What I love about Hollywood: In Rosanna Arquette's docu about the plight of the over-30 A-list actress Searching for Debra Winger, a roundtable of a dozen A/B list actresses were complaining about how hard it is for them to be taken seriously when they don't look or act like bimbos. What none of them mentioned (or possibly even observed) was that all but one of them was blonde, at least 50% of which was from a bottle.
Full disclosure: I actually like the overall film.
If for no other reason, I will continue to enjoy watching Sandra Bullock because she looks like she has the lips she was born with. Ditto for Jennifer Aniston.
Take note, Courteney Cox and Heather Locklear, because it's getting realllly hard not to avert my eyes.
@DahlELama: She went through a really BAAAAAAAAD period when she was dating Heath Ledger and was really too young for facelifts. Her mouth was stretched so far her head nearly split in two every time she smiled. But with the help of a good "rehab surgeon" she's recovered beautifully and looks...exactly like Sandra Bullock, twenty years ago.
Sigh. here we go again. Sandra Bullock = very nice lady. Does a lot for charities. Reputation of being incredibly nice, giving, great to work with. Makes very amusing, non-threatening films that many people enjoy (including me). And, finally, god forbid a woman is actually getting parts in Hollywood, filling theater seats and not being some type of tabloid or Maxim magazine victim.
Go Sandy. You keep starring in them and I'll keep seeing them.
""The Blind Side" won this weekend with $129.3 million cumulative box office take, compared to "New Moon"'s $15.7."
You're comparing cumulative box office for one film with weekly box office? Oh, man, "Titanic"'s $1.2 BIL cum wiped the floor with "Amored"'s measly $4 mil.
As we've already discussed, at length, everybody loves Sandra Bullock, especially other women. And Sandra Bullock is just about the only thing that could get women to watch this movie about football, since unlike me most women don't have crushes on the author of the book. Not enough beefcake in tight pants shots to compensate for the fact it's, you know, a FOOTBALL movie.
@raincoaster: Indeed, indeed. But you must realize there are parts of the country where men and women will go see anything with FOOTBALL in it. And add a heartwarming story about suburban white people helping Negroes succeed through football? Voila, box office smash.
@raincoaster: Ahem. This woman voluntarily spent nine hours watching college and pro football this weekend. I don't even look at the asses anymore. Well...all right...I seldom look.
More often than not ugly guys like Letterman have to use their status in the workplace to score with the women; or they would never be given a second look. Some exceptions do exist - but not usually. . . .
He took advantage (imo).
Darling, we women of (ahem) a certain age have some perspective on the situation that apparently escapes you.
Screwing the boss to get ahead seems like a great strategy in your 20s and 30s. Believe me, I've seen both men and women do it.
But it has a depressingly bad effect on the rest of the workforce, who must constantly deal with the side effects of the bo-mance. Resentment builds, as hard-working people begin to suspect that their own careers are lagooned while sweetie-of-the-month gets the good assignments, promotions and undivided boss attention.
Look, it's difficult enough to traverse the emotional terrain when two colleagues are romancin'. When it's the boss-man (and it usually IS a man), that terrain is littered with landmines, son.
i do not condone this behavior at all but that's the way a lot of men and women work in the entertainment business- casting couch realities have been around for decades and we read about them here all the time - unfortunately, there are predators, victims and future stars-
@budy920: Ugh, if I hear one more person suggest/assume these women are "victims," I'm going to scream.
I know this is hard for some people to understsand, but women are perfectly capable of schtupping their superios without being victimized by the experience. Yes, sexual harrassment and predation exists. But there is zilch evidence that it existed between Letterman and these interns. It is not an inherent aspect of such a relationship, and to suggest that it is just makes women sound like idiots who aren't in control of their own sexuality.
Women sometimes WANT to fuck the boss. It does not make them victims.
@budy920: This isn't the casting couch. Screwing around with a subordinate, however willing, isn't a crime. It's a tich tacky, and one wonder why there weren't any Sr. female producers and writers on Letterman's payroll, but it's not a casting situation.
@if_i_only_had_a_heart: Same thing that should happen if the underling tires of the boss--Everybody needs to acts like grown ups and continues to do their job.
And yes, of course, SOMETIMES that is not what happens and someone is fired or demoted as part of the fall-out from the relationship. But my point is--there is NO evidence that happened between Dave and any of his employees so the assumptions these women were victimized is bogus.
@Atilla the Bun: No, to suggest a power imbalance exists -- that sexual harrassment inheres to the relationship -- does not make "women sound like idiots who aren't in control of their own sexuality"; but it sure makes men sound like that. Of course, it's part of any relationship between a boss (for our purposes male) and subordinate (for our purposes female), always, always. That doesn't mean the relationship can't turn into something more meaningful, and it doesn't mean that that power imbalance has to be exploited -- BUT IT IS ALWAYS, ALWAYS THERE. And to deny so is idiotic. And regardless of what women want or think they want, their desires should not always be met. Plenty of college students think they're in love with their professors, but that doesn't mean those professors should take advantage of that delusion or crush. Grow up.
@GotlandMilk: There is a big, BIG difference between saying a "power imbalance exists" and ASSUMING that a woman who is sleeping with her boss is a "victim." One does not necessarily begat another, and the post I was responding to was assuming that it does. And where did I say a woman should get sex on demand from her boss? Of course they shouldn't. Any person that wants to engage in a sexual relationship with their boss or employee is taking a risk that it could end up messy. That's true for even co-workers of equal stature. There is that saying "don't fish off the company pier" for a reason. Certainly in this specific instance, things did get messy. But not because these women were in any way victims. To assume they are is bullshit.
@Atilla the Bun: I agree. Victim-politics don't always need to be injected into these things.
And, (because this isn't Jezebel I'll just say this), if you look at the situation, in the end isn't Letterman the "victim?" Has he not lost and been hurt in the end? And to suggest that he isn't, because he's a man, is to just further play into the damaging conception our society has of masculinity which doesn't like vulnerable/victim men.
@Lulupasternak: Just a minor correction, but Barbara Gaines has been an executive producer of the Late Show since 2000, she occasionally appears on-camera and while I don't know, it's probably pretty safe to say that she's never slept with Dave.
@if_i_only_had_a_heart: In this particular case, the "underling" started living with someone from 48 Hours and continued being Dave's assistant.
@Atilla the Bun: You say "potatoE" and I say "potaAto," because I don't think there is a "big, big difference" between an existing "power imbalance" and "sexual harassment," that is victimization. Sex is a complicated matter, intimate, messy, chockfull of all sorts of emotions and vulnerabilities. So when a man, a boss, and in this case thirty years older, is sleeping with a subordinate, chances are it's not healthy, not based on mutuality and consiousness, that is, a meeting of minds. Just because the woman agrees to it, or even initiates it, doesn't mean she isn't THE ONE being manipulated. Plenty of things are done tacitly. But there is a big, big difference between a mess ignited by two sexually involved co-workers, and a mess ignited when one person has power over another. That all said, sometimes good relationships can start in the darndest ways. But not in this case, not where a man essentially built a harem -- had one affair after the next -- for what I'm sure were narcissistic, selfish purposes. Who cares how nice Letterman seems -- what is he really?
12/07/09
Full disclosure: I actually like the overall film.
12/07/09
12/07/09
Take note, Courteney Cox and Heather Locklear, because it's getting realllly hard not to avert my eyes.
12/07/09
12/07/09
Go Sandy. You keep starring in them and I'll keep seeing them.
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
You're comparing cumulative box office for one film with weekly box office? Oh, man, "Titanic"'s $1.2 BIL cum wiped the floor with "Amored"'s measly $4 mil.
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
10/05/09
He took advantage (imo).
10/05/09
Dave -- call me.
10/05/09
It's the ones who don't and then watch the ones who do get the promotions, plum assignments, air time, etc.
10/05/09
10/06/09
10/05/09
Screwing the boss to get ahead seems like a great strategy in your 20s and 30s. Believe me, I've seen both men and women do it.
But it has a depressingly bad effect on the rest of the workforce, who must constantly deal with the side effects of the bo-mance. Resentment builds, as hard-working people begin to suspect that their own careers are lagooned while sweetie-of-the-month gets the good assignments, promotions and undivided boss attention.
Look, it's difficult enough to traverse the emotional terrain when two colleagues are romancin'. When it's the boss-man (and it usually IS a man), that terrain is littered with landmines, son.
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
I know this is hard for some people to understsand, but women are perfectly capable of schtupping their superios without being victimized by the experience. Yes, sexual harrassment and predation exists. But there is zilch evidence that it existed between Letterman and these interns. It is not an inherent aspect of such a relationship, and to suggest that it is just makes women sound like idiots who aren't in control of their own sexuality.
Women sometimes WANT to fuck the boss. It does not make them victims.
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
And yes, of course, SOMETIMES that is not what happens and someone is fired or demoted as part of the fall-out from the relationship. But my point is--there is NO evidence that happened between Dave and any of his employees so the assumptions these women were victimized is bogus.
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
And, (because this isn't Jezebel I'll just say this), if you look at the situation, in the end isn't Letterman the "victim?" Has he not lost and been hurt in the end? And to suggest that he isn't, because he's a man, is to just further play into the damaging conception our society has of masculinity which doesn't like vulnerable/victim men.
10/05/09
10/05/09
@if_i_only_had_a_heart: In this particular case, the "underling" started living with someone from 48 Hours and continued being Dave's assistant.
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09