<![CDATA[Gawker: Tom Wolfe]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: Tom Wolfe]]> http://gawker.com/tag/tom wolfe http://gawker.com/tag/tom wolfe <![CDATA[ Financial Armageddon Possible Tomorrow, Says Tom Wolfe ]]> AP080226061531.jpgLast week the Observer, Tom Wolfe said the truly rich would be protected from the Wall Street meltdown because all the smart guys had long since decamped for hedge funds, leaving investment banks staffed by "real second-raters." This weekend in the Times, the author of Bonfire of the Vanities clarified that statement by adding that elite hedge funders may still be ruined, just not until September 30, that is to say tomorrow. In other words, these strapping Masters of the Universe are so ingenious they staved off the sad fate of i-bankers for all of maybe 14 extra days:

Their hedge funds have blown up here and there, but unlike the investment banks, they are still very much in business. They have hurriedly pulled themselves into defensive positions inside their shells, like turtles. Their Armageddon, if any, will not come for two more days, which is to say, Tuesday, Sept. 30.

Most hedge funds open up a crack on Sept. 30, Dec. 31, March 31 and June 30 to give investors the chance to “redeem” their investments, meaning take their money out. These moments are called gates, like a series of gates in a prison. The gate is the limit, the fixed percentage of your money, that the fund will allow you to take out at one time. Even with these strict caps on withdrawals, some funds may end up nothing but shells.

But hedge funders are still superior, Wolfe added, because only they practice the magic of "saving," leaving them with a "nut" that will be just fine when their funds collapse, because they don't lead ostentatious lives of excess like investment bankers. Ha!

In any case, thanks for the warning, Tom. For a minute there we were all worried the torrent of horrific bad news might slow down this week!

]]>
Gawker-5056124 Mon, 29 Sep 2008 04:24:45 EDT Ryan Tate http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5056124&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Promiscuous Tina Brown To Bring Tom Wolfe's Deflowered Virgin To Screen ]]> SimmonsSo Tina Brown's job as creative consultant to troubled HBO—"If I collide with some interesting material, I’ll call or e-mail them"—has finally paid off. The former New Yorker editor is to produce a movie version of Tom Wolfe's college novel I am Charlotte Simmons. It's not as much as a stretch as one might think. The magazine veteran and the Bonfire of the Vanities author are both still on the Upper East Side scene; many editors, including Clay Felker of New York and Graydon Carter of Vanity Fair have been flattered by Hollywood into the movie business; Tina Brown's father George was himself a moderately successful producer in the UK. But it's still a perplexing role.

First of all, Charlotte Simmons is supposed among other things to be an indictment of college promiscuity, something Tina Brown had no trouble with as an ambitious young undergraduate at Oxford University with boyfriends such as Martin Amis. (I'd been looking for an excuse to rehash Brown's active college sex life.)

Second, it is a profoundly conservative book—George Bush's favorite—by an author who has mocked Tina Brown for her salon liberalism. Tom Wolfe tells of a dinner party at which the guests engaged in ritualistic disdain for George Bush, only to be punctured by one of those workers they professed to care about so much, a waiter who planned to vote for the despised Republican. Wolfe told the Guardian: "Tina and her circle in the media do not have a clue about the rest of the United States."

Above all, how on earth can Brown spare the time? In her career choices Tina Brown has of late become as promiscuous as the college students ridiculed in Charlotte Simmons. She pops up in the restroom to which reporters covering Hillary Clinton's campaign had been exiled, working on a book on the candidate which now seems redundant; she's still pitching her book on Lady Diana to middle-aged women in cities such as Pittsburgh and Naples, FL; originally British, Tina Brown is one of the candidates to take over the BBC's famed Letter from America radio broadcast; as the supposed founder of the forthcoming Daily Beast web site, she's been establishing her internet bona fides talking to the dreary Online News Association.

That wouldn't matter except that she's been presenting herself as an internet convert, full of passion for a new medium “vibrant with life instead of constantly obsessed with fears of its own extinction.” She's a founder of a website which is supposed to launch in weeks. One would have thought Barry Diller would be expecting the degree of maniacal commitment that Brown once brought to magazines and that internet entrepreneurs are expected to bring to their ventures.

]]>
Gawker-5054806 Thu, 25 Sep 2008 12:58:30 EDT Nick Denton http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5054806&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Tom Wolfe Blames Money Crisis On 'The Computer' ]]> 71955045.jpgHalfway through a cranky discussion with the Observer on New York real estate development, Tom Wolfe turned with relish to the topic of the ongoing financial panic. The enthusiasm was understandable from an author who wrote an epic novel, Bonfire Of The Vanities, psychologically centered on Wall Street. First thing to understand, according to Wolfe: Investment banks like Lehman Brothers hire losers, "real second-raters" from "the bottom of the barrel" who couldn't get on at hedge funds. Of course they set your money on fire! Second thing to understand: Even these incompetents might have made do if it weren't for the evils of information technology:

The whole thing, starting with the subprime, is the fault of the computer. I was just talking to a banker the other day, and not that long ago, 20 years ago, an investment banking house, let’s say, Lehman Brothers, when it got a package of mortgages, they would go through every mortgage, every single one, and they’d throw out the ones that just seemed absurd, they just wouldn’t accept them. Things used to arrive on paper. Today things arrive on a screen, and a screen is back lit, and one of the biggest pains in the neck is trying to read something dully written and complicated on a computer screen. It will drive you nuts—I mean, try it sometime.

It's actually true that the financial crisis was caused in part by certain Collateralized Debt Obligations and other complex, devil's brew financial vehicles whose risk could only be assessed — or claimed to be assessed, really — using computer models and whose contents were poorly understood if examined in the first place. But the proper response to an investment you don't understand is to refrain from buying it, not to blame the tool that made it possible.

After all, as Wolfe should know, investment banks only started caring about boring old home mortgages when computer technology made it possible to quickly bundle and sell them on the global market. And good luck running a hedge fund without heavy use of computers and the internet.

Furthermore — wait, why are we seriously arguing finance with a novelist? Isn't there something else we can talk about, Tom?

Did I mention to you I’m pimping out my cars?

Much better!

[Observer]

]]>
Gawker-5054027 Wed, 24 Sep 2008 07:16:21 EDT Ryan Tate http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5054027&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ <i>New York</i> Founding Editor Clay Felker To Be Memorialized This Evening ]]> You're invited, space permitting, to a memorial service this evening for the beloved New York magazine founding editor Clay Felker. It's at the New York Society for Ethical Culture and starts at six. Tom Wolfe, Gloria Steinem and Lesley Stahl will pay tribute to the man who taught a city to talk about itself at a celebration organized by New York and Gail Sheehy, the writer and widow of the late editor. Felker's legacy, which Wolfe in July described as nothing less than the restoration of vitality to a bloodless, disconnected New York media, is also honored less directly today in New York's excellent issue on the Great Shakeout.

]]>
Gawker-5053140 Mon, 22 Sep 2008 12:43:37 EDT Moe http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5053140&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Ask Tom Wolfe <i>Anything</i> ]]> Uh oh! Remember when Time magazine solicited questions for Japanese author Haruki Murakami? Ask him anything, and the 2.0-tards did, wondering "How would your own funeral be like?" etc. (It also generated some pretty hilarious questions from y'all.) Since they didn't learn their lesson about the idiocy of user-generated "content" the first time, they're now looking for questions to ask white-suited Bonfire of the Vanities author Tom Wolfe. Gems so far?

Man. It's like, you score an interview with a heavyweight like Wolfe, and then screw it up by subjecting him to embarrassing questions like these:

Are you afraid of death?

HI ,since i was very young,i have dreams,visions,premonitions and receve messeges ,FROM JESUS,ST MARY,ANGELS.HE ANSWERED TO MY prayer ,to write this book, …Gods Blessing Through Dreams,Visions,& Premonitions. my web http://www.godisblessingmylife. .tk. true story

MMy mother read an article several years ago which mentioned a favorite childhood book which had Bear in the title. Could you possibly email me the title?

Many thanks,
Sharon

Did you ever use LSD or marijuana while traveling with the Merry Pranksters?

Sigh.

]]>
Gawker-5036962 Thu, 14 Aug 2008 10:48:05 EDT Sheila http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5036962&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ "New Styles of Life": Tom Wolfe Eulogizes Clay Felker ]]> Felker.jpgWrites author Tom Wolfe on New York magazine's late founder, Clay Felker: "One afternoon I came by to see Clay at his Xanadu on 57th Street and found him sitting at a desk going through a date book to put together some income-tax data. 'Look at this,' he told me, riffling through the date book, 'I only ate dinner at home eight times last year!' I don't think I can adequately convey the pride he took in this discovery. He had developed night vision for detecting new styles of life." [NY Mag]

]]>
Gawker-398016 Mon, 07 Jul 2008 14:41:30 EDT Sheila http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=398016&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Sheen Slur May Offend Veteran Best Man ]]> 71003137

  • Charlie Sheen is sorry to black people for calling his ex-wife Denise Richards a "f—king n—--r." He's especially sorry to "Tony Todd, an African-American, who was my best man at my first two weddings." Ha! Richards, with whom Sheen has been bitterly feuding, doesn't get an apology, and can presumably just "f—king" deal. [Us]
  • Yesterday, everyone was worried fashiongay Andre Leon Talley would ruin Michelle Obama by putting her in a bolero jacket or some other atrocious thing. He hasn't done that yet. Instead, the Vogue editor-at-large introduced the would-be first lady at a fashion-industry fundraiser while he was wearing "a kind of turban that recalled the much-discussed costume [Barack Obama] once wore in Somalia." No one should have a problem with Obama hanging out with what looks like a gay muslim, even an elitist gay fashion muslim in New York, so obviously no one, anywhere, will. [R&M]
  • Not only did Anne Hathaway break up with her scuzzy Italian boyfriend, she also moved out. Yay! But what's this business about dinner at Cipriani? [P6]
  • Relentlessly cranky novelist Tom Wolfe demanded to know why a developer insinuated he was anti-Semitic. OK, this time he might have a legitimate reason to be cranky. [P6]
  • Broadway and former TV star Mario Lopez is being named People's "Hottest Bachelor," but he's still totally getting evicted from his Broadway theater to make way for Katie Holmes. The guy's biceps can't catch a break.
  • Supposedly Heidi Montag and Spencer Pratt just bought a $10,000 stash of guns, including "two Benelli semiautomatic M4 tactical shotguns, two Wilson close quarter combat .45-caliber pistols and one Scout semiautomatic rifle." Suddenly, I'm kind of interested in seeing them in front of some reality television cameras again. Near other reality television stars. While drunk and angry. [The Superficial]
  • So sad: Freeloading music critics get free drinks, but no free food, at a listening party. They stormed out in a huff, logically. [P6]
  • The mother of 50 Cent's 11-year-old son claims the rapper burned down her Long Island mansion. He claims she totally monitors his cell-phone conversations with the son. Call it a draw? [R&M]
]]>
Gawker-5017854 Thu, 19 Jun 2008 06:37:33 EDT Ryan Tate http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5017854&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Ugly New Buildings: Not in Tom Wolfe's Backyard! ]]> Tom Wolfe has been fighting the plan for a new building at 980 Madison, near his home on the Upper East Side, for a while now. Yesterday, he made it quite clear that he didn't want an ugly new building: "980 Madison is in the heart of the Upper East Side historic district and it does not need this additional structure. The district has been treated as a specifically landmarked area... I think it is incumbent... to roam through the great archives of architectural history, or architectural future, and come up with something that has more meaning with the Upper East Side." It's true that everybody is putting inappropriate buildings everywhere these days. (Wolfe previously vented his opinions on the original plans for 980 Madison, a skyscraper, to the New York Times.) After the jump: a Wolfe paen to skyscrapers! [Sun]

]]>
Gawker-5017708 Wed, 18 Jun 2008 17:12:03 EDT Sheila http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5017708&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Just Like Tom Wolfe's Blues ]]> Picture 2-17In Tom Wolfe's 1998 novel A Man In Full, big-time real estate developer Charlie Croker becomes a religious evangelical as his once-vast wealth dissolves. The same thing seems to be happening to Bear Stearns chairman and former CEO James Cayne, who played golf and bridge and maybe smoked pot as his firm crumbled, and whose horde of Stearns shares is now worth maybe one-twentieth its value a year ago. Cayne is selling all those shares. Like Croker, he considers such worldly possessions baggage and, to hear the Times tell it, is on the verge of some kind of spiritual awakening:

People who have spoken with Mr. Cayne say that he, like everyone at Bear, was stunned by the firm’s precipitous collapse and the rock-bottom price of its sale. In the past weeks, together with his wife, Patricia Cayne, who is a student of Jewish religious traditions, Mr. Cayne has spent considerable time searching for comparable events in religious history to see what lessons can be learned from the collapse of his firm, said a person who has spoken to him recently...

While Mr. Cayne has not publicly said why he sold his shares, people who know him say that it suggests a need to separate himself, emotionally as well as financially, from the firm that for so long had been part of every fiber of his being and that now had become a source of pain and disappointment.

Here's a taste of Wolfe's Croker, from A Man In Full, after his corporate meltdown and religious conversion:

"...You think if only you can acquire enough worldly goods, enough recognition, enough eminence, you will be free, there'll be nothing more to worry about, and instead you become a bigger and bigger slave to how you think others are judging you. 'You have priceless silver and goblets of gold,' said the philosopher, 'but your reason is of common clay.' As of this morning, I am as rich as the richest of you, for I am hereby handing over anything I own, the Croker Global Corporation, every last branch of it..."

"I don't know what you're like," Croker was saying, "but if you're like most uv'us here is Atlanta, you're driving yourself crazy over possessions. Just think about that for a second..."

"I can tell you that the only real possession you'll ever have is your character, that and your 'scheme of life,' you might say. The Manager has given every person a spark from His own divinity, and no one can take that away from you, not even the Manager himself, and from that spark comes your character. Everything else is temporary and worthless in the long run..."

"But you say, 'I'd rather die than sit down beside the road with a Dixie cup, begging.' Do you realize what you're really saying? You're saying, 'It ain't what I'm gonna eat or where I'm gonna stay I'm worrying about, it's saving face, it's what everybody in Buckhead's gon' think about me..."

Times: Down $900 Million or More, the Chairman of Bear Sells

]]>
Gawker-5004705 Fri, 28 Mar 2008 02:05:20 EDT Ryan Tate http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5004705&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Tom Wolfe Eats Alone, On Display ]]> wolfe.jpg"At EAT on Upper East Side. Tom Wolff is sitting by himself eating breakfast in the window. Wearing full white suit." Sometimes, even when you do get a $7 million advance on your next book about "class, family, wealth, race, crime, sex, corruption, and ambition in Miami," you still end up seated near the damn window, for the whole world to see.

]]>
Gawker-358076 Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:37:13 EST Sheila http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=358076&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ The publishing industry's disappearing act ]]> Picture 32-1If anybody still believes the book publishing industry remains a cultural haven in this numbers-obsessed era, this should shatter their illusions. In Motoko Rich's article on Tom Wolfe's new book deal, there's a hugely compromising nugget of data. I am Charlotte Simmons, the dapper author's most recent blockbuster, had a print run of 1,500,000. Or so the publisher's publicists claimed, in an effort to build excitement for the 2004 novel. A self-fulfiling prophecy? Nope. The publishers actually shipped more like 800,000 copies, and the book eventually sold only 293,000, a respectable number in these illiterate times, but only about a fifth of the notional print run. (The disappearing book sales are represented graphically to the left.) Book publishers are no different from their counterparts in the magazine and newspaper industries: as print declines, so the claims, whether of print runs or circulation figures, become ever more inflated and ever more desperate. (Thanks, John, for the idea.)

]]>
Gawker-5001975 Thu, 03 Jan 2008 16:30:14 EST Nick Denton http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5001975&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Tom Wolfe abandons New York ]]> wolfe.jpgTom Wolfe's next book, "Back to Blood," will be published by Little, Brown in 2009. (Not Farrar, Straus & Giroux, the firm he's been with for 40 years!) The book covers Wolfe's usual bases: "class, family, wealth, race, crime, sex, corruption, and ambition in Miami, the city where America's future has arrived first," says the press release. (Dear Tom: you wanted to set the stage for the future in a super-stratified city of dizzying wealth, grinding poverty, and a vast illegal underclass, and you picked MIAMI?)

]]>
Gawker-339761 Wed, 02 Jan 2008 17:15:51 EST Sheila http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=339761&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Happy 20th birthday, 'Bonfire of the Vanities'! ... ]]> tomwolfe.jpg Happy 20th birthday, 'Bonfire of the Vanities'! Today, the Times celebrates Tom Wolfe's novel with a look at the ways New York has changed since 1987—it's full of rich white people now, did you know?—and interviews with some of the people who characters in the book were based on, or who knew those people. The choicest quote comes from Ronald L. Kuby, the former partner of the radical lawyer William 'Al Vogel' Kunstler. "'Bonfire of the Vanities' ... managed to create a fantasy criminal justice system where rich, white Sherman McCoy is being railroaded by a combination of craven black leaders and corrupt journalists and spineless political leaders. That was white people's fantasy, that was not black people's reality. It was a fundamentally racist novel appealing to the very worst in white people, at their most privileged and snivelly. And no, I don't think it could possibly have the same cachet today."

]]>
Gawker-332121 Mon, 10 Dec 2007 16:10:00 EST Emily Gould http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=332121&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Tom Wolfe Dresses Way Down In The Hamptons ]]> TomSince time immemorial, or since maybe 2004, we have received missives from a person called The Earl Grey. As frequently as possible, we print these letters as a service to society.

Thursday, July 26, 2007. 7:45 pm. I'm on the Hampton Jitney, Montauk Highway, Route 27, we pull into the forlorn Southampton Jitney HQ/Health Spa parking lot. I'm drowsy from a full afternoon on Main Beach, when I notice famed New Journalism author & bon vivant TOM WOLFE walking slowly to his car in the parking lot just beneath my bus window.

Wolfe's owl-like visage is unmistakable, but I'm very put off by the rag tag outfit he's wearing this mid-summer evening. Normally of course one imagines Wolfe dressed to the nines in his signature ice cream white suit, custom dress shirt, silk tie and jazz-age spat shoes.

Shockingly, Wolfe is wearing faded, worn navy sweatpants, ill-fitting and slovenly, as one might wear for a touch football game on the Great Lawn. He has on a royal blue shirt rolled up at the sleeves. The cut and hue of the shirt actually has a sloppy cowboy denim shirt quality to it. Wolfe has balloon-like white sneakers on his feet, most like the casual Reebok white aerobic shoes that my father sported in South Beach a couple of years before his death. Wolfe's famous parted grey hair is all askew, splayed across his forehead and touching his eye and nose like some gator-trailed, drunken Brooklyn hipster at Studio B's closing time.

Wolfe walks the few steps to his car [perhaps he was dropping off a friend for the ride back to Manhattan; I caught the bus in Amagansett at 6:50 but it took us an hour to reach South]. His choice of automobile was the only aspect of the experience that seemed suited to the great author. Wolfe's car was a Cadillac, in the pristine ice cream white that one sees in his custom three-piece suits. It's a Caddy of fairly recent vintage, big and boxey and somewhat inflated like his white Reebok sneakers. It has a similar design quality to the Escalade, but it's a luxury 4 door Cadillac, big and puffy, not like the classic long, sleek Lincoln Towncar that I prefer; more like a sawed-off shoebox Rolls Royce design, but still impeccable in the whiteness of the paint and the opulence of the high suspension.

The other Wolfe-ian aspect were his rims: Wolfe had installed full white-walled wafer-like ice cream white metal disc rims inside his fat tires, with a showy Cadillac logo in the center. Very Palm Beach or Beverly Hills, I thought to myself. He inched out of his parking space, so, so slowly, a foot at a time, haltingly, perhaps wisely avoiding a collision with the huge lurking Jitney Prevost bus that has taken more than a few lives in past summers on Montauk Highway.

I suppose in the city Wolfe takes pride in his immaculate three piece suits and manicured Southern Gentleman profile. But like certain East Enders, he dresses way down in the country—yet making sure his choice of car bespeaks a man of over-arching, even intimidating, refinement, accomplishment, taste and means.

The Earl Grey -
11937 / 10021

]]>
Gawker-284704 Wed, 01 Aug 2007 12:00:23 EDT Choire http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=284704&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ The 'New York Observer' At The Four Seasons ]]> jaredkushner2.jpgThe significance of holding last night's party to celebrate the New York Observer and its new website at the Four Seasons restaurant was intentional, obvious, and not at all lost on anyone. Despite its recent Frank Bruni demotion to two New York Times stars, the restaurant remains the symbolic and probably actual center of New York old-guard media power. After so many years of playing gadfly to the media, politics, and real estate elite of this city, the Observer and its boy-owner and his advisers chose to make a very specific sort of statement.

Inside the restaurant, Tom Wolfe had his photo taken with Julia Allison. (That bears repeating: Tom Wolfe had his photo taken with Julia Allison.) Kurt Andersen made a little chit-chat before begging off to the Larry King appreciation party in the next room. (They had better snacks, by far. Also CNN partygoers received a Coach-imitation leather tote with a CNN tag, and a DVD of King's reputedly best work. You could sneak in through the kitchen.) The two parties side-by-side may have been a slight disaster on the part of Steven Rubenstein and his PR folks, but it came off fine, actually. (It was a question of wattage; did we see Hillary Clinton presswoman Jennifer Hanley outside, meaning that Hillary Clinton was inside the CNN party?)

Uniformed waiters were aggressive with the hors d'oeuvres, most of which featured caviar in some form, but the knot of yarmulked men gathered by the bar ignored them. (The duck, the shrimp, the crabcakes!) Also not eating, or drinking, was Jared's rehabilitated felon father, Charles Kushner, who mostly spoke in low tones to men at the end of the bar. Ever-gracious Jared entertained a seemingly endless stream of well-wishers and posed for photographs. The real estate broker-developer Michael Shvo said he'd call him about having lunch. Jared recently purchased the most expensive office building in America.

So how were things at the paper? "We're having a lot of fun," Jared said. Was he dating Ivanka Trump? "We're just friends. But thanks for asking." So that partnership was all business too.

Ms. Trump was in a very nice short black dress, looking tall and blonde; she talked for what seemed like eons with Jared's assistant Kimberly. Steven Rubenstein, who represents the Observer and the Kushner family, made sure everyone was having a good time and that the photographers were getting all the right people; he talked with did not talk with New York Times reporter Allen Salkin, who wrote such nice things about Jared in the Sunday Styles section.

Cindy Adams talked to Police Commissioner Ray Kelly, notebook in hand, hair at attention. Salon editor Joan Walsh, in a pantsuit, stayed close to Salon writer and former NYO staffer Rebecca Traister. Harry Evans was there with his wife, former lots-of-places editor Tina Brown, who spent a lot of time deep in very close conversation with W/WWD boy Jacob Bernstein.

"I love this tabloid!" Mr. Evans said, Britishly. "I seized it with great joy before a long bus ride, and I loved every word!" He is somewhat reminiscent of a brilliant leprechaun. "Joe Conason on politics! John Heilpern! The Obama piece! I thought it was terrific! The tabloid format is far better." Mr. Evans said that the bus had taken him to Southampton.

Ms. Brown has recently finished her book about Princess Diana. "It's like a plum pudding—there are great nuggets everywhere!" she said. "It's as much about celebrity culture as it is about Diana herself." And how did Ms. Brown feel about the Stephen Frears film The Queen? "I loved The Queen," Ms. Brown said. "It was very accurate! Except for the portrayal of Robin Janvrin, the Queen's private secretary. He looks like Kenneth Branagh in real life."

Ms. Brown said that the book had taken her a year and a half; for it, she conducted 250 interviews. "I feel like a giant whale has been lifted from my head."

Maer Roshan, who worked for Ms. Brown at her short-lived magazine Talk, was there with a bundle of his Radar-ites, including his lieutenant Chris Tennant, who was holding court with several ladies in a booth. He was wearing jeans that appeared to have been painted on. That tall woman with the jet-black hair, talking with the older man? So tall! Atoosa Rubenstein! Lots of flashbulbs.

Observer reporters seemed vaguely uncomfortable at such an extravagant gathering ("It's the Observer with money," more than one was overheard whispering), and they swiped multiple Bellinis as they came around on silver trays. Transom reporter Spencer Morgan however did not look uncomfortable.

Jessica Joffe wore eyeglasses. Slate editor Jacob Weisberg and Domino editor Deborah Needleman arrived with New York's Ariel Levy. Jacob is going on a three-month book leave soon. Andrew Balazs, Columbia J-school graduate, was there solo. Lloyd Grove was not in attendance, but Ben Widdicombe, Hud Morgan, and Daily News gossip boy Patrick Huguenin were.

We were promised there'd be no speeches but there was a microphone and so Jared took it and said that 20 years ago, when the New York Observer was founded, he was starting a venture called... kindergarten. His voice still has a little hint of his Livingston, New Jersey upbringing. The new website, he said, was to launch on Monday, but as a preview, they had a page up on the screen. (The Four Seasons, it turns out, does not have Internet access.) Jared said he was very fortunate to work with Peter Kaplan, the editor of the newspaper, a sentiment that was greeted with cheers from the crowd. "We get to go to the 21st century with a new newspaper," said Kaplan. He then referred to the paper's former owner and publisher, Arthur Carter, as "my buddy and weekly tormenter."

Of the paper, he said: "The paper is younger, thinner, and better looking, like Jared."

We talked to Peter Kaplan in person. "For anyone under 30, the New York Times is a queen-sized sheet!" he said. "Going smaller was the best thing we could have done. We're still smart. We still have an edge." He said something about possibly becoming the smartest tabloid in America. "It was time to make a change. I love it. It's great!"

alexkpmcmul.jpgJacob Bernstein left in Peggy Siegal's car. The New Yorker's Nick Paumgarten may have left with William Berlind for stiffer drinks. Patrick McMullan's photographers would prove unable to identify Alex Kuczynski. Ivanka Trump left alone, and on foot, heading east on 52nd Street.

]]>
Gawker-253731 Thu, 19 Apr 2007 16:18:19 EDT Doree Shafrir http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=253731&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ The Other 'Portfolio' ]]> We can understand how, in the manic rush to deliver your premier issue to a waiting public and get your website up to snuff, certain details can be overlooked. Still, shouldn't someone at Conde Nast thought to have spent $7.95 from their $125 million endowment to snap up portfoliomag.com? Because this does not exactly scream "business lifestyle." On the other hand, the Tom Wolfe essay on toe-sucking is well worth reading.

Portfoliomag.com

]]>
Gawker-253312 Wed, 18 Apr 2007 12:37:03 EDT abalk2 http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=253312&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ We Read 'Portfolio' So You Don't Have To ]]> sherman and wolfeLet us begin with the cover of Portfolio. It's a gilded city image, a metropolis of lit-up office windows in earth tones, oddly, as it is supposed to be an homage to Berenice Abbott. (A funny reference, as she was told that New York City was too toxic for her to live in and so she left.) Publisher David Carey and Editor in Chief Joanne Lipman are shown in the Times this morning comparing their cover favorably to a recent Fortune cover, with Carey saying, "We're not giving you peas and carrots. We want to capture that glamour." By that measure things are certainly already a success; the magazine certainly weighs as much as Glamour.

Inside that cover, there are a healthy eleven pages of ads before Lipman's Editor's Letter, ranging from the stolid (GE, Chevron, Fidelity, etc.) to the sexy (BMW, Visa's line of luxury cards). Lipman's letter is almost aggressively boastful about the vapidity of the content that you'll find within the book; Portfolio is apparently the brilliant girl in high school who acted dumb to attract the boys. "Today's 24/7 news cycle bombards us with information but gives us less time to process it," says Lipman, who notes that:

We chose a monthly frequency for Cond Nast Portfolio so we can offer you deep dives into important subjects, providing you with the most compelling—and most useful—information. After this issue, we take a break and begin publishing monthly with our September issue.
The Radar-acity! Also, her dad just died, so we'll try to be nice.

After a three page Ralph Lauren spread we come to the Table of Contents page. As is this case with most upmarket titles aimed (ideally!) at people who want to have something to flip through while their driver hies them to Teterboro, the T.O.C. is broken up by ad pages. We pass by Rolex (one page), Armani (spread), Canon (spread), Travelers Insurance (spread), hit the second page of the T.O.C., and then it's a Hermes one pager and a Cartier spread to take us to the Contents' conclusion. We're certainly feeling an urge to consume! Up next is a foldout ad for Grey Goose. We're certainly feeling an urge to become incredibly drunk! There's an ad for Think Tank ("an exclusive forum for Conde Nast Portfolio readers to share their thinking") that directs you to the Portfolio website, where you can join this virtual community. (Sure, Conde may be shelling out upwards of $100 million on a new print mag, but they get the Web.) Calvin Klein has a three page ad, Van Heusen is in for one, DeBeers takes a spread, Portfolio.com gets another plug (they get the Web), IBM has four pages and then, lo and behold, there's an ad for Portfolio.com (they get the Web)! A two page Prudential "Red Zone" ad follows and looks like nothing so much as a promo for Old Spice.

And then is something called "Photo Genesis." It's about how "the biggest names in business can be tricky to photograph," presumably because they are all vampires for whom sunlight represents the ultimate enemy. Is this section some kind of contributor's page for the photogs? Probably! FedEx is in for a page, Goldman Sachs gets a spread to show how much they love developing countries, which they illustrate with eight pictures of children who will no doubt be adopted by Angelina Jolie in the immediate future. Hyatt Place—a new hotel designed around you—takes a spread. BlackBerry's got a single-pager starring the CEO of Capital Management Group.

Then it's the second page of Photo Genesis. Look, there's Tom Wolfe! And Bill Ford! Also, business people only ask for one photographer by name: Annie Leibovitz. Why? She's the only one they've ever heard of.

Cargill goes for a spread and then we reach the Index of Companies and People mentioned in the magazine, which is presumably placed here to remind you that there's some sort of business element to the book. The index is, of course, interspersed with more ads (four pages for Ameriprise Financial), but we did note that Conde Nast is not included. David Geffen gets three mentions, apparently, and Peter Guber one. We're starting to get a better idea of what the magazine is about.

Banana Republic has a spread—the pastels make our eyes happy—and then it's the masthead. Let's give a random shout-out to Art Assistant Paloma Shutes as we whiz by. CreditSuisse has a foldout ad, which is backed by THe FILe, "events + promotions + news from our advertisers." Um, what the hell else has the magazine been thus far? Ermenegildo Zegna does four pages, in two of which well-dressed gentlemen are shown reading the Financial Times. Ooh, showing a real business publication in the pages of Portfolio. This magazine is ballsy!

The second page of THe FILe directs you to, yes, Portfolio.com (who gets the Web?). An Omega watch ad surrounds the business masthead, and this time we're gonna give a wave to Events Director Elise Mehrige. Lincoln takes four pages, CA gets one and then... Contributors!

This is an odd layout. The writers are shown on a map of the world with datelines underneath their names signifying where they reported from. It's a little jarring:

Gabriel Sherman
NAPLES, FLORIDA

looks like a nametag you'd see on a server at an Applebees. (Also, Gabriel Sherman looks kind of like Macaulay Culkin if he were just about to be molested by Tom Wolfe, which, for all we know, may be the plot of Home Alone 5.)

Samsung, John Hardy and UBS account for four pages, and then we get "MAY AGENDA," which, at page 87, can be fairly said to be the first piece of real content in the magazine. Our first impression is that we have mistakenly picked up the world's heaviest New York: there's something about the layout and line art that feel vaguely Mossian. But what's on the calendar? The Kentucky Derby's on May 5th, and there's "speculation that Queen Elizabeth II will be on hand." There's a gala for the Met on the 7th. The iPhone launches in June, but we'll not see another Portfolio until September, so best to cram it in now. (Incidentally, this counts as one of the two mentions of Steve Jobs in this issue, if the Index is at all accurate.) There's a goofy icon of the Google boys (shareholders' meeting on the 10th, y'all!), and then it's back to the ads.

Four-page foldout for Accenture featuring Tiger Woods. THe FILe gets another page. 650 Sixth Avenue—the first piece of real estate advertising we've seen thus far!— does a one-pager. It's "gallery style condominium living," which sounds incredibly hip and happening. Plus it's right near The Container Store! Northwestern Mutual does a spread, Patek Philippe has one page, and now we're at brief. The magazine may actually be starting for real this time!

Stick with us, we're not doing this for ourselves!

Brief is: "WHO'S DOING WHAT TO WHOM AND WHY." Wow, that's Us Weekly's mission statement too! Apparently this is the "front of book." Jesse Eisinger does a bit on how private equity firms are doing such gigantic deals that they can no longer avoid scrutiny. It's broken up by a Xerox spread, so we sort of lost the thread in the middle, but there's half-page graphy/charty thing on the other side that, again, looks like it came out of New York.

After an Intel ad we get a brief interview with Sirius CEO Mel Karmazin. (Kudos to the editors for going with "Siriusly Speaking" rather than "The Karmazin' Race.") Mel claims to have learned "nothing good" from former employer Sumner Redstone. Interviewer Nancy Hass asks some toughish questions, but stuff like "You are a man with an urge to merge" doesn't exactly go for the jugular. Below the interview is a photo-laden timeline that could have come from Radar, Spy or Vanity Fair, actually.

Microsoft has a page, and then there's a photospread on the ad people who will make the big decisions at the television upfronts. Unilever's Laura Klauberg has nice legs. A Microsoft spread following up on the previous ad gives way to a page on architecture ("Mine's Bigger") that is both chart and list on the "ridiculous race to build the world's tallest building." Canali has a page. The next page has a cartoon! It's about corporate-cafeteria health-code violations! (Advertiser Credit Suisse, as well as Newsweek and Verizon get mentions, but there is nothing about the Conde caf, which we're sure is spotless.)

There's a then-and-now charticle (So many entry points!) concerning Bubble 2.0 (FAVORITE POL: Then: Bill, Now: Hillary. You get the idea). After another page of THe FILe, there's a humorous collection of real excuses corporations made for not meeting estimates, which is slightly less amusing when you realize that the item atop it is all about MINING DEATHS. Well, we guess they both do fall under the "WORKPLACE" rubric.

Nic Cage is selling Montblanc watches? What, they couldn't find anyone creepier? Anyway, that ad is followed up by a four-page Merrill Lynch thing. Their slogan is "TOTAL MERILL" which seems an odd choice when it's placed directly next to a giant bull. Anyway. There's a full spread about China's preparation for the 2008 Olympics, which mainly consists of a giant picture of the still-under-construction stadium. Helpful logos at bottom bring you information about how much steel is being used, daily worker pay, etc.

Porsche has an ad spread. There's a page about exit compensation that tries to muster some outrage about the giant sums given to underperforming executives upon their departure that would be more convincing were it not placed aside an ad for Audemars Piguet watches, which are apparently made for the rich executive with Asperger's. That ad continues on for three more pages, and is followed by an ad from Portfolio.com thanking its "digital partners" for "embracing innovation."

"THE LAST WORD" in brief is an Alexandra "Daughter of Tom" Wolfe piece on "the past year's most extravagant bar and bat mitzvahs." As our co-editor Emily said, "I remember reading 'there are lavish bar mitzvahs' articles when i was PREPARING FOR MY BAT MITZVAH. And they had better headlines." (This one is called "Mazel Top This," so we're inclined to agree.) Still, you're not going to see pictures of Snoop Dogg and Liza Minnelli in fusty old Forbes, are you?

We don't read Forbes, so that's an actual question.

Burberry: One page. Mass Mutual: a spread. And, here we go. Columnists. John Cassidy tackles Economics (Global warming might not be as bad as we think, economists say. Oh do they.) Jesse Eisenger covers Wall Street (Will derivatives fuck up the market? Maybe not! But probably!). At this point we're just gonna stop counting the ads unless there's something really sexy or egregious, but trust us, there's one on every other page. We're not sure what they're charging over at Conde, but even if it's pennies they've probably already earned out on that 100-million-dollar investment.

Gabriel Sherman (NAPLES, FLORIDA) profiles Bruce Sherman (no relation). Sherman's the CEO of Private Capital Management, and he's got newspaper owners everywhere pissing in their Ermenegildo Zegna trousers (wow, those ads really work!) as he tries to destroy the industry force news conglomerates to become more efficient through the bullying tactic we currently refer to as "shareholder activism." Sherman has already been successful in forcing Knight Ridder to sell itself off. Now he's teaming up with Morgan Stanley's Hasan Elmasry in an attempt to do the same to the New York Times Company. (Good luck with that. No seriously, good luck!) This is a lengthy, detailed profile that may be of interest to the casual reader who knows little about mysterious asset managers who are trying to change the way newspapers focus on their bottom lines. Not being among such we cannot judge it on its merits, but again, long and detailed. So points for that.

Sheelah Kolhatkar wonders why there aren't more women making the deals for private equity firms. (Answer: Men are bad.) It's a spread with a big picture of the six women who apparently have made it in the man's world, and there's a chart on the following page of the men who run the show. We don't really follow finance all that closely and we still feel like we knew everything in this piece. Still, it's mercifully brief, so we're giving the same amount of points that we did to the Sherman thing.

Michael Lewis, who made his name writing about finance and then revitalized his career by writing a book about finance as it pertains to sports, has an article about sports finance. It's a little logo-heavy, but so long as he's not writing about his children, we've always found Lewis extremely readable. You could do worse!

Special four-page Mark Ecko advertorial supplement. The sound you hear is us skipping over the pages with the celerity of Paul Rubens at a masturbation contest. Kolhatkar returns with a piece on Ken Griffin, "hedge fund wunderkind." It starts off with this: "The people who run hedge funds, as everyone knows, are tight-lipped." We did know that! You know who else is tight-lipped? Bruce Sherman, asset manager. Still, he talked to Portfolio, just like Ken Griffin, who untightened his lips long enough to talk about his wife and his art collection. Will he take Citadel, his hedge fund, public? "It's a strategic option." We feel somehow less informed.

Someone should tell the people who do print ads for Loews Hotels that color photographs superimposed over silver tint makes for a jarring, hideous ad.

"Behind the Green Doerr" is an article about John Doerr, a venture capitalist who wants to help the environment or something. We refuse to read any more articles about "green" anything—seriously, fuck the environment—so we can't evaluate this one, but it begins with Bono, which may give you some idea of where it goes.

Art! There's an art piece! It's about Marianne Boesky, the daughter of Ivan, whom older readers may remember as Wall Street's 80's symbol of greed gone wild. This one is sort of interesting. Also the art industry can be as cut-throat as the financial industry. We're going to go back and really read this one later. Also, it seems like Mike Ovitz comes off as a dick, which is always enjoyable.

Former Time writer Matt Cooper is still working his fifteen minutes of Plame. Matt was so totally ready to go to prison over the leak of the CIA agent's identity, right up until the moment where he spilled everything to stay out of jail. Best line: "As [Judy] Miller was hauled off to jail and I was let go, I told her to stay strong." Ever the comedian, we don't doubt that Cooper added something about not bending down for the soap.

There's a ten-page Lexus ad. If nothing else this magazine makes you realize how little money you have in your savings account. Or, we suppose, how much.

Here we are at page 227. We're in the final third of the damn thing now. It's culture | inc. (WHERE art MEETS commerce). Quick piece, complete with charticle, on the ins-and-outs of arts patronage. Alexandra Wolfe looks at the Chinese art market: Is it inflated? Some say yes! Others are unsure! A little infobox with five contemporary Chinese artists adds value, we guess. Investing in the theater: It's a risky proposition! Eileen Daspin introduces you to some folks who think that Legally Blonde: The Musical will somehow help cover their nut. Graphical box included for your pleasure. "DECONSTRUCTED PROGRAM" does the annotated document thing so popular with editors these days. Portfolio chooses to examine who's funding the Seattle Symphony. The answers may surprise you, particularly if you don't know anything about Seattle. Or the Symphony. Or people who might care about those two things in combination.

Level Vodka ad. Mmm. Vodka.

How is Time Warner CEO Dick Parsons helping to turn around the fortunes of the struggling Apollo Theater? A photicle (you know, the big picture accompanied by the small, numbered line art drawing that tells you who everyone is) may provide the answers!

There's a piece about the private equity/asset management guys who own Octone Records, which is responsible for Maroon 5. Bastards. Also, "This Love" is now stuck in our head. MOTHERFUCKERS.

Now it's THE GOLD Standard, Portfolio's Strategist. Things you should buy your rich fat ass this month: Tennis rackets, cameras, watches, and Nassim Nicholas Taleb's The Black Swan, a book about our inability to accept that life is essentially random. Having waded this far through Portfolio we are entirely convinced. A few capsule book reviews trail after.

And now, ladies and gentlemen, direct your attention to page 267, where Tom Wolfe examines the NEW MASTERS OF THE UNIVERSE. Guess what? They're hedge fund managers! Do you like Tom Wolfe writing about rich people? Then go buy Portfolio, because he's doing it some more in this issue.

What else! The ruler of Dubai likes horsies. Horsie dynasty graphic included. Is Ford fucked? We're not sure, the article jumps to the back. Eira Thomas is a Canadian diamond mining magnate who is styled in green gown and mining boots. She lives in two different worlds! John Hockenberry wants you to know that if you pay taxes you are helping to fund the military/industrial complex. Ryan Kavanaugh is some red-headed 32-year-old standing on the corner where Hollywood meets Wall Street. (This one might actually be interesting, we see Harvey Weinstein barking in it.) Harry Hurt III writes about someone other than himself for once: Texas legend T. Boone Pickens. Oh, look, here's the rest of that Ford piece. Yeah, it's probably fucked. We're almost there! Look, an ad for Portfolio.com on your mobile! (They get the etc.) Okay, back page! It's "the demystifier." It's a charticle explaining the credit default swap. We still don't get it. Final ad: four page Cadillac foldout.

So, Portfolio? Honestly, this really is the Vanity Fair for the finance set. With the resources they're planning to pour into it, we don't doubt it'll survive for a couple years at least. Is it a good magazine? That depends! If you think Vanity Fair and New York are good magazines—and many people seem to—then, yes, you will find this a good magazine. By the standards of Manhattan, it certainly reeks of overclass success: fat, healthy, holding up a glass of high-end vodka with a $15,000 watch weighing down each wrist.

]]>
Gawker-252653 Mon, 16 Apr 2007 16:15:54 EDT abalk2 http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=252653&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Media Bubble: Hassan Elmasry's Campaign ]]> elmasry.jpg
  • Read all about Hassan Elmasry, the Morgan Stanley portfolio manager who's trying to take the Times out of Sulzberger family hands, and the man responsible for tearing Pinch Sulzberger a new one at the late February board meeting. (In PowerPoint, no less!) [WSJ]
  • The Times' February numbers give him some great new ammunition. [BW]
  • Amanda Congdon: "I am not subject to the "rules" traditional journalists have to follow." Not with a set like that, sure. [Amanda Congdon]
  • Portfolio: secretive start-up will feature the many ellipses of Tom Wolfe, who is apparently part of a Take Your Father To Work Day program. [NYO]

  • Conrad Black not the world's most honest man, say prosecutors in Chicago trial. [Guardian]
  • Lady Black: You vermin and sluts know who you are. [E&P]
  • Can Ira Glass be as irritating on television as he is on radio? We're guessing yes. [NYT]
  • Life in these United States getting uncomfortable for staff at the increasingly Condefied Reader's Digest. [NYP]
  • Sam Zell takes another shot at buying Tribune, keeping this fucking story alive. [WSJ]
  • Young people much better judges of talent than we had previously given them credit for being. [Boston Globe]
  • Last one out at the Globe, please turn off the lights. [Boston Phoenix]
  • Media buyers cannot get enough KRAUTHAMMER. [WSJ]
  • Conde Nast Media Group president Richard Beckman is so much fun to work for that it's amazing no one wants to do it. [WWD]
  • Life & Style: hell on earth. Hello, it's in New Jersey. [NYP]

    ]]> Gawker-245838 Wed, 21 Mar 2007 09:54:04 EDT abalk2 http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=245838&view=rss&microfeed=true <![CDATA[ Help Us Be Like Tom Wolfe ]]> tom%20wolfe%20white%20suit%20wanted.jpgWhen he's not defending the architectural sanctity of the Upper East Side, Tom Wolfe wears white suits. It's his gimmick, his thing, like Paris Hilton's vagina or Mel Gibson's anti-Semitism. Whether or not you subscribe to the "enduring appeal" of the white suit, we nevertheless require your assistance. We hate to bend you over and use you like our personal Craigslist bitch, but these are desperate times. One of us males in the vast newsroom requires a white suit. This is for a — no really — upcoming wedding in the tropics. It need not be a white suit of Wolfean dappertude, nor do we desire to blow much cash on what is essentially a novelty. One would think that, this being New York, you can get anything at any time, right? No, for even our crappiest retailers must adhere to the laws of season, which mean that the few harebrained consumers who might buy white suits do so in the springtime, not now, on the eve of December. Forget all the chains and discounters (Daffy's, Men's Wearhouse, etc.); we've had better luck with small crap suiteries, though so far nothing in our size. Help us resolve this fashion emergency. If you know where one can acquire a cheap white suit (remember: for the tropics!) in the next week, in Manhattan, let us know in the comments or via the memory hole. In return, we'll bring back beautiful photos and maybe some of that military-grade Caribbean blow.

    [Photo: Getty]

    ]]>
    Gawker-218243 Thu, 30 Nov 2006 09:00:32 EST Chris Mohney http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=218243&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ JoeJournalist.com: Could One Of These Men Be JoeJournalist? Yeah, Maybe. ]]> This morning we asked you to help us identify the mystery journalist who had the effrontery to start his own website in the early days of the Internet. While the general consensus remains fixated on Andrew Sullivan, there are a few other ideas out there. We present them after the jump.

    • "Perhaps Joe Journalist was Tom Wolfe? Would fit the description. TomWolfe.com was created July 20, 1998. Gladwell's site went up in September of 2004, BTW."
    • "Reeks of Brit Hume. He was a computer geek before most of the world knew what a computer geek was. But don't quote me on that!"
    • "I'd always assumed that stupid Kinsley column was referencing Josh—excuse Joshua Micah Marshall's—excruciatingly self-infatuated blog"
    • Isn't it Adam Nagourney?
    • "Wouldn't it be Matt Drudge?" [No. —ed.]
    • "It's definitely Andy Glass."

      We'd actually be inclined to buy that last one, assuming we knew who the fuck Andy Glass is. Thanks for playing. More on this stunning story if it ever develops.

      Earlier: JoeJournalist.com: World's Most Boring Guessing Game Continues

    ]]>
    Gawker-218108 Wed, 29 Nov 2006 17:40:51 EST abalk2 http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=218108&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Why You Cannot Afford to Skip Any Parts of the Sunday 'Times' ]]> 20060313tomwolfe.jpgIf you hadn't read the Automobiles section — which, in fact, we usually don't, and we have no idea what possessed us to do so this week — you'd have missed this delightfully jarring bit:

    "It's not worth pimping out a car unless it has something a little tacky," Mr. Wolfe said. "You have to suffer for style."

    That Mr. Wolfe is Tom Wolfe, the mannerly, white-suited, 75-year-old novelist. Who has, apparently, pimped his own ride.

    Amazing what you learn from the newspaper.

    Call Him Ishmael. (He Has the Whale.) [NYT]

    ]]>
    Gawker-160062 Mon, 13 Mar 2006 08:26:53 EST Jesse http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=160062&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Tom Wolfe Speaks in Tongues ]]> Remember Doctor Rammer Doc Doc? No? Then you must not've read Tom Wolfe's A Man In Full, which featured the improbably named rapper's threat to "peel yo cap."

    Well, Wolfe is back, speaking tongues yet again, holding forth on "gibber-gibber" and other things. After the jump, a letter Wolfe wrote to The Chronicle of Higher Education about Robert S. Boynton's new book, The New New Journalism.

    To the Editor:
    Is it really true that due to the sheer enormity of the task, college department heads today no longer read books—and instead rely on "book briefings" by graduate students? When that rumor began circulating four years ago, I dismissed it as absurd. But recent events have caused me to pause, and ponder.

    For example, in The Chronicle Review's March 4 issue, writing about what he calls "the New New Journalism," Robert S. Boynton, director of New York University's magazine-journalism program, states that the book Moneyball, by Michael Lewis, "chronicles big business" ("Drilling Into the Bedrock of Ordinary Experience"). Inexplicably, the director's statement is not merely inaccurate. It is wildly gibber-gibber ape-shrieking off the wall.

    Moneyball is about playing a game on the field, baseball. Specifically, it is about how one Billy Beane, office-bound general manager of a woebegone team, the Oakland Athletics, used the findings of a string of baseball-happy amateur statisticians to make a completely objective analysis of which player skills and field strategies work best in that game. The figures showed, for example, that the stolen base, the sacrifice bunt, and the hit and run actually reduce a team's chances of winning at that game. They showed that the hitter who has the knack of forcing the pitcher to a long count, say, 3-1 or 3-2, and then drawing a walk is a team's great invisible batting power, and that a hitter's on-base percentage was more important than his batting average in that game.

    By using the blind stats and ignoring conventional baseball savvy, over a four year stretch (1999-2002) the Athletics won more regular season games than any other team in the Major Leagues aside from the Atlanta Braves, made the play offs three times, and in 2002 won the toughest of the Major League divisions, the American League West, with 103 wins, including a record-breaking 20 straight in September—despite being so strapped for money, they could afford only two types of players: has -beens and not-yets of that game. In other words, Moneyball is a book about a radical mathematical science for playing a particular game. It is a book about a game.

    How could Director Boynton get the very subject of a book he cites as evidence supporting his thesis so completely wrong? Could it have possibly been a bungled briefing by some underpaid, overworked graduate student who himself couldn't find time to read the book? It is very hard to believe such a thing. But I challenge anyone to come up with a more logical explanation.

    Or how could Director Boynton be not merely incorrect but, again, astonishingly, brain-numbingly wrong about an essay he chooses to make central to his argument, "The New Journalism" (1973) by Tom Wolfe? According to Director Boynton—or some grad student who hasn't slept for three days??—"Wolfe's New Journalism" involved such "avant-garde" devices as "placing the author at the center of the story" and "exploding traditional narrative." In fact, ego-centered narration is as old as journalism itself, and Wolfe warns against its pitfalls. And far from "exploding traditional narrative," Wolfe recommends the opposite: bringing into nonfiction the traditional structure and narrative of the novel or short story.

    Director Boynton—or the voice at ear?—says Wolfe uses the sociological term "status" to refer to cosmetic matters, "how one dresses, where one lives," and overlooks the more profound matters of "class and race." In fact, Wolfe uses the term "status" in precisely the way Max Weber, who introduced it to sociology, did; i.e., to refer to the entire range of ways in which human beings rank one another, class and race being two of them—and he underlines that point in his essay.

    Not incidentally, the essay served as the introduction to an anthology that included excerpts from two of the most vivid and best-known nonfiction stories ever written about class and race: "Martin Luther King Is Still on the Case," by Garry Wills, and "Radical Chic & Maumauing the Flak Catchers," the only chronicle of the thousands of racial "confrontations" minority organizations were compelled to use in order to get money out of the Poverty Program's white administrators.

    Director Boynton—or the grad-grind elf on his shoulder?—says that when Wolfe's essay uses the term "point of vies," it is referring to "varying points of view," the narrator's being one. In fact, it refers to something else entirely: point of view in Henry James's technical use of the term, i.e., making the reader feel he is always inside the skin, the eye sockets, the central nervous system of some character as the story unfolds.

    Director Boynton says that Wolfe thinks of "ethnic and ideological subcultures" as "terra incognita," phenomena that so baffle him, he regards them as different not just in "degree" but "in kind" from "the rest of American culture." Really? Whose hookah has the elf been smoking? The fact is, Wolfe doesn't refer in any way to" ethnic and ideological subcultures" and uses the term "terra incognita" only in reference to the physiology of the brain.

    Today, just as in 1973 when Wolfe wrote his "New Journalism" essay, neuroscientists are still unable to provide a physiological explanation of consciousness, memory, language, sleep, or the effect of general anesthesia. But they do know what such brain functions are not. They are not "ethnic and ideological subcultures," whatever these 12 poor old tumble-down shabby-genteel abstract syllables may summon up in the mind of the director.

    If this is the extent of Director Boynton's—or the homunculus's?—grasp of the obvious, I'm not sure I want to see how he has—they have?—handled the excellent journalists included in his—their?—upcoming book, The New New Journalism. Speaking of which, the evidence, as we have seen, indicates that he—or the little fellow?—has never read Michael Lewis's Moneyball.

    It should come as no surprise, then, that he appears oblivious of something else: the "New New" locution of The New New Journalism is a haircut off Michael Lewis's brilliant Silicon Valley story, "The New New Thing."

    Despite all the foregoing, I still don't believe Director Boynton or any other college department head in America would have graduate students read books for him. But should such a practice exist, it is the strongest argument yet for paying graduate-student T.A.'s professional-level salaries and lowering their workloads. They must be given greater incentive and more time for the important chores they now do for faculty members.
    Tom Wolfe
    New York

    Chronicle of Higher Education [Sub. required]
    New New Journalism [official site]

    ]]>
    Gawker-39891 Thu, 14 Apr 2005 12:35:04 EDT Haber http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=39891&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ To Do: Sedaris' Christmas, Broken Social Scene, Or Tom Wolfe ]]> · Alec Baldwin, Rosie Perez, Molly Shannon, and Liev Schreiber read some Christmas stories written by funnyman David Sedaris at Studio 54 tonight. Kind of like the Oceans 12 of staged readings, but without the A-listers. And don't scoff at the $25 ticket price, Grinch—all the proceeds go to charity. [Filmmaker Magazine]
    · Eclectic Canadians Broken Social Scene play for all the nice little boys and girls tonight at Bowery Ballroom. The Pixies play again tonight at Hammerstein, if you can get your dirty fingers on a ticket. [BB]
    · Sooo many nagging questions still unanswered from Tom Wolfe's latest sex book. Like, who is Charlotte Simmons based on? Oh, it's supposed to be his daughter? Well color us dense. If you think of any more burning issues in the meantime, he speaks tonight at the 92nd Street Y. [92Y]

    ]]>
    Gawker-27561 Mon, 13 Dec 2004 17:35:42 EST Jessica http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=27561&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Report: Tom Wolfe Very Bad at Sex ]]> Not that you wanted to know this, but apparently Tom Wolfe has won some sort of award for bad sex. Writing about sex badly, that is.

    Care for a sample? "Slither slither slither slither went the tongue..." No, you didn't need that. We apologize.
    Tom Wolfe wins bad sex award [Reuters, via CNN]

    ]]>
    Gawker-27568 Mon, 13 Dec 2004 17:26:13 EST Haber http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=27568&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Alexandra Wolfe, Always Daddy's Girl ]]> Today's Page Six reports that Tom Wolfe's daughter, 24 year-old Alexandra (or Charlotte Simmons, as most like to call her), has signed a deal with Broadway Books to pen American Coddle. The book is based on her Observer article about children being—you guessed it—coddled by their parents. If she gets this thing to the stands quickly enough, she may be the first non-fiction writer in history to compete with her own fictional alter-ego.
    We Hear [Page Six]

    ]]>
    Gawker-26882 Fri, 03 Dec 2004 16:00:28 EST Jessica http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=26882&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Stalking Tom Wolfe, Exclusively ]]> A Gawker manservant sends this delightfully obscure camera phone picture of novelist Tom Wolfe (indicated by "white suit"), taken at JFK airport last night:

    tomwolfejfk.jpg

    As Wolfe's bag was coming down the opposite side of one of the carousels, we're told he sort of pointed to this "normal-looking dude," and pointed at the bag. The "dude" then retrieved Wolfe's bag, but it looked as if the two men didn't actually know each other. It's like Tom Wolfe just controls the universe and we're all his little baggage puppets.

    ]]>
    Gawker-26209 Tue, 23 Nov 2004 09:42:28 EST Jessica http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=26209&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ David Brooks, Always The Bigger Man, Reviews Tom Wolfe ]]> Lest you think the Times Op-Ed page is devoid of fiction (guffaw!), columnist David Brooks deigns to review Tom Wolfe's latest novel, I Am Charlotte Simmons. In fact, he even tells us HOW to review Wolfe, just in case you want to do it yourself:

    First, out of the thousands of sociological details Wolfe gets right, you pick out some he gets wrong (thus establishing your superior hipness). You mention that he obsesses over the superficial details of life while you ignore his moral intent (thus hinting at your own superior depth). Then you graciously allow that many of Wolfe's scenes are hilarious, while lamenting that his characters are not fully developed.

    David Brooks, His Superior Hipness? Well, compared to a guy in spats, maybe.
    'Moral Suicide,' la Wolfe [NYT]

    ]]>
    Gawker-25749 Tue, 16 Nov 2004 09:40:58 EST Jessica http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=25749&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Gossip roundup ]]> Harvey and Bob Weinstein· A few celebrities walked out when the band played "God Bless America" at Miramax's Oscar pre-party. [Page Six]
    · Page Six on being disinvited to the Oscar parties: "It started to dawn on us reporters that we were like U.N. weapons inspectors. We knew the celebs were out there, but they were being moved around, out of sight." [Page Six]
    · Salma Hayek on eating: "Listen, don't think I don't eat. I always eat. If I'm happy, I eat; unhappy, I eat. If I'm nervous, I eat. Not nervous, I eat. I eat alot." [Cindy Adams]
    · Director John Waters thinks President Bush needs new writers: "I mean 'shock and awe?'...It sounds like one of my movies.'" [NY Daily News]
    · Tom Wolfe's next novel "about college life" will be published next year. Tina Brown had her booker call around town, looking for "hot war photographers" for her talk show after the war in Iraq began. [The Word]

    ]]>
    Gawker-11698 Mon, 24 Mar 2003 11:38:10 EST Gawker http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=11698&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ FAQs ]]> For the next few days or weeks or as long as I feel so inclined, I will be answering "Frequently Asked Questions" for those of you who may be new to Gawker. The first five are below. Submit new questions to editorial@gawker.com.

    1. Are you as shallow as you appear?
    Gawker is dedicated exclusively to frivolity and excess. I do, on occasion, stare into the existential abyss, ponder the nuances and shudders, and produce what some might refer to as "serious thoughts." You will never see these on Gawker.

    In truth, I aim to be much more shallow, and am very demanding of myself in this respect. Every morning I look in the mirror and ask myself, "Am I vapid enough?" "How can I learn to make people care less about others, and more about me?" And most importantly, "Can I really bring myself to wear an outfit that just screams 'middle-class tax bracket?'" Sometimes I find myself not really caring which book Nicky Hilton's reading or whether she's remembering to color inside the lines, and I feel momentarily guilty. Happily, a Xanax, a martini, and a couple of lines of moderate-quality coke seem an effective remedy.

    As I recently informed my publisher, I plan to learn how to be even more shallow very soon by infiltrating the Conde Nast cafeteria and conducting covert research. From a recent email to a neutral third party: "Conde double-agents have been teaching me the proper technique for effectively grinding a Manolo into the neck of an unwitting editorial assistant so that I can appropriately camouflage myself among the Vogue editors. I have spent the week spitting on poor people and scoffing at public transportation in preparation. In the course of the last month, I have also successfully expensed some $1.4 million to Si Newhouse. (No one seemed to notice. But I guess that's not terribly unusual.)"

    2. Admit it: you're just a bunch of social climbers.
    We're just a bunch of social climbers.

    3. What do you say to those who describe you as "solipsistic assholes"? (Not that this has actually happened.)
    We are, in fact, assholes, but I'd say we're no more solipsistic than the type of people who refer to us as "solipsistic assholes."

    4. Why are you so down on San Francisco?
    Because San Franciscans send us the most interesting hate mail. It's almost like they don't even realize we're joking!

    5. What can a bunch of people from Alabama (Elizabeth), Minnesota (Jason) and the UK/Hungary (Nick) know about New York?
    I think it's actually easier to write about Manhattan if you're an outsider. The absurdities, in particular, are much more apparent. The darker Manhattan-centric themes—class warfare as recreational sport; pathological status obsession; and the complete, total, and wholly unapologetic embrace of decadence—are much more fascinating to us. [Ed. note—We can spend entire minutes thinking about them.] The ironies of life in Manhattan hit you with all the subtlety of a two-ton sledgehammer to the back of the head. You find yourself inexplicably reveling in them and obsessively writing about them.

    If we had a recommended reading list, it would include Kurt Andersen and Graydon Carter's Spy Magazine circa 1988, Tom Wolfe's Bonfire of the Vanities, Jay McInerney's Bright Lights, Big City, possibly a little Bret Easton Ellis, Toby Young's How to Lose Friends and Alienate People, and more recently, Tina Brown's New York column. None of these people are from New York either.

    But enough with the sincerity. It's making me twitch. Next question?

    6. Don't you spellcheck anything?
    We have what's called "collective spellcheck." It involves you, the reader, emailing me and saying, "hey, you spelled that wrong." (Editor's a bit of a misnomer. I write everything and edit nothing.)

    Publications with "budgets" apparently have "copyeditors" that serve the same purpose. We were forced very early on to choose between the "copyeditor" and the "vacation bungalow in St. Bart's," and, well, you see our dilemma.

    7. What's in it for you?
    For Gawker in general: Invitations to better parties (to borrow from Brooklyn fashion entrepreneur Ken Courtney) and one day soon, a positive net income figure.

    For me: flattering fan mail, entertaining hate mail, a part-time paycheck, an outlet for mischievous impulses, and Conde Nast-wide peals of laughter (or a resounding "fuck you") if I ever send a resume or query letter to Vogue.

    Publisher Nick Denton explains his complex motives for starting Gawker: "Ehm...I thought it'd be a fun thing to do."

    8. What's the business model?
    Mostly ad sales, right now. Gawker's extremely cheap to run, because on the technical side, expenses are nominal, and on the Editorial side, you have me, and...well, me. And I'm not full-time. (If you click on Gawker during business hours and it hasn't updated in an hour or two, it's probably because I'm out hustling for freelance assignments from the two or three publications we don't routinely and compulsively mock.)

    We briefly considered acquiring AOL, but how stupid would that be?

    9. Hell or San Francisco?
    Hell. Obviously.

    10. No one wants to hear about Tina Brown/Page Six/Craig's List, you idiots!
    Yes, they do. For every email we idiots get that says "No more Tina! No more Page Six!", we're getting much more feedback indicating that people like it. If it were, in fact, true that no one wanted to hear about it, we'd probably take it off the site. (Reader abuse is never intentionally part of the program.)

    On some larger existential level, we, too, find it mildly disturbing that people are actually interested in Paris Hilton's reading habits. But apparently they are. This is the culture in which we live...oooh, let's not think about it too much.

    11. How come I've never heard of you?
    Gawker's only been in existence since Mid-December of 2002. Prior to Gawker, I was working in finance and Nick was a technology entrepreneur. (Truth be told, Nick's still a technology entrepreneur *cough* media investor.)

    Thus the wide-eyed enthusiasm for this strange new celebrity/media culture.

    I, for example, had no idea who Bonnie Fuller was four months ago. Paris Hilton was but a hotel in France! (I'm still a bit confused, but it's only partially because I don't know what I'm doing.)

    If it makes you feel any better, we've probably never heard of you either.

    ]]>
    Gawker-10082 Tue, 12 Mar 2002 05:01:33 EST Gawker http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=10082&view=rss&microfeed=true