In this case, the Why is likely not nearly as joyful and interesting as the What. Caroline Kennedy can say she's "dropping out" to sit next to Uncle Teddy, spend more time with her kids, raise chinchillas... all that matters is that Paterson isn't appointing her, and this is good news.
I honestly cannot believe that the Kennedy-friendly Times would - without question - attribute Caroline's dropping out to her reported concern over Ted's health. He had been hospitalized with a serious medical condition before she announced her intentions. Apart from his collapse at the inaugural luncheon on Tuesday, what was so different then from yesterday? Seems the Times just went ahead and swallowed whatever the Kennedy camp gave them.
Thank goodness for the comments. It showed that readers could read between the lines. Although in fairness, what could the reporters do, esp. on these crazy deadlines, except report what they were told by an unnamed "person"? To express skepticism in the story without a source would have been blatant editorializing.
(For some reason, my comments keep getting submitted prematurely; don't know what I'm doing.)
I'm not ready to write her political obituary yet; I actually do think she could win a major race if she really worked at it; but I never got the impression that she wanted it that much.
Isn't it kind of unseemly - bordering on suspiciously defensive - for New Yorkers to expend so much energy dissing DC?
FWIW, I worked there for a couple of years, working in neither politics nor the bureaucracy - like a lot of that city's residents. And there's great food, great music, FREE museums, and a great quality of life - mitigated by a hellish climate.
@BadUncle: When I went up to Boston for college and went to a museum there for the first time, and was asked to pay I was completely and utterly confused. Pay? For a museum? What?! Mind = blown.
The problem with D.C. is that if you're not in college and you're in your 20s, you're (and I use this because its appropriate) a douche who's only wondering how the next person you meet can possibly help your political ambition. Not that NYC doesn't have that for particular industries, but in DC its only politics, all the time.
Seriously? Now that DC finally has a chance to make progress on Home Rule, have money re-routed back into the city by a first family that cares in order to rebuild after the 1968 riots, and to get a modicum of respect from the rest of the nation as a city in its own right, as oppposed to simply the seat of government, and this is how New York (and its commentors) respond?
DC doesn't have an inferiority complex. New York does. If you guys are so fucking threatened by our little city then New York must really be the pit of shallowness and predictability I've been hearing so much about. Maybe if you stopped caring so much about what name brands you wear or what kind of cred your neighborhood has you could go back to being a cultural center and stop devoting so much ink to why our city isn't actually "cool."
Meanwhile, here in DC we're going to attend the weekly Obama-hosted poetry readings, the free concerts the first family will be sponsoring, the charity events hosted by Michelle to start re-funding and reviatlizing the nation's capital. Because you know what? We get enough pretentious assholes with each wave of government. No need to add New Yorkers into that mix.
@stoprobbers: I'm personally OK with people hating dc if it means all the inauguration tourists clear the hell out and let my commute time get back to normal.
@stoprobbers: the person who wrote this article is bashing NYC, not the other way around. new yorkers are simply sick of hearing about what hot new city is supposed to replace us. It happens about every year or so. it's tired.
Two years ago New York Magazine declared that London had eclipsed New York in terms of influence and cachet. Sixteen years ago it was Los Angeles. It's worth noting that the British pound has gone from 2.10 to 1.37 in that time period, and Los Angeles' single greatest contribtution to Western civilization remains right on red.
01/22/09
01/22/09
01/22/09
01/22/09
Thank goodness for the comments. It showed that readers could read between the lines. Although in fairness, what could the reporters do, esp. on these crazy deadlines, except report what they were told by an unnamed "person"? To express skepticism in the story without a source would have been blatant editorializing.
01/22/09
(For some reason, my comments keep getting submitted prematurely; don't know what I'm doing.)
I'm not ready to write her political obituary yet; I actually do think she could win a major race if she really worked at it; but I never got the impression that she wanted it that much.
01/22/09
Caroline in the Pity.
01/22/09
01/22/09
01/22/09
01/22/09
Who is on first!.
01/22/09
Well, I don't know if he did, but it wouldn't surprise me.
01/21/09
FWIW, I worked there for a couple of years, working in neither politics nor the bureaucracy - like a lot of that city's residents. And there's great food, great music, FREE museums, and a great quality of life - mitigated by a hellish climate.
01/21/09
01/21/09
01/21/09
01/21/09
01/21/09
DC doesn't have an inferiority complex. New York does. If you guys are so fucking threatened by our little city then New York must really be the pit of shallowness and predictability I've been hearing so much about. Maybe if you stopped caring so much about what name brands you wear or what kind of cred your neighborhood has you could go back to being a cultural center and stop devoting so much ink to why our city isn't actually "cool."
Meanwhile, here in DC we're going to attend the weekly Obama-hosted poetry readings, the free concerts the first family will be sponsoring, the charity events hosted by Michelle to start re-funding and reviatlizing the nation's capital. Because you know what? We get enough pretentious assholes with each wave of government. No need to add New Yorkers into that mix.
01/21/09
01/21/09
I'm just sick of people hating on DC. We have the government here. THE WHOLE THING. Isn't that punishment enough?
01/21/09
01/21/09
01/21/09
01/21/09
01/21/09
01/21/09
01/21/09
01/21/09