<![CDATA[Gawker: TiVo]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: TiVo]]> http://gawker.com/tag/tivo http://gawker.com/tag/tivo <![CDATA[ Pizza Ordering No Longer Strenuous ]]> The nifty technology of TiVo is killing the advertisers that subsidize free television, which is why TiVos are so widely used by greedy socialists such as yourself. The friendly Domino's Pizza corporation, however, has figured out a way to work with TiVo to both enrich themselves and serve you, the lazy American consumer. Aren't you tired of having to push buttons on a telephone to summon a pizza to your doorstep?

Well there's no need to exercise your pudgy fingers any more! Because now when you try to skip over a Domino's ad, it will automatically give you the option of ordering a pizza through your TiVo. This is a breakthrough in ease of service to our nation's cheese-laden bellies:

"We believe that interactive television ordering is the future," Mr. Weisberg says. "Why even get up off that couch now?" In traditional ordering, there are numerous "barriers to purchase," he says, such as turning up a competing takeout menu while looking for the Domino's flier or deciding to eat from your own refrigerator after going to it in search of a Domino's magnet.

Not sure how this fits in with the national obesity crisis. [WSJ; pic via]

]]>
Gawker-5092106 Tue, 18 Nov 2008 13:28:21 EST Hamilton Nolan http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5092106&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Advertainment Becoming Just As Disposable As Advertising ]]> The Tivo users among us have decided that they no longer need to watch television commercials, but rest assured that their unpatriotic fast-forwarding will not go unpunished. The entire advertising industry in now engaged in nothing except figuring out how to make TV viewers watch ads whether they want to or not. The most popular method is to try to turn commercials into "shows" themselves, or mix up advertising and actual content so much that you have to watch both. But CBS is raising the question: what if the advertising and the content are equally annoying?

To entice Unilever, the Anglo-Dutch consumer-product giant, to spend on its network, CBS created a campaign featuring the host of its entertainment-news show "The Insider." In so-called interstitials, or mini segments, during breaks in the comedy shows, the host dishes about the CBS comedies while preparing a new Bertolli product.

So if you can stand to miss the host of The Insider "dishing" about CBS comedies while preparing Italian food, Tivo away! Wanna see an example? Sure you do:

[via WSJ]

]]>
Gawker-5066365 Tue, 21 Oct 2008 09:37:13 EDT Hamilton Nolan http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5066365&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Don't Worry, <i>Entertainment Weekly</i> Will Program Your TiVo For You ]]> As if your life were not already dictated my media outlets and tastemakers, sorta popular DVR recording device company TiVo—overshadowed of late by cable providers' record-two-things-at-once! DVR systems—has signed a deal with Entertainment Weekly magazine that will enable users to have EW editors pick what shows their TiVo should record. Yes, that's right! Tim Stack and Gillian Flynn and Annie Barrett and all your other magazine friends will finally force you to watch Friday Night Lights!

It's an interesting development for the networks, who continue to cede control of our eyeballs. Imagine if you weren't a loyal NBC viewer, but a Gawker TV viewer instead. You'd just have to fire up the TiVo box and there waiting for you would be all of the shows we are relentlessly obsessed with (so, like, 146 episodes of Gossip Girl and then a Frontline about sad people.) If a show starts to suck, like this season of Project Runway, we remove it for you. You don't have to press any buttons or anything! (What was that point Wall-E was trying to make again?) All the networks will be able to do is desperately act as publicists for their shows, hoping the astute editors at Ranger Rick TV or whatever will decide to pick up their new Tim Daly series and feed it right into our brains. A new middleman emerges? [WSJ]

]]>
Gawker-5042464 Wed, 27 Aug 2008 11:34:00 EDT Richard http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5042464&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Do We Really Want Better Ads? ]]> ads.jpegMTV Networks is having its upfronts today, where it pitches its new season to advertisers. The network is also trying to sell sponsors on its "podbusting" techniques—i.e., making commercials that are like mini-shows in themselves. The theory, of course, is that making ads more like regular programs will defeat the almighty Tivo, with content so compelling that you cannot help but watch, slack-jawed, as the hypnotic 60-second Mountain Dew Bourne Ultimatum spinoff flickers before your eyes. They're so entertaining! Way better than boring old regular commercials. In one sense, this is corporate America trying to give us what we want. But do we really want better ads?

Examples of MTV's work in this regard include several different "C.S.I. Guys" spots for Dunkin Donuts and Papa John's, and a three and a half minute long film about a young designer that is actually a Target ad.

Dario Spina, who handles the same job for MTV's entertainment channels like Comedy Central and Spike, said of countering the digital video recorder, "That's the idea here; we want to blur the lines between the commercial breaks and the entertainment content."

...

"Viewers keep watching right through the commercial," Mr. Spina said, adding that "good commercial content is good content."

Here's an idea: how about keeping ads clunky, boring, and easily skippable? Bad ads—or even just traditional ones—are very straightforward. They make a sales pitch. They offer information. It's quite simple to delineate them from the regular programming.

More entertaining and engaging ads are the work of the devil. The editorial- advertising divide is a good thing, even in its warped and watered-down television entertainment version. Enhanced product placement, which brings ads into shows, and more "podbusting," which brings shows into ads, add up to nothing but ads all the time. The takeover will soon be complete!

Please keep our television commercials in neat little blocks, so that we can get up and go to the bathroom while they are on, or, if we have the proper technology, skip them altogether. This whole "great ads that you want to watch just cause they're so great" is a huge backlash waiting to happen. It was also the business model of Firebrand.com, which went out of business despite a preponderance of nakedness.

We, as a society, have a social compact with television advertisers. We grumble about your sucky ads, and do everything we can to skip over them. But in the end we still buy your products. Everybody's happy. Start mixing up the shows and the ads too much, and people will get angry. That's when the revolution comes.

Well, probably not. But please don't make these fancy ads. Thank you.

[pic via Adbusters]

]]>
Gawker-388427 Thu, 08 May 2008 11:05:10 EDT Hamilton Nolan http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=388427&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Media Bubble: Judith Miller Is Just a Terrible Person ]]> ev1.jpg
  • NBC News layoffs: Dateline, Today hardest hit. Ann Curry still there, unfortunately. [LAT]
  • No matter what Marie Claire wants you to think, Elizabeth Vargas would never breastfeed at the anchor desk. You can't get a good angle. [Drudge]
  • If Judith Miller testifies under oath that she's a skeptical journalist, is it perjury? [E&P]
  • Maureen Dowd's ex-boyfriend is leaving the NYT OpEd page to write, blog for Science Times. [NYT]
  • New York Post regretfully informs you that New York Daily News city editor has jumped ship. [NYP]
  • Soon you'll be able to TiVo the treasure trove of crap provided by YouTube and its ilk. [NYT]
  • Reporters should shut up about YouTube already. [Guardian]
  • Lots of people go to Washington. [NYO]

    ]]> Gawker-214609 Tue, 14 Nov 2006 09:50:43 EST abalk2 http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=214609&view=rss&microfeed=true