<![CDATA[Gawker: village voice media]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: village voice media]]> http://gawker.com/tag/villagevoicemedia http://gawker.com/tag/villagevoicemedia <![CDATA[Longtime Editor Departs L.A. Weekly]]> The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.(UPDATED) After eight years as editor in chief, Laurie Ochoa is leaving LA Weekly as Village Voice Media severs more of its own legacy.

It's unclear who instigated the move. But VVM didn't make life easy for Ochoa.

Critics say LA Weekly's quality began declining after it was merged into New Times (now VVM) in 2005. The alt-newspaper chain reportedly went over Ochoa's head in late 2006 to install an unpopular news editor.

There's no word yet on what Ochoa's next move is — and the Weekly has no replacement lined up.

UPDATE: Marc Cooper, a former LA Weekly senior editor now on faculty at USC, writes:

It was inevitable. Laurie defied laws of gravity for four years. She protected the little she could and kept the peace. When everyone was gone and she was no longer needed they disposed of her as well.

(Again, we haven't verified that this was VVM's decision.)

(Pic: Ochoa, right, celebrates a Pulitzer Prize for food critic Jonathan Gold, left. Via On The Media.)

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5274670&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[On Internet, Digg Games You]]> Gasp! Village Voice Media abuses Digg. But ineffectively.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5147230&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Village Voice Media Buys Tardy Social Networking Site]]> PreviewScreenSnapz001.jpgWe hear Village Voice Media has bought a controlling interest in social networking site LikeMe.net. But we can't imagine why.

It's clear what the alt-weekly chain's hope is: That LikeMe will form the backbone of a viable internet strategy for the company, which has seen its once-robust classified ad business swiped by Craigslist and now faces a deep recession in display ads. Village Voice Media began rolling LikeMe out in Denver last week and will soon spread the Web application to papers in its other markets, including New York.

Advertisers should be pleased, since users can only mark what they "like" in their respective cities, including restaurants, bars and music venues. There's no "what I hate" function.

But Yelp already does this, without the bias and with far, far more users. Per the concept of network effects, this makes Yelp hugely more useful to a visitor than LikeMe. With a weaker product and a late start, Village Voice Media's effort is doomed before it launches, even if it includes exclusive tie-ins to the chain's dwindling river of original, professional reviews (which people can get for free anyway). Watching this company struggle is getting increasingly sad.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5131757&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Prosecutor Fired In New Times Case; All Charges Dropped]]> laceyAll charges against Village Voice Media executives Mike Lacey and Jim Larkin were dropped over the weekend, and the special prosecutor running the case against their paper, the Phoenix New Times, has been fired. (The paper was exploring misconduct by a local law official.) The Arizona State Bar is now investigating the prosecutor's conduct in the case, in which there were "serious missteps," according to the county D.A., who... is now also being investigated by the bar!

What a neat clusterfuck! We're sure there's a chatroom somewhere on the web, maybe "DSBRD LWYRS 4 LUV," where they can go spend some time with former Duke-case-handling D.A. Mike Nifong.

Jack Shafer, who once worked for Lacey and Larkin and maintains a favorable opinion of the two, waggled his finger in Arizona's direction: "Never pick a fight with people who buy their whiskey by the truckload, their ink by the tanker, and their pixels at wholesale."

This morning, the state's largest newspaper, the Arizona Republic, went to court to ask that all filings in the case be unsealed. Their Sunday editorial explained that they're often "leery of New Times' style of free-for-all journalism. But, in this appalling overreach of government intrusion, both the New Times and the public were grievously wronged."

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=313510&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Village Voice Media Execs Released From Jail]]> The co-founders of New Times, now known as Village Voice Media*, were arrested last night ("led away in handcuffs," according to their press release), at their homes in Phoenix, AZ, on misdemeanor charges related to revealing details of a grand jury investigation. Mike Lacey, the company's executive editor, and Jim Larkin, VVM's CEO, revealed in a story published yesterday in the Phoenix New-Times, that the paper is the target of a grand jury investigation stemming from a long-running feud with mercenary county sheriff Joe Arpaio. A few hours later, they were in the pokey themselves.

Reports in the New-Times over more than a decade have detailed Arpaio's backroom dealings, his mistreatment of prisoners under his watch and his general scuminess. Prisoners at his county jail get only two meals a day, must wear pink underwear, and live in tents outside the jail where they work seven days a week in chain gangs, digging graves for the indigent.

An investigation by county prosecutors into the paper's reporting began when New-Times published Arpaio's home address on its website in 2004. A little-known Arizona statute dictates that it's legal to publish the home address of a law enforcement agent in print, or on the radio or television, just not on the Internet; when the print article was uploaded to the New-Times website, prosecutors pounced.

Lacey and Larkin's "first joint byline" in 40 years of working together came after the two decided the special prosecutor leading the investigation was operating outside ethical boundaries—according to Lacey and Larkin's piece, he had made ex parte advances toward the judge and subpoenaed "all documents" related to the paper's stories, as well as analytical information on the Internet activities of the paper's entire web audience, including IP addresses and "contents of electronic shopping carts." All you people who've bought that bestselling "How To Assassinate a Maricopa County Sheriff" are in big trouble now!

"In our deliberations, we faced the obvious: A grand jury investigation is a fearsome thing; a tainted grand jury is a tipping point," Lacey and Larkin write. "We intend now to break the silence and resist." They did so with the 5,000-word piece and were answered with a night in jail; they were released early this morning on $500 bonds.

New Times was born out of Kent State rage, and we're pretty sure Lacey and Larkin, while not wild about the whole jail thing, are kind of loving fighting the man again, though Lacey had enough decorum (shocking, really) to tell off reporters outside the jail: "The problem is that it takes me being arrested for you guys to show up. This is a story we're all involved in. Those subpoenas are what you should be writing about."

The Village Voice's editor, Tony Ortega, knows something about Sheriff Joe Arpaio; while a reporter at the Phoenix New-Times, he investigated the sheriff's abuse of prisoners, and had this to say about his bosses' arrests: "I hope that, whatever other journalists think about the Voice or VVM, they can see that this represents one of the worst abuses of a newspaper's first amendment rights in memory," he told us. Gotta say, we can't disagree with that. Update: Ortega weighs in with his own thoughts on the Voice's website.

Earlier: Village Voice Media Executive Editor Released From Jail and Vows to Fight [VV]

*My former employer

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=312878&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[What Will Happen To All The Poor Alt-Weeklies?]]> Yesterday's news that the alt-weeklies Chicago Reader and Washington City Paper had been sold to Creative Loafing, which owns a few alt-weeklies in the Southeast, left some people a little puzzled—especially employees of both papers, who didn't seem aware in the slightest that their publications were on the block at all. Over on the Reader's website, commenters are debating what it means that Creative Loafing bought the paper; the general sentiment seems to be cynicism and wariness of an outsider company buying their beloved Reader. So what does the sale portend for the state of alt-weeklies in this country? Is Creative Loafing emerging as the only viable national competitor to Village Voice Media?

Well, maybe—but the company is far smaller (six papers to VVM's 16), and most of its papers, with the exception of its Atlanta paper, have been in less prominent markets than VVM's. (In addition to the Voice here, VVM owns papers in Los Angeles, San Francisco, Miami, Dallas, Seattle, and other major cities.

By acquiring papers in D.C. and Chicago—two major markets where VVM doesn't have a presence—Creative Loafing could be gearing itself up to buy other independently owned alt-weeklies in other cities. After all, it's not just the Times and the Tribune Co. that are being hit hard by the downturn in classified advertising. Classifieds were alt-weeklies' bread and butter, but now that you can hire a prostitute just by going online, the ads for trannies and massage services in the back of alt-weeklies are becoming fewer and farther between.

Then there's the whole alt-weekly culture thing. A few years ago, at an AAN convention in San Diego, I went to dinner with another youngish woman who worked for a Creative Loafing paper, as it turned out. We discussed the prototypical alt-weekly editor: white dude, middle-aged, former SDS member (or at least, sympathizer), someone who still believed that the alt-weeklies were fighting the good fight, who hired attractive youngish girls to keep around the office and make inappropriate comments to whenever he felt like it. This seemed like an archaic prototype, to us, and we wondered what would become of these editors, speaking so earnestly as they did about how lame the free dailies in their cities were. There was even a slide show about lame free dailies trying to bite alt-weeklies' steez, and everyone reassured themselves that smart readers would always realize the difference between the "fake-alts" and "real" ones. But maybe part of the problem is that alt-weeklies themselves were slow to change, and do things like embrace the Internet, and maybe have a few more female and black editors, and espouse a perspective that was anything other than predictable left-wingism (or, in the case of the New Times papers, that weird Western Libertarianism).

Of course, that's just us. Now that it looks like the whole country's alt-weeklies will eventually run Rob Harvilla's music reviews and be subject to blog-hating Bill Jensen's new media ideas, maybe things will get... better? Hey maybe not.

The Reader Has New Owners [Chicago Reader]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=282377&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Music critic Kate Sullivan, a favorite of...]]> Music critic Kate Sullivan, a favorite of ours, has been canned by Village Voice Media's L.A. Weekly as part of an ongoing effort by the magazine's parent company to enforce a lifeless, stultifying conformity in the pages of its papers. [Tabloid Baby]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=279878&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA["I'm a bad lesbian." We can't claim any expertise...]]> SP32-20070709-074443.jpg"I'm a bad lesbian." We can't claim any expertise in the area, but if this accompanying photo is any indication, you seem to be doing just fine. Also, you stay classy, Village Voice Media. [Phoenix New Times, via]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=276136&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Tiny Dynamine]]> spiers
  • Lockhart Steele: Elizabeth Spiers invented the Internet. [MarketWatch]
  • British magazine publisher Emap in play? [WSJ]
  • It's Ron Burkle vs. Kent Brownridge in the battle for Dennis Publishing's titty mags. [AdAge]
  • Is Village Voice Media slowly selling itself off? [SF Gate]
  • CollegeHumor's Ricky Van Veen: Sophomoric, rich, and one fine looking man. Seriously, we've met the dude, and we would totally do him. [BW]
  • Don Imus wants to get back on the air. Why not, this is America. We all deserve third acts. [NYP]

    ]]> http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=261546&view=rss&microfeed=true <![CDATA[Media Bubble: Race For The, Uh, Prize?]]>

    • Ron Burkle and Eli Broad top Sam Zell's bid for Tribune by a buck a share. Why do we feel like our grandchildren will still be awaiting resolution of this fucking story? [LAT]
    • Joe Dolce is a free man come May. Maybe now he can resume his career in the movie business! [NYP]
    • The only way to get people to watch "Dirt" is to show Courtney Cox and Jennifer Aniston lezzing out. [WWD]
    • How to write a Village Voice Media story. [ Alt-Weekly Death Watch]
    ]]>
    http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=248375&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[Media Bubble: Telephone Screamers]]>

    • A slightly dry sociological bit from the U.K. on why the news is better in Europe than America. [Independent]
    • Helen Thomas regains front row seat in White House Press Room originally given to her during Van Buren administration. [E&P]
    • Who will replace WSJ's Paul Steiger as managing editor? Some white dude, apparently. [Talking Biz News, via Romenesko]
      Cookie's Eva Dillion leaves Conde Nast for Reader's Digest. [FishbowlNY]
    • Celebrity coverage moves magazines, bears defecate in forested areas. [Mediaweek]
    • David Carr on collaborative virtual newsrooms. Do not read while operating heavy machinery. [NYT]
    • Tracy Morgan one more season away from collecting unemployment. [B&C]
    • Anything godlike genius Chris Morris does is worthy of note; this time it's a comedy about suicide bombers. [Independent]
    • Village Voice Media facing insurrection, competition in the O.C. [LAT]
    • Rachel Sklar: not only Canadian and stacked, but "gracious." [AdAge]
    ]]>
    http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=245174&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[Village Voice Media Tutors Us In The Ways Of Original Reportage]]>

    There are two types of blogospheric sensations: the utterly predictable (the electronic op-edification provided by the Huffington Post, the breathless bitchiness barfed up by Gawker) and the truly original. We lean toward the latter around here—you know, stuff that actually involves independent thinking.
    So says Village Voice Media, on the front page of their website. Well, we're going to take this corporate editorial position as a compliment nonetheless; it's always nice to be acknowledged. And we love independent thinking too! Let's see what kind of independent thinking makes the front of some VVM titles from around the country this week.
    • Denver's Westword has an article about a guy who's a big star amongst fellow World of Warcraft players.
    • Broward's New Times discusses Anna Nicole Smith, a celebrity who recently passed away.
    • Phoenix's New Times discusses Anna Nicole Smith, a celebrity who recently passed away.
    • Kansas City's Pitch profiles the Scissor Sisters, an "over the top" musical act.
    • San Francisco's Weekly examines why dogs go bad.
    • The East Bay Express reveals that there are private detective agencies that will spy on cheating spouses.
    • Miami's New Times examines "the little known dark side of South Beach."

    • You get the point. (Bonus: Every paper has Nathan Lee's review of The 300.) We can't wait until Tony Ortega brings this kind of independence here to New York. We really need it. Our suggestion: something about when Jake Shears' dog goes crazy on the seamy underbelly of the Lower East Side and the detectives who spy on him while he dresses Ana Matronic up like Anna Nicole Smith.

      Village Voice Media
    ]]>
    http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=242945&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[Media Bubble: Send Katie To Baghdad]]>

    ]]>
    http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=242560&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[David Blum's 'Voice' Ouster: Meaning! Context!]]> At last, two gigantic David Blum post-mortems. Huffington Post's Rachel Sklar—who needs to learn that it's not all hugs and kisses in this business—seems to think Blum has been tarred as a racist, when he should really have been tarred as an incompetent. (Actually, she doesn't say that. Apparently, he sure was nice when he edited her "SNL" piece. He was pretty helpful while she was writing this essay, too.) The Observer's Michael Calderone, leaning more heavily on reporting than analysis, supports the hell out of the "couldn't edit a bus ticket" theory.

    Calderone notes that Blum "seemed more at ease with recent hires, plucked from Columbia's journalism school—where he has worked as an adjunct—than with the strong-willed Voice lifers." Tony Ortega, the new Voice head, comes off as the ultimate company man, not just for his ability to follow the [piece of shit—Ed.] New Times model for an alt-weekly, but also for the fact that, whatever Mike Lacey is selling, he'll be first in line to buy.

    Poor Blum. New Times talked to Ortega "weeks" ago about coming to New York. But best of all: When the New Times dudes come to town from Phoenix? They insist on reservations at the Waverly Inn. Of course they do.

    We're not going to get into a whole "our sources at the paper" pissing match, but here's what you need to know: David Blum was not the right hire. You cannot afford to let someone learn on the job, even at a paper whose reputation has diminished as badly as the Voice's has. It's hard enough to edit a weekly with the most calcified staff outside of the New Criterion's; it's that much more difficult when you're a neophyte in the spotlight. Ortega, rightly or wrongly, will bring the Voice into line with the rest of the company's titles, and hard. So the Voice will start to look like every other alt-weekly in America. Big deal. New York is starting to look like every other city in America; why shouldn't we have a crappy free paper that reflects that as well?

    Why The Smear? Village Voice Bloodletting Gets Messy, Public: "No One Thinks That's Why Blum Was Fired" [ETP]
    Voice Publisher Rousts Its Editor After Bumpy Ride [NYO]
    [Image via]

    ]]>
    http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=242203&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[Media Bubble: Laissez Les Bon Temps Rouler]]>

    • Bonnie Fuller is allegedly "reaching out to Hachette Filipacchi and to TMZ.com." There are the usual denials all around, but we think if anyone can revive Shock, it's Bonnie "Bon Temps" Fuller. [NYP]
    • Less than half the targeted "volunteers" at Time Inc. have yet to take their packages and go. Guess Ann Moore underestimated the appeal of working near a big pile of shit. [WWD]
    ]]>
    http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=241000&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[Village Voice Media Hates, Creates Victim Stories]]> This week's Boston Phoenix has a must-read piece on the fallout from the New Times-Village Voice merger. We've seen some of the effects locally, but the Phoenix's Adam Reilly takes the pulse throughout the country and, guess what? The news is not so good. Again, you should really read the whole thing, but here are a couple of highlights.

    The absolute best bit concerns the Seattle Weekly:

    Another point cited in [new editor] Fefer's favor, though, is that he's more sophisticated than managing editor Mike Seely, who joined the paper after the merger and ran it between Berger's departure and Fefer's arrival. Seely, this former staffer complained, is "kind of a backwards-hat guy." Dawdy, too, is a vocal Seely critic, and references an e-mail exchange he had with Seely last October to bolster his case. The conversation began with Seely citing a story from the East Bay Express, the company's paper in Oakland, as an example of the kind of stuff he'd like from Dawdy, who specializes in mental-health issues. The article in question, by Lauren Gard, was on the link between the Internet and sex addiction. "One thing the writer hints at here are the tendency for massage parlors to double as hand-job factories or more," Seely wrote. "I'd love for someone to gauge whether this sort of thing is going on in Seattle."

    Dawdy then mentioned knowing a therapist whose business consists largely of Internet-porn addicts working at Microsoft. Seely asked if the therapist would go on the record. Dawdy said it was doubtful, but that details could probably be gleaned from online chat rooms. To which Seely responded:
    "yep. think it might be futile to start from there and simply replicate this story. frankly, if you were up to visiting some massage parlors to see if certain practitioners would finish you off, that's the sort of street-level expose i'd be up for running. but i'd never force you to do that."
    Dawdy took a pass. A week later, he quit.

    In an e-mail, Seely confirmed this exchange, but noted that Dawdy wrote a story on a Star Wars-loving, gay-porn-producing, suicide-committing Seattle-ite that ran that same month.

    Another interesting part:
    Less well-known, but equally telling, is the hostility [Village Voice Media executive editor Mike] Lacey and his lieutenants reportedly have for what they term "victim stories." Broadly speaking, these seem to be stories in which a member of some marginal group — the physically disabled, the mentally ill, the poor — is ill-used by a particular system or society at large. According to several current and former staffers, Lacey and his editors generally balk at these pieces unless something sets them apart, like a counterintuitive twist (victim as victimizer!) or plenty of lurid detail. So defined, "victim stories" were the specialty of Gonnerman, arguably the Voice's best young reporter before her resignation last year. They were also the stock in trade of Jarrett Murphy, who wrote extensively on poor neighborhoods for the Voice and recently left the paper. And they were the kind of pieces Dawdy frequently wrote for Seattle Weekly.

    "Anything where there is an identifiable victim, or a little-guy hero, for lack of a better term — any story that has that kind of narrative arc — they hate on sight, without even reading it," argues Dawdy. "They consider it veritable socialism to get any little person's back. I'm not that ideological as a journalist, but sometimes you do end up in those places, and you end up writing those stories." "Nobody is willing to do these stories," adds a current VVM staffer.

    Lacey, of course, denies that, but should he? Who wants the kind of "victim story" churned out by, say, Pulitzer Prize winner Kate Boo, or (former Phoenix reporter) Pulitzer nominee Ellen Barry? Or, you know, Mara Altman. Oh wait.

    In a weird way, this piece is kind of the ultimate "victim story": Who's more marginalized than alt-weekly journalists? Also? "Star Wars-loving, gay-porn-producing, suicide-committing Seattle-ite " should so be a T-shirt.

    Culture war [Boston Phoenix]

    ]]>
    http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=240669&view=rss&microfeed=true