I wonder if this is of any semantic significance: alter the "is it wrong/ethical" qeustion to "is it OK/okay", then Google reveals a bunch of suggestions related to pregnancy. Does pregnancy drive people towards a similar vocabulary? #google
In the future we'll not only be able to see who wrote these, but we'll then be able to click to watch a video of what happened to those people after they typed the question. It will be awesome and terrifying.
@Airvault: Actually, that's exactly what they're talking about. For example, the parents of a kid with a failing body part (i.e., a kidney problem where daily dialysis is needed) who has no other options may consider having another child in order to transplant a kidney when they are at the appropriate age for the operation.
Just for the record, seems completely unethical to me. #google
@seyswho: There are smaller impact things, like bone marrow transplants from a yet-t0-be-conceived sibling. Doesn't hurt the yet-to-be-conceived one much at all. Ethical? #google
@seyswho: If it were me, I'd just get rid of the broken kid and then pop out two good ones. Seems a lot easier than always having a "fixer upper" around. #google
@If_I_Had_a_Poodle: Or even smaller impact, like cord blood from the new kid -- no pain involved for the baby. Ignoring other ethical questions, there are so many factors that have to match in order for stem cell transplant to work that you could conceive the child and then completely strike out. Not to mention that typing the fetus is also risky to the fetus. #google
@PoBoyNation: All good points. I don't see ethical issues if a child is a wanted child and if having that child can help a sibling without harming the new child #google
It may be strange that THIS is the question that pops into my mind when looking at the above list, but why do you need to know if a human can outrun a bear unless you are currently being chased by a bear? In which case, put down the iPhone and RUN! #google
@m4ximusprim3: @kneetoe: @Z und Vielpunkt's chick: Not afraid to be servicey. If you are chased by a bear and there is any incline, run downhill. Bears have shorter front legs, which allow them to run fast uphill but make running downhill awkward. #google
There's one or two of these that aren't so bad ("Can a human catch parvo?" - you'd be surprised how many people don't know the answer to this). However, the many, many other disturbing questions sort of negate that. #google
My parents' house has a butler's pantry, and if I had a nickel for every time my father lurched out of it into the dining room with a chicken on a tray like Lurch (You rang?), my house would have one too. They're fun and cool but not necessary. #thewaywelivenow
If the publicly-traded companies who used to specialize in large, luxury homes are now building things at or below the national square foot average, then what's going to happen to that average?
If they continue down that road, then soon, a lot more people will be living in above-average homes. #thewaywelivenow
Though, if according to the article, the average new home was 2507 sqft in 2007 and now it's down to 2392, and if new home sales are less than half of what they were in 2005, then it goes to reason that it won't be long until "a lot more" of the people owning a home less than ten years old will be living in something larger than the national new home average.
01:11 PM
So many stoners getting the munchies for corn on the cob. #google
11/13/09
"Help me Howard"
"Help me God"
"Help me grow"
"Help me Rhonda" #google
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
Bing does this too. #google
11/13/09
11/13/09
You mean... for parts? #google
11/13/09
Just for the record, seems completely unethical to me. #google
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
Wait...can a bear get a human pregnant? #google
11/13/09
11/13/09
01:09 PM
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
If they continue down that road, then soon, a lot more people will be living in above-average homes. #thewaywelivenow
11/13/09
11/13/09
Though, if according to the article, the average new home was 2507 sqft in 2007 and now it's down to 2392, and if new home sales are less than half of what they were in 2005, then it goes to reason that it won't be long until "a lot more" of the people owning a home less than ten years old will be living in something larger than the national new home average.