Gawker 
Enter your username and password.
New York, 6:57 AM
Mon Nov 23
15 posts in the last 24 hours
Tip Your Editors:
tips@gawker.com
Tipline: 646-214-8138
Editor-in-Chief:
Gabriel Snyder | Email
West Coast Editor:
Richard Rushfield | Email
Contributing Editors:
Valleywag:
Ryan Tate | Email
Media:
Hamilton Nolan | Email
Politics:
Alex Pareene | Email
Investigations:
John Cook | Email
Entertainment:
Brian Moylan | Email
Nights:
Adrian Chen | Email
Azaria Jagger | Email
Ravi Somaiya | Email
Weekends:
Foster Kamer | Email
Video Editor:
Richard Blakeley | Email
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.
11/19/09
11/19/09
Even scarier: Her guitar playing
[www.youtube.com]
[www.youtube.com]
11/17/09
11/17/09
11/17/09
11/17/09
11/17/09
11/17/09
11/17/09
11/17/09
11/17/09
11/17/09
Isn't that the new DreamWorks movie starring ScarJo and Keira Knightley? #rupertmurdoch
11/17/09
11/03/09
But seriously - why take a perfectly good business and finance paper and turn it into something else? #wallstreetjournal
11/03/09
11/03/09
11/03/09
11/03/09
11/03/09
11/03/09
He's not trying to indoctrinate children to socialism. STFU. It's focusing on this irrational BS that is keeping his real crimes ignored. #barackobama
11/03/09
As for his "crimes," I sort of a agree, although the way I'd put it is that Obama is indeed neglecting taping together and wiping the shit off of the Constitution so thoroughly desecrated by the Dick Cheney administration. But I remain hopeful that he will address that regime's crimes fully. If he doesn't, I have no problem supporting another candidate. #barackobama
11/03/09
Then, I would appear on Meet The Press and reply to the first question (you know what will be about) with something like, "you know, I'm really glad you and I agree on this point. I just wanted to demonstrate in the most unambiguous way possible how the USA PATRIOT Act and other Acts of Congress passed during the previous administration enable the President to abuse power in a perfectly legal way. I'll be sending Congress legislation tomorrow morning to fix all of this, but in the meantime, the people I had put on the no-fly list will stay there, kind of as an incentive for action." #barackobama
11/02/09
And the real story there, which the Times covered in greater depth a couple days ago, is not just that he ended production of one weapon or another, but that he stopped production of a slew of them, and in the process has now reshaped the entire war planning strategy of this country, and put the military industrial complex on notice that they're not in control anymore. Even Bush wielded little power in that area when he tried, despite these people supposedly being his friends.
(I guess it's easier to say "no" when people are *not* your friends.) #barackobama
11/02/09
He's not off the hook yet. Gays in the military is a bug up my craw because it is about as simple and straightforward a progressive change there is. There aren't any new rules to make other than, "okay, now we won't kick you out" just to signal that he's at least going in the right direction. We can deal with the marriage and benefits question later. And what else? There isn't anything else to figure out on that issue. Why do we need to kick this down the road??
And that whole torture/FISA/Guantanamo/letting-Bush-off-the-hook stuff is no small potatoes, not only because it's just wrong and a total betrayal of his campaign promises, but also because REPUBLICANS/CONSERVATIVES/LIBERTARIANS/WHOEVER will use that shit against him to impeach him later. We know that "hypocrisy" is not a word that exists in the conservative dictionary, and they will be more than willing to take Obama down on the very same shit they cheered Bush on.
11/02/09
These things aren't as simple as they seem. Changing military legislation would requite votes from Congress, which is currently embroiled in healthcare reform. Regardless of his popularity rating, Obama's not going to push both healthcare reform AND gay rights through congress at the same time, or both will fail and we'll end up with nothing. As for signing an executive order to stop enforcement of DADT, doing so will cost him potential support for healthcare reform both in Congress and amongst the general public; support for gay rights is not nearly as high as support for, say, the public option.
As for Bush, that will be even more controversial and complicated than gay rights; we would have months and months of hearings and a lot of dirty laundry will be aired. Needless to say, this is also something that would hamper the healthcare issue.
Now, I know he promised us these things, and I wish they would happen sooner rather than later, but I will wait four years before I decide whether Obama's reneged on his promises. While I think denying homosexuals their civil rights is horrible, I will focus more on fixing the problem locally, both in my city and my state, and hopefully that will help build support for when we are able to address the matter nationally.
I suggest those who support the 14th amendment focus on doing the same in their communities. #barackobama
11/03/09
I doubt Obama's ending DADT by executive order would have much ripple effect. I do suspect that Obama has other reasons for wanting DADT to go through Congress rather than be done by executive order, I just wish he would say what those reasons were. #barackobama
11/03/09
You see, it isn't that simple, and wouldn't you like to see Congress finish up health care reform at the very least before trying to kill that particular elephant? #barackobama