<![CDATA[Gawker: The New York Times]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: The New York Times]]> http://gawker.com/tag/the new york times http://gawker.com/tag/the new york times <![CDATA[ <i>Times</i> Critics' Five Worst Lines About Children's Books ]]> Tomorrow you can sit down and read the New York Times Book Review childrens' literature special insert. The annual feature is one way to find a choice picture book to give to a young person, and it also gives us the gift of the insane seriousness with which the Times reviewers treat the subject. The task of making these kinds of books relevant to the adult reader is admittedly a difficult one, and yet the best of the overwrought sentences that follow truly make us feel like children again. Unbelievably stupid children.

Our favorite five bon mots:

5. "The story is told in a fluid, seemingly effort­less manner. Neither showy nor dull, the text has that feeling of giving you the right words in the right order with the right pacing," says Amy Krouse Rosenthal about Jon Agee's The Retired Kid. Chills, Amy.

4. In his review of Doreen Rappaport's Lady Liberty, James McMullan breaks out the big guns: "The book also provides several pages of facts about the statue and its history: important events, selected sources, an author’s note and an illustrator’s note. This added material seems totally appropriate for the smart, practical kid I can imagine poring over this volume." Don't push us too far, James. We don't want to hear this semiotics bullshit. Stick to the here and now.

3. Some of the best moments happen when the critic is forced to really tear into the author, as when John Green writes of Susan Beth Pfeffer's The Dead and the Gone, "Some of the plot seems more symbolically resonant than realistic — Alex, for instance, takes coats and shoes from dead people to trade for food, and it’s hard to imagine a shoe shortage in a mostly depopulated Manhattan." A shoe shortage is what he doesn't find believable. I hope he doesn't start reading The Retired Kid.

2. We feel for Becca Zerkin, who is given the heady task of reviewing alphabet books. Her opening line is "If only life were as tidy as an alphabet book." No words.

1.: The big prize has to go to children's book critic Leonard S. Marcus, author of Minders of Make-Believe: Idealists, Entrepreneurs, and the Shaping of American Children’s Literature. In his review of The Monster Who Ate Darkness, he summarizes the villain in the following fashion: "But to a small child the dark can be palpably real, a malleable and at times sinister medium, and the suggestion that a monster might exert a beneficial influence in a small child’s world is one that brims with possibilities." Amazing, Leonard. You may collect your prize.

]]>
Gawker-5080513 Sat, 08 Nov 2008 11:55:00 EST Alex Carnevale http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5080513&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ 'NYT' Rabbit Kill Story Enrages Bunny-Huggers ]]> Picture 15-2This photo—along with the headline "Peter Rabbit Must Die"—opens today's "Home and Garden" section of The New York Times. It's a piece on killing backyard pests such as adorable woodchucks and icky snakes, but the illustration has NYC's bunny-owning community screaming bloody murder. A tipster writes, "On Yahoo’s nycbuns group, which is dedicated to the well-being of bunnies as well as the emotional disorders of their owners, the New York Times photo has provoked a wave of infuriated posts." One enraged bunner pleads, "everyone please inform the NYT that it is totally inappropriate to use a picture of a lop eared house rabbit for a story about killing garden pests. one would think these journalists making $200k a year would know better - yeah damn mad at them and sent a very nasty email." More bunny rage after the jump.

"i read the article in the new york times today and i think it is atrocious!!! This is one for Mary Cotter and Cindy to respond to. They made it sound like it was 'fun' to shoot or kill these animals. I am really surprised as the NY times!!! Horrible. What happened to respecting all life and learning to co exist! I am appalled!"
the story is No.2 most popular and has 350 comments... photo still
there, but at least is not on the homepage anymore. 

"i have also called (of course they don't answer calls) and e-mailed the public editor to demand the photo be taken down immediately. i cc'd my attorney and susan richmond of spca. would love to sue them for something like this if there was a way. you can reach the public editor Clark Hoyt, public@nytimes.com or
call 212.556.7652. the ignorance of using this photo really and truly astounds me."

"thanks sent letter to the public editor...In addition to removing the picture I asked for a retraction as well as a researched follow up article that appropriately honors the companionship House Rabbits provide to millions of humans. i certrainly hope HRS and all its chapters as well as Humane Society and local and national ASPCA use their influence and address this article as well. Although I was appalled by some of the comments in a way a bold reminder of the challenges other species face in the hands of many humans."

]]>
Gawker-5014216 Sat, 07 Jun 2008 09:14:24 EDT ian spiegelman http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5014216&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ "Framing a Century: Master Photographers, 1840 - 1940" ]]> Picture 3-18“'Framing a Century: Master Photographers, 1840-1940,' at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, manages to operate in the gap between both kinds of miracles, innovative and talismanic. It presents the history of a medium as well as history itself. This exhibition appropriates a model usually reserved for painters, old or modern masters. Organized by Malcolm Daniels, the curator in charge of the Met’s photography department, “Framing a Century” recounts the medium’s 100 years with a succinct cavalcade of big names, substantial bodies of work and significant historical impact."

Picture 4-22

Picture 5-12

Picture 7-11

Picture 8-11

Picture 9-6

Picture 10-5

Picture 11-5

Picture 14

Picture 13-4

[NYT]

]]>
Gawker-5014214 Sat, 07 Jun 2008 08:59:00 EDT ian spiegelman http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5014214&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ 'NYT' Leaving the Suburbs ]]> In yet another move that will likely piss-off Old Tyme-y newspaper types, The New York Times is shutting down a whole batch of its suburban outposts. One staffer writes in, "Big stuff. They are closing all of their suburban bureaus, packing up, giving up, going home to protect what is left of their base—seven 84 year-olds on the upper west side. White Plains, New Jersey, Connecticut and Long Island—shuttered, reporters brought into Manhattan and reassigned, pretty much except for one dude in New Jersey, kept there so that tri-state doesn't have less correspondents than, say, Montana. If that's not a metaphor for their dire economic circumstances, I'm not sure what is—but it's a curious decision too. Their shrinking readership base in the city is smaller than the ring outside it. Maybe they want it to be bigger again…by shrinking what's outside of it. Ah, now I get it." But another source inside the Gray Lady has a less dire take.

"I can say that your correspondent is off the mark on the substance, the drivers, the mood, and the implications. We're all pretty excited about the new direction, me included.

"I would only observe that we have a large and loyal readership in the New York suburbs, a bigger one than in the five boroughs. But those people mostly aren't reading the Times for detailed local coverage of suburban New Jersey and Connecticut. And such stories will not be what keeps Metro thriving and relevant in an era when the Times is a national and global platform.

"I know people like to dance on our grave out there, but this is a good and positive thing, not a cheap metaphor for decline."

]]>
Gawker-5010881 Sat, 24 May 2008 15:20:17 EDT ian spiegelman http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5010881&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ <i>Awww</i> 'NYT' Headline Writers Think They Work <i>Here</i> ]]> What does it say about a story when an editor at The New York Times resorts to snark? Is this part of that whole Times loosening up thing? Is it a way to soften the blow of a really wordy article on a topic that no one seems to know anything about? Take this, for instance.

"In recent weeks, some analysts have started to talk about prices rising to $200 a barrel. But not everyone is so glum. Some experts say that today’s prices have resulted from a speculative bubble that is increasingly disconnected from reality. Energy economists at Lehman Brothers argue, for instance, that oil prices are just as likely to fall to $80 a barrel as they are to rise to $200 a barrel." [NYT]

]]>
Gawker-5008620 Sun, 11 May 2008 12:33:11 EDT ian spiegelman http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5008620&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ <i>Times</i> Journo's Prison Weekend ]]> 27Bearak-600-1The New York Times' Barry Bearak reports on his four-day stint in a Zimbabwe prison on charges of "committing journalism." It began when 21 policemen and detectives raided the lodge where he'd been staying. "The crowded room was hot. Already, I felt jailed. I needed a breath of air, but when I moved toward the door, Detective Jasper Musademba, a well-built man in a jacket and tie, stopped me. He had been the most threatening of the police. 'If you try to go outside...' he said sternly, stopping in midsentence. He made his hand into a gun and pulled the trigger. 'You’ll kill me?' I asked. 'Good,' he remarked wryly. 'Then you’ve seen that movie.'”

"Sleep was impossible. The bench was hard, the room cold and noisy. Near dawn, one of the bribed night crew, fearing his supervisors, rousted us from the bench and hastily herded us upstairs into an unlighted empty cage. 'You can’t be found wearing your socks,' he warned urgently. 'It’s not allowed. You can’t wear more than one shirt either. Hide these things.'

"The heavy bars then clanged shut; a padlock clicked. We couldn’t really observe the surroundings until morning, when the first sliver of sunlight pierced the one narrow window at the ceiling.

"The cell was about 7 feet wide and 15 feet deep. Three bare shelves of rough concrete extended a body’s length from both of the longer walls. Only the top slab left enough space for a person to sit upright, albeit with slouched shoulders. There was a circle of concrete in a corner to be used as a toilet. Behind it was a faucet. Stephen tried the knob. It did not work.

"The floor was filthy. The odor of human waste infected the air. More bothersome were the bugs. 'Cockroaches the size of skateboards,' I quipped. This was hyperbole. The insects were mostly tiny and black, others short, white and wormy. We were soon sharing our clothes with them." [NYT]

]]>
Gawker-5007042 Sun, 27 Apr 2008 10:53:31 EDT ian spiegelman http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5007042&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ 'NYT' Bullied Boy Bullied a Boy ]]> Bully4Turns out the subject of that New York Times article about the Arkansas kid who gets beat up all the time, Billy Wolfe, is himself a bit of bad news. And that Pulitzer-winning reporter Dan Barry either missed or ignored that complicating little twist. A story in the Northwest Arkansas Times details a police report on young Wolfe: "[T]he police report contains allegations that Billy harassed a student confined to a wheelchair with muscular dystrophy by sneaking up behind him and screaming to aggravate the disabled boy’s sensitivity to noise, by bouncing a rubber ball against the disabled boy’s head, and by calling him 'stupid' and a 'retard.' The police report provides further context on the assaults described in the NYT."

"One allegedly occurred after Billy called a boy who had just moved from Germany and whose mother had just died of cancer a 'gay [expletive ] German' and then called his 'deceased mother a vulgar name.' Another incident allegedly occurred after Billy pushed another student. Billy was accused of picking on other kids, stealing, and intimidating those that he picked on against telling the teacher."

Blogger Jay P. Greene, who lives in Wolfe's town and whose kids go to the school featured in the Times article, further notes, "But the NYT article by Dan Barry makes no mention of the police report or the details contained in it. Nor did Dan Barry’s reporting uncover any of the information from the interviews contained in the Northwest Arkansas Times article. Instead, Barry simply writes, 'It remains unclear why Billy became a target…' He also declares, '[Billy] has received a few suspensions for misbehavior, though none for bullying.' It seems the NYT reporter either somehow missed the existence of the police report or decided not to include its contents in his piece. Either way, it is very sloppy reporting. I sent an email to the Public Editor of the NYT asking if Barry had seen the police report, and, if he had seen it, why he chose not to include it in his article. Other than a form letter I’ve received no reply."

]]>
Gawker-5006912 Fri, 25 Apr 2008 12:17:25 EDT ian spiegelman http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5006912&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Blogging Will Make You Fat, Or Skinny, And KILL YOU! ]]> Images-2-7In the last few months, two bloggers—ages 50 and 60—dropped dead of heart attacks. Times for a trend piece! "Other bloggers complain of weight loss or gain, sleep disorders, exhaustion and other maladies born of the nonstop strain of producing for a news and information cycle that is as always-on as the Internet." Whoa, sucks to be them. But who are the evil bastards that drive this infernal machine? "Some sites, like those owned by Gawker Media, give bloggers retainers and then bonuses for hitting benchmarks, like if the pages they write are viewed 100,000 times a month. Then the goal is raised, like a sales commission: write more, earn more." D'Oh!

Take, for instance, the tragic case of a 22-year-old Brooklyn-based blogboy Matt Buchanan, who writes for something called Gizmodo. "He says he sleeps about five hours a night and often does not have time to eat proper meals. But he does stay fueled—by regularly consuming a protein supplement mixed into coffee."

"But make no mistake: Mr. Buchanan, a recent graduate of New York University, loves his job. He said he gets paid to write (he will not say how much) while interacting with readers in a global conversation about the latest and greatest products."

“'The fact I have a few thousand people a day reading what I write — that’s kind of cool,' he said. And, yes, it is exhausting. Sometimes, he said, 'I just want to lie down.'” And so he does—on the job! “'If I don’t hear from him, I’ll think: Matt’s passed out again,' said Brian Lam, the editor of Gizmodo. 'It’s happened four or five times.'" But will these bloggy sweatshops really kill a nerd?

"To be sure, there is no official diagnosis of death by blogging, and the premature demise of two people obviously does not qualify as an epidemic. There is also no certainty that the stress of the work contributed to their deaths. But friends and family of the deceased, and fellow information workers, say those deaths have them thinking about the dangers of their work style." [NYT]

Oh snap... I'd better post this shit before everyone beats me to it! But... getting... diz

]]>
Gawker-5005102 Sun, 06 Apr 2008 10:11:23 EDT ian spiegelman http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5005102&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Charlton Heston, Actor ]]> Images-26Well, you can have his gun now. Oscar winning actor, NRA president, and all around iconic conservative slab of beefcake, Charlton Heston, died last night at his Beverly Hills home. He was 84. "His death was confirmed by a spokesman for the family, Bill Powers, who declined to discuss the cause. In August 2002, Mr. Heston announced that he had been diagnosed with neurological symptoms 'consistent with Alzheimer’s disease.'" [NYT] Olds, and The New York Times, will remember him as the star of The Ten Commandments and Ben-Hur, but for the rest of us, he will always be the man who launched a thousand spoofs. Update: "Heston was born John Charles Carter in Evanston, Illinois, on Oct. 4, 1923, though the year of his birth has been in dispute for years, with some sources saying he was born in 1924." [Bloomberg]

While many thespians of his generation were students of the naturalistic "Method" school of acting, Heston would have none of that pussy crap, and prided himself on being a Movie Star who could win at yelling and hit the mark without tripping over the scenery. And scenery feared him. Because he could eat the hell out of it. But his style was wonderfully suited to the roles he chose. There is little room for subtlety when you're damning the maniacs who blew up the earth! Or when you're confronted by damned dirty apes! And no one's in the mood for James Dean's sissy-boy whining when you've just found out that your favorite snack is made out of people! I Am Legend? Heston's Omega Man would have ripped Will Smith's face off right off it's silly skull.

Sadly, Heston's last prominent role was as himself in Michael Moore's Bowling for Columbine. Moore wanted to debate Heston over his appearance at an NRA rally in Flint, Michigan, in the wake of a six-year-old boy shooting a six-year-old girl to death there. Nobody won.

]]>
Gawker-5005101 Sun, 06 Apr 2008 08:57:55 EDT ian spiegelman http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5005101&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Moneyed Wusses Prepare for Doomsday ]]> Images-1-5“'I’m not a gun-nut, camo-wearing skinhead. I don’t even hunt or fish,' said Bill Marcom, 53, a construction executive in Dallas. Still, motivated by a belief that the credit crunch and a bursting housing bubble might spark widespread economic chaos — 'the Greater Depression,' as he put it — Mr. Marcom began to take measures to prepare for the unknown over the last few years: buying old silver coins to use as currency; buying G.P.S. units, a satellite telephone and a hydroponic kit; and building a simple cabin in a remote West Texas desert." Yes, Mr. Marcom, when the apocalypse hits, Lord Humongous will gladly accept your old sliver coins as "currency."

Another crunchy green poser ripe for slaughter when civilization takes a powder "is Alex Steffen, the executive editor of www.wWorldchanging.com, a Web site devoted to sustainability. With only slight irony, Mr. Steffen, 40, said he and his girlfriend could serve as 'poster children for the well-adjusted, urban liberal survivalist,' given that they keep a six-week cache of food and supplies in his basement in Seattle (although they polished off their bottle of doomsday whiskey at a party)."

Who else will provide forced labor while we munch up their tasty supplies? "Joyce Jimerson of Bellingham, Wash., a coordinator for a recycling-composting program affiliated with Washington State University... ma[d]e her yard an 'edible garden,' with fruit trees and vegetables, in case supplies are threatened by oil shortages, climate change or economic collapse. 'It’s all the same ball of wax, as far as I’m concerned,' she said."

Okay, friends. We've got names and locations. The List has begun! [NYT]

]]>
Gawker-5005073 Sat, 05 Apr 2008 08:32:56 EDT ian spiegelman http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5005073&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Dowd Screams Her Point, Backtracks ]]> Images-4-3Times columnist and walking self-parody Maureen Dowd insists today that "Democrats are trying to sneak up on Hillary, throw a burlap sack over her head, carry her off the field and stick her in a Saddam spider hole until after the Denver convention." Yep, the party is through with Senator Hillary Clinton. "Democrats are coming around to the point Jay Rockefeller made 10 days ago after introducing Obama in West Virginia: 'Democrats always make a mistake by nominating people who know everything on earth there is to know about public policy. I introduced both Al Gore and John Kerry at their rallies. They knew all the policies, but people didn’t connect with them. You don’t get elected president if people don’t like you.'" Plus, the ladies of The View find Barack Obama "sexy," so surely the race is over.

"One Obama adviser moaned that the race was 'beginning to feel like a hostage crisis' and would probably go on for another month to six weeks. And Obama said that the 'God, when will this be over?' primary season was like 'a good movie that lasted about a half an hour too long.' Hillary sunnily riposted that she likes long movies. Her favorite as a girl was 'The Wizard of Oz,' so surely she spots the 'Surrender Dorothy' sign in the sky and the bad portent of the ladies of 'The View' burbling to Obama about how sexy he is." Okay, case closed.

"But who knows? Obama and Bob Casey talking March Madness to the patrons of Sharky’s sports cafe in Latrobe, Pa., on Friday night seemed demographically clever. But it is always when Hillary is pushed back by the boys that women help hoist her up." Note to all you young journos eager to someday be this relevant: Cover all bases. [NYT]

]]>
Gawker-5004775 Sun, 30 Mar 2008 12:37:28 EDT ian spiegelman http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5004775&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ This is Not a Crack House ]]> Crac650Last week, annoyingly one-named reporter for The New York Times, Toure, wrote about his middle class guilt and snitching to the cops about a crack house on his block. The article was illustrated with this photo of some handsome residences in Toure's neighborhood. But, oops!

"A picture last Sunday with an essay about a crack house in Fort Greene, Brooklyn, was published in error. The three houses in the picture are on the same street as the crack house, but none of the three figured in the essay." The photo's been removed from the original article online. Good thing we grabbed it. [NYT]

]]>
Gawker-5004774 Sun, 30 Mar 2008 11:54:28 EDT ian spiegelman http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5004774&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Eliot Spitzer: Media Critic ]]> Images-2-4Before The New York Times utterly destroyed former Governor Eliot Spitzer by breaking the news of his whoring ways, Spitzer didn't have much respect for the paper. New York State District Attorney David Soares' report on Troopergate includes an email exchange between Spitzer and aid Rich Baum in which they discuss Times reporter Nick Confessore. "In a separate set of e-mails early in the morning on that date, Spitzer asked Rich Baum: 'So how do u think confessore came out?'"

"To this, Baum replied: 'Thought confe[ssore] story was what you said—fine but not how should have been written. Amazing what they pass off as analysis."

"Spitzer responded: 'Agreed. Confessor[e] was just so superficial, but our side is there, and headline and lead are okay."

Nice of Spitzer to give Confessore and his Times colleagues some stronger meat to cover.

]]>
Gawker-5004743 Sat, 29 Mar 2008 10:55:43 EDT ian spiegelman http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5004743&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Our Nation Is Gripped By A Turkey Carving Crisis! ]]> 21carve-190.jpgThe hard part about writing News You Can Use isn't finding the solution; it's proving there's a problem to be solved. Consider today's Times, wherein dining reporter Julia Moskin has a nice Thanksgiving Eve article (accompanied online by a thrilling instructional video) about a new low-stress, expert-approved way to carve up your turkey. But is the old hack-and-slice regime really so problematic? Yes. "Before breakfast on Thanksgiving," begins Moskin's tale, "as the first Americans rise to preheat the oven, the question of who is going to carve the bird starts to ripple anxiously across the land." This being journalism (of sorts), the burden of proof requires at least some civilian testimony, which is where things take a decided turn toward the gothic.

By mealtime, many cooks will be tired of hovering over the turkey and ready to unload it, but just try to find a taker.

"One year my 13-year-old nephew, Josh, was the only one willing to take it on," said Nissa Goldstein, a retired teacher in West Hartford, Conn. "Of course, everyone was shouting instructions at him, and he ended up locking himself in his room and refusing to come out."

Of course. Who hasn't experienced an adolescent nervous breakdown over poultry?

But Josh isn't alone; the turkey terror lurks everywhere! "One year the turkey took a long time to cook and I went to carve it after about 13 beers," said Maurice Landry, who lives near Lake Charles, LA. "The way I remember it, I bore down to take off the leg and the whole thing went shooting off the platter and knocked over the centerpiece." Indeed, why wield a knife at all if you aren't a little bit buzzed?

With the proof of a problem's existence established rather indisputably by just two "One year..." recollections, Moskin moves on to the meat of her story. The Goldsteins and Landrys aren't heard from again—which makes one wonder: how exactly were these folks from "West Hartford" and "Lake Charles" identified as prime sources on holidays hysteria? And who's making sure they stay in treatment for good this time?

Butcher's Method Takes Carving Off the Table
[NYT]

]]>
Gawker-325291 Wed, 21 Nov 2007 09:40:44 EST JonLiu http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=325291&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ David Brooks Discovers "Dozens Of Niche Musical Genres Where There Used To Be This Thing Called Rock" ]]> ts-brooks-190.jpgFriedman's oblivious egomania, Dowd's insouciance to basic norms of logical argument, Kristof's admirable ambulance chasing: all such other Times op-ed superpowers pale in comparison to David Brooks's truly awe-inspiring, magisterial laziness. Like a frat boy funneling a brew, he sits waiting for ideas to trickle down and, when he's had his fill, spits out a rank, frothy mess whose resemblance to last week's rank, frothy mess he takes as affirmative proof of his unfalsifiable claims about life and stuff. Today, he pretends to write about music. Why?

Best I can tell, because he sometimes reads The New Yorker and Slate, and the former recently published a much-discussed rumination by Sasha Frere-Jones about race and indie rock, a Carl Wilson rejoinder to which was published in the latter. Obviously, David Brooks doesn't know anything about indie rock—or hip-hop or punk—but that's okay, because David Brooks knows how to turn anything into a David Brooks column.

David Brooks also appears to know Steven Van Zandt, of the E Street Band, who he tells us "fell for the Beatles and discovered the blues and early rock music that inspired them." Of course, because cliches and commonplaces aren't ever deducted from the word count or pay check, David Brooks's account of rock music begins with the Beatles's 1964 appearance on Ed Sullivan. To be exact, it begins like this: "On Feb. 9, 1964, the Beatles played on 'The Ed Sullivan Show.'" Then there were the '70s, "a great moment for musical integration." But, then, at "some point toward the end of the 1970s or the early 1980s, the era of integration gave way to the era of fragmentation. There are now dozens of niche musical genres where there used to be this thing called rock."

It turns out that "people have been writing about the fragmentation of American music for decades." Here's where Brooks makes mention of the Frere-Jones/Wilson debate. But really, you see, people like Sasha Frere-Jones and Carl Wilson, who can name music acts besides the Beatles, Springsteen, the Rolling Stones, and U2 (who grew famous long after "the era of integration" ended, but who's counting?), miss the forest for the trees! No, Brooks, explains, what's going on now/happened twenty years ago (whatever!) to music is happening because:"Technology drives some of the fragmentation. Computers allow musicians to produce a broader range of sounds. Top 40 radio no longer serves as the gateway for the listening public. Music industry executives can use market research to divide consumers into narrower and narrower slices."

"But other causes flow from the temper of the times. It's considered inappropriate or even immoral for white musicians to appropriate African-American styles. And there's the rise of the mass educated class." And wait, back to little Stevie: he's starting a high-school curriculum about the history of American popular music. Why? "He argues that if the Rolling Stones came along now, they wouldn't be able to get mass airtime because there is no broadcast vehicle for all-purpose rock. And he says that most young musicians don't know the roots and traditions of their music. They don't have broad musical vocabularies to draw on when they are writing songs."

Alright, so popular music has splintered, and some people believe there are ways to unsplinter it. But, come on, why does David Brooks really care about Van Zandt's music-class plan? Could it be that a deadline is looming?

"It seems that whatever story I cover, people are anxious about fragmentation and longing for cohesion," he concludes. "This is the driving fear behind the inequality and immigration debates, behind worries of polarization and behind the entire Obama candidacy."

There you have it: the David Brooks pivot in all its glory. Basically: 'there are a lot of details and specificities and technicalities to all the things I hear about, but really there's one theme that runs through it all: I heard it.'

The Segmented Society [NYT]

]]>
Gawker-324740 Tue, 20 Nov 2007 11:30:03 EST JonLiu http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=324740&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Yesterday Radar seized on a memo circulating ... ]]> 41FBJ1733BL.jpg Yesterday Radar seized on a memo circulating at the Times which would abolish the use of story datelines indicating when a reporter actually wrote a story, as opposed to when the story was printed. "The "significant advantages" include doing "away with datelines that are several days old, which can make a story seem stale rather than immediate," Radar reports. Ah yes, much better to seem immediate than to actually be immediate.[Radar]

]]>
Gawker-324475 Tue, 20 Nov 2007 10:08:20 EST Maggie http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=324475&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ 'Times' Review Deems New Times Building 'Kind of Okay!' ]]> Building190.jpgStep aside, public editor Clark Hoyt! The Times's impulse for self-assessment takes a more material(ist) turn today with architecture critic Nicolai Ouroussoff's review of the new Renzo Piano-designed Times HQ on Eighth Ave. and 41st Street. Ouroussoff—as far as architecture critics go, really an unimpeachable guy who continues to fight the good fight against the Cialis-crude phallus going up as the so-called Freedom Tower—doesn't dodge the conflict of interest issues. Much.

So let me get this out of the way: As an employee, I'm enchanted with our new building on Eighth Avenue. The grand old 18-story neo-Gothic structure on 43rd Street, home to The New York Times for nearly a century, had its sentimental charms. But it was a depressing place to work. Its labyrinthine warren of desks and piles of yellowing newspapers were redolent of tradition but also seemed an anachronism.
Phew. No more crummy "yellowing newspapers" in the newspaper building!

Indeed, the de-paperification of newspapers looms large in Ouroussoff's review of a building that "comes to life when it hits the ground" but is "less than spectacular in the skyline" with the "menacing air" of its "battleship gray" steel frame and the "ragged and unfinished" effect of its "disappointing" crown. Because, hey, Modernism or whatever may be on life-support, but: "Journalism, too, has moved on. Reality television, anonymous bloggers, the threat of ideologically driven global media enterprises — such forces have undermined newspapers' traditional mission. Even as journalists at The Times adjust to their new home, they worry about the future. As advertising inches decline, the paper is literally shrinking; its page width was reduced in August. And some doubt that newspapers will even exist in print form a generation from now."

"Depending on your point of view, the Times Building can thus be read as a poignant expression of nostalgia or a reassertion of the paper's highest values as it faces an uncertain future. Or, more likely, a bit of both."

While it's unclear how Kid Nation will challenge the Grey Lady's supremacy as Truth, and—hi mom!—even Gawker posts ain't anonymous nomore, but the sentiments are Lever House-pure. Still, for a critic who tells us that "One of the joys of working in an ambitious new building is that you can watch its personality develop," Ouroussoff is tantalizingly demure about the real building components that deserve judgment regarding capital-"D" Design. That's right, not a word on the men's rooms. So, insiders, has architect Piano solved the problem, apparently endemic in corporate Manhattan, of urinals that either regularly disgorge their contents onto the tiles underneath or, um, encourage their users to "sell short"?

And the stalls: How wide of a stance are we talking about there?

Pride and Nostalgia Mix in the Times's New Home [NYT]

]]>
Gawker-324695 Tue, 20 Nov 2007 09:36:15 EST JonLiu http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=324695&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Good news for books! John Grisham's "Playing ... ]]> pizza.jpgGood news for books! John Grisham's "Playing For Pizza"—the story of a washed-up American quarterback whose trip to Italy to play for the Parma Panthers leads to hijinx—is no longer #1 on the Times hardcover bestseller list. Bad news for books: "Playing for Pizza" is now at #3, bumped by a new Patricia Cornwell novel with "dead" in the title and a "paranormal romance" called "A Lick [hmm!] Of Frost." More distressingly, "The Orc King"—the story of a dark elf named Drizzt Do'Urden—is all the way down to #17. Of course, the list "is not a completely accurate barometer of what the reading public is buying," so phew.

]]>
Gawker-318877 Mon, 05 Nov 2007 11:55:11 EST Emily Gould http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=318877&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Inside The 'Times' Hardcover Bestseller List ]]> pizzaWhat's this? The New York Times bestseller list "is not a completely accurate barometer of what the reading public is buying," public editor Clark Hoyt informed us last week. This, even in spite of recent adjustments to the top-secret formula, devised in order to prevent publishers from "gaming the system" that determines the list's rankings: Appalling! Well, not really. As people who work in publishing like to tell their disappointed authors, the mysteriously-weighted list has always been essentially meaningless. Unless those authors have bestseller bonuses in their contracts, in which case: The list is extremely meaningful! And so while the list does not mean everything, it must mean something. For example, the #1 spot on this week's Hardcover Fiction list is occupied by a John Grisham book called "Playing For Pizza." What's that about?

Well, this is what "Playing For Pizza" is about: "An American third-string quarterback joins the Italian National Football League's Parma Panthers." "To say that Italy—the land of opera, fine wines, extremely small cars, romance, and Football Americano— holds a few surprises for Rick Dockery would be something of an understatement," promises Doubleday's website. We'll bet!

Basically all this means is that if something says "John Grisham" on it, people will buy it absolutely no matter what. Which: Duh.

#2 is Alice Sebold's book club lady book "The Almost Moon," about a lady who kills her burdensomely ill mother. Everyone hates this book, but your mom and mine are still going to read it. Got a problem with that? You know what you can do.

#3 is Ken Follett's enormous historical novel "World Without End," which people are reading because they, like me, like their medieval novels as smutty as possible. You know what word is in this book a lot? "Cunny." Hot, right?

There aren't too many surprises elsewhere on the list. "A Thousand Splendid Suns," the second of Khaled Hosseini's "vitamin books" (books people buy to assuage their guilt for not knowing anything about Afghanistan/some other afflicted region), is down a spot to #4. "Run," Ann Patchett's lauded latest, is down to slot 11, from 8 last week. Otherwise, it's all schlocky thrillers and paranormal mysteries.

Oh! At #13 there's a book called "The Orc King." "The dark elf Drizzt Do'Urden seeks vengeance against the orcs; the first book of a new trilogy, Transitions." YES. YES PLEASE.

And at #17 on the extended list is Richard Pevear and Larissa Volokhonsky's new translation of "War and Peace," which has convinced a lot of people that they are finally going to get around to reading "War and Peace." Hey, I am! As soon as I finish finding out what Drizzt Do'Urden is up to.

]]>
Gawker-316202 Mon, 29 Oct 2007 12:50:04 EDT Emily Gould http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=316202&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Found Poetry In The 'Times' Readers' Comments ]]> poet1.jpg "Where Are You Right Now?" is the oblique, multivalent title of a new chapbook from Semiotext(e). Psych, it is the name of today's Times Readers' Comments forum, which is about whether GPS technology in cellphones is a good idea. But really, how are you supposed to be able to tell the difference based on comments like this one, from Carlos Andrade:
"I think this is madness...But it's bad modernity
because world is very dangerous at present.
Probably the parents feel good know where yours children stay.
It is the price the new world." Seriously.

]]>
Gawker-313972 Tue, 23 Oct 2007 11:50:55 EDT Emily Gould http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=313972&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ The 'Times' In Flames! ]]> How smart are reporters at the New York Times? Well, at least some of them don't know you can't put metal in the microwaves. Seriously. What follows is a memo of shame that went around the office this morning, after a little fire on the second floor of their nice new building.

There was a small fire on the 2nd floor this morning, apparently the result of someone putting a metal container in the microwave. People nearby were startled by seeing flames; then someone incorrectly attempted to use water to douse the fire, something that is clearly dangerous. Signage is going up by all the microwaves to use paper, ceramic or plastic containers. Building operations folks asked for a reminder against the use of metal containers.
We hear the fire was a delightful mixture of Halloween orange and Renzo red. ]]>
Gawker-303056 Mon, 24 Sep 2007 14:10:53 EDT abalk http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=303056&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Michelle Slatalla's Daughter Hates Her So Much Right Now ]]> michelleslatallaThe Times' "families use computers now" beat reporter, Facebook-loving helicopter mom Michelle Slatalla, is having another rough week. One of her little ones is leaving the nest!

MY 18-year-old daughter recently perfected a new technique to avoid the stress of packing for college.

Her system consisted mostly of lying on her bed and watching me pack for her. That was fine with me, since it was possibly my last opportunity to interfere with her life — and to see what she kept in her drawers — before she left home.

"Do you want to take this empty beer bottle with you?" I asked, gingerly holding it between pincer fingers.

"Get out of my closet," she said.

This is the same daughter, you'll recall, who would not friend Michelle on Facebook, calling her "super creepy" for even trying to have a profile. Hang in there, honey! College is going to be the best thing ever.

]]>
Gawker-295090 Thu, 30 Aug 2007 13:20:56 EDT Emily Gould http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=295090&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ A Very Sexually Frustrating Week ]]>
  • The Manny left us unsatisfied.
  • At The Manny book party, Josh left some cougars unsatisfied.
  • We wondered about the ins and outs of circumcision.
  • We visited Pinkberry and found rats and culture.
  • We learned what eldergays are nostalgic for, Pridewise.
  • We worried that the Times is shrinking faster than it knows.
  • We found out how the rich get rid of their children for the summer.
  • We fooled around with the clippers.

    ]]> Gawker-271514 Fri, 22 Jun 2007 18:00:00 EDT Emily Gould http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=271514&view=rss&microfeed=true <![CDATA[ 'Times' Columnists Cry On Each Others' Shoulders ]]> gourd.jpgJudith Warner's 'Domestic Disturbances' TimesSelect blog-column grows increasingly, well, disturbing. Buckling under the stress of "two grade-parent cocktail parties, one all-school gala, a Spring Fling, three music recitals" and other trials, she offers this confession: "I have, there's no question, gone off my gourd." Luckily for her, colleague David Brooks is perfectly willing to be her ad-hoc therapist.

    My two-doors-down office neighbor, David Brooks... had the misfortune to stop in the hallway right before school pickup time and ask how I was doing. 'I wake in the morning and go to bed at night stalked by a feeling of incipient failure!' I stopped hyperventilating long enough to almost scream. He blinked for a moment, impassively.

    'Some people thrive on that,' he said. Yes, I thought, I've built an entire career in just that way.

    Back away slowly, David, and make sure not to mention Michelle Slatalla's burgeoning encroachment on the 'insane mommy' beat.

    End of (School) Year Frenzy [NYT]

    ]]>
    Gawker-267186 Fri, 08 Jun 2007 15:55:34 EDT Emily Gould http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=267186&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Michelle Slatalla Is A Super Creepy Adult ]]> michelleslatalla.jpg It's only the second installment of Michelle Slatalla's "Cyberfamilias" Times column, which is about how she tortures her family via the Internet, and already she has discovered social networking. No one is happy about this, least of all her teenage daughter: "'You won't get away with this,' she typed. 'everyone in the whole world thinks its super creepy when adults have facebooks.'" In search of refutation, Michelle consulted some of her experts: "Although he didn't go so far as to say he disapproved of my parenting skills, Professor Wesch reminded me that what Facebook's younger users really are doing is exploring their identities, which they may not want to parade in front of their parents. 'Can't I explore my identity, too?' I asked. 'Why does everything fun have to be for them?'" Um. Also: "'I can't really comment on your family dynamics,' said Brandee Barker, a Facebook spokeswoman." Michelle, you creep, get off the Internet before it tears your family apart!

    'omg my mom joined facebook!!' [NYT]

    ]]>
    Gawker-266768 Thu, 07 Jun 2007 11:31:00 EDT Emily Gould http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=266768&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ 'Times' Still Too Wordy For Young Atoosa ]]> toosAtoosa Rubenstein still has a bone to pick with the Grey Lady, and it wasn't good enough just to complain to Forbes readers. She also needed to tell her MySpace pals!
    I probably should be embarrassed to say this, but most news is delivered in the most boring way possible!! I look at the New York Times and as smart as their reporting is, it's just so wordy. I zone out before I can dig in. I know it's not because I'm not stupid - I just think this generation (from my age and younger) just consumes information DIFFERENTLY and the newspapers and news programs are still being made for my parent's generation.
    Right, no news is targeted at people in their late 30s. None at all.

    Why Don't We Care About The News? [ToosSpace]

    ]]>
    Gawker-261441 Fri, 18 May 2007 10:20:22 EDT Emily Gould http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=261441&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ 'Times' Loves Dustin Hoffman's Wife ]]> lisahoffman.jpgIt was less than two weeks ago when Ellen Tien told us What Lisa Hoffman is Wearing, and more importantly, what she's Selling. "She's become such a proficient globe-trotter that this year she created a travel-friendly line of skin care products, Lisa Hoffman Night & Day 24 Hour Skincare. 'Most people shop for upcoming seasons,'' Ms. Hoffman said. 'I shop for upcoming locations.'" Today, we find another glowing mention of Lisa in a roundup of celebrity wives who have beauty businesses as hobbies, full of sentences that read like ad copy, eg, "Lisa Hoffman's line, Night & Day 24 Hour Skincare, packages products in sizes that can probably pass muster with even the most ornery airport security agents." But it's not all fluff! Eventually the reporter gets around to asking Lisa whether her husband's fame has helped her business. "Sure it opens doors for me, but if the product wasn't good, nobody would buy it," she replied. Uh huh. And no one would write about it either.

    Secret Ingredients: Their Husbands [NYT]
    [Photo: Natasha Calzatti]

    ]]>
    Gawker-261229 Thu, 17 May 2007 11:00:38 EDT Emily Gould http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=261229&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Media Bubble: 'New York' to Pick Hot Young Editors, Who May or May Not Be Hot and Young ]]> New York to anoint hot young editors; those photographed rumored to include TNR's Franklin Foer, The Atlantic's James Bennet, Roger Hodge of Harper's, and the Paris Review's Philip Gourevitch, who, at 44, calls the whole conceit into question. [Media Mob/NYO]
    • The Times nominated Dargis for a Pulitzer, and no one there understands why; New York is pitching a Look Book book. [WWD]
    The Washington Post gets 88 New York Timeses every day, costing $18K annually. At least it's nice to know someone other than us isn't getting free papers. [WCP]
    Cargo was confused, and nobody will miss it. Um, yeah. [Slate]
    Bob Woodruff, the ABC anchor badly wounded in Iraq, last night received the Radio and Television Correspondents Association's David Bloom award, named for the NBC correspondent who died while covering the early days of the Iraq war. [B&C]

    ]]>
    Gawker-164166 Thu, 30 Mar 2006 16:40:57 EST Jesse http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=164166&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Navasky Emigrates from 'Nation' ]]> 20051107navasky.jpgThere are several notable facts in a "Media Talk" blurb on The Nation in today's Times. First is the peg, that liberal lion Victor Navasky, who has been the magazine's publisher since he led the group of investors who bought it from Observer moneybags Arthur Carter in 1995, is stepping aside in favor of its editor, Katrina vanden Heuvel. Next is what Navasky will be focusing on instead: "his other job, as chairman of The Columbia Journalism Review," a fact that will make rightie press-crit sorts even more dyspeptic than usual. Then there's a notable financial reality, the magazine's current and unprecedented status as profitable, which, boosted by its oppositional prominence in the Bush years, it has been since 2003. Finally, and perhaps most interesting, is this: Even in light of that last fact, Navasky's beloved chestnut — "What's bad for the country is good for The Nation," quoted repeatedly as though it's new and fresh — makes no appearance at all.

    We kind of miss it.

    The Nation, Now Profitable, Has a New Commander [NYT]

    ]]>
    Gawker-135562 Mon, 07 Nov 2005 09:43:18 EST Jesse http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=135562&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Breakfast at Michael's, Abridged ]]> 20050816breakfast.jpgWe don't much like panel discussions. No one says anything new, no one changes anyone's mind, and the food is rarely any good. But Court TV promised breakfast at Michael's and a crew of media bigshots who don't much like each other, and so it seemed worth showering earlier than we have in months and getting on the E train to midtown.

    With our low expectations — free food and barely restrained animosity — the event more than delivered. For a delightful hour, a group of bald, balding, or white-haired old Jews yelled at each other. Wolff badgered Abrams, Lemann lectured Wolff, Cohen taunted Pearlstine, Schleiff served as tummler — "we need to continue this," he yuk-yukked in closing, "but unfortunately I think they have the Rosenberg bar mitzvah coming in right now" — and the whole thing felt like a particularly cantankerous condo-board meeting in Boca. Except with trayf. (Which was, incidentally, delicious. The accompanying scrambled eggs, less so.)

    What did everyone have to say? Exactly what you'd expect them to, of course. For a Gawker abridgement of Court TV's "The Case of the Rule of Law vs. The Rule of Journalism," you might as well jump.

    Henry Schlieff, Court TV chairman and CEO: Welcome. I don't understand the facts of the Plame case, but I think we're all very smart.

    Catherine Crier, Court TV anchor, moderator: I will ask questions, which you will ignore to argue among yourselves.

    Michael Wolff, Vanity Fair columnist: Fuck confidentiality. Karl Rove is evil, he committed a terrible, treasonous crime, and Miller and Copper abetted him. Fuck 'em all.

    Nicholas Lemann, Columbia Journalism School dean: I am a journalism professor.

    Floyd Abrams, noted First Amendment lawyer: Reporters must always keep promises. Also, I am a noted First Amendment lawyer.

    Norman Pearlstine, Time Inc. editor-in-chief: Don't hate me. It's really all Matt Cooper's fault. He never should have promised Rove confidentiality.

    Richard Cohen, Washington Post columnist: Treasonous crime? Feh. Third-rate burglary.

    Wolff: Rove, crime. Big fucking story.

    Paul Holmes, Reuters global editor for political and general news: This is stupid. Reuters, real news.

    Pearlstine: Don't hate me. Grand jury. National security.

    Cohen: Kay Graham was a god.

    Wolff: Dick Parsons, not Norm, would be Kay Graham.

    Pearlstine: I don't get Michael's joke. Also, don't hate me.

    Wolff: Liars. Everywhere. You struggled with your decision, Norm? You had no choice — Time Warner's board would have forced you. Plus your stock sucks. Also, Judy Miller is indefensible.

    Cohen: I detest Michael. "You don't know anything. You suppose. You guess. And then you write. If you stick to what you know, you have very little to say."

    Lemann: It's good that this is a bad case. I am still a professor. Also, editors are demanding.

    Crier: Banal witticism.

    Cohen: Reporters didn't get prewar coverage wrong. The government did, and we reported what they told us.

    Wolff: So you got it wrong. Fess up.

    Cohen: "If someone tells me the building's burning and I write that the building is burning, is that wrong?"

    [Gawker: It depends. Look at the fucking building. Is it burning?]

    Wolff: Rove, evil; reporters, conspirators.

    Abrams: Reporters must always keep promises. Also, I am a noted First Amendment lawyer.

    Wolff: Fuck off, Floyd.

    Crier: Banal witticism.

    Schlieff: We're a bunch of Jews.

    Our pals at FishbowlNY have a less abridged, more respectful transcription, if you're a stickler for those sorts of things.

    Liveblogging the Pursuit of Justice [FishbowlNY]

    ]]>
    Gawker-117638 Tue, 16 Aug 2005 15:14:53 EDT Jesse http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=117638&view=rss&microfeed=true