@PaisleyPajamas: He ex-husband's name was Wilbur, so maybe Mr. Ed would be a better comparison.
My favorite moment when she was Lt. Gov in NY was when she stood up during Gov. Pataki's ENTIRE inauguration speech. Anyone who didn't think she was nuts after that was kidding themselves.
I still love watching her fumble through her documentation on the Daily Show, desperately trying to back up the "death panel" passage. And Stewart asking why didn't even bother to use stickies.
@BadUncle: And kudos to Stewart and his editors for sitting back in silence as she paged and paged and paged through and couldn't come up with THE ONE SECTION she kept saying everything hinged on. Bravo to them for recognizing the power of dead air.
There was this argument, see, back in the early days, the 70s. Archie Bunker opened up a new era in which a dingbat spewed his ignorance to the masses on primetime teevee! This was not Leave it to Beaver, friends.
The explanation was, the arguments are dispelled by a clown who delivers them. It's Vonnegut's theory of the wrang-wrang.
You want the spotlight of the enemy focused on a clown. It's why David Brooks is all upset and in denial about these loons in front of cameras on his side, and why you shouldn't be.
I honestly don't understand the appeal of these "love letter" type books. I thought the true pleasure of reading non-fiction was cackling mean-spiritedly along with the author as he bitchily eviscerates his subject. Right?
it's not only that he has compromised all journalistic integrity but he scoffs at the idea that someone would dare criticize him - i can no longer even remotely believe anything he says or writes and i resent being treated like an idiot-
This is everything that's wrong with the media. Dan Bartlett, who helped spin us into Iraq and four years too many of the worst administration in modern history, employs Richard Wolffe to spin some more for the "liberal" elements of the media. Wolffe sees no problem with going to work for his spin machine in the guise of being an independent voice. Worst, Wolffe sees no problem with any of it.
A couple of years ago a friend of mine warned me to be wary of the phony left. He mentioned Salon at the time, but he also could have mentioned MSNBC. I told him he was being paranoid. Now I realize he was right. And we're fucked.
@Mediahohoho: Liberals were so happy to see someone on TV who wasn't a Bush cheerleader, they gave each of them a lifetime pass. Even if that anti-Bush host/pundit/blogger was against or mocked everything else they believed in. See all the defenders of Olbermann.
@La Mareada: Honestly, no offense but I'm kind of over the stereotyping. I agree with your first sentence to a point; and I think that's true about a lot of commentators on both sides of the fence. But if we are going to stereotype, let's remember that conservatives will forgive their spokesbot a fuckuva lot, no, what with the blaming tolerance toward gays for 9-11, calling for the assassination of government officials, being racists fucktards and the whatnot?
What strikes me is that we're now also supposed to align ourselves with media brands for easy labeling. Fuck that. I watch Olbermann because I hold similarly opinions to his on a range of issues and like the way he synthesizes and presents the information. I also like a lot of the people he books, like John Dean and Jonathon Turley. Does it make me a liberal? Probably. Does it determine my responses to a host of hypothetical situations? Fuck you.
As a very regular viewer (so shoot me) of his show, I take the good with the bad. Not a fan of worst persons, his "feud" with O'Reilly. Love the special commentaries. They're well written and generally about things I believe very strongly in.
What should concern everyone reading this story is the very apparent corruption of the whole system. Does anyone else feel like they're being played as rubes by Wolffe and Bartlett? Fuck them, too. But thank them for revealing how utterly shallow and dishonest the whole shit show really is.
So...you want to define me by that, go ahead. There's a lot of crap to watch/read/listen to. And there are a lot of opinions out there, too, each unique in its own way. Like a snowflake. Or an asshole.
Awww Cajun, you have been so prolific all evening.
I've noticed. Good job. Sometimes a "You are awesome" is counterproductive to "You can do better."
But positive reinforcement is always necessary at strategic times. Just not the wrong times.
@Iwillnotauditionforastar: I agree. The highlight of my weird vampire work schedule is periodically falling in love with a cajun. Who is likely not a vampire.
10/05/09
And Seabiscuit's teeth!
10/05/09
Something tells me Republicans are willing to drop the Kissinger's brain requirement when confronted with the Jessica Rabbit body.
10/05/09
10/05/09
My favorite moment when she was Lt. Gov in NY was when she stood up during Gov. Pataki's ENTIRE inauguration speech. Anyone who didn't think she was nuts after that was kidding themselves.
10/05/09
[www.thedailyshow.com]
[www.thedailyshow.com]
Unfortunately the extended version (off air portion) was taken down.
10/05/09
Jon was extraordinarily patient with this nincompoop.
10/05/09
10/05/09
Still gloriously preserved on HuffPo.
10/05/09
Not only a liar, but a dimwit.
10/05/09
10/05/09
The explanation was, the arguments are dispelled by a clown who delivers them. It's Vonnegut's theory of the wrang-wrang.
You want the spotlight of the enemy focused on a clown. It's why David Brooks is all upset and in denial about these loons in front of cameras on his side, and why you shouldn't be.
Keep Sarah Palin.
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
What's up death doc?
08/05/09
08/05/09
08/05/09
Look behind you. You passed it a few steps back. It was labeled 'Integrity'
08/05/09
A couple of years ago a friend of mine warned me to be wary of the phony left. He mentioned Salon at the time, but he also could have mentioned MSNBC. I told him he was being paranoid. Now I realize he was right. And we're fucked.
08/05/09
08/05/09
What strikes me is that we're now also supposed to align ourselves with media brands for easy labeling. Fuck that. I watch Olbermann because I hold similarly opinions to his on a range of issues and like the way he synthesizes and presents the information. I also like a lot of the people he books, like John Dean and Jonathon Turley. Does it make me a liberal? Probably. Does it determine my responses to a host of hypothetical situations? Fuck you.
As a very regular viewer (so shoot me) of his show, I take the good with the bad. Not a fan of worst persons, his "feud" with O'Reilly. Love the special commentaries. They're well written and generally about things I believe very strongly in.
What should concern everyone reading this story is the very apparent corruption of the whole system. Does anyone else feel like they're being played as rubes by Wolffe and Bartlett? Fuck them, too. But thank them for revealing how utterly shallow and dishonest the whole shit show really is.
So...you want to define me by that, go ahead. There's a lot of crap to watch/read/listen to. And there are a lot of opinions out there, too, each unique in its own way. Like a snowflake. Or an asshole.
08/05/09
08/05/09
08/05/09
I've noticed. Good job. Sometimes a "You are awesome" is counterproductive to "You can do better."
But positive reinforcement is always necessary at strategic times. Just not the wrong times.
08/05/09
08/05/09