Print still does things the web can't do---and it should. I do think doing away with Men.Style.com for example is a good move---several times last year I wanted to go to the GQ site, not some watered-down style thingie.
one of the problems for me is that mags like W feature the same photogs every issue. with (it seems like) the same models. CN needs to make a hip, YOUNG (20-35) fashion mag that not Teen Vogue. At this point all their mags are yawns. I get my mags from London.
@tailpipebananna: British GQ is a dreadful, dreadful mess. I picked it up the last time I flew, and almost thought that I had accidentally purchased FHM.
The internet has definitely replaced magazines for me. It feels like such a waste to spend 3 or 4 dollars on something I'll flip through once at the train station. During that same time, I can check out a bunch of funny, amazing and thoughtful websites on my ipod.
@meg9: Have to disagree, strongly, there. I tried to read the new Michael Lewis story on AIG on the Vanity Fair website, and couldn't get through one page. It's a horrible, horrible site. And I ADORE Michael Lewis.
I picked up the magazine itself to keep me busy while travelling, loved it, forgot it at a Starbucks one day, and went out and bought another copy of the same issue. That's how good it was. The same edition I couldn't get through 1 page of online.
I also think what's killing magazines is that the writing is not very good. At all. I found myself trying to remember when I was impressed by something in Vanity Fair or W or Vogue or any of the Time, Inc. or Hearst publications and I'm at a loss.
But online content? There are a ton of funny, well-written bloggers who I follow about as regularly as people probably followed writers back in the day--when magazines actually had writers. I mean, the unveiling of the anonymous model on Jezebel, for instance, was off the hook (even if you hate Jezebel, seriously go read it). The snark on upupandagay (a flight attendant blog soon to be book deal, I'm sure) is funnier than the Countess in W. Magazines need to find their relevance. And I don't think McKinsey is going to help them do that.
@Trulymadlyme: But funny bloggers don't report, for the most part. They make 80s/90s pop culture references and talk about themselves. Which is excellent and amusing. But if the New Yorker and Wired and GQ (and to a lesser extent VF) stop unearthing facts, quotes etc then what is there to snark at?
@EphraimGadsby: That's just it, sure the AP and news wires need to figure out how to monetize their content, but the feature writers? Suck. Profiles? Suck.
The blogs I follow don't simply run through pop culture cliches or snark. They provide funny interesting insights I'm not getting anywhere else. I mean, what if the Washington Post actually hired the writer for whyihatedc?
@FormerEnglishMajor: I prefer it to Esquire, though the quality of writing in Esquire is usually superior to that of GQ. The problem with Esquire is that the articles are always really bitchy/biased, especially when they're about politics, and that turns me off, even if they're written better than the ones in GQ. When it comes to features, editorials, etc., however, GQ trumps for me.
@FormerEnglishMajor: CHUCK TOWNSEND: So, Chris, you know your new book about how everything is supposed to be "free."
CHRIS ANDERSON: Sure.
CHUCK: Yeah, so, uh--
RANDOM MCKINSEY GUY: Chris, we'd like you and your staff to continue producing Wired. For free.
CHRIS: What? No, that's not exactly--
CHUCK: Yeah, uh, it's not really, like, negotiable. Our options are kind of limited here, Chris. We can either close the magazine, and then you wouldn't be paid for it. Or we can produce the magazine, and you won't be paid for it. Now, you wouldn't want us to close the magazine, would you?
CHRIS: Frankly, I--
CHUCK: Would you?
CHRIS: Shit.
MALCOLM GLADWELL, eating a salad with David Remnick at the next cafeteria table: Dumbshit.
@Nice Beaver: As a well-known analyst in this niche of the media market, I've always said, with respect to Conde's future economic attractiveness, "Black Tail" is always a better indicator than than "Juggs".
Under the one picture in which we see Bruce's face up close, there's a beauty tip on using the right SPF to avoid wrinkles. Oh, nothing like some well-placed quiet bitchiness.
When I get home from work tonight, I'm going to suggest to Mr. P (who is about one million times sexier than BW, BTW) that we set up our own early-middle-age photo spread. Some highlights include: Mr. P artfully arranged on our bed (only a queen b/c we're close like that), flat on his back, me scrunched up on the edge of my side, eyes wide open, a look of anger and frustration; the Mr. & Mrs. P couch dance, which is each of us on opposite ends of the couch, arranging and rearranging our legs in order to get comfy; and the secret late-night living room assignation, Mrs. P with a gigantic bowl of chocolate ice cream, Mr. P with a 20% EXTRA bag of Cheetos.
07/22/09
07/22/09
07/21/09
07/21/09
07/21/09
07/21/09
I picked up the magazine itself to keep me busy while travelling, loved it, forgot it at a Starbucks one day, and went out and bought another copy of the same issue. That's how good it was. The same edition I couldn't get through 1 page of online.
07/21/09
07/21/09
But online content? There are a ton of funny, well-written bloggers who I follow about as regularly as people probably followed writers back in the day--when magazines actually had writers. I mean, the unveiling of the anonymous model on Jezebel, for instance, was off the hook (even if you hate Jezebel, seriously go read it). The snark on upupandagay (a flight attendant blog soon to be book deal, I'm sure) is funnier than the Countess in W. Magazines need to find their relevance. And I don't think McKinsey is going to help them do that.
07/21/09
07/21/09
The blogs I follow don't simply run through pop culture cliches or snark. They provide funny interesting insights I'm not getting anywhere else. I mean, what if the Washington Post actually hired the writer for whyihatedc?
07/21/09
Dumb moves.
07/21/09
07/21/09
07/21/09
07/21/09
07/21/09
CHRIS ANDERSON: Sure.
CHUCK: Yeah, so, uh--
RANDOM MCKINSEY GUY: Chris, we'd like you and your staff to continue producing Wired. For free.
CHRIS: What? No, that's not exactly--
CHUCK: Yeah, uh, it's not really, like, negotiable. Our options are kind of limited here, Chris. We can either close the magazine, and then you wouldn't be paid for it. Or we can produce the magazine, and you won't be paid for it. Now, you wouldn't want us to close the magazine, would you?
CHRIS: Frankly, I--
CHUCK: Would you?
CHRIS: Shit.
MALCOLM GLADWELL, eating a salad with David Remnick at the next cafeteria table: Dumbshit.
07/21/09
07/21/09
07/21/09
I've heard the target market is firm.
07/21/09
07/21/09
07/21/09
07/21/09
07/21/09
07/21/09
07/21/09
07/21/09
Juggs will be held tightly, fondled, yea, even caressed--if occasionally allowed to get chilly.
06/16/09
This thing looks like that thing.
06/15/09
06/15/09
06/15/09
06/15/09
06/15/09
06/15/09
06/15/09
Team Matte 4Evah!
06/15/09