ledger's Oscar ads. We know that's "the way it's done" and everything, but it's not like it has to be. If the guy's grown wings, jumping on his back seems worse than ghoulish. It's just senseless.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5148155&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Slumdog Millionaire Advances to the Final Round]]> All of a sudden Slumdog Millionaire, Danny Boyle's "love letter" (ugh) to Mumbai, is the frontrunner to take the top award at next month's Academy Oscars Awards for Movies and Things. Bet on it!

Oscar nominations will be announced on Thursday. But already the film, which barnstormed through the Golden Globes, is the betting favorite on Intrade to win best picture. It's also got the highest Hollywood Stock Exchange, and a top panel of awards-predicting journalists have unanimously named it their favorite to win as well. The days of the exciting Dark Knight whispering campaign are long over, gone the way of the long-dead wispy Wall-E hopes.

The film's swelling possibilities make sense, though. The film is a feel-good underdog orphan—not bleak or overly-quirked enough to be art-house, too sideways and foreign to be mainstream—and who doesn't like to feel that they're being kind and welcoming some poor kindly mongrel into their home? In this case "home" is America, and the kindly mongrel is the, you know, entirety of long-thriving Bollywood cinema. It took us a few years to catch on, but we finally got there! Obama!

The only risk the film could run is if its quick ignite takes it too far, too fast. Academy voters might grow tired of everyone caterwauling about the film, as they did when Crash swept the $9,000 designer rug out from under gay old Brokeback Mountain. (Yeah, that was a gay thing, but it was also a fatigue thing. Enough already with the cowboys, the Crash voters said.) Slumdog's real advantage is that it doesn't really have terribly strong competition. Milk is too small and too gay and too studied. Frost/Nixon is talky and just never caught enough buzz. Benjamin Button woulda won hands down like fifteen years ago, but not anymore. And Dark Knight, if it gets nominated (we'll find out on Thursday morning)? Well, it could have a late surge to victory, but it's probably too late in the game, and the picture is probably just too actiony. There's nothing about that movie that lets voters pat themselves on the back (as they could with Crash). So we're calling it. Slumdog takes it all. Final answer.

(Oh, and you really should go see it. It's quite good.)

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5134867&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Aaron Eckhart Holds Out Hope]]> Aaron Eckhart: Hey, maybe Two-Face had a twin! Anyone? [MTV]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5129852&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[We Will Now Predict the Oscar Nominations]]> All the major movie awards nominations, with the exception of those for the Oscars, have been announced. So we can make a pretty good guess about what will get nods come January 22nd.

Best Picture
Looking like sure bets are Milk, The Curious Case of Benjamin Button, crowd-pleaser Slumdog Millionaire, and Frost/Nixon. The fifth slot is shaping up to be a horse race between Doubt and The Dark Knight. Actors are the biggest voting block of the Academy, and the Screen Actors Guild didn't nominate TDK. But it is an audience favorite, which would mean good ratings for the awards show. And no one wants to win an Oscar when no one's watching. So we'll see. Either way, sorry, Wall-E.

Best Director
Usually falls in line with Best Picture, so Slumdog's Danny Boyle, Milk's Gus van Sant, and Button's David Fincher are sure bets. We're not positive that Ron Howard will get a nod for his somewhat utilitarian direction of what is mostly an actors movie, though he did get recognized by the Directors Guild. Christopher Nolan could very well squeak in for TDK. John Patrick Shanley, who is viewed (rightly) as mostly a writer probs won't end up here for Doubt. Maybe Wall-E's Andrew Stanton will get a little "hey thanks for playing."

Best Actress
Definitely Anne Hathaway for her stripped-down-yet-still-showy work in Rachel Getting Married, Kate Winslet's for her mopey/yelly turn in Revolutionary Road, and Meryl Streep's barking in Doubt. Sally Hawkins' pluck in Happy-Go-Lucky didn't woo SAG, but everyone else seems to love her. We hope that Melissa Leo gets recognized in the fifth slot for her grizzled performance in Frozen River, but it might go to Angelina Jolie because she's pretty and yells a lot in Changeling. Boo.

Best Actor
Yes on: Sean Penn for Milk, Mickey Rourke for The Wrestler, Frank Langella for People Talking!: The Non-Musical Frost/Nixon, and Bradley Jane Pitt in Button. Number five will mayyybe go to Six Feet Under Papa Richard Jenkins for The Visitor. Though everyone likes the growly old Clint Eastwood schtick he does in Gran Torino.

And the rest of these are really too wide to tell, but we're going to go ahead and predict anyway...

Best Supporting Actress
Viola Davis is practically a lock to win the whole damn thing for her two scenes in Doubt. Joining her at her table at the pre-awards luncheon will probably be Taraji P. Henson for Button, Amy Adams for Doubt as well, Penelope Cruz for Hannah and Her Spanish Sisters or whatever, and Annette Bening for her deliciously screwball work in 2008's most overlooked gem, The Women. (We're joking on that last one.) Let's give it to that creepy girl in Let the Right One In!

Best Supporting Actor
Josh Brolin will win for Milk as a consolation prize for no one really liking W. that much (and for him having to deal with Babs as a mother-in-law step-mother). Robert Downey Jr. and Heath Ledger ought to get notices for their heavily-made-up work in Tropic Thunder and TDK, respectively. I dunno. Who else? Maybe Phil Hoffman for Doubt. Maybe George Clooney for just being alive in the world. We hope Emile Hirsch gets recognized for his fantastic work as Cleve Jones in the fantastic Milk.

Screenplays
Both Adapted and Original are much wider races, but look for TDK (surprise!), Button, and Nixon in the former; Vicky Cristina Barcelona, Milk, and Rachel Getting Married in the latter.

I know you guys mostly care about Best Sound Editing, but you'll have to wait to find out about that. Happy ballot making or whatever!

DGA Nominations
PGA Nominations
SAG Nominations
WGA Nominations

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5126690&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Something Called 'People's Choice Awards' Praises 'Dark Knight,' '27 Dresses']]> A mysterious show known as the 2008 People's Choice Awards was broadcast Wednesday on CBS, selecting The Dark Knight, 27 Dresses, Will Smith, Reese Witherspoon and others among its many honorees.

Apparently celebrating its 35th anniversary, the awards were based on tabulations from hoi polloi votes flooding this Web site. In recognition of this anonymous constituency, many of the winners, including Bale, Witherspoon, Ellen DeGeneres and Carrie Underwood, appeared live on the broadcast to accept bulky glass statuettes and offer thanks to whoever noticed whatever it was they did to earn the accolade. Bale also singled out his Dark Knight co-star Heath Ledger, with whom he shared the prize for "Favorite On-Screen Match Up" and who most certainly would have attended himself had he not had better things to do.

Other winners included:

· Favorite Comedy Movie: 27 Dresses

· Favorite Drama and Independent Movie The Secret Life of Bees

· Favorite Family Movie: WALL-E

· Favorite Male Movie Star: Will Smith

· Favorite Female Movie Star: Reese Witherspoon

· Favorite Leading Man: Brad Pitt

· Favorite TV Drama: House

· Favorite TV Comedy: Two and a Half Men

· Favorite TV Game Show: Deal or No Deal

· Favorite TV Drama Diva: Kyra Sedgwick, The Closer

· Favorite Male Singer: Chris Brown

· Favorite Female Singer: Carrie Underwood

And many, many more, viewable here. Congratulations (we think?) to the winners; may their Oscar/Emmy/Grammy campaigns steam forth from here.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5126217&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[PGA Noms Boost 'Dark Knight' At Other Films' Expense]]> The Producers Guild of America just announced its five Best Picture nominations. So which films made the cut, and which found no endorsement with this leading Oscar indicator?

First, the (mostly predictable) nominations:

The Dark Knight
Slumdog Millionaire
The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
Frost/Nixon
Milk

The PGA recognition positions Dark Knight well for the Oscars, though the organization historically misses one Best Picture-nominated film a year (last year, the Academy subbed in Atonement for the PGA-vetted The Diving Bell and the Butterfly, and in 2006, the PGA gave a slot to Dreamgirls, which went on to face a surprise Oscar snub in favor of Letters to Iwo Jima). That the Academy likes to sneak in a period drama should serve up some consolation for also-rans like Doubt, The Reader, and Revolutionary Road, but the latter two films are beginning to circle the Best Picture drain (without the sure-shot trifecta of acting nominations that will keep Doubt buzzy throughout its expansion). At least Scott Rudin and Harvey Weinstein can agree on one thing: someone needs to be so fired for this.

But who cares about those real people movies! The burning question is whether these nominations hurt the chances of Oscar dark horse Wall-E. Pixar's finest actually did score a PGA nom in the animated category (alongside Bolt and Kung Fu Panda), and we've heard that animated films may not be allowed to submit in any other PGA category besides the one set aside for them. Also encouraging: the Oscars weigh their nomination votes according to numerical ranking, and Wall-E fans, who may be among the Academy's most ardent, are likely to list the film as their number-one choice. Sure, it's still a long shot, but Disney: it may be time to send EVE out to those voter-rich Toluca Lake retirement homes!

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5123834&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA['Twilight,' Dark Knight' Disappoint After Adjustment For Inflation, Reality]]> Among the year-end movie surveys bombing the landscape, few offer as rewarding a reality check as the one recapping 2008 as the Year of the Sucker.

A New York Times report acknowledged over the weekend that, yes, those phenomena still glowing on the horizon in your rearview mirror are no less newsworthy than they were when they exploded months ago. The Dark Knight's $500 million-plus windfall indeed helped Warner Bros. handily earn a record box-office market share in 2008, and Twilight's $168 million take since Nov. 21 remains nothing short of a hormonally, follically fueled sensation.

But there's a terrible truth concealed beneath the money bags, and it involves the clown-shod ghost of Robin Williams (among others):

It was amazing. When all is said and done, maybe 24 million tickets will be sold to Twilight, based on current sales. That makes it almost as big as, what?

Patch Adams, the No. 10 movie of 1998. Or roughly the size of George of the Jungle, which placed No. 13 the year before. Or any number of films that are fondly remembered as midsize hits.

After adjusting for inflation, even Sex and the City fared about as well as 1989's Steel Magnolias and 1996's The First Wives Club, and The Dark Knight is only the 26th highest-grossing film of all time behind Grease and just $1.5 million ahead of Thunderball.

Still, while we can't deny some enlightenment and even surprise at the revised numbers, neither we nor you should be caught off-guard in 2009. We've helped you prepare: Have another read through our rosy Recession-Era Film Forecast, and spend these precious few remaining days of 2008 plotting your immunity to next year's hype flood and/or sizing your closets up for the stockpile of canned food and bottled water you'll accrue in the bleak months to come. Except for you, Warner Bros. — just redirect your shipment to Fox and cannibalize Harry Potter at will.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5119726&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Warners' PR Cedes Control of 'Dark Knight' Oscar Campaign to Fans]]> The Dark Knight may yet receive its January re-release, but it hardly seems to matter with the Oscar-season fan-offensive presently — and unofficially — being mounted in the blockbuster's name.

The earnest Dark Campaign to which we alerted you a few weeks back has inherited the role of Bat-freak Oscar Clearing House, gathering one fanmade for-your-consideration poster after another and today announcing the TDK community's plans to hit the trades with their grass-roots blitz:

Tomorrow… Dec. 17th we are sending Joker cards in the mail to Variety.

It is simple;
1. find a deck of cards
2. remove the joker card
3. with a red pen, somewhere on the card write:

“Why So Serious?”
For Your Consideration
Heath Ledger - Best Supporting Actor
The Dark Knight - Best Picture of 2008
http://DarkCampaign.com

We're all for these people ruining however many decks of cards they feel they need to trash to get a couple Oscar nods or whatever, but they're forgetting the key step: Address them to Peter Bart. The look of curiosity, whimsy and horror that the campaign's ad money is basically being spent on postage will virtually guarantee whatever the blog equivalent of a heart attack looks like. Cameras at the ready, tradesters.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5111845&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[The Top 10 Worst Pop Culture Bits Of the Year]]> Everyone's doing Top 10 Lists this time of year! About movies and TV and stuff! So I figured I should too. But just one list, that encompasses everything. Everything bad. Enjoy!

10) The Hills, MTV's reality muck about TV and the sad things it does to young people, is full of faux-existential angst that's fun to write about, to be sure. But it's also terrible, terrible, terrible and worst of all doesn't seem to show any signs that it's ending, ever.

9) The Mentalist—a show about a fake psychic (he's really just super-observant!) that's a rip-off of an even terribler show, Psych—was this season's only new breakout hit TV series. It's on CBS of course. Sigh.

8) The Office kind of stopped being as funny. I mean, didn't it? Do you worry about things like: How sustainable is the credibility of the idea that this "documentary film crew" has been following these people for four years? I try not to. But, y'know, Ricky Gervais mighta been onto something with that whole two seasons only thing.

7) John Leguizamo and Jeremy Piven not knowing their lines on Broadway. They were both in David Mamet plays—Leguizamo as the fast-talkin', foul mouthed Teach in American Buffalo; Piven as the fast-talkin', foul mouthed Hollywood suit in Speed the Plow—and it was such an agony watching them struggle to find their words. Like, they're being paid a lotta money here. To not bother to learn the script is just rude.

6) Kath & Kim. Not that it's awful, that you're not watching it. It's actually kind of funny once you get used to its weirdness.

5) That Fred Armisen's spot-on Barack Obama impression on Saturday Night Live was maligned because he's not black. Yes, absolutely, the show needs a much more diverse cast than it currently sports, but Armisen's take on the president-elect is pretty damn good.

4) 27 Dresses. The entirety of Katherine Heigl, actually.

3) The nickname "Sasha Fierce" that Beyonce gave herself so she could release a double album and make more money from us. Don't get me wrong, "Single Ladies" is a bodacious song, but didn't anyone in her camp tap her on the shoulder and show her a photograph of Chris Gaines?

2) The Dark Knight hoopla. For all its pomp and circumstance, the film was really only good because of Heath Ledger's insanely brilliant and scary performance as the Joker. Think about it. The Harvey Dent plotline was featured too prominently and was really over-serious (why so?). Christian Bale's Batman growl was laughable and, worse, distracting. The city didn't look anything like what Gotham should look like. It looked like exactly what it was: modernist Chicago in late afternoon. The whole "let's blow up the other boat" climax was a groaner. And, they used up two good (well, could have been good in the case of Two Face) villains in one movie that didn't need them both. The movie was entertaining, yes. But best picture of the year material? You must be joking.

1) Everything about the Twilight freak fest that came to a thundering climax when the shitty movie (didn't pay, watched it for free online) came out last month. The books, about chaste teen vampires and the sad anti-feminist teenagers who love them, are terribly written and play into some really creaky ideas about sex and gender that are probably doing some damage to the series' obsessed kid fans. Though, you know what? I might hate Twilight most of all because it lead to Caitlin Flanagan's utterly horrifying think piece crapstravaganza in The Atlantic. Read it. Become enraged.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5109382&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[WGA Hopes You Won't Remember Who Directed 'The Dark Knight']]> When we received an awards consideration copy of The Dark Knight last week, there was clearly something missing — or, to be more accurate, censored with black felt-tip pen.

On both the front and back of the DVD, the words "A Christopher Nolan Film" were marked out. We initially brushed off the matter (assuming some posthumous Joker vandalism) until another tipster wrote in today about his own censored screener. "I just wonder what's the rationale - conspiracy to cockblock Nolan from Oscar consideration?" asked the tipster. "Secret WB plan to put Ratner in the running for Batman 3: Egghead Takes Gotham?"

We called Warner Bros. to find out, and a helpful publicist sighed. "You must be WGA," she said. "It's because the guild won't accept a possessory credit for a director." Thus, a poor awards season intern must censor every DVD with black pen. We eagerly await the day that the WGA not only retains the services of the "Unimportant Defacers Team" to enact web-wide cleanup, but sends Patric Verrone into every Suncoast Video in Southern California to scrawl over the terribly offensive possessory credits awarded to Space Chimps. Way to pick your battles, WGA!

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5107746&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Golden Globes Jilt 'Milk,' 'Dark Knight'; 'In Treatment' Leads TV Noms]]> No looming strike will slow down this year's Golden Globe Awards, nominations for which were announced this morning with a few mildly head-cramping surprises.

The good news: Slumptastic Revolutionary Road finally got some awards season recognition! The bad news: It came at Milk's expense. And in the TV categories, In Treatment's five nods surpassed Mad Men, 30 Rock and Entourage, each with three nominations. A full list of nominees follows the jump. We'll have a closer read through the nominees later this morning after we properly suit up for another journey into Awards Hell, but for now we ask: James Franco as Best Actor for Pineapple Express? And: Between the four nominations apiece for Vicky Cristina Barcelona and The Reader, how about those Weinsteins?

FILM CATEGORIES

BEST PICTURE: DRAMA
· The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
· Frost/Nixon
· The Reader
· Revolutionary Road
· Slumdog Millionaire

BEST PICTURE: COMEDY OR MUSICAL
· Burn After Reading
· Happy-go-lucky
· In Bruges
· Mamma Mia
· Vicky Cristina Barcelona

BEST DIRECTOR
· Danny Boyle, Slumdog Millionaire
· Stephen Daldry, The Reader
· David Fincher, The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
· Ron Howard, Frost/Nixon
· Sam Mendes, Revolutionary Road

BEST ACTOR: DRAMA
· Leonardo DiCaprio, Revolutionary Road
· Frank Langella, Frost/Nixon
· Sean Penn, Milk
· Brad Pitt, The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
· Mickey Rourke, The Wrestler

BEST ACTRESS: DRAMA
· Anne Hathaway, Rachel Getting Married
· Angelina Jolie, Changeling
· Meryl Streep, Doubt
· Kristin Scott Thomas, I've Loved You So Long
· Kate Winslet, Revolutionary Road

BEST ACTRESS: COMEDY OR MUSICAL
· Rebecca Hall, Vicky Cristina Barcelona
· Sally Hawkins, Happy-go-lucky
· Frances McDormand, Burn After Reading
· Meryl Streep, Mamma Mia
· Emma Thompson, Last Chance Harvey

BEST ACTOR: COMEDY OR MUSICAL
· Javier Bardem, Vicky Cristina Barcelona
· Colin Farrell, In Bruges
· James Franco, Pineapple Express
· Brendan Gleeseon, In Bruges
· Dustin Hoffman, Last Chance Harvey

BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS
· Amy Adams, Doubt
· Penelope Cruz, Vicky Cristina Barecelona
· Viola Davis, Doubt
· Marisa Tomei, The Wrestler
· Kate Winslet, The Reader

BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR
· Tom Cruise, Tropic Thunder
· Robert Downey Jr., Tropic Thunder
· Ralph Fiennes, The Duchess
· Philip Seymour Hoffman, Doubt
· Heath Ledger,The Dark Knight

BEST FOREIGN LANGUAGE FILM
· The Baader Meinhof Complex (Germany)
· Everlasting Moments (Sweden/Denmark)
· Gomorrah (Italy)
· I've Loved You So Long (France)
· Waltz With Bashir (Israel)

BEST ANIMATED FILM
· Bolt
· Kung Fu Panda
· Wall-E

BEST SCREENPLAY
· Simon Beaufoy, Slumdog Millionaire
· David Hare, The Reader
· Peter Morgan, Frost/Nixon
· Eric Roth, The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
· John Patrick Shanley, Doubt

BEST ORIGINAL SCORE
· Alexandre Desplat, The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
· Clint Eastwood, Changeling
· James Newton Howard, Defiance
· A.R. Rahman, Slumdog Millionaire
· Hans Zimmer, Frost/Nixon

TELEVISION CATEGORIES

BEST DRAMATIC TV SERIES
· Dexter
· House M.D.
· In Treatment
· Mad Men
· True Blood

BEST ACTOR, TV DRAMA
· Gabriel Byrne, In Treatment
· Michael C. Hall, Dexter
· Jon Hamm,Mad Men
· Hugh Laurie, House M.D.
· Jonathan Rhys Meyers, The Tudors

BEST ACTRESS, TV DRAMA
· Sally Field, Brothers & Sisters
· Mariska Hargitay, Law & Order: SVU
· January Jones, Mad Men
· Anna Paquin, True Blood
· Kyra Sedgwick, The Closer

BEST TV SERIES, MUSICAL OR COMEDY
· Californication
· Entourage
· The Office
· 30 Rock
· Weeds

BEST ACTOR, TV MUSICAL OR COMEDY
· Alec Baldwin, 30 Rock
· Steve Carell, The Office
· Kevin Connolly, Entourage
· David Duchovny, Californication
· Tony Shalhoub, Monk

BEST ACTRESS, TV MUSICAL OR COMEDY
· Christina Applegate, Samantha Who?
· America Ferrera, Ugly Betty
· Tina Fey, 30 Rock
· Debra Messing, The Starter Wife
· Mary-Louise Parker, Weeds

BEST MINI-SERIES OR MOTION PICTURE MADE FOR TELEVISION
· Cranford
· Bernard & Doris
· John Adams
· A Raisin in the Sun
· Recount

BEST PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTRESS IN A MINISERIES OR A MOTION PICTURE MADE FOR TELEVISION
· Judi Dench, Cranford
· Laura Linney, John Adams
· Catherine Keener, An American Crime
· Shirley MacLaine, Coco Chanel
· Susan Sarandon, Bernard & Doris

BEST PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTOR IN A MINISERIES OR A MOTION PICTURE MADE FOR TELEVISION
· Ralph Fiennes, Bernard and Doris
· Paul Giammatti, John Adams
· Kevin Spacey, Recount
· Kiefer Sutherland, 24: Redemption
· Tom Wilkinson, Recount

BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS: SERIES, MINISERIES OR MOTION PICTURE MADE FOR TV
· Eileen Atkins, Cranford
· Laura Dern, Recount
· Melissa George, In Treatment
· Rachel Griffiths, Brothers & Sisters
· Dianne Wiest, In Treatment

BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR: SERIES, MINISERIES OR MOTION PICTURE MADE FOR TV
· Neil Patrick Harris, How I Met Your Mother
· Denis Leary, Recount
· Jeremy Piven, Entourage
· Blair Underwood, In Treatment
· Tom Wilkinson, John Adams

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5107309&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Fans Pick Up Oscar Slack as Warner Bros. Kills 'Dark Knight' Re-Release]]> The Dark Knight isn't making the Oscar impression many thought it would by this point in the year, which may be why Warner Bros. reportedly confirmed today that it spiked its planned IMAX re-release for next month. And in any case, it's definitely why the mouthbreathing legions of Bat-supporters have gone guerrilla for their hero's awards-season sake.

The comics site Superhero Hype noted this morning that Warners had backed out of its tentative plan to push TDK back in to theaters in January 2009 — something about not wanting to go up against Fox's rumored X-Files 2 re-release, we think, though no official reason was given. A more realistic suspicion is that if TDK isn't getting the awards love that many critics and industry observers once foresaw for it, then Warners will let the DVD ride this month and save its theatrical resources for Watchmen (and/or fighting Fox in court for the film's rights).

But one devotee is carrying its Oscar water either way at the site The Dark Campaign, featuring a fan-made TV spot rich with easy-to-read blurbs and a mission statement urging Academy revolution:

There are so many comic books done badly by studios that don’t understand. They all made plenty of money for their studios, but what makes Dark Knight different and special? What about all those qualities that make it a great film? The studios should understand the power of a great comic book storytelling translation and the pointlessness of a bad one. I’m hoping an effort to get a Best Picture nomination makes that clear to them. It’s rewarding the studio and filmmakers that did it right.

Not to mention that profound Obama boost they'd forsake by diverting The Dark Knight solely to video. Please, Warners — listen to reason.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5101109&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA['X-Files' Producer Accuses 'Dark Knight' of Hogging Fanboys, Box Office For Itself]]> The co-writer and producer of last summer's X Files: I Want to Believe has a theory about why the film flopped with $21 million — one you might expect from someone who writes about aliens, but which surprises nevertheless.

In short, says Frank Spotnitz: It was The Dark Knight's fault. Warners' blockbuster, with all its brooding and scares simply claimed too much of the market on gothic fanboy melancholy for X-Files to compete a week after TDK first hijacked the box office. One one hand, it's not the most outlandish claim; few films escaped the Batman Revolution without at least a flesh wound (even Mamma Mia!, which Spotnitz cites among the season's most resilient counter-programming). Yet on the other, we can't help but feel a little embarrassed for a guy this delusional about his 15-year-old pop-cult franchise:

According to Spotnitz, I Want to Believe should have been a hit, based on its quality and on its genre as a scary movie. "Blockbusters, comedies, horror, scary films, these are always going to have a place in the theatre," Spotnitz tells Sun Media.

"Our theatrical performance this past summer notwithstanding, I think The X-Files is still a natural for theatrical release. We just opened the wrong week. The week after The Dark Knight, I think, was just not the right week for us. [...] We were a little dark scary movie coming in the fumes, in the exhaust, of this mammoth machine that was The Dark Knight. And I don't think we had a chance!"

They also didn't have the late Heath Ledger, IMAX, three years between films (as opposed to 10 years, with the previous X-Files film earning $80 million), virtually unanimous critical praise or a Momzo the Clown scandal. As Spotnitz almost certainly knows, it takes a village to make a hit. Literally — just ask the leaders of Batman, Turkey. Come to think of it, we hear they might be looking for co-plaintiffs against Warner Bros. if you think a class-action suit is worth a shot. Think it over.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5100946&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Nitpicky Academy Haters Deny 'Dark Knight' Its Chance For Oscar Sweep]]> The Dark Knight came up lame in the first stretch of this year's Oscar marathon, hobbled by the Academy music branch's disqualification of its big, haunting, lugubrious Bat-score. At issue: Credited composers Hans Zimmer and James Newton Howard wrote "more than 60%, but less than 70%" of the music, according to documentation sent the Academy's way. This throws our awards-seasons handicapping into complete disarray, but as Variety points out, it might be our own fault for not seeing it coming.

Add it to the Dark Knight curse, we suppose: The same scenario torpedoed Batman Begins' Best Original Score hopes in 2005, when Zimmer and Howard were last DQ'd. Yet the duo once again leaned too heavily on collaborations for the Academy's taste, bringing on a third composer, the film's music editor and an "ambient music designer" whose achievement in melodifying Heath Ledger's scenery-gobbling will likely go forever unrecognized beyond the controversial five-person credit list — a/k/a the "cue sheet":

Zimmer said, in an interview with Variety prior to this week's Acad action, that listing multiple names on the cue sheet was a way of financially rewarding parts of the music team who helped make the overall work successful. (Performing-rights societies like ASCAP and BMI use the cue sheet to distribute royalties to composers.) [...]

Some members sided with Zimmer and Howard; citing the originality and cutting-edge nature of the music, they urged others to keep the Dark Knight score eligible despite the cue-sheet issue.

And that's not even counting the protests of Hüseyin Kalkan, the embittered mayor of Batman, Turkey, who is expected to argue that his city was singly responsible for the folk tune that inspired the soundtrack's hit instrumental, "Like a Dog Chasing Cars."

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5086063&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[World Crisis Looms as City of Batman Revolts Against Christopher Nolan]]> No one in Hollywood likely ever expected to see the words "Batman" and "Turkey" in the same sentence, but a developing story out of the Balkans reaffirms our faith in the impossible: The mayor of an actual Turkish city called Batman announced over the weekend he plans to sue director Christopher Nolan for naming infringement.

Frustrated over the superhero's incursion into his centuries-old city's cultural turf, mayor Hüseyin Kalkan's proposed lawsuit would nevertheless omit Batman creator Bob Kane, publisher DC Comics and film franchisee Warner Bros. as Nolan's co-defendants. Instead, it would hold the filmmaker himself singly responsible for the region's growing international reputation as a brooding, froggy-voiced world capital of mayhem — none of it in glorious IMAX:

“The royalty of the name ‘Batman’ belongs to us … There is only one Batman in the world. The American producers used the name of our city without informing us,” Kalkan told to the Doğan news agency.

Mayor Kalkan, speaking to the Hürriyet Daily News and the Economic Review, said last year foreign media picked up on Batman and the city’s increasing suicide rates among women. He said a columnist asked why Batman’s mayor did not sue the movie Batman for royalties while struggling with economic problems. “We found this criticism right and started to look for legal possibilities of a case like that,” he said.

Naturally, we sympathize with the mayor's social crisis, not to mention the bind in which Batman natives have found themselves outside the country; one Turk in Germany told reporters that Warner Bros. issued a cease-and-desist from naming his two restaurants after his hometown. To be fair, however, Batman Grill, The Dark Bite™ and a spectrum of other eatery variations are in fact the fiercely protected province of Six Flags, and a lawyer in Istanbul noted that the Batman Municipality has already missed the periodduring which it could file an objection to Batman's trademark as a superhero.

Still, we think this is far from over, with the whole scenario prompting noted Oscar diplomacy expert Dave Karger to reconsider his controversial theory on "How Obama Helps Batman." This is NATO's jurisdiction all the way.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5082214&view=rss&microfeed=true