• Profile logout login

#twitter#brosinccompanyhistoryhtml

Gawker

Share Cancel
   
Upload an image | Add an image URL
×

logging in
  • FAQ. Include # before tag:
  • #tips,
  • #stalker,
  • #opencaption,
  • #internalmemos,
  • etc.

New York, 11:12 PM
Thu Dec 10
60 posts in the last 24 hours

Team

Tip Your Editors:

Tipline: 646-214-8138

Editor-in-Chief:
Gabriel Snyder |

West Coast Editor:
Richard Rushfield |

Contributing Editors:

Valleywag:
Ryan Tate |

Media:
Hamilton Nolan |

Politics:
Alex Pareene |

Investigations:
John Cook |

Entertainment:
Brian Moylan |

Nights:
Adrian Chen |
Azaria Jagger |
Ravi Somaiya |

Weekends:
Foster Kamer |

Video Editor:
Richard Blakeley |

SUBSCRIBE TO Gawker RSS

New: Breaking news and daily top stories via email
4260 Subscribers
Gawker
  • Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.

    Dsmvwl  Admin  Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×
    Image of Valerie Flame Valerie Flame
    08:18 AM

    In reply to Facebook Begins 'Privacy' Con
    Am I reading this wrong or are they forcing people to be searchable? Some people don't want to be found by others. At all.

    But go to that page where you used to be able to choose who searches for you an you get:

    "Your privacy settings are secured for your protection."
    with a lock box. How is putting your info out there against your will "for your protection"? What if you have an abusive ex who will now find you?
     Reply
    Valerie Flame was starred Valerie Flame was unstarred
    Image of MaelstromInTheMiddle MaelstromInTheMiddle
    06:31 AM

    In reply to Facebook Begins 'Privacy' Con
    You have to enter your password to even alter the new default settings. There are also multiple pages in which you'll have to visit to get all your original settings back, ei. all your profile pictures will be viewable to everyone unless you specifically go into a second screen and change that back as well. You also have to go into the Settings tab and change each item, posts, links, notes, photos, etc, that you post back to only friends, as it's been defaulted to everyone. Also, there is no way now to keep your profile completely viewable by only friends, as the option of who can add you as a friend only has two choices everyone and friends of friends. I used to be able to completely hide my entire profile so that only friends could see it, and if I friended someone, I had to add them because no one else could see my profile. That layer of protection is now no longer an option.
     Reply
    MaelstromInTheMiddle was starred MaelstromInTheMiddle was unstarred
    Image of Schm Schm
    04:41 AM

    In reply to Facebook Begins 'Privacy' Con
    It also looks like they altered the profile picture album privacy settings - I logged on tonight and realized that I was suddenly able to see a non-friend's profile picture album. So then I just started randomly clicking on strangers, and everyone's albums were viewable. I checked my privacy settings and sure enough, my profile photo album settings were set to "everyone". Some shiesty shit right there.
    I'm not one of those people who throws a big hissy fit whenever they make changes, but damn. If they're gonna be going around quietly fucking with everyone's privacy settings, I might have to deactivate again.
     Reply
    Edited by Schm at 12/10/09 4:42 AM Schm was starred Schm was unstarred
    Image of Swifter Swifter
    12/09/09

    In reply to Facebook Begins 'Privacy' Con
    Asking you questions you don't want to have to answer about content no one cares about.

    Isn't this the entire premise of NonSociety?
     Reply
    Swifter was starred Swifter was unstarred
    Image of Varnsen Varnsen
    12/09/09

    @Swifter: I think this is the premise of ordering at Subway.
     Reply
    Swifter promoted this comment Varnsen was starred Varnsen was unstarred
    Image of TheUptightMidwesterner TheUptightMidwesterner
    12/09/09

    In reply to Facebook Begins 'Privacy' Con
    Neither Facebook nor Twitter can be of any relevance to me because my work blocked them from the server.I need to just live without...
     Reply
    Edited by TheUptightMidwesterner at 12/09/09 8:49 PM TheUptightMidwesterner was starred TheUptightMidwesterner was unstarred
    Image of Uncle_Billy_Slumming Uncle_Billy_Slumming
    12/09/09

    In reply to Facebook Begins 'Privacy' Con
    I like the cut of your jib, Tate.
     Reply
    Uncle_Billy_Slumming was starred Uncle_Billy_Slumming was unstarred
    Image of Valerie Flame Valerie Flame
    12/09/09

    In reply to The Laziest Journalists on Twitter
    So what. The worst thing about this is it tips off competitors to what you're working on. The second worst is that someone will try to pull one over on you, and that NEVER happens in journalism. The best thing is you can reach a ton of potential sources or people who know a lot more than you about what you're writing about in, oh, about less time than it took me to write this comment. It's better than pissing in a closed pool of sources by e-mailing just your friends and asking them or e-mailing a journalism undergraduate listserv.
     Reply
    Valerie Flame was starred Valerie Flame was unstarred
    Image of raincoaster raincoaster
    12/08/09

    In reply to The Laziest Journalists on Twitter
    J*l*a is down to interviewing her acupuncture guy??? And I thought I had trouble getting my calls returned!
     Reply
    raincoaster was starred raincoaster was unstarred
    Image of OnBackground OnBackground
    12/08/09

    In reply to The Laziest Journalists on Twitter
    Looking through the microfiche to find the "Laziest Journalists on Profnet" listicle from 1999 . . . .
     Reply
    Edited by OnBackground at 12/08/09 12:38 PM OnBackground was starred OnBackground was unstarred
    Image of PrincessKashmir PrincessKashmir
    12/08/09

    In reply to The Laziest Journalists on Twitter
    Ryan, come on. "Journalist" is not a synonym for "columnist"; you must be aware of this.

    Julia Allison (btw, Baugher is her last name, not Allison) writes opinion pieces, not articles involving research or interviews with actual human beings. Just because she has been paid to write a series of words in a weekly newsmagazine does not mean she is a journalist. If that's the case, then Anna Quindlen should stop yammering on about her family and start reporting on the goings on in Afghanistan.

    Calling her and those like her journalists -- which Gawker does a hell of a lot for no real reason -- is demeaning to people who have actually earned degrees in journalism and have pursued careers in this field.

    One more thing: If journalism is now being defined as copying and pasting from Wikipedia, someone had better order a few million press hats for anyone with a Tumblr account.
     Reply
    PrincessKashmir was starred PrincessKashmir was unstarred
    Image of cassandra cassandra
    12/08/09

    @PrincessKashmir: "earned degrees in journalism," LOL.
     Reply
    cassandra was starred cassandra was unstarred
    Image of PrincessKashmir PrincessKashmir
    12/08/09

    @cassandra: LOL, indeed, Cassandra. LOL, indeed.
     Reply
    PrincessKashmir was starred PrincessKashmir was unstarred
    Image of Tremonius Tremonius
    12/08/09

    In reply to The Laziest Journalists on Twitter
    The granddaddy of all aggregators is the inimitable, much-imitated Herb Caen of the old Chronicle Way Back When. He called it three-dot journalism, and it was simply a string of items phoned into his office each day and it was the premiere column in all North America probably so everybody wanted to appear there. He had his stable of regular contributors, but he'd take amateurs if they were good. He was a one-man clipping service, and he lived the dream of Willie Loman, whose idea of the perfect saleman was one who opened his suitcase in his hotel room in any town and the buyers came in droves.
     Reply
    Tremonius was starred Tremonius was unstarred
    Image of Ryan Tate Ryan Tate
    12/08/09

    @Tremonius: Great point. Walter Winchell worked in a similar fashion. Actually, may have taken it further: Publicists would actually write whole items, some of which were good enough to run unedited. He had a longtime editorial assistant ( name escapes me at moment), employed by him not his papers, that would do any further rewrite and do items of his own.

    Not to say Winchell didn't do his own items but many were delivered to him whole, not just the facts but the actual words.

    Caen, from what I gather, took info and tips from outside and wrote them up himself, right? Or did they come in whole?

    Anyway, just goes to show, lazy does not always mean inferior. To the contrary.
     Reply
    Ryan Tate was starred Ryan Tate was unstarred
    Image of Tremonius Tremonius
    12/08/09

    @Ryan Tate: Was Winchell the model for J J Hunsecker in Sweet Smell of Success? I don't know much about him, only that he was one of the Walters represented in some novel I don't recall; Winchell as the flippant superficial sort whereas the penetrating substance was represented by Lippman.

    I'm curious about the time when the writer becomes the brand and others take over the tedious work of composition for them. Fitzgerald in Hollywood and his cups, it was reported, would call on his gofer, a teenager named Billy Warren (a creator of Gunsmoke in his latter days) to put the mess in order. (Of course, Fitzgerald wasn't around to refute Crazy Sundays so it may have been just another episode of résumé padding.)

    One of the Trumpettes was in classic company when she signed a contract to deliver a murder mystery and placed a notice for a writer to do it for her. Most, like Palin, are more discreet.

    To the best of my memory, Herb Caen strung out items from contributors, and he made no claims of originality. He reported the charge he was merely taking dictation, and never denied it. Seemed he was on perfect terms with the process, as were we all.
     Reply
    Tremonius was starred Tremonius was unstarred
    Image of Ryan Tate Ryan Tate
    12/08/09

    @Tremonius: Actually, Hunsecker was modeled on Winchell; it's amazing how utterly forgotten Winchell is given the power of his column and radio broadcast back before television came around (his TV show never took and Winchell entered a long sad and well-earned comeuppance).

    Fitzgerlad is interesting, though I thought his Hollywood period was pretty dark; which Trump was that?

    Ya, I read Caen when I first moved up here in 94, though if I recall correctly they were already starting to re-run old columns some day (very confusing). He was great. Still unmatched.
     Reply
    Edited by Ryan Tate at 12/08/09 6:25 PM Ryan Tate was starred Ryan Tate was unstarred
    Image of Tremonius Tremonius
    12/09/09

    @Ryan Tate: I'm sure it was Ivana; I see her yet posing in an ad for an author for the novel for which she already had a contract.

    All powerful columnists should have a copy of Ozymandias on their desks. How the mighty have fallen. Back before he was a wideout with the Cowboys, Drew Pearson was a feared muckraker, as became his understudy Jack Anderson. There was a rancid guttersnipe name of Westbrook Pegler who was feared and loathed by presidents. And who remembers him today?

    If you're interested in Fitzgerald and have a spare evening, you might want to find Crazy Sundays by Aaron Latham, about the late-stage alcoholism of Fitzgerald. I read it around 1972 and the stories are vivid still.

    I came to the west coast in 1972, and Herb Caen was god, or at least the most powerful figure in San Francisco, which may be the same. The Chronicle was the only paper in those days for the Bay Area, and Herb Caen was the cause of it. And just look where the Chronicle is today (although I don't think that can be laid to the account of the passing of Caen).

    Thanks for the memories.
     Reply
    Tremonius was starred Tremonius was unstarred
    Image of oopsidoo oopsidoo
    12/07/09

    In reply to Eric Schmidt Bullied into Submission Twice in One Day
    I guess I'm AOL-esque. Someone explain to me why eschmidt0 is outdated. Is using numbers outdated?
     Reply
    oopsidoo was starred oopsidoo was unstarred
    Image of Niko Bellic Niko Bellic
    12/07/09

    @oopsidoo: Nerd.
     Reply
    Niko Bellic was starred Niko Bellic was unstarred
    Image of oopsidoo oopsidoo
    12/08/09

    @Niko Bellic: ne, stvarno. sta je problem s njegovo ime?
     Reply
    oopsidoo was starred oopsidoo was unstarred
    Image of Niko Bellic Niko Bellic
    12/08/09

    @oopsidoo: ruzno je.
     Reply
    Niko Bellic was starred Niko Bellic was unstarred
    Image of Niko Bellic Niko Bellic
    12/07/09

    In reply to Eric Schmidt Bullied into Submission Twice in One Day
    As a rich person, I have to say that I don't even touch a computer. This comment is being typed by my secretary.
     Reply
    Edited by Niko Bellic at 12/07/09 3:20 PM Niko Bellic was starred Niko Bellic was unstarred
    Image of Uncle_Billy_Slumming Uncle_Billy_Slumming
    12/07/09

    In reply to Eric Schmidt Bullied into Submission Twice in One Day
    Schmidt und Meyer Von Twitter.
     Reply
    Uncle_Billy_Slumming was starred Uncle_Billy_Slumming was unstarred
    Image of i'm a bottle i'm a bottle
    12/07/09

    In reply to The Twitter Song Is Media Thing of The Year
    "The meta-philosophy of free — we should get rid of this philosophy," said Christoph Keese, Springer’s head of public affairs and an architect of its online strategy. "A highly industrialized world cannot survive on rumors. It needs quality journalism, and that costs money."

    This is a quote from a Bild spokesman, a newspaper that has famously low editorial standards. I don't get his appeal to the public interest here. These people have made a business of publishing irresponsible rumors that appeal to populist sentiment.

    There are German newspapers that are actually doing poorly. These are mainly the broadsheets with high standards. Bild is not having any major financial issues like the broadsheets are having. It's true that its circulation is decreasing, sure, but for a newspaper that has consistently chosen the profit motive as a guiding principle over quality journalism in the public's interest, it's obviously disingenuous of them to justify their price increase as a way to provide better journalism.

    The motivation is so clear here: squeeze as much money out of their readers before the great unwashed migrate away from Bild to equally poor-quality blogs.
     Reply
    Edited by i'm a bottle at 12/07/09 2:11 PM i'm a bottle was starred i'm a bottle was unstarred
    Image of freakshowtime freakshowtime
    12/07/09

    @i'm a bottle: I worked for a short period at Axel Springer. From what I saw, that company has a way of putting douchebags in charge and repressing people who actually have good ideas — even at the online division! But isn't this what the print media business does nowadays, anyway?
     Reply
    i'm a bottle promoted this comment freakshowtime was starred freakshowtime was unstarred
    Image of i'm a bottle i'm a bottle
    12/07/09

    @freakshowtime: The douchebaggery doesn't surprise me at all.

    Also, those douches aren't doing their job. Most of the Bild properties haven't changed their format in years and their online presence is especially a mess.

    They can't expect to just keep doing what they've been doing since the eighties yet hope to preserve or increase their circulation numbers. The major problem I see is that the Bild concept is graphics heavy but commentary light -- a format that's easily supplanted by anybody with an Internet connection and a Wordpress account.
     Reply
    i'm a bottle was starred i'm a bottle was unstarred
    Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion

Login

Enter your username and password.

Please enter a username.
Please enter your password.
logging in
Login via Facebook | Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Reset Password

Please enter your email address to have your password reset.

Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
requesting password reset

Register

Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.

Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.

Please enter a username.
Please enter a password.
Please confirm your password.
Passwords are not identical.
Please enter a valid email address.
registration sent, waiting for reply

Submit Your Comment

You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.

See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.

Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
logging in

Login with your Facebook or Gawker account.

Sign up here.



  • Archives
  • About
  • Advertising
  • Legal
  • Help
  • Report a Bug
  • FAQ
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.