Enter your username and password.
New York, 2:41 AM
Fri Nov 27
15 posts in the last 24 hours

Tip Your Editors:
tips@gawker.com
Tipline: 646-214-8138
Editor-in-Chief:
Gabriel Snyder | Email
West Coast Editor:
Richard Rushfield | Email
Contributing Editors:
Valleywag:
Ryan Tate | Email
Media:
Hamilton Nolan | Email
Politics:
Alex Pareene | Email
Investigations:
John Cook | Email
Entertainment:
Brian Moylan | Email
Nights:
Adrian Chen | Email
Azaria Jagger | Email
Ravi Somaiya | Email
Weekends:
Foster Kamer | Email
Video Editor:
Richard Blakeley | Email
Please enter your email address to have your password reset.
Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.
Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.
You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.
See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.
03/18/09
03/18/09
The F-word is "French", I take it?
03/02/09
03/02/09
03/02/09
Uh, you guys? Don't forget that he loses his brother at the exact moment as he wins the money. So I don't really see the cloying sentimentality you lot are referring to.
Is it perfect? No. But no American would have made this movie (well, not unless Hilary Duff was cast as the titular character WHICH, YES, WOULD BE AWESOME).
03/02/09
The gameshow is kind of an elaborate conceit for trawling through the life of a horribly abused person born into poverty. If it's analysed too much, it falls apart, but I didn't hear anyone complaining when about that when Bruce Willis was dead all along.
The dance at the end is misjudged, tonally - I have no time for Bollywood conventions anyway - but I took it as almost a DVD extra. I mean, dead characters come back to life and start dancing. It's like those fake deleted scenes that play next to the end credits of Pixar films.
03/01/09
03/02/09
03/01/09
[www.southparkstudios.com]
03/02/09
How do you think Mr. Garrison is weighing in on this issue?
03/01/09
03/01/09
03/01/09
03/01/09
03/01/09
Oh yes.
03/01/09
Terrorist #5
Terrorist/Rapist #2
Car Bomber
03/02/09
03/01/09
03/01/09
Also, the italian mob movies, while some italians had problems with them, always paint italians as having good qualities as well like being fun and stylish. The mobsters are usually heroes or anti-heroes viewers root for. That's a different thing.
03/01/09
When terrorists in film are identified as being from Iran, is that a stereotype? Terrorist do come from Iran and Iraq and Saudi Arabia. I would be happy to see a movie that portrays Iranians in a good light. But if the movie doesn't it's based on realties.
03/01/09
Seriously, though, for both of you, one word: Persepolis.
03/01/09
03/01/09
03/01/09
Of course the Battle of Thermopylae took place. However, there was a decision to choose a particular historical battle where it was Iranian aggressing against westerners (as opposed to, say, the battles of the crusades or the repeated years of Roman attacks to try to take over the Persian empire in which the Christians and Romans were not only aggressors but they conducted themselves in a terrible and barbaric way compared to their Middle Eastern adversaries) and present the Persian leader as a repulsive one dimensional villain.
And, sure, the Persians were trying to take over Greece, but contrast that to the way Alexander portrayed the conquest of Persia by Greeks.
Terrorists aren't only Middle Eastern, and there are millions and millions of Middle Eastern people who aren't terrorists. But whether it's Airforce One or whatever, you would never know that from Hollywood. Even when movie terrorists are from outside the Middle East (especially if they are white) like IRA bombers all of a sudden they are played by loveable old Brad Pitt and the movie presents their side too usually.
When the US has spent years behaving criminally against Middle Eastern countries and people, maybe it's time to question the dehumanization of Middle Eastern people in American films.
03/01/09
03/01/09
I don't know, I understand the point and agree, to an extent, but let's not get all into superlatives.
03/01/09
This is an example of a murderous dictatorship trying to impose their rules against free speech on citizens of another country.
Maybe we should appologize for not hanging homosexuals too.
03/01/09
And why did the CIA do that? Because he was demanding that the British not keep all the oil profits for themselves.
Try to get a clue before you type, ignorant jackhole.
03/01/09
03/04/09
Delightful spectacle invariably. So easy, any vapid chump can do it!