Oh, for fuck's sake, indeed. Remember when you interviewed me for PR Week, Hamilton? You know, when you worked there? Back then, I told you that I liked PR people, that I found the good ones extremely useful and helpful. You certainly seemed fine with PR people then: http://www.brandrepublic.com/InDepth/Features/577004/Interview-Rachel-Sklar/?DCMP=ILC-SEARCH
@Hamilton Nolan: Actually, yes, it is: That's the gist of the post, which I liked. When I like something, I tweet it out. I liked this. (I also liked the Entourage piece, but I'm biased because I wrote it. Just like I have always liked the Gawker "Our Advertisers" posts which are done by Gawker people in the Gawker voice.) If Gossip Girl sponsors Gawker, will you guys not do your roundup that week? If Diet Coke sponsors Mediaite, am I supposed to stop mentioning that I've had twelve that day? Never mind that this is from my personal Twitter. As always, I am confused about what all the hubbub is about.
So anyway: My point of bringing up that interview you did with me three years ago is to demonstrate how my views are pretty much exactly the same. It's pretty fucking simple: I liked the post.
@Hamilton Nolan: Gawker runs ads for Nurse Jackie and then does reviews for it. There are numerous instances where Gawker editorial and Gawker ad department have crossed paths. Do I even need to mention Bloodcopy?
Gawker posts advertisements meant to look like editorial posts right in with the editorial.
Can you guys please stop acting like you're any different?
@RachelSklar: Come on. A "sponsored post" is one that's paid for. If you weren't paid to put out, say so. If you were on retainer to put out (ie you were married to the product) say so. Is easy. Otherwise when I see this I'm going to hit you up with my:
Get 250,000 new Twitter Followers, guaranteed http://twurl.nl/6mracg PLZ RT
@raincoaster: The whole exchange above sounds like I'm listening in on an argument while in line for my egg-white-sandwich-and-coffee breakfast in midtown. I'm going to listen in, then Twat it on my Twit.
well, based on the sponsored post, which I did read (thanks Gawker!) it's hard to tell which loathes the other more, publicists or reporters...
Which is it, media experts?
-------Are reporters just thin veneers of respectability, in place to provide another channel for organizations to get their message out, via money spent on publicists rather than money spent on ad buys?
-------Or are reporters principled defenders of the Truth, using and abusing publicists as they see fit, all in the pursuit of an honestly reported story, a balanced, comprehensive report on the issues of the day?
You think this looks bad? You should have seen the hordes of tween girls they had to turn away at the door last year when Wilford Brimley was testifying.
@Banjo-Sea Kitten: I've heard the old rumor, started by married women, that wedding bands will get a guy laid. Not true, of course. But I can see where a promise ring might afford some advantages.
@kneetoe: I should hope so. What's the point of being young, cute and famous, if you know...
p.s. I caught a glimpse of the awkward interview between somnambulant Larry King and the J boys about their Promise Ring Pledge and it was so painful to watch and so lacking in conviction that I had to flip the channel. Monkeys with cue cards would have done a better job of shilling that nonsense.
07/10/09
07/10/09
07/10/09
07/10/09
So anyway: My point of bringing up that interview you did with me three years ago is to demonstrate how my views are pretty much exactly the same. It's pretty fucking simple: I liked the post.
07/10/09
Read that about 1,000 times. If it somehow sinks in after that, perhaps some progress will have been made.
I'm not sure why anyone would see something "By SPONSORED CONTENT" and keep reading, but that's just me.
07/10/09
Gawker posts advertisements meant to look like editorial posts right in with the editorial.
Can you guys please stop acting like you're any different?
07/11/09
Get 250,000 new Twitter Followers, guaranteed http://twurl.nl/6mracg PLZ RT
And you will have earned it.
07/11/09
07/11/09
07/11/09
07/10/09
Which is it, media experts?
-------Are reporters just thin veneers of respectability, in place to provide another channel for organizations to get their message out, via money spent on publicists rather than money spent on ad buys?
-------Or are reporters principled defenders of the Truth, using and abusing publicists as they see fit, all in the pursuit of an honestly reported story, a balanced, comprehensive report on the issues of the day?
07/10/09
07/10/09
07/10/09
07/10/09
07/10/09
06/24/09
06/24/09
06/24/09
06/24/09
06/24/09
But that guy in the picture reminds me of the old pedophile from family guy
06/24/09
OK, kill me now.
06/24/09
Also, I think Mary Tyler Moore is pictured on the panel, yes?
06/24/09
06/24/09
06/24/09
p.s. I caught a glimpse of the awkward interview between somnambulant Larry King and the J boys about their Promise Ring Pledge and it was so painful to watch and so lacking in conviction that I had to flip the channel. Monkeys with cue cards would have done a better job of shilling that nonsense.
06/24/09
But where can I get one of those rings? I'll be the very essence of conviction.
06/24/09
Sorry, but you'll have to produce a set of micromanaging Bible Nut parents before we can get you that ring.
06/24/09
I can come close, very close, but in the end I can't produce the parents. So no ring for me. What's the consolation prize?
06/24/09
06/24/09
06/24/09
06/24/09
06/24/09
06/24/09
06/24/09
06/24/09
06/24/09