This should be a piece about bad science reporting. What the study shows is that there's a correlation. Beyond that, they know very little at all, much less what controls what, or whether some third unconsidered variable controls both.
MissNormaDesmond promoted this comment
Edited by The Recession Is Over at 08/24/09 5:20 PM
The Recession Is Over was starred
The Recession Is Over was unstarred
Credit Reports are a great to figure out if you're going to pay BACK borrowed money.
They do not indicate at all whether you are liable to steal money.
I mean, if you were willing to steal money, wouldn't you steal the money NOW so you don't have to go into default later?
Employers are believe this shit because Experian got SHRM (Society For Human Resource Management) to shill credit reports as lie detector tests.
It's not a credit score anymore... now employers see it as an "ethics score"
@Adah: Wouldn't they tack on some sort of cancellation fee? I'm assuming you're still under the 2-year contract that they got you to sign up for by dangling a cheap phone in front of you. (second sentence needs editing)
@cmd: Or people who live in apartments who need landlines to buzz in visitors through the security gate. Or run a business from their home and need a fax (yes, major corporations still use faxes to communicate with consultants). Or those who live in earthquake prone areas and need a hardwire landline. :-)
@cmd: I'm not an old, and I have a landline. No way in hell I'm giving up my 212. Also, when it rings, I know it's either my mother or a telemarketer so I don't even bother answering.
It's called loss prevention. The question of whether those who are tempted to steal are tempted because they are in dire financial straits. Possibly stealing everything from pens to customer packages.
See if you are in shipping where there is no money, you can still divert customer orders so you can sell them on ebay.
In other words, every employee deals with money, if you realize that assets can be sold for money
Like that computer at the empty cubicle next to you? $300 when you sell it.
Thinking that you have to be handling dollar bills for it to be the purview of loss prevention is so 1980's.
It has been going on for 15+ years. Johny come lately's.
CaptainFantastic promoted this comment
Edited by Iwillnotauditionforastar at 08/07/09 5:22 AM
Iwillnotauditionforastar was starred
Iwillnotauditionforastar was unstarred
@Iwillnotauditionforastar: Forgive me for going all libertarian here, but it's actually called invasion of privacy. There is a difference between screening for criminality and screening for credit worthiness.
@son of spam: I believe you sign away part of your privacy when you fill out that application with your SSN# and sign the back so they can have their way with whatever info they can find with what you've signed away to them.
So the current coddled brats in their 20s who are making life annoying for us Olds are one day going to have to figure out how to work alongside young whippersnappers who keep flinging off their clothes. Awesome!
The olds may not have needed conversion to accept this horseshit. I vividly remember the summer of '73, when my 8-year-old little girl self was sternly informed by an aunt that I was now too old to play outside shirtless. Somewhere along the line since then, it has became horrific for a female child to ever expose her completely undeveloped torso in public, so it seems going commando is the equivalent alternative.
I'm opposed. In general I get tired of parents letting their little demon spawn run all over the place, while also trying to act hyper-protective. If you're going to micromanage your monsters, then keep those fuckers away from me. I don't want to talk to them, and don't want them talking to me because I don't want you turning around blaming me for shit if something goes wrong.
I think it's about the moment. If you're going around the city on a Saturday afternoon with a naked child, then something must be wrong with you. That's just inviting perverts.
However, you may just be home and maybe it's hot and maybe your kid only wants to wear a t-shirt. That's a completely different situation that I totally support. At the beach? I'd say it depend on which beach, but still, I wouldn't judge those parents.
08/23/09
08/24/09
08/23/09
08/23/09
08/23/09
The sample was pretty small, too - 94 participants.
08/23/09
08/24/09
08/23/09
08/23/09
08/23/09
08/23/09
08/24/09
08/23/09
08/23/09
08/23/09
08/23/09
@if_i_only_had_a_heart:
08/24/09
08/07/09
They do not indicate at all whether you are liable to steal money.
I mean, if you were willing to steal money, wouldn't you steal the money NOW so you don't have to go into default later?
Employers are believe this shit because Experian got SHRM (Society For Human Resource Management) to shill credit reports as lie detector tests.
It's not a credit score anymore... now employers see it as an "ethics score"
08/07/09
08/07/09
08/07/09
08/07/09
08/07/09
I hope you're being sarcastic. I honestly can't tell.
08/07/09
08/07/09
08/07/09
08/07/09
08/07/09
See if you are in shipping where there is no money, you can still divert customer orders so you can sell them on ebay.
In other words, every employee deals with money, if you realize that assets can be sold for money
Like that computer at the empty cubicle next to you? $300 when you sell it.
Thinking that you have to be handling dollar bills for it to be the purview of loss prevention is so 1980's.
It has been going on for 15+ years. Johny come lately's.
*punch* *punch*
Not every article is "new" news, right Gabriel?
08/07/09
08/07/09
08/07/09
07/16/09
07/16/09
07/16/09
07/16/09
07/16/09
However, you may just be home and maybe it's hot and maybe your kid only wants to wear a t-shirt. That's a completely different situation that I totally support. At the beach? I'd say it depend on which beach, but still, I wouldn't judge those parents.
I'm all for bareness.