<![CDATA[Gawker: truth]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: truth]]> http://gawker.com/tag/truth http://gawker.com/tag/truth <![CDATA[ La Scala To Stage <i>An Inconvenient Truth</i> ]]> The Italian opera house is adapting Al Gore's film. Please suggest lines for the libretto below. [Breitbart]

]]>
Thu, 29 May 2008 13:18:11 EDT Nick Douglas http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=394015&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Mocking Fox News "Seemed like a good idea at the time." ]]> seemedlike.jpegRich Jernstedt, the chief marketing officer of the massive PR firm Fleishman-Hillard, emails us to explain why, exactly, someone at his firm had the bright idea of mocking Fox News as a nasty, bedbug-infested den of disease, and offering Fox guests a free de-lousing in order to get publicity for a pest control client. Rich, Rich, you don't understand: we're with you on this one. Fox News is a nasty, bedbug-infested den of disease. And we like to see a PR firm uncharacteristically attack a powerful media outlet. We're hoping for a full-on war here! But, reading between the lines of Rich's email, it sounds like Fleishman has done some serious groveling since its CEO got mocked by Fox on-air in retaliation last week. His full email about "our friends at FOX," below:

Hamilton,

It seemed like a good idea at the time. Sometimes the commitment to generate publicity can get an agency in trouble. As you noted in your post, one of our more aggressive marcom specialists at Fleishman-Hillard developed a news release for a client that made light of the FOX News green room. Understandably, the folks at FOX didn't appreciate it. One of our strengths is maintaining good relationships with major media like FOX. We talked with our friends at FOX, and also made a note to our file on how to avoid these situations in the future.

Rich Jernstedt
CMO
Fleishman-Hillard

]]>
Tue, 06 May 2008 11:39:35 EDT Hamilton Nolan http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=387602&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Smoke And Have Your Fingers Hacked Off ]]> amputee.jpegThe City of New York has always run anti-smoking ads that are pretty great, in the sense that they're disgusting and make smokers jump up and change channels as quickly as possible. The city's newest campaign features "Marie," a 58 year-old who has smoked for 40 years, even as bits of her body were constantly being amputated because of her poor circulation [NY Sun]. This could backfire, though, because it just makes it easy to say "I'll stop after my first amputation." The ad is below—I particularly admire how they slipped in a picture of a bone saw. Something to think about on my smoke break.

]]>
Thu, 17 Apr 2008 12:48:16 EDT Hamilton Nolan http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=380983&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Bad 'Moment Of Truth' Lady: "The Heart Wants What It Wants" ]]> m.o.t3.jpegRemember Lauren Cleri, the original terrible "Moment of Truth" contestant who sold out her husband and her marriage on live TV, only to walk away with no money at all? Well FOX has helpfully put a brand new update interview with her on YouTube. Seems she's having some relationship troubles now! Her husband is hurting. She's hurting. Everybody's hurting! But you know what? This experience has helped make her the strong woman that she is today. What hasn't gotten stronger, though: her sense of judgment, for doing this updated interview in the first place. The full video is after the jump.

]]>
Fri, 04 Apr 2008 13:26:01 EDT Hamilton Nolan http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=376239&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ No One Is Free When Nike Is Oppressed ]]> nikedunk.jpegDo you know what defines what it means to "be true?" That's right, Nike Dunks! Not only that, but that particular shoe "HAS BECOME AN ICON OF self-expression and a symbol of DEMOCRATIC STYLE." The Revolution is Basketball! Freedom is slavery! It's a Brave New World! Nike Dunks were introduced in 1985—if it had been 1984, people might be inclined to make jokes about its dystopian advertising rhetoric. Below, a full look at the amazingly dramatic prose on a flier promoting what is just a Nike-sponsored photography show, "in the spirit of the shoe that inspires those who dare to be different." [Hypebeast]. I'd hate to see them if they really get worked up.

nike.jpeg

]]>
Tue, 25 Mar 2008 17:56:17 EDT Hamilton Nolan http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=372133&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ The Media Wants You Fat And Broke! ]]> fitness.jpegFirst, the media implants an unattainable idea in our heads about what a human body should look like. Then, on top of that, popular publications give confusing advice about how to achieve that impossibly cut look! In the last couple of days, the lying liberal media has published several articles on various fitness techniques. You don't need to read any of them, because we're about to round them all up and drop some serious knowledge on you about the phony, media-driven fitness fantasy. After the jump, how to save money and kick ass in this shallow, workout-obsessed world.

Let's examine three fitness programs profiled in the last two days:

1. Crossfit, via the NYT—CrossFit is an internet-based cult of fitness for psychos, itinerant preachers, ex-killers, and crazy people of all stripes. I have met some people who do CrossFit, and they are scarily in shape and also not at all fun to be around. All you have to do is complete the psycho workout routine posted online every day. Sample, from Friday:

For time:
15 Handstand push-ups
1 L Pull-up
13 Handstand push-ups
3 L Pull-ups
11 Handstand push-ups
5 L Pull-ups
9 Handstand push-ups
7 L Pull-ups
7 Handstand push-ups
9 L Pull-ups
5 Handstand push-ups
11 L Pull-ups
3 Handstand push-ups
13 L Pull-ups
1 Handstand push-up
15 L Pull-ups

Post time to comments.

Seriously, just forget CrossFit. It will make you insane.

2. Gyrotonics, via the NY Sun—Gyrotonics is based on a huge, complicated machine that is specially designed to extract money from the wallets of idly rich women. It looks like this:

gyrotonics.jpeg

The hustle is that you have to go to some particular specialist on this particular machine to help you unlock its magical potential, while you pay them handsomely for their secret knowledge. Here's another idea: grab a towel, pull it till your shoulders feel stretched out, then go run stairs until you're in shape. Fuck gyrotonics.

3. "Hollywood's Dirty Diet Secrets," via the NYDN—finally, something real. Also, sick. Did you know Hollywood starlets go on crazy crash diets which consist mostly of smoking, drinking coffee, and doing coke, supplemented only by lettuce or boiled eggs or lemonade or something equally ridiculous? Yes, you probably did know that. Combining laxative tea with fasting and five-hour daily workouts reportedly produces some real results. The downside is that you will be totally dead pretty quick. But yes, you will leave a pretty corpse.

What does it really take to get fit? Nothing more than an iron will, the Eye of the Tiger, buckets of sweat, hours of pain, days of hope, years of conquest, and THIS:

supersquats.jpeg

]]>
Mon, 24 Mar 2008 12:51:49 EDT Hamilton Nolan http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=371415&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ We Are All Complicit In 'Moment Of Truth' ]]> M.o.t.jpegSo, anybody catch last night's episode of Fox's show, "You're A Dirty Whore, Aren't You?" Okay, I see here the formal title is "Moment of Truth." Last night, a blonde, curly-haired hostess/ model from New York hit the trifecta by insulting her mother, insulting her friend, and proving herself to be a dirty, bad girl. Whoa, Fox was just as outraged as you were! Why is it so hard to find clean-living people for these reality shows? In perfect form, the guest proved that both her current and former boyfriend are smug assholes (simply by allowing them to show their faces), and then proceeded to confidently continue to sell her honor past the point of no return. And how much money did she walk away with in exchange? The highlight clip is below. This show makes my soul feel weird.

]]>
Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:03:19 EDT Hamilton Nolan http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=370400&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Investigative Team Digs Up Motivation For Being TV Jerk ]]> m.o.t.jpegThe New York Post this morning puts a total of four reporters on the trail of Lauren Cleri, the bad woman who ruined her husband's life on national television this week by revealing her cheating heart on the Fox show "Moment of Truth." She wasn't that hard to track down, but you need some support in touch and go reporting situations like this. The stunning headline: WIFE: I DID IT FOR THE TV MONEY [NYP]. She's still telling the truth, at least. Cleri said she was surprised at the attention the couple's meltdown in front of 8 million viewers got, because she didn't think they were "going to stand out." Well then. It's hard for her too, you know; a message on her MySpace page (below) trumpets the depth of her despair.

clerimyspace.jpeg

]]>
Wed, 27 Feb 2008 09:11:25 EST Hamilton Nolan http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=361277&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Bad Lady Is Not A Good Person After All ]]> m.o.t.jpegDon't know if anybody caught Fox's new honesty-promoting reality show "Moment of Truth" last night, but if you did, you may still feel a bit dirty. They should go ahead and rename it, "Destroy All You Hold Dear In Exchange For Thousands of Dollars, Then Be Crushed In A Stunning Twist For Our Collective National Amusement." Yea, that's better. In the clip below, our heroine, having already broken her husband's heart with her painful true answers about her lack of love for him, receives her ironic comeuppance. This show would only be justifiable if they put, say, Rupert Murdoch in the chair.

]]>
Tue, 26 Feb 2008 17:07:03 EST Hamilton Nolan http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=361090&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Accurate Descriptions ]]> "Our prayers are with the families of those injured in this tragic incident," said Ronn Torossian, a spokesman for the "Girls Gone Wild" flasher-video franchise. [Boston Herald]

]]>
Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:39:41 EST Hamilton Nolan http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=361032&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Celeb-verity ]]> Fox's monstrous tell-the-truth-for-sweet-sweet-cash game show, Moment of Truth, has apparently been attracting some interest from "celebrities" like Roger Clemens and suspected murderer Drew Peterson. Juicers and murderers. Mission accomplished, Fox. May we suggest Mary-Kate Olsen? [Vulture]

]]>
Wed, 30 Jan 2008 17:06:39 EST Richard Lawson http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=350836&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ We Can Handle The Truth ]]> you-cant-handle-the-truth.jpgMoment of Truth, that hideous new game show that precariously rewards people for telling the truth about their embarrassing lives, seems to be a hit. Fox is reporting the highest retention rate of any post-Idol show ever; 94 percent to be exact, for a total of 23.2 million viewers. Mike Darnell, president of Fox's ominously titled "alternative entertainment", is quoted as saying "What I care about is it is causing a dialogue about telling the truth." Ah yes. No better grease for the gears of public discourse than a rabid public watching someone shame themselves for the promise of money. [AP]

]]>
Fri, 25 Jan 2008 10:31:45 EST Richard Lawson http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=348957&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Magic Hair's Big Break ]]> Remember those old, seemingly ubiquitous ads for the Hair Club for Men with the guy who wasn't just the president, he was also a client? Of course you do, they were everywhere. Then, they just kind of disappeared. The anti-balding industry had faded. Until now! Last night an only slightly apologetic contestant on Fox's Moment of Truth admitted to being a member of the Club. I could never have guessed from the the big, bushy pine cone sitting atop his forehead. This morning "Hair Club for Men" is one of the hottest searches on Google. Also, the New York Times ran a story today about the recent upsurge of that other bald dude juggernaut, Rogaine. Their new success is mostly due to some sort of icky foam. Here we have an ad for the product which, for the first time ever, the Times reports, is being directly marketed to gay men. Well, on the Logo channel. So about twelve gay men. Maybe the Hair Club for Men is doing the same thing, because that guy? On the show last night? Uh, let's just say that if he gets to the $500,000 question next episode, it just might start with "A" and end with "re you a homosexual?" Awkward! But with beautiful hair!

]]>
Thu, 24 Jan 2008 11:25:00 EST Richard Lawson http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=348496&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ The Devolution Will Be Televised ]]> Mark L. Wahlberg, host of other proud and noble Fox shows Joe Millionaire and Temptation Island, is now our emcee for Moment of Truth, a "game show" that Entertainment Weekly calls "Genius" (or, maybe not). Tonight was the grand premiere. It's pretty much the nadir of the contemporary challenge show, which began so innocently with Regis Philbin shouting at poor, trivia-spouting office assistants. Contestants are asked to answer a series of horribly awkward questions (Would you have your wife get lipo if she got fat? Are you a gambling addict?) while three friends, lovers, or family members watch on in sweaty, money-craving horror. Are they telling the truth? Are they lying? Only predetermined lie detector test results will tell. The longer you tell the truth, the more you win. Watch here as Ty, a former professional football player and current personal trainer who has already admitted to checking out other dudes' "privates", takes the plunge, much to the chagrin of wife Catia. He leaves with nothing. Not even his dignity, which he traded in not at the door, but at some indefinable date years ago, when all of us gurgling Americans threw up our hands and said "Fuck it, gimme some cash."

]]>
Wed, 23 Jan 2008 22:19:12 EST Richard Lawson http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=348321&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Breaking: Actors Just Pretending ]]> mcbrayer_jack.jpg One of Gawker's i-Stalkers spotted 30 Rock's Jack McBrayer out of character.

Saw Jack McBrayer sitting outside at the Bone Lick Park barbecue joint at Greenwich and 7th Avenues, looking way hotter than he does on 30 Rock. Sporting a thick head of au natural, gel-free hair and a kinda sexy just-got-back-from-a-relaxing-tropical-vacation tan. Was with some bearded hipster guy chowing down lunch. I was looking at him like "I know that guy from somewhere" when we made eye contact before I realized, "Hey, that's Kenneth?! He's not even dorky!" He looks like a nice guy.

]]>
Wed, 09 Jan 2008 12:49:49 EST Valerie Flame http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=342780&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ 'New York Times' Rolling Out Moderated Comments On Articles ]]> The New York Times is now carefully allowing comments on some articles, not just blog posts. According to an in-house email from NYT.com general manager Vivian Schiller and deputy managing editor Jonathan Landman, "This week we rolled out some new technology for commentary on articles. It's more discriminating than the blog-comment platform and it gives readers more control. For instance, readers can recommend comments and view them in rank order starting with the ones with the most recommendations. Editors can choose an interesting selection for readers with time to read just a few.... You'll notice that we're only putting comments on a handful of articles at first. That's because we're still building our moderation force and the tools for automated moderation. There are some important features built into the system that you can't see and that we're not using yet. For example, producers and editors will be able to designate certain users as 'trusted,' potentially allowing some comments to bypass moderation. We're excited about the chance to experiment."

]]>
Fri, 02 Nov 2007 09:20:31 EDT Choire http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=318126&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ The Problem With "Brooklyn Principles" And "Brooklyn Books Of Wonder" ]]> kunk. There's a totally insane assault on Brooklyn writers—yes, nearly all of them! Jonathan Safran Foer and Nicole Krauss and even the Brooklyn writers who actually live in Manhattan, such as Ben Kunkel—in the Autumn issue of the American Scholar. It's notable for the sheer intensity of its hatred.

"Brooklyn principles can be found anywhere that young people gather to share their search for love and meaning, a search that they alone are qualified to pursue by virtue of their pristine vision of the deep oneness of things. Whereas physical danger or emotional grief leaves most people lonely or ruined or dead, they triumph over adversity.... [The resulting books are] kitsch, which Milan Kundera defined as 'the translation of the stupidity of received ideas into the language of beauty and feeling [that] moves us to tears of compassion for ourselves, for the banality of what we think and feel.'"

The one problem with Brooklyn writers that goes unmentioned is that they discard all criticisms. In the land of emotional truth, who can be wrong? So while history may prove this essay on-target, it's a bit like the crazy lady muttering in the food co-op—everyone can hear her but oh my God isn't all that organic home-grown kale just so special and amazing?

Wonder Bread [American Scholar, via]

]]>
Wed, 19 Sep 2007 12:30:59 EDT Choire http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=301201&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ "Make It A 3-Some Relationship! People Do It Every Day." ]]> asktionna.jpgNeed help getting your head right? Hood psychologist Tionna Smalls is here to answer your questions. Ask Tionna! This week: a two-fer!

Dear Tionna,

I'm a lesbian. I've been dating this girl Suzanne on and off for close to three years. She's absolutely wonderful, possesses all the characteristics you'd desire in someone you want to be with long-term. I'm in love with her. Recently during an "off" period she got drunk and slept with a girl she'd been wanting to sleep with for a long time, who happens to be my ex-girlfriend Molly. Worse, Suzanne didn't tell me; I found out a few weeks after it happened from Molly. When I confronted Suzanne about it she said that she didn't want to tell me because it didn't mean anything. Suzanne and Molly work near each other, and whenever I go to pick up Suzanne from work we run into Molly. I want to punch Suzanne in the face because I feel so betrayed, since I would not even have known had Molly not told me! However, Suzanne insists it was a stupid one-time thing. I love her very much but I just can't bear the idea of Suzanne and Molly together.

Crying in Clinton Hill

Dear Crying in Clinton Hill,

First off, dry those tears! Tionna is here to help you. What Suzanne did was maddd wack. She broke the code; she messed with your ex girl. You said that this was someone that she wanted to get down and dirty with and you knew that. I have learned in my past with heavy drinkers that a drunk tongue speaks the truth, so her sleeping with Molly is something that she wanted to do and she did it.

I will give Suzanne some credit: she did admit that she cheated once she was busted. Most people don't! And Molly only told you because she's a hater and mad that you have moved on with your life and have someone new that you love and adore. Like you said, a person with the "characteristics."

Molly isn't really a threat. However, she can turn into one based on the fact that she works near Suzanne. But I think if you think Suzanne really has a thing for Molly and you still want Suzanne ... Do what my friend D did: Make it a 3-some relationship! People do it every day. They live in a relationship with three people. I am so serious and it works for them. Then you won't have to be stressed because you know everything. Think about it like this- you had sex with Molly, you had sex with Suzanne, Suzanne had sex with you, Suzanne had sex with Molly, Molly had sex with you, Molly had sex with Suzanne. Hell, y'all a team already and dont even know it. So why not reap the benefits of having two women since Molly is always around anyway.

But if you don't want anything to do with Molly at all in that way or can't face seeing them two being intimate around you, then end all ties with Molly and ask Suzanne to make a choice. I know it will hurt if she picks Molly over you but at least you will know what's up. See what happens. But I still think the triad thing would be a great idea.

Ooh, definitely let me know how this goes.

Tionna



Tionna,

I'm in a big problem. I've been seeing this guy for the past year; now it hasn't been the best of relationships but I've become emotionally attached and there are times i just want to walk away. I haven't met any of his close friends/family or really know that much about him. I've spend almost every night with him and in the past I've snooped ... YES ... I snooped and found e-mails/myspace messages and texts all that allude to the fact that he maybe cheated on me if not physically then definitely verbally. He has a Myspace and never approves any of my comments and hides his friends so i can't see them. Aside from that the relationship hasn't been that great. He stays home all of the time when he's not working and never goes out with me. Granted I haven't been with anyone else but I have gone out with other guys when he is to lazy and stays home. So you're probably wondering why I'm still with him. I guess i am too. Overall, he is a sweet guy and cares for me but he doesn't wear his heart on his sleeve.

So this past weekend I ran into his friends and of course they do not know me but through the power of Myspace i know who they are and what they look like. I told my b/f they were there and hitting on me...but i never once told them who i was since the b/f wouldn't like that so i remained a mystery. Meanwhile his good friend—a very hot friend—was hitting on me nonstop. I forgot what it was like to have some guy hit on me even if he just wanted to get in my panties. Oh I forgot to mention i was with a guy friend of mine who apparently liked me more than just a friend. So the guy (the friend of my b/f) asked for my number but I didn't give it to him instead I took his and danced the night away with him. Tionna, all I keep thinking about is this dude and i know it's wrong and I'm not that slutty girl that breaks up friendships or any of that but i think I'm fascinated with something NEW and EXCITING and I'm tempted every day to just pick up the phone and call him.

Please help..what would you do?

ttyl - LP


Dear LP,

Your problem really isn't a big problem but many women go through these same issues. First, you never met any of his family or close friends, then you snooped into his email/Myspace (a no-no), then you assumed that he has cheated on you based on your snooping. LMAO.

First off, let be the first to tell you that Myspace is a relationship killer. When I was a freshman in college, I took a class on Internet and Identity and you know what the whole thesis of the class was that people's identities change when their real one is shielded by the computer. So what you may think is "cheating" is what we call in the hood "Myspace G." That is G meaning game. Everyone on Myspace plays a game. That's why so many people love it. You can be whatever you want on Myspace; a baller, a single guy, a singer, whatever. Its all game so don't assume he's cheating on you from that bullcrap.

Another thing is, theres no such thing as verbal cheating. Verbally, we can say what the hell we want. That doesn't mean that we mean it. If he's online telling some chick yeah, we gotta hook up or whatever, that doesn't mean anything. I have over 4,000 friends on Myspace and get plenty of messages of men saying what they would and wouldn't do to me because I can't do anything to them, they don't know my ass. So who cares? That's how people think. If talking was a sin, we would all be in hell right now—feel me?

So don't use that against him and stop snooping! That is corny and we always end up being the ones hurt by that (I have learned that the hard way) and now it's something you can pass along to someone else.

Lastly, your man forgot that what he doesn't do another man will be happy and willing to do in a hot NY minute. But you can't teach him that by taking his friend's number on the low. All that does is make you seem like a skeet and maybe that's why he didn't want to introduce you to his friends in the first place. Communication is the key in any relationship, so go and talk it out with him. Put everything on the table and if his response doesn't bring closure to the problem, leave his laid back ass alone.

Good luck and keep in touch,

Tionna

Come on, just ask her!

]]>
Tue, 18 Sep 2007 18:02:04 EDT Tionna http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=300964&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Fuck The Bullshit, It's Time To Throw James Frey Down ]]> frey"James Frey is a liar. His best-selling memoir, A Million Little Pieces, is a fraud. It is a seamless mass of falsehoods, told deliberately, for the purpose of making money." Back when Tom Scocca wrote those words in the Observer last January, it was nearly impossible to imagine the disgraced memoirist would ever sell another book to a major U.S. publisher. Sure, he'd have little tossed-off pieces in magazines every once in a while, or maybe he'd go back to writing screenplays. Hollywood doesn't care about this kind of thing! But the idea that Frey would sell what amounts to his third novel, for more than a million dollars, to Harper's Jonathan Burnham, seemed as unlikely as, say, Ron Goldman's family pimping a book by O.J. Simpson. And then it happened. A lot of things happen that shouldn't.

I bought Frey's book, before The Smoking Gun debunked so much of it, and I liked it. I'm a sucker for confessions. (Hey, even Gawker loved him on first sight, back in January of 2003.) I love writers who specialize in wide-open honesty; it's sort of my favorite thing, actually. My favorite writers—Kathy Acker, Eileen Myles, Jonathan Ames, David Sedaris, Cookie Mueller, Sylvia Plath, Colette, Mary Gaitskill, Phoebe Gloeckner, Aline Kominsky-Crumb, Dawn Powell—are all expert confessors.

Oh, and here are the people whose confessions generally rub me the wrong way: Chuck Klosterman, Neal Pollack, Nick Hornby, Steve Almond, Julie Powell, Elizabeth Gilbert, Stephanie Klein. The people whose confessions often reek of bragging, even when—especially when—the bragging is along the lines of "look how disgusting/uncool/modest/bad at relationships I am." Or: "look at what a lame person I used to be."

But I liked A Million Little Pieces specifically because James Frey seemed to eschew that kind of self-mythologizing. There was something about the book that just felt... honest. True. Which means, I guess, that Frey is a very talented writer? Or maybe just a very, very talented liar.

Frey didn't just pull an Augusten Burroughs—it's not like the lies were "discrepancies" attributable to "we all have our own personal truths," though he did use nearly that exact lame line. He blatantly wrote about factual things that never occurred as if they'd happened to him, and in doing so, made his readers feel sympathy and vicarious pain. He toyed with our emotions, and when we found out we'd been lied to, we felt betrayed. I did, at least—and, hey, Oprah did! And everyone who said, "well, it's still a really well-written book" seriously has something wrong with them.

But apparently it's a big so-what. Our culture isn't into consequences. Shame is the new fame. What yesterday's news means is that James Frey's career will continue, and as it does, the story of the fraud he perpetrated on four million readers will drift further and further down the page in any profile written about him, until it's in the last paragraph, until it's in the last line, until it's not there at all.

George Saunders, in an essay about how reading Johnny Tremain changed his life, wrote:

Working with language is a means by which we can identify the bullshit within ourselves (and others). If we learn what a truthful sentence looks like, a little flag goes up at a false one. False prose can mark an attempt to evade responsibility, or something more diabolical; the process of improving our prose disciplines the mind, hones the logic, and most importantly, tells us what we really think.
I wish James Frey believed in this dictum, but the fact that he lied to Motoko Rich yesterday about something as basic as whether he'd ever written a short story—not to mention his utter lack of real contrition on Oprah and, well, anyplace when the news of his deception originally broke, as well as his perpetual victim act—says that: No. He still doesn't get it. And neither do people like Jonathan Burnham or Frey's agent, Eric Simonoff, who are happy to profit off all of this.

You know that Miss Teen USA contestant Lauren Caitlin Upton, the one who gave a retarded answer to a stupid question and became an instant YouTube sensation? Last week, the wire services were full of pictures of her, going to fashion shows and parties. She's famous now. In a few more weeks, no one will remember what she originally became famous for. They'll only know that they know her name.


]]>
Thu, 13 Sep 2007 18:02:55 EDT Emily Gould http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=299606&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Is The New Bret Easton Ellis Movie About Judith Regan? ]]> judith.jpg"Frog King," Adam Davies' 2002 debut novel—a roman a clef about book publishing—didn't make much of a splash when it first hit bookstores. But in 2004, Intermedia optioned Bret Easton Ellis's adaptation of the book, with Asif Kapadia to direct. Now, the script is floating around town, and people are noticing the remarkable similarities a certain character in it bears to a famous recently-deposed publishing tyrant. We got our hands on a copy, and, lookie here: She's a sexually rapacious evil bitch goddess and her name is "Judith Nathan."

HARRY: You're the head of this hugely successful publishing house ... how could you miss little me?

JUDITH:
You're adorable and the older men in this city are cretins.

HARRY:
What about Isaac Hirsch?

JUDITH:
He's dead, Harry.

HARRY:
That's ... heartbreaking.

JUDITH: (FLIRTY)
Are you making fun of me? Don't make fun of me, Harry.

HARRY:
I'm amusing you, Judith. Isn't that what I do? Amuse you?

JUDITH: (STANDING TOO CLOSE)
When am I gonna see you again?

HARRY: (HESITANT)
Soon. I promise. This week.

JUDITH:
How about tomorrow night? You wanna amuse me tomorrow night?

JUDITH touches HARRY'S dick through his pants.

HARRY: (TIGHT, LITTLE VOICE)
Tomorrow night sounds great.

JUDITH smiles, quickly baring her teeth, then turns away.

Dunno, do you think it's supposed to be Judith Regan? It's possible, I guess.

]]>
Tue, 04 Sep 2007 16:20:06 EDT Emily Gould http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=296321&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Lance Bass And 'New York' In Spatty Meowfest ]]> For a brief glimpse of a moment last week we genuinely liked Lance Bass. He'd just given an interview with New York mag's party hobbit Jada Yuan in which he A) bitched accurately about the NY real estate market B) dissed astutely Justin Timberlake's new restaurant and C) copped admirably to being the worst dancer in 'N Sync. "I've been a few times," he said about Southern Hospitality. "But it's really up there. The Upper East Side? I'm not in college anymore." Now Bass claims that he said no such things and he's demanding a retraction.

Writing on his MySpace blog, the catty Bass writes, "This dumb reporter just put words in my mouth..." Now you think he'd be used to things being put in his mouth (ZING!) but he's pretty steamed. He also offers persuasive proof that he never said those things that she said he said.

I told her I eat at Justins new place all the time, but it is really far away in the upper east side and always full of a college crowd. She turned that into " Lance doesnt go to Justins restaurant cause its too far away and he doesnt like it because he is not in college anymore!" Um.. I didnt go to college, why the hell would I say that!

This girl should be working for the Enquirer instead of a legit magazine!

Don't worry, Bassy—she's not!


Update:: New York magazine responds.

(1) We stand by the interview; Bass was not misquoted. (2) Bass is not quoted as saying New Yorkers have no style — it's clear that he's referring to the apartments he looked at. (3) The piece also does not suggest that Bass doesn't hang out at Justin Timberlake's restaurant. In fact, it specifically quotes him as saying he goes there. (4) Though Bass's quote about his dancing ability ("I was the worst dancer in the band") has not been called into question, we'd like to reiterate that Bass was, indeed, the worst dancer in 'N Sync. (5) Bass now says he's going bi-coastal; he never mentioned that to us, but we're glad to hear it! Welcome to New York, Lance.
Meowkay! ]]>
Tue, 28 Aug 2007 14:40:09 EDT Joshua Stein http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=294286&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Metro's humor columnist Elliott Kalan fired ... ]]> Metro's humor columnist Elliott Kalan fired for admitting that the only way to get people to read the paper is to shove it into their unsuspecting hands as they fumble for their MetroCard. [NYM]

]]>
Mon, 13 Aug 2007 10:00:23 EDT abalk http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=288683&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Lindsay Lohan, Victim ]]>
"Entertainment Tonight" correspondent Gina Glickman (billed as a "Lohan family insider") blows the lid off a conspiracy so wide-reaching that it may never fully be uncovered. That's right, someone was out to get Lindsay Lohan, who "didn't even know whose clothes she was wearing" when she was arrested for DUI. Here's the whole shocking tale.

]]>
Thu, 26 Jul 2007 10:40:16 EDT abalk http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=282746&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ "I grabbed a pad from under my sink and unwrapped ... ]]> menstrual.jpg"I grabbed a pad from under my sink and unwrapped it. I looked down on the little tab attached to the wings and noticed the message printed on it. "Have a happy period." FUCK YOU, I thought. Who the fuck has happy periods? No one. Periods only make you happy if you've been irresponsible that month. And that joy only lasts like 1.5 seconds of the 5 - 7 days you have to deal with it." [One D]

]]>
Thu, 12 Jul 2007 10:30:29 EDT Emily Gould http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=277658&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ What Color Is Schnabel's Hot Pink Building Really? ]]> So Julian Schnabel's bright pink building—what color is that anyway, eh? And is that a leading question? Do we care? Where is Cuba? What is Cuba? These are the questions raised by the Villager regarding the hue of Schnabel's West Village crazy-house.

Schnabel called the building's color "Pompeii red...." [Schnabel's partner Brian] Kelly dubbed the building's color "dusty rose"—then later said Schnabel is describing it as "Venetian red." Or! "It's straight out of Cuba, or Venice, or Florence," Kelly said of the building's design and color. "Venice mostly—it's Venetian. There's buildings like this in Naples, in Palermo, Sicily. If you go to Cuba, you see buildings like this."
Eh, Cuba, Venice, Pompeii, Red, Pink, whatever. Same difference. We were going to go for Hustler Pink but then realized that Hustler Pink is the same thing as Dusty Rose which, we guess, is why there are so many strippers named Dusty Rose.

Venetian Red or Pepto Pink? [The Villager]

]]>
Mon, 09 Jul 2007 17:40:46 EDT Joshua Stein http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=276331&view=rss&microfeed=true