This guy Kink Aid is alot like those people who painted Keane paintings of bug eyed children with mop hair. They are probable aliens from outer space. The artists, not their subjects.
I must be the ONLY person in the world who doesn't see Jesus in this guy's paintings...i don't even see miracles nor any religious iconography...I dont' remember there being any snow covered cottages in the bible. to me it looks similar to what fantasy artists have been producing for years...cept without the gnomes and elves. Perhaps that's the dealio, this guy's paintings are devoid of people, so that would make the post Rapture? is that the religious aspect? this is what the world looks like after all those nutters get vaporized? hmmm...i kinda like that.
This adorable little cottage, with its four chimbleys belching smoke and all its lights ablaze, has a larger carbon footprint than an Airbus A380 full of drunken Aussies on a flight from Brisbane to New York.
When I see these paintings, I just kinda say "hmm a little forest scene. NEXT!"
But I wish someone would explain to me WHY it's SO BAD. I don't see it as anything special, but I don't see it as vile. Someone tell me how to think about this!
@JesseJb: They're like Hummel Figurines: their existence is unnecessary and detracts from the culture; the time used to produce them could have been directed at something constructive (or even, just, nothing); and they gloss over the yawning chasm that is contemporary spirituality.
@JesseJb: He is called the "Painter of Light." Now, knowing that, I suggest you locate the spots or dapples of light in that painting, like the walkway that another commenter referred to as a "trail of piss." Now locate the light source. There does appear to be a sun shining, but it would not create those specific lit areas. And if the sun's shining, even IF all the lights were on in the house and the tree, the lights would not stand out as much because of the lack of contrast with the ambient light.
That, to me, is the dominant reason why the painting is bad. But there's also the twee factor.
Catch of what? It's not a photoshop tragedy; he's simply standing outside behind one of his giant horrible canvases, attempting to give the impression that he paints these horrors "from life."
I must confess, I've done worse. Back when I was a starving art school student, I did holiday drawings for an iron-on company. Kitties sitting in frost-covered windows looking out at a snowman. Wreaths, terrible horrible wreaths decorated with the worst kind of holiday crap. Plates of cookies for Santa with vile notes scrawled by faux children. At $400 a pop, I couldn't turn it down, but I still to this day feel kind of dirty knowing that I inflicted these horrible images on unsuspecting midwestern grandmas.
Does this type of art seem emotionally retarded to anyone else? I'm pretty sure it would have appealed to me as a six-year-old. It's picturesque and soothing and easy to comprehend.
It's as if Kinkade fans haven't developed emotionally beyond grade school. I imagine they're doll collectors as well.
In all fairness to yourself, misslinda, those were completely suspecting grandmas. If you had done a series of Christmas cards depicting dead-eyed Egon Schiele cadavers with wreathes like nooses around their necks, well THAT would be unsuspecting.
And also, I've drawn dumb crap for money and I've worked at grocery stores for money. And I'd just as soon be drawing disposable fluff than standing at a cash register 9 times out of 10.
The first paragraph will probably explain the stream of urine:
The Los Angeles Times has reported that some of Kinkade's former colleagues, employees, and even collectors of his work say that he has a long history of cursing and heckling other artists and performers. The Times further reported that he openly groped a woman's breasts at a South Bend, Indiana sales event, and mentioned his proclivity for ritual territory marking through urination, once relieving himself on a Winnie the Pooh figure at a Disney site while saying "This one's for you, Walt".Kinkade has denied some of the allegations, and accepted and apologized for others.
In 2006 John Dandois, Media Arts Group executive, recounted a story that on one occasion ("about six years ago") Kinkade became drunk at a Siegfried and Roy magic show in Las Vegas and began shouting "Codpiece! Codpiece!" at the performers. Eventually he was calmed by his mother. Dandois also said of Kinkade, "Thom would be fine, he would be drinking, and then all of a sudden, you couldn't tell where the boundary was, and then he became very incoherent, and he would start cussing and doing a lot of weird stuff."
@squeakel: "Thom would be fine, he would be drinking, and then all of a sudden, you couldn't tell where the boundary was, and then he became very incoherent, and he would start cussing and doing a lot of weird stuff."
"He would start making these...things. I guess you'd say they were paintings. God, it was so terrible, he'd be talking about selling them to people and becoming a big famous artist. We'd always make the children leave the room...what's that you say? Oh...Damn."
06/19/09
06/19/09
06/19/09
06/19/09
06/19/09
06/19/09
06/19/09
06/19/09
06/19/09
06/19/09
06/22/09
So.
Score one to Kinkade
06/19/09
[www.nytimes.com]
[www.diacenter.org]
06/19/09
06/19/09
But I wish someone would explain to me WHY it's SO BAD. I don't see it as anything special, but I don't see it as vile. Someone tell me how to think about this!
06/19/09
or something.
06/19/09
That, to me, is the dominant reason why the painting is bad. But there's also the twee factor.
06/19/09
06/19/09
WHHHOOOOOAAAAAAA!!!!
06/19/09
06/19/09
06/19/09
Catch of what? It's not a photoshop tragedy; he's simply standing outside behind one of his giant horrible canvases, attempting to give the impression that he paints these horrors "from life."
06/19/09
06/19/09
It's as if Kinkade fans haven't developed emotionally beyond grade school. I imagine they're doll collectors as well.
06/19/09
In all fairness to yourself, misslinda, those were completely suspecting grandmas. If you had done a series of Christmas cards depicting dead-eyed Egon Schiele cadavers with wreathes like nooses around their necks, well THAT would be unsuspecting.
And also, I've drawn dumb crap for money and I've worked at grocery stores for money. And I'd just as soon be drawing disposable fluff than standing at a cash register 9 times out of 10.
06/19/09
06/19/09
06/19/09
06/19/09
06/19/09
06/19/09
The Los Angeles Times has reported that some of Kinkade's former colleagues, employees, and even collectors of his work say that he has a long history of cursing and heckling other artists and performers. The Times further reported that he openly groped a woman's breasts at a South Bend, Indiana sales event, and mentioned his proclivity for ritual territory marking through urination, once relieving himself on a Winnie the Pooh figure at a Disney site while saying "This one's for you, Walt".Kinkade has denied some of the allegations, and accepted and apologized for others.
In 2006 John Dandois, Media Arts Group executive, recounted a story that on one occasion ("about six years ago") Kinkade became drunk at a Siegfried and Roy magic show in Las Vegas and began shouting "Codpiece! Codpiece!" at the performers. Eventually he was calmed by his mother. Dandois also said of Kinkade, "Thom would be fine, he would be drinking, and then all of a sudden, you couldn't tell where the boundary was, and then he became very incoherent, and he would start cussing and doing a lot of weird stuff."
06/19/09
06/19/09
06/19/09
06/19/09
"He would start making these...things. I guess you'd say they were paintings. God, it was so terrible, he'd be talking about selling them to people and becoming a big famous artist. We'd always make the children leave the room...what's that you say? Oh...Damn."
06/19/09
06/19/09
06/19/09